An Epistemic Conception of Democracy
1986; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 97; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/292815
ISSN1539-297X
Autores Tópico(s)Political Philosophy and Ethics
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessSymposium on Explanation and Justification in Social TheoryAn Epistemic Conception of DemocracyJoshua CohenJoshua CohenPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 97, Number 1Oct., 1986 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/292815 Views: 91Total views on this site Citations: 179Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1986 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Roy Baharad, Shmuel Nitzan, Erel Segal-Halevi One person, one weight: when is weighted voting democratic?, Social Choice and Welfare 59, no.22 (Mar 2022): 467–493.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-022-01393-8Matthew Chick The problems democracy can solve, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (May 2022): 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2022.2077013Erik Lindhult The Movement toward Knowledge Democracy in Participatory and Action Research, (Mar 2022): 107–128.https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80117-694-120221006Matthew Chick The Epistemic Value of Testimony, Contemporary Political Theory 21, no.11 (May 2021): 93–113.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-021-00496-8Elizabeth Anderson, Blas Radi Epistemología de la Democracia, Las Torres de Lucca. International Journal of Political Philosophy 11, no.11 (Jan 2022): 117–127.https://doi.org/10.5209/ltdl.79873Gregory R. Peterson Intellectual Virtues, Epistemic Democracy, and the Wisdom of “the People”, (Aug 2022): 321–350.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05785-4_15Pierpaolo Marrone Epistemic Democracy and Technopolitics, International Journal of Technoethics 13, no.11 (Jan 2022): 1–14.https://doi.org/10.4018/IJT.291551Christoph Schamberger The metaethical dilemma of epistemic democracy, Economics and Philosophy (Dec 2021): 1–19.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267121000328Greg Lusk Does democracy require value-neutral science? Analyzing the legitimacy of scientific information in the political sphere, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 90 (Dec 2021): 102–110.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.08.009Jonathan Benson The epistemic value of deliberative democracy: how far can diversity take us?, Synthese 199, no.3-43-4 (Apr 2021): 8257–8279.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03161-0Rob Barlow Deliberation Without Democracy in Multi-stakeholder Initiatives: A Pragmatic Way Forward, Journal of Business Ethics 19 (Oct 2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04987-xJunyeol Kim Democracy and Epistemic Fairness: Testimonial Justice as a Founding Principle of Aggregative Democracy, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (Sep 2021).https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12440Jane Suiter, David M Farrell, Clodagh Harris, Philip Murphy Measuring Epistemic Deliberation on Polarized Issues: The Case of Abortion Provision in Ireland, Political Studies Review 146 (Jul 2021): 147892992110209.https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299211020909 References, (Jun 2021): 173–188.https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-720-320211012Peter J. Steinberger Political action and the philosophy of mind, Contemporary Political Theory 20, no.22 (Jun 2020): 364–384.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-020-00416-2Huihui Ding, Marcus Pivato Deliberation and epistemic democracy, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 185 (May 2021): 138–167.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.02.020Raja R Timilsina, Koji Kotani, Yoshinori Nakagawa, Tatsuyoshi Saijo Concerns for future generations in societies: A deliberative analysis of the intergenerational sustainability dilemma, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 90 (Feb 2021): 101628.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101628Atsushi Ueshima, Hugo Mercier, Tatsuya Kameda Social deliberation systematically shifts resource allocation decisions by focusing on the fate of the least well-off, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 92 (Jan 2021): 104067.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104067Anthony M. Bertelli, Madalina Busuioc Reputation‐Sourced Authority and the Prospect of Unchecked Bureaucratic Power, Public Administration Review 81, no.11 (Oct 2020): 38–48.https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13281Anders Herlitz, Karim Sadek Social Choice, Nondeterminacy, and Public Reasoning, Res Philosophica 98, no.33 (Jan 2021): 377–401.https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.2072Samuel DeCanio EFFICIENCY, LEGITIMACY, AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE, Social Philosophy and Policy 38, no.11 (Oct 2021): 198–219.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052521000285Cyrille Imbert, Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Vincent Chevrier, Christine Bourjot IMPROVING DELIBERATIONS BY REDUCING MISREPRESENTATION EFFECTS, Episteme 17, no.44 (Nov 2018): 403–419.https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.41Patrick Grim, Aaron Bramson, Daniel J. Singer, William J. Berger, Jiin Jung, Scott E. Page REPRESENTATION IN MODELS OF EPISTEMIC DEMOCRACY, Episteme 17, no.44 (Dec 2018): 498–518.https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.51Donald Bello Hutt Political Representation as Interpretation: A Contribution to Deliberative Constitutionalism, Ratio Juris 33, no.44 (Jan 2021): 351–367.https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12300Michael Hannon Empathetic Understanding and Deliberative Democracy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101, no.33 (Jul 2019): 591–611.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12624Sungmoon Kim The challenge of Confucian political meritocracy: A critical introduction, Philosophy & Social Criticism 46, no.99 (Aug 2020): 1005–1016.https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453720948380Alexander Motchoulski Democratic Public Justification, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50, no.77 (Nov 2020): 844–861.https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2020.40Alice el-Wakil, Spencer McKay Disentangling Referendums and Direct Democracy: A Defence of the Systemic Approach to Popular Vote Processes, Representation 56, no.44 (Aug 2019): 449–466.https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2019.1652203Andreas Rasche “Speaking on Behalf of…”: Leadership Ethics and the Collective Nature of Moral Reflection, Journal of Business Ethics 163, no.11 (Nov 2019): 13–22.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04325-2Zhichao Tong Political realism and epistemic democracy: An international perspective, European Journal of Political Theory 19, no.22 (Sep 2018): 184–205.https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885118799454Udit Bhatia Cracking the whip: the deliberative costs of strict party discipline, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23, no.22 (Jun 2018): 254–279.https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2018.1479813DIMITRI LANDA, RYAN PEVNICK Representative Democracy as Defensible Epistocracy, American Political Science Review 114, no.11 (Sep 2019): 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000509Fabio de Nardis Democracy and Political Participation, (Mar 2020): 253–313.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37760-1_8Antonio Carnevale, Carmela Occhipinti Ethics and Decisions in Distributed Technologies: A Problem of Trust and Governance Advocating Substantive Democracy, (Feb 2020): 300–307.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38227-8_34Ivan Cerovac The Truth Tenet, (Apr 2020): 19–71.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44602-4_2Ivan Cerovac Epistemic Democracy, (Apr 2020): 157–196.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44602-4_5Michael I. Räber Democracy, Epistemology and Deweyan Pragmatism, (Oct 2020): 25–54.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53258-1_2Robert Garner Animal rights and the deliberative turn in democratic theory, European Journal of Political Theory 18, no.33 (Feb 2016): 309–329.https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885116630937Joachim Behnke Nachdenken über Reformen des deutschen Wahlgesetzes. Sollte die Mehrheitswahlkomponente des Wahlsystems gestärkt werden?, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 60, no.22 (Jun 2019): 195–219.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-019-00167-9Assaf Sharon Populism and democracy: The challenge for deliberative democracy, European Journal of Philosophy 27, no.22 (Sep 2018): 359–376.https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12400Nicolás Maloberti Markets in votes: Alienability, strict secrecy, and political clientelism, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 18, no.22 (Nov 2018): 193–215.https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X18809068Yiftah Elazar, Geneviève Rousselière Republicanism and the Future of Democracy, 2 (May 2019).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108630153Sean Ingham Why Arrow’s theorem matters for political theory even if preference cycles never occur, Public Choice 179, no.1-21-2 (Feb 2018): 97–111.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-018-0521-9Han van Wietmarschen Political testimony, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 18, no.11 (Sep 2018): 23–45.https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X18798062Marta Poblet, Pompeu Casanovas, Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel Deliberative and Epistemic Approaches to Democracy, (May 2019): 27–49.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13363-4_2Marcus Pivato Realizing Epistemic Democracy, (Nov 2019): 103–112.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18050-8_16Nicole Curato, Marit Hammond, John B. Min Norms, (Oct 2018): 25–59.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95534-6_2Lynn A. Staeheli Paradoxes of Young People’s Political Participation, (Jul 2019): 251–269.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-041-4_5Lynn A. Staeheli Paradoxes of Young People’s Political Participation, (Nov 2018): 1–19.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-88-0_5-1Bo Rothstein , European Politics and Society 20, no.11 ( 2019): 16.https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2018.1515873Marcus Pivato, Huihui Ding Deliberation and Epistemic Democracy, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2019).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3440612Sean Ingham Rule by Multiple Majorities, 9 (Dec 2018).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108683821Arnon Keren The Public Understanding of What? Laypersons’ Epistemic Needs, the Division of Cognitive Labor, and the Demarcation of Science, Philosophy of Science 85, no.55 (Dec 2018): 781–792.https://doi.org/10.1086/699690Justin Steinberg Spinoza's Political Psychology, 1 (Oct 2018).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316493465Pavel Dufek Democracy as Intellectual Taste? Pluralism in Democratic Theory, Critical Review 30, no.3-43-4 (Jan 2019): 219–255.https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2018.1560669Rousiley C M Maia, Danila Cal, Vanessa V Oliveira, Ana Carolina Vimieiro, Gabriella Hauber, Patrícia G C Rossini Deliberation Across a Space of Reasons: Assessing Epistemic Changes in Group Discussions, Human Communication Research 44, no.44 (Jun 2018): 399–426.https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqy007Alice el-Wakil, Francis Cheneval Designing Popular Vote Processes to Enhance Democratic Systems, Swiss Political Science Review 24, no.33 (Sep 2018): 348–358.https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12318MELISSA SCHWARTZBERG Justifying the Jury: Reconciling Justice, Equality, and Democracy, American Political Science Review 112, no.33 (Feb 2018): 446–458.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000661John B. Min, James K. Wong Epistemic approaches to deliberative democracy, Philosophy Compass 13, no.66 (May 2018): e12497.https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12497Thomas Mulligan Plural Voting for the Twenty-First Century, The Philosophical Quarterly 68, no.271271 (Sep 2017): 286–306.https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqx046Donald Bello Hutt Republicanism, Deliberative Democracy, and Equality of Access and Deliberation, Theoria 84, no.11 (Jan 2018): 83–111.https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12138Carolyn P. Neuhaus Community Engagement and Field Trials of Genetically Modified Insects and Animals, Hastings Center Report 48, no.11 (Feb 2018): 25–36.https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.808Daniele Santoro, Manohar Kumar , 6 ( 2018): 83.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90723-9_4Robert E. Goodin The epistemic benefits of deliberative democracy, Policy Sciences 50, no.33 (Mar 2017): 351–366.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9286-0Hélène Landemore Inclusive Constitution Making and Religious Rights: Lessons from the Icelandic Experiment, The Journal of Politics 79, no.33 (May 2017): 762–779.https://doi.org/10.1086/690300Nalliely Hern?ndez EXPERTOS EN LA VIDA P?BLICA: ??LITES INDEPENDIENTES O INVESTIGACI?N SOCIALIZADA? UNA APORTACI?N DEL DEBATE LIPPMANN-DEWEY EN EL CONTEXTO CONTEMPOR?NEO, Pen?nsula 12, no.22 (Jul 2017): 169–199.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsla.2017.06.008Aaron Ancell DEMOCRACY ISN'T THAT SMART (BUT WE CAN MAKE IT SMARTER): ON LANDEMORE'S DEMOCRATIC REASON, Episteme 14, no.22 (Jan 2016): 161–175.https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2015.67Hélène Landemore Beyond the Fact of Disagreement? The Epistemic Turn in Deliberative Democracy, Social Epistemology 31, no.33 (Jun 2017): 277–295.https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2017.1317868Andreas Follesdal Tracking justice democratically, Social Epistemology 31, no.33 (May 2017): 324–339.https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2017.1317869John T. Woolley, Joseph Gardner The effect of “sunshine” on policy deliberation: The case of the Federal Open Market Committee, The Social Science Journal 54, no.11 (Dec 2019): 13–29.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2016.09.006Sungmoon Kim Pragmatic Confucian Democracy: Rethinking the Value of Democracy in East Asia, The Journal of Politics 79, no.11 (Nov 2016): 237–249.https://doi.org/10.1086/687762Carlo Invernizzi-Accetti Does Democratic Theory Need Epistemic Standards?, Democratic Theory 4, no.22 (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2017.040202Fabienne Peter The Epistemology of Deliberative Democracy, (Oct 2016): 76–88.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118869109.ch6John B. Min Politics Must Get it Right Sometimes: Reply to Muirhead, Critical Review 28, no.3-43-4 (Sep 2016): 404–411.https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2016.1194594Joseph Gardner, John T. Woolley Measuring Deliberative Conditions, Political Research Quarterly 69, no.33 (Sep 2016): 594–605.https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916657186Christian List, Kai Spiekermann THE CONDORCET JURY THEOREM AND VOTER-SPECIFIC TRUTH, (Aug 2016): 219–233.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118609378.ch10Lucio Baccaro, André Bächtiger, Marion Deville Small Differences that Matter: The Impact of Discussion Modalities on Deliberative Outcomes, British Journal of Political Science 46, no.33 (Jul 2014): 551–566.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000167Julia Maskivker An Epistemic Justification for the Obligation to Vote, Critical Review 28, no.22 (Jun 2016): 224–247.https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2016.1191183Jack Knight, Hélène Landemore, Nadia Urbinati, Daniel Viehoff Roundtable on Epistemic Democracy and Its Critics, Critical Review 28, no.22 (Jul 2016): 137–170.https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2016.1206744Sean Ingham Social choice and popular control, Journal of Theoretical Politics 28, no.22 (Apr 2016): 331–349.https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629815586876George Masterton, Erik J. Olsson, Staffan Angere Linking as voting: how the Condorcet jury theorem in political science is relevant to webometrics, Scientometrics 106, no.33 (Jan 2016): 945–966.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1837-1Allan Hazlett The Social Value of Non-Deferential Belief, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94, no.11 (Jun 2015): 131–151.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2015.1049625Eerik Lagerspetz Interpretations, (Jan 2016): 247–340.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23261-4_5Roberto Gargarella Scope and Limits of Dialogic Constitutionalism, (Apr 2016): 119–146.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28371-5_6Engin Bozdag, Jeroen van den Hoven Breaking the filter bubble: democracy and design, Ethics and Information Technology 17, no.44 (Dec 2015): 249–265.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-015-9380-yJohn A. Weymark COGNITIVE DIVERSITY, BINARY DECISIONS, AND EPISTEMIC DEMOCRACY, Episteme 12, no.0404 (Sep 2015): 497–511.https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2015.34Hélène Landemore, Scott E. Page Deliberation and disagreement, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 14, no.33 (Aug 2014): 229–254.https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X14544284, Roberto García Alonso Representación política y democracia deliberativa. ¿Qué puede significar hoy la participación política?, Estudios Políticos (Medellín) , no.4747 (Jul 2015).https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.espo.n47a04Melissa Schwartzberg Epistemic Democracy and Its Challenges, Annual Review of Political Science 18, no.11 (May 2015): 187–203.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-110113-121908Ian O'Flynn, Nicole Curato Deliberative democratization: a framework for systemic analysis, Policy Studies 36, no.33 (Sep 2015): 298–313.https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2015.1065965Brendan Coolsaet, John Pitseys Fair and Equitable Negotiations? African Influence and the International Access and Benefit-Sharing Regime, Global Environmental Politics 15, no.22 (May 2015): 38–56.https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00297John B. Min Epistocracy and democratic epistemology, Politics in Central Europe 11, no.11 (Nov 2016): 91–112.https://doi.org/10.1515/pce-2015-0005Juan Perote-Peña, Ashley Piggins A MODEL OF DELIBERATIVE AND AGGREGATIVE DEMOCRACY, Economics and Philosophy 31, no.11 (Feb 2015): 93–121.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267114000418Marit Böker, Stephen Elstub THE POSSIBILITY OF CRITICAL MINI-PUBLICS: REALPOLITIK AND NORMATIVE CYCLES IN DEMOCRATIC THEORY, Representation 51, no.11 (Apr 2015): 125–144.https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2015.1026205Claudia Landwehr Deliberation, Aggregation und epistemischer Fortschritt, (Jan 2015): 41–63.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07583-5_2Samuel DeCanio Democracy, the Market, and the Logic of Social Choice, American Journal of Political Science 58, no.33 (Nov 2013): 637–652.https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12072Lu Xiao, Nicole Askin What influences online deliberation? A wikipedia study, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65, no.55 (Jan 2014): 898–910.https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23004Robert Sparrow Egalitarianism and Moral Bioenhancement, The American Journal of Bioethics 14, no.44 (Apr 2014): 20–28.https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2014.889241Andrew Ward Social Tyranny and Democratic Governance in the Information Age, International Journal of E-Politics 5, no.22 (Apr 2014): 32–52.https://doi.org/10.4018/ijep.2014040103Davide Grossi, Gabriella Pigozzi Judgment Aggregation: A Primer, Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning 8, no.22 (Mar 2014): 1–151.https://doi.org/10.2200/S00559ED1V01Y201312AIM027Sean Ingham Social Choice and Popular Control, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2416974MICHAEL FUERSTEIN Epistemic Trust and Liberal Justification*, Journal of Political Philosophy 21, no.22 (Feb 2012): 179–199.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2012.00415.xSean Ingham Disagreement and epistemic arguments for democracy, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 12, no.22 (May 2013): 136–155.https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X12460642Franz Dietrich, Kai Spiekermann EPISTEMIC DEMOCRACY WITH DEFENSIBLE PREMISES, Economics and Philosophy 29, no.11 (Apr 2013): 87–120.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267113000096Marcus Pivato Voting rules as statistical estimators, Social Choice and Welfare 40, no.22 (Feb 2012): 581–630.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0619-1JOSIAH OBER Democracy's Wisdom: An Aristotelian Middle Way for Collective Judgment, American Political Science Review 107, no.11 (Jan 2013): 104–122.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000627Laura Valentini Justice, Disagreement and Democracy, British Journal of Political Science 43, no.11 (Jul 2012): 177–199.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000294Gustavo Pereira Democratic Ethical Life and Public Reason, (Jan 2013): 175–193.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137263384_9Emanuel V. Towfigh, Andreas Glöckner, Sebastian J. Goerg, Philip Leifeld, Carlos Kurschilgen, Aniol Llorente-Saguer, Sophie Bade Does Political Representation through Parties Decrease Voters' Acceptance of Decisions?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2273600Sylvain Lavelle Paradigms of Governance, (Jan 2013): 126–148.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-3670-5.ch009Hélène Landemore, Aude Bandini Pourquoi le grand nombre est plus intelligent que le petit nombre, et pourquoi il faut en tenir compte, Philosophiques 40, no.22 (Mar 2014): 283–299.https://doi.org/10.7202/1023698arAlice Le Goff, Christian Nadeau Autorité démocratique et contestation. L’apport d’une approche épistémique, Philosophiques 40, no.22 (Mar 2014): 255–281.https://doi.org/10.7202/1023697arMarcus Pivato A STATISTICAL APPROACH TO EPISTEMIC DEMOCRACY, Episteme 9, no.22 (Jul 2012): 115–137.https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2012.4Hugo Mercier, Hélène Landemore Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation, Political Psychology 33, no.22 (Mar 2012): 243–258.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00873.xRichard Bradley, Christopher Thompson A (MAINLY EPISTEMIC) CASE FOR MULTIPLE-VOTE MAJORITY RULE, Episteme 9, no.11 (Apr 2012): 63–79.https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2011.5Claudia Landwehr Demokratische Legitimation durch rationale Kommunikation, (Jan 2012): 355–385.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94161-5_12Nicholas John Munn The New Political Blogosphere, Social Epistemology 26, no.11 (Jan 2012): 55–70.https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.634529Daniela Cammack Aristotle on the Virtue of the Multitude, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2161069Mathew Coakley On the value of political legitimacy, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 10, no.44 (Nov 2011): 345–369.https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X10387272Lionel Marquis, Hans-Peter Schaub, Marlène Gerber The Fairness of Media Coverage in Question: An Analysis of Referendum Campaigns on Welfare State Issues in Switzerland, Swiss Political Science Review 17, no.22 (May 2011): 128–163.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02015.xHugo Mercier, Dan Sperber Argumentation: Its adaptiveness and efficacy, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34, no.22 (Mar 2011): 94–111.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10003031LISA DISCH Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation, American Political Science Review 105, no.11 (Feb 2011): 100–114.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000602Zsuzsanna Chappell Justifying deliberative democracy: Are two heads always wiser than one?, Contemporary Political Theory 10, no.11 (Jan 2011): 78–101.https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2010.8Ramón Maiz The Political Mind and Its Other, (Jan 2011): 29–70.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93201-9_2George Wilmers Collective Choice as Information Theory: Towards a Theory of Gravitas, (Jan 2011): 423–438.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0214-1_23Melissa Schwartzberg Shouts, Murmurs and Votes: Acclamation and Aggregation in Ancient Greece, Journal of Political Philosophy 18, no.44 (Mar 2010): 448–468.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00362.xValeria Ottonelli What Does the Discursive Paradox Really Mean for Democracy?, Political Studies 58, no.44 (Sep 2010): 666–687.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00821.xSimon N. Williams A twenty-first century Citizens’ POLIS: introducing a democratic experiment in electronic citizen participation in science and technology decision-making, Public Understanding of Science 19, no.55 (Jun 2009): 528–544.https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509104726Gordon L Clark, Ashby H B Monk The Legitimacy and Governance of Norway's Sovereign Wealth Fund: The Ethics of Global Investment, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 42, no.77 (Jan 2010): 1723–1738.https://doi.org/10.1068/a42441Mariah Zeisberg Democratic Processualism, Journal of Social Philosophy 41, no.22 (Jun 2010): 202–209.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2010.01488.xEerik Lagerspetz Wisdom and numbers, Social Science Information 49, no.11 (Mar 2010): 29–59.https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018409354475Cláudio Araújo Reis, Vontade geral e decisão coletiva em Rousseau, Trans/Form/Ação 33, no.22 (Jan 2010): 11–34.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31732010000200003Mariah Zeisberg Democratic Processualism, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1583703 HyugBaegIm What dose representative democracy represent for?, Korean Political Science Review 43, no.44 (Dec 2009): 27–49.https://doi.org/10.18854/kpsr.2009.43.4.002Mathias Risse On the Philosophy of Group Decision Methods I: The Nonobviousness of Majority Rule, Philosophy Compass 4, no.55 (Sep 2009): 793–802.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00224.xMathias Risse On the Philosophy of Group Decision Methods II: Alternatives to Majority Rule, Philosophy Compass 4, no.55 (Sep 2009): 803–812.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00225.xGordon L. Clark, Ashby H. B. Monk The Legitimacy and Governance of Norway’s Sovereign Wealth Fund: The Ethics of Global Investment, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1473973William Nelson The Epistemic Value of the Democratic Process, Episteme 5, no.11 (Jan 2012): 19–32.https://doi.org/10.3366/E174236000800021XMichael Fuerstein Epistemic Democracy and the Social Character of Knowledge, Episteme 5, no.11 (Jan 2012): 74–93.https://doi.org/10.3366/E1742360008000245Simon Niemeyer, John S. Dryzek The Ends of Deliberation: Meta-consensus and Inter-subjective Rationality as Ideal Outcomes, Swiss Political Science Review 13, no.44 (Jan 2011): 497–526.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2007.tb00087.xMichael C. Munger Blogging and political information: truth or truthiness?, Public Choice 134, no.1-21-2 (Aug 2007): 125–138.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9205-6Martin van Hees The limits of epistemic democracy, Social Choice and Welfare 28, no.44 (Aug 2006): 649–666.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0185-0Nikhil Kaza Tyranny of the Median and Costly Consent: A Reflection on the Justification for Participatory Urban Planning Processes, Planning Theory 5, no.33 (Aug 2016): 255–270.https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095206068630Mark B. Brown Survey Article: Citizen Panels and the Concept of Representation*, Journal of Political Philosophy 14, no.22 (Jun 2006): 203–225.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00245.xElizabeth Anderson The Epistemology of Democracy, Episteme 3, no.1-21-2 (Jan 2012): 8–22.https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.8Luc Bovens, Wlodek Rabinowicz Democratic Answers to Complex Questions – An Epistemic Perspective, Synthese 150, no.11 (May 2006): 131–153.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-0005-1Franz Dietrich General Representation of Epistemically Optimal Procedures, Social Choice and Welfare 26, no.22 (Apr 2006): 263–283.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0094-2F. M. Frohock An Alternative Model of Political Reasoning, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9, no.11 (Feb 2006): 27–64.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-006-7906-4Keith Dowding Can Populism Be Defended? William Riker, Gerry Mackie and the Interpretation of Democracy, Government and Opposition 41, no.33 (Mar 2014): 327–346.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2006.00182.xB. Stich Planning to Include the Public: Transportation Policy Implementation With Effective Citizen Involvement, Public Works Management & Policy 9, no.44 (Apr 2005): 319–340.https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X05275672Stéphane Courtois Démocratie délibérative et sécession, Canadian Journal of Political Science 37, no.44 (Aug 2005): 811–838.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423904990208Christian List On the Significance of the Absolute Margin, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55, no.33 (Dec 2020): 521–544.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/55.3.521Luc Bovens, Wlodek Rabinowicz Voting Procedures for Complex Collective Decisions. An Epistemic Perspective, Ratio Juris 17, no.22 (Jun 2004): 241–258.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2004.00266.xGerry Mackie Democracy Defended, 20 (Sep 2009).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490293Brian Chan, Mary Carlson, Barbara Trickett, Felton Earls Youth Participation: A Critical Element of Research on Child Well-Being, (Jan 2003): 65–96.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0091-9_4Learry Gagné La délibération circonstancielle en théorie démocratique1, Philosophiques 29, no.22 (May 2003): 327–350.https://doi.org/10.7202/006259arPhilip Pettit Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma, Philosophical Issues 11, no.11 (Oct 2001): 268–299.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2237.2001.tb00047.xColin Bird The Possibility of Self-Government, American Political Science Review 94, no.33 (Aug 2014): 563–577.https://doi.org/10.2307/2585831M Sagoff Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods:, Ecological Economics 24, no.2-32-3 (Feb 1998): 213–230.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00144-4Henry S. Richardson Truth and Ends in Dewey's Pragmatism, Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume 24 (Jan 2020): 109–147.https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1998.10717497William Rehg, James Bohman Discourse and Democracy: The Formal and Informal Bases of Legitimacy in Habermas' Faktizität und Geltung *, Journal of Political Philosophy 4, no.11 (Mar 2006): 79–99.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.1996.tb00043.xBurt L. Monroe Fully Proportional Representation, American Political Science Review 89, no.44 (Sep 2013): 925–940.https://doi.org/10.2307/2082518Albert Weale William Riker and the theory of democracy, Democratization 2, no.33 (Sep 2007): 377–395.https://doi.org/10.1080/13510349508403447Philippe Gérard Bibliographie, (Jan 1995): 299–318.https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pusl.18106Samuel Freeman, Democracia e controle jurídico da constitucionalidade, Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política , no.3232 (Apr 1994): 181–199.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-64451994000100010Philip Pettit Liberalism and republicanism, Australian Journal of Political Science 28, no.44 (Dec 1993): 162–189.https://doi.org/10.1080/00323269308402274Pierre Salmon Unpopular Policies and the Theory of Representative Democracy, (Jan 1993): 13–39.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2188-0_2Laura Stoker Interests and Ethics in Politics, American Political Science Review 86, no.22 (Sep 2013): 369–380.https://doi.org/10.2307/1964226Jos Beus The Ecological Social Contract, (Jan 1991): 181–205.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3560-3_11 Thomas Christiano Freedom, Consensus, and Equality in Collective Decision Making, Ethics 101, no.11 (Oct 2015): 151–181.https://doi.org/10.1086/293265Geoffrey Brennan, Philip Pettit Unveiling the Vote, British Journal of Political Science 20, no.33 (Jan 2009): 311–333.https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712340000586XDavid M. Estlund, Jeremy Waldron, Bernard Grofman, Scott L. Feld Democratic Theory and the Public Interest: Condorcet and Rousseau Revisited, American Political Science Review 83, no.44 (Aug 2014): 1317–1340.https://doi.org/10.2307/1961672Joshua Cohen The Economic Basis of Deliberative Democracy, Social Philosophy and Policy 6, no.22 (Jan 2009): 25–50.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500000625Matthew Festenstein Truth and Trust in Democratic Epistemology, (): 69–79.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8849-0_6Sylvain Lavelle Paradigms of Governance, (): 555–576.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6433-3.ch031Andrew C. Ward Social Tyranny and Democratic Governance in the Information Age, (): 106–128.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9461-3.ch006Simon Niemeyer Intersubjective Reasoning and the Formation of Metaconsensus, (): 18–37.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-091-4.ch002Hélène Landemore, Helene Landemore, Jon Elster Democratic Reason, (): 251–289.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511846427.012Gerry Mackie, Stéphanie Novak, Jon Elster The reception of social choice theory by democratic theory, (): 77–102.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107286160.005
Referência(s)