The Discursive Dilemma and Public Reason
2006; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 116; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/498466
ISSN1539-297X
Autores Tópico(s)Judicial and Constitutional Studies
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessSurvey ArticleThe Discursive Dilemma and Public Reason*Christian ListChristian ListPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 116, Number 2January 2006 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/498466 Views: 346Total views on this site Citations: 87Citations are reported from Crossref © 2006 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Takuya Sekiguchi, Hisashi Ohtsuki Aggregation of Correlated Judgments on Multiple Interconnected Issues, Group Decision and Negotiation 32, no.11 (Nov 2022): 233–256.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-022-09806-wPhilippe Mongin, Samuel Ferey Quelle importance empirique pour le paradoxe doctrinal ? Une enquête sur la jurisprudence du Conseil constitutionnel français, Revue économique Vol. 73, no.66 (Jan 2023): 1093–1118.https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.736.1093Aureli Alabert, Mercè Farré The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework, Social Choice and Welfare 58, no.44 (Nov 2021): 863–895.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-021-01372-5Henrik D. Kugelberg Social choice problems with public reason proceduralism, Economics and Philosophy 38, no.11 (Feb 2021): 51–70.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267120000498Lewis Ross The Foundations of Criminal Law Epistemology, SSRN Electronic Journal 177 (Jan 2022).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4133719Rosa W. Runhardt Evidential Pluralism and Epistemic Reliability in Political Science: Deciphering Contradictions between Process Tracing Methodologies, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 51, no.44 (Apr 2021): 425–442.https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931211008545Pankaj Koirala, Raja Rajendra Timilsina, Koji Kotani Deliberative Forms of Democracy and Intergenerational Sustainability Dilemma, Sustainability 13, no.1313 (Jul 2021): 7377.https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137377David Tan Uncommon Legislative Attitudes: Why a Theory of Legislative Intent Needs Nontrivial Aggregation, Ratio Juris 34, no.22 (Aug 2021): 139–160.https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12312Jesper Kallestrup Group virtue epistemology, Synthese 197, no.1212 (Oct 2016): 5233–5251.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1225-7Dorothea Baumeister, Gábor Erdélyi, Olivia J. Erdélyi, Jörg Rothe, Ann-Kathrin Selker Complexity of control in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 112 (Sep 2020): 13–33.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2020.03.001Vesco Paskalev Collective Reason, the Rationality Gap, and Political Leadership, Ratio Juris 33, no.22 (Jul 2020): 169–195.https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12289Gustavo Bodanza, Esteban Freidin, Sebastián Linares, Fernando Delbianco Modulation of the leniency bias in the discursive dilemma, International Journal of Psychology 55, no.11 (Nov 2018): 67–75.https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12545Gregory Conti Parliament the Mirror of the Nation, 24 (Apr 2019).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108582469Takuya Sekiguchi Preferences over procedures and outcomes in judgment aggregation: an experimental study, Theory and Decision 86, no.22 (Nov 2018): 239–258.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-018-9678-4Chester Kin-man To, Rachel W.Y. Yee, P.Y. Mok, K.P. Chau, Man Chong Wong, N.M. Cheung Collaboration reasoning or social heuristics? Value proposition validity in omnium-gatherum business models, Journal of Business Research 88 (Jul 2018): 550–559.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.062William A. Edmundson Distributive Justice and Distributed Obligations, Journal of Moral Philosophy 15, no.11 (Jan 2018): 1–19.https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-46810065Vesselin Paskalev Why Elections? Collective Reason, Unreason and the Role of Political Leadership, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3195801Edmond Awad, Jean-François Bonnefon, Martin Caminada, Thomas W. Malone, Iyad Rahwan Experimental Assessment of Aggregation Principles in Argumentation-Enabled Collective Intelligence, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 17, no.33 (Jun 2017): 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1145/3053371Franz Dietrich, Christian List Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part two: the premise-based approach, Social Choice and Welfare 48, no.44 (Apr 2017): 787–814.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-017-1035-yMargherita Brusa, Michael Y. Barilan Newborn Screening on the Cusp of Genetic Screening: From Solidarity in Public Health to Personal Counselling, (May 2017): 503–522.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51783-4_29Fabienne Peter The Epistemology of Deliberative Democracy, (Oct 2016): 76–88.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118869109.ch6Caroline T. Arruda From Individual to Collective Intentionality, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46, no.33 (Feb 2016): 318–331.https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393116632685Peter Heindl, Philipp Kanschik Ecological sufficiency, individual liberties, and distributive justice: Implications for policy making, Ecological Economics 126 (Jun 2016): 42–50.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.019Peter Heindl, Philipp Kanschik Ecological Sufficiency, Individual Liberties, and Distributive Justice: Implications for Policy Making, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2762287Eerik Lagerspetz Arrow's Theorem, (Jan 2016): 171–245.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23261-4_4Caroline T. Arruda Shared Intention and Reasons for Action, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45, no.66 (Oct 2015): 596–623.https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393115608945Dorothea Baumeister, Gábor Erdélyi, Olivia J. Erdélyi, Jörg Rothe Complexity of manipulation and bribery in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules, Mathematical Social Sciences 76 (Jul 2015): 19–30.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2015.03.006Jens David Ohlin The One or the Many, Criminal Law and Philosophy 9, no.22 (Sep 2013): 285–299.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-013-9258-1Dorothea Baumeister, Jörg Rothe, Ann-Kathrin Selker Complexity of Bribery and Control for Uniform Premise-Based Quota Rules Under Various Preference Types, (Aug 2015): 432–448.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23114-3_26Geoffroy de Clippel, Kfir Eliaz Premise-based versus outcome-based information aggregation, Games and Economic Behavior 89 (Jan 2015): 34–42.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2014.10.011Ryota SAKAI Discursive Dilemma and Division of Deliberation:, The Annuals of Japanese Political Science Association 66, no.22 (Jan 2015): 2_279–2_300.https://doi.org/10.7218/nenpouseijigaku.66.2_279Philip Pettit Group Agents are Not Expressive, Pragmatic or Theoretical Fictions, Erkenntnis 79, no.S9S9 (Apr 2014): 1641–1662.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9633-xJames K. L. Wong Formal Political Theory, (Jul 2014): 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0375Eerik Lagerspetz Albert Heckscher on collective decision-making, Public Choice 159, no.3-43-4 (Mar 2014): 327–339.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-014-0169-zNao SAITO Discursive Dilemma and the Justification for Judicial Review, The Annuals of Japanese Political Science Association 65, no.22 (Jan 2014): 2_211–2_231.https://doi.org/10.7218/nenpouseijigaku.65.2_211András Szigeti Collective Responsibility and Group-Control, (May 2014): 97–116.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05344-8_6András Szigeti Are Individualist Accounts of Collective Responsibility Morally Deficient?, (Aug 2013): 329–342.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6934-2_20Fabian Schuppert Collective Agency, Democracy and Political Institutions, (May 2013): 117–143.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6806-2_5Luis Vega Reñón Vindicación y elogio de la retórica deliberativa: glosas de Aristóteles, Isegoría 0, no.4848 (Aug 2013): 149–172.https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2013.048.08Alice Le Goff, Christian Nadeau Autorité démocratique et contestation. L'apport d'une approche épistémique, Philosophiques 40, no.22 (Mar 2014): 255–281.https://doi.org/10.7202/1023697arPhilip Pettit, Aude Bandini L'énigme démocratique, Philosophiques 40, no.22 (Mar 2014): 351–368.https://doi.org/10.7202/1023701arKai Spiekermann Judgement Aggregation and Distributed Thinking, (Jan 2013): 31–51.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5125-8_3Christian List The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review, Synthese 187, no.11 (Dec 2011): 179–207.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-0025-3Stephan Hartmann, Jan Sprenger Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth, Synthese 187, no.11 (Oct 2011): 209–221.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-0031-5Christian List Judgment Aggregation, (Jan 2012): 799–822.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51676-3.50026-9JENS DAVID OHLIN , Leiden Journal of International Law 25, no.33 ( 2012): 771.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156512000386Andrew Knops Representing collective reasons for group decisions: The judgment aggregation problem revisited, Journal of Theoretical Politics 23, no.44 (Oct 2011): 448–462.https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629811416321Christian List Group Communication and the Transformation of Judgments: An Impossibility Result*, Journal of Political Philosophy 19, no.11 (Oct 2010): 1–27.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00369.xDorothea Baumeister, Gábor Erdélyi, Jörg Rothe How Hard Is it to Bribe the Judges? A Study of the Complexity of Bribery in Judgment Aggregation, (Jan 2011): 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24873-3_1Bruce Chapman Rational Association and Corporate Responsibility, (Jan 2011): 272–295.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230302112_10Fabrizio Cariani Judgment Aggregation, Philosophy Compass 6, no.11 (Jan 2011): 22–32.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00366.xKai Spiekermann Judgement aggregation and distributed thinking, AI & SOCIETY 25, no.44 (Feb 2010): 401–412.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-010-0273-7 by Ben Saunders Democracy, Political Equality, and Majority Rule, Ethics 121, no.11 (Jul 2015): 148–177.https://doi.org/10.1086/656474Valeria Ottonelli What Does the Discursive Paradox Really Mean for Democracy?, Political Studies 58, no.44 (Sep 2010): 666–687.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00821.xJean-François Bonnefon Behavioral evidence for framing effects in the resolution of the doctrinal paradox, Social Choice and Welfare 34, no.44 (Sep 2009): 631–641.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-009-0421-5Klaus Nehring, Clemens Puppe Justifiable group choice, Journal of Economic Theory 145, no.22 (Mar 2010): 583–602.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2009.12.004Jon Elster Décisions individuelles et décisions collectives, Social Science Information 49, no.11 (Feb 2010): 11–28.https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018409354809Kenneth Shockley Preference Aggregation and Individual Development Rights, Ethics, Place & Environment 12, no.33 (Oct 2009): 301–304.https://doi.org/10.1080/13668790903195552 Basic Problems of Sociality, (Sep 2009): 5–8.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812880.002Philip Pettit The Reality of Group Agents, (Sep 2009): 67–91.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812880.007Diego Rios Comment, (Sep 2009): 92–98.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812880.008Mathias Risse On the Philosophy of Group Decision Methods I: The Nonobviousness of Majority Rule, Philosophy Compass 4, no.55 (Sep 2009): 793–802.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00224.xMathias Risse On the Philosophy of Group Decision Methods II: Alternatives to Majority Rule, Philosophy Compass 4, no.55 (Sep 2009): 803–812.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00225.xBen Saunders Democracy After Deliberation, Res Publica 15, no.33 (Apr 2009): 315–319.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-009-9082-6Michael K. Miller, Daniel Osherson Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation, Social Choice and Welfare 32, no.44 (Oct 2008): 575–601.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0340-xDavid Sosa WHAT IS IT LIKE TO BE A GROUP?, Social Philosophy and Policy 26, no.11 (Nov 2008): 212–226.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052509090098Frank Hindriks , Economics and Philosophy 25, no.22 ( 2009): 161.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267109990034Fabienne Peter Democratic Legitimacy without Collective Rationality, (Jan 2009): 143–157.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234994_8Klaus Nehring, Clemens Puppe Justifiable Group Choice, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1558362Michael K. Miller JUDGMENT AGGREGATION AND SUBJECTIVE DECISION-MAKING, Economics and Philosophy 24, no.22 (Jul 2008): 205–231.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267108001818William Rehg, Kent Staley The CDF Collaboration and Argumentation Theory: The Role of Process in Objective Knowledge, Perspectives on Science 16, no.11 (May 2008): 1–25.https://doi.org/10.1162/posc.2008.16.1.1Frank Lovett Consent and the Legitimacy of Punishment, Political Theory 35, no.66 (Aug 2016): 806–810.https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591707307332FRANZ DIETRICH, CHRISTIAN LIST STRATEGY-PROOF JUDGMENT AGGREGATION, Economics and Philosophy 23, no.33 (Nov 2007): 269–300.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267107001496Philip Pettit Rationality, Reasoning and Group Agency, dialectica 0, no.00 (Oct 2007): 071003000954002–???.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2007.01115.xJean-François Bonnefon How Do Individuals Solve the Doctrinal Paradox in Collective Decisions?, Psychological Science 18, no.99 (May 2016): 753–755.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01972.xDavid Copp The Collective Moral Autonomy Thesis, Journal of Social Philosophy 38, no.33 (Sep 2007): 369–388.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2007.00386.xKent W. Staley Evidential Collaborations: Epistemic and Pragmatic Considerations in "Group Belief", Social Epistemology 21, no.33 (Jul 2007): 321–335.https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720701674247Corey Brettschneider The Rights of the Guilty, Political Theory 35, no.22 (Aug 2016): 175–199.https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591706297714Fabienne Peter Rawls' Idea of Public Reason and Democratic Legitimacy, Politics and Ethics Review 3, no.11 (Apr 2007): 129–143.https://doi.org/10.3366/per.2007.3.1.129 by Philip Pettit Responsibility Incorporated Pettit, Ethics 117, no.22 (Jul 2015): 171–201.https://doi.org/10.1086/510695Christian List Group Deliberation and the Transformation of Judgments: An Impossibility Result, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1078127Gabriella Pigozzi Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation, Synthese 152, no.22 (Sep 2006): 285–298.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9063-7Philip Pettit No Testimonial Route to Consensus, Episteme 3, no.33 (Jan 2012): 156–165.https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2006.3.3.156Philip Pettit When to defer to majority testimony - and when not, Analysis 66, no.291291 (Jul 2006): 179–187.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8284.2006.00612.xChristian List, Philip Pettit Group Agency and Supervenience, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 44, no.S1S1 (Mar 2006): 85–105.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00032.x Bibliographie, (): 323–347.https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pur.12008Christian List, Helene Landemore, Jon Elster Collective Wisdom, (): 203–229.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511846427.010
Referência(s)