A Note on the History of Perfect Competition
1967; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 75; Issue: 4, Part 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/259295
ISSN1537-534X
Autores Tópico(s)Economic Theory and Policy
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessA Note on the History of Perfect CompetitionPaul J. McNultyPaul J. McNulty Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 75, Number 4, Part 1Aug., 1967Part 1 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/259295 Views: 135Total views on this site Citations: 66Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1967 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:David Emanuel Andersson, Marek Hudik The Austrian School and the Theory of Markets, (Nov 2021): 1–22.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4106-3_6-2Gary M. Galles, Robert L. Sexton Why the kinked demand curve may still be useful, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 28, no.44 (Nov 2020): 559–576.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2020.1849337Brandon Dupont, Yvonne Durham Adam Smith and the not so invisible hand: A revision for the undergraduate classroom, International Review of Economics Education 36 (Mar 2021): 100205.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2020.100205Peter Vanderschraaf Contractarianisms and markets, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 181 (Jan 2021): 270–287.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.11.019Fabio Petri Firms, Partial Equilibria and the General Equilibrium with Production, (May 2021): 353–442.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62070-7_5Raphaël Fèvre 2. L’évolution du concept de concurrence d’Adam Smith à Friedrich Hayek, Regards croisés sur l'économie n° 25, no.22 (Jun 2020): 24–35.https://doi.org/10.3917/rce.025.0024Levent GÖRÜN 2018-2019 SEZONU SPOR TOTO SÜPER LİGDE REKABETÇİ DENGE, Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi (Apr 2020).https://doi.org/10.17155/omuspd.615996Jeewon Park, SeungJin Bae, Tae-Jin Lee, Kyung-Bok Son Marketing and Pricing Strategies of Blockbuster Drugs in the South Korean Market: A 15-Year Retrospective Cohort Study for Choline Alfoscerate, Frontiers in Pharmacology 11 (Mar 2020).https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00232Ernesto Screpanti Labour and Value, (Oct 2019).https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0182Christopher Mulanda Aura, Chrisphine S. Nyamweya, James M. Njiru, Cyprian Odoli, Safina Musa, Zachary Ogari, Richard Abila, Raphael Okeyo, Robert Oketch Using fish landing sites and markets information towards quantification of the blue economy to enhance fisheries management, Fisheries Management and Ecology 26, no.22 (Jan 2019): 141–152.https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12334Gerasimos T. Soldatos, Erotokritos Varelas Emotional intelligence in a neoclassical framework and the nature of capitalism, Journal of Economic Studies 46, no.11 (Jan 2019): 2–17.https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-08-2017-0215Jonathan Hearn How to Read The Wealth of Nations (or Why the Division of Labor Is More Important Than Competition in Adam Smith), Sociological Theory 36, no.22 (Jun 2018): 162–184.https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275118777010Paul J. McNulty Competition, Austrian, (Feb 2018): 1955–1958.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_141George J. Stigler Competition, (Feb 2018): 1930–1938.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_524Mark Blaug British Classical Economics, (Feb 2018): 1088–1107.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_99Slade Mendenhall Two Sides of a Platonic Coin: Marxism and Neoclassicism in the Socialist Calculation Debate, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3190465Nicola Giocoli Elevating Competition: Classical Political Economy in Justice Peckham’s Jurisprudence, Journal of Contextual Economics 137, no.44 (Oct 2017): 331–370.https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.137.4.331Amanda B. Delp, John W. Mayo The Evolution of “Competition”: Lessons for 21st Century Telecommunications Policy, Review of Industrial Organization 50, no.44 (Dec 2016): 393–416.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-016-9553-9Nicola Giocoli Elevating Competition: Classical Political Economy in Justice Peckhamms Jurisprudence, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2928198Chander Velu, Arun Jacob Business model innovation and owner-managers: the moderating role of competition, R&D Management 46, no.33 (Oct 2014): 451–463.https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12095Michel Callon Revisiting marketization: from interface-markets to market-agencements, Consumption Markets & Culture 19, no.11 (Aug 2015): 17–37.https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2015.1067002Robert K. Toutkoushian, Michael B. Paulsen Competition and Production in Higher Education, (Mar 2016): 275–322.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7506-9_8Tobias Werron Why do we believe in competition? A historical-sociological view of competition as an institutionalized modern imaginary, Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 16, no.22 (Oct 2015): 186–210.https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2015.1049190Natascha Just Competition/Antitrust/Antimonopoly Law, (Feb 2015): 1–14.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs068Siyuan Liu, Chunyan Miao, Yuan Liu, Hui Fang, Han Yu, Jie Zhang, Yueting Chai, Cyril Leung A Reputation Revision Mechanism to Mitigate the Negative Effects of Misreported Ratings, (Jan 2015): 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1145/2781562.2781570Nicola Giocoli Free from What? Competition, Regulation and Antitrust During the Gilded Age, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2695362Benoît Walraevens Vertus et justice du marché chez Adam Smith, Revue économique Vol. 65, no.22 (Feb 2014): 419–438.https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.652.0419Nicola Giocoli Classical Competition and Freedom of Contract in American Laissez Faire Constitutionalism, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2448419Nicola Giocoli British economists on competition policy (1890–1920), (Sep 2014): 1–57.https://doi.org/10.1108/S0743-4154(2013)000031A001Serdal Bahçe, Benan Eres Competing Paradigms of Competition, Review of Radical Political Economics 45, no.22 (Sep 2012): 201–224.https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613412458650Neri Salvadori, Rodolfo Signorino The Classical Notion of Competition Revisited, History of Political Economy 45, no.11 (Mar 2013): 149–175.https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-1965222Rodolphe Dos Santos Ferreira Two views of competition: “Is it peace or war?”, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 19, no.66 (Nov 2012): 852–867.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2012.735685Nathalie Berta, Ludovic A. Julien, Fabrice Tricou On perfect competition: definitions, usages and foundations, Cahiers d'économie Politique n° 63, no.22 (Dec 2012): 7–24.https://doi.org/10.3917/cep.063.0007Stephen Martin Market Structure and Market Performance, Review of Industrial Organization 40, no.22 (Feb 2012): 87–108.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-012-9338-8Nicola Giocoli British Economists on Competition Policy (1890-1920), SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2070185Güler Aydın, Araz Takay The role of competition in the technoeconomic paradigm on the market, Economic annals 57, no.193193 (Jan 2012): 137–150.https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA1293137AMICHAEL E. BRADLEY ADAM SMITH’S SYSTEM OF NATURAL LIBERTY: COMPETITION, CONTESTABILITY, AND MARKET PROCESS, Journal of the History of Economic Thought 32, no.22 (May 2010): 237–262.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837210000131AVI J. COHEN CAPITAL CONTROVERSY FROM BÖHM-BAWERK TO BLISS: BADLY POSED OR VERY DEEP QUESTIONS? OR WHAT “WE” CAN LEARN FROM CAPITAL CONTROVERSY EVEN IF YOU DON'T CARE WHO WON, Journal of the History of Economic Thought 32, no.11 (Feb 2010): 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1017/S105383720999040XThomas C. Powell, Noushi Rahman, William H. Starbuck European and North American origins of competitive advantage, (Mar 2015): 313–351.https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-3322(2010)0000027014Luca Zamparelli Average cost and marginal cost pricing in Marshall: Textual analysis and interpretation, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 16, no.44 (Sep 2009): 665–694.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672560903201276Manuela Mosca The Sources of Monopoly Power Before Bain (1956), SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1430322S. C. Littlechild Misleading Calculations of The Social Costs of Monopoly Power, (Jan 2008): 89–104.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79247-5_4Paul J. McNulty Competition, Austrian, (Mar 2017): 1–3.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_141-2George J. Stigler Competition, (Mar 2017): 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_524-2Mark Blaug British Classical Economics, (Mar 2017): 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_99-2Michael E. Bradley Adam Smith's System of Natural Liberty: Competition, Contestability and Market Process, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1021305Keith Jakee, Heath Spong Praxeology, Entrepreneurship and the Market Process: A Review of Kirzner's Contribution, Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25, no.44 (Jun 2009): 461–486.https://doi.org/10.1080/1042771032000147515V. Novikov The Influence of the Russian Antitrust Legislation on Economic Development, Voprosy Ekonomiki , no.99 (Sep 2003): 33–48.https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2003-9-33-48Roberto Leombruni The Methodological Status of Agent-Based Simulations, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2002).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.886671Richard E. Wagner Competition as a rivalrous process, Journal of Economic Studies 28, no.4/54/5 (Aug 2001): 337–345.https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005951Philippe Bazard Sidgwick and Edgeworth on indeterminacy in the labour market, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 7, no.33 (Oct 2010): 350–362.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672560050192099Sergio Cesaratto Long-period method and analysis of technological change: is there any inconsistency? ∗, Review of Political Economy 7, no.33 (Jul 1995): 249–278.https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259500000041Mary S. Morgan Competing Notions of “Competition” in Late Nineteenth-Century American Economics, History of Political Economy 25, no.44 (Nov 1993): 563–604.https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-25-4-563Thomas J. Dilorenzo, Jack C. High ANTITRUST and COMPETITION, HISTORICALLY CONSIDERED, Economic Inquiry 26, no.33 (Jul 1988): 423–435.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1988.tb01505.xPaul J. McNulty Competition: Austrian Conceptions, (Oct 2016): 1–3.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_141-1George J. Stigler Competition, (Oct 2016): 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_524-1Mark Blaug Classical Economics, (Oct 2016): 1–19.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_99-1Thomas J. DiLorenzo Competition, monopoly, and differential profit rates: On te relevance of the classical and Marxian theories of production prices for modern industrial, International Review of Law and Economics 6, no.11 (Jun 1986): 144–147.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(86)90051-7IAN STEEDMAN NATURAL PRICES, DIFFERENTIAL PROFIT RATES AND THE CLASSICAL COMPETITIVE PROCESS, The Manchester School 52, no.22 (Jun 1984): 123–140.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1984.tb00774.xM. S. ADDLESON General Equilibrium and ‘Competition’: On Competition as Strategy, South African Journal of Economics 52, no.22 (Jun 1984): 104–113.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1813-6982.1984.tb00828.xPeter M. Lichtenstein Extensions of the basic model, (Jan 1983): 139–148.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17344-0_10Warren S. Gramm The Selective Interpretation of Adam Smith, Journal of Economic Issues 14, no.11 (Jan 2016): 119–142.https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1980.11503726S. C. Littlechild AN ENTREPRENEURIAL THEORY OF GAMES(*), Metroeconomica 31, no.22 (Jun 1979): 145–166.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-999X.1979.tb00241.xE. F. Beach Une théorie réaliste des prix et de la production, L'Actualité économique 53, no.11 (Jun 2009): 65–81.https://doi.org/10.7202/800712arHans E. Jensen Sources and Contours of Adam Smith's Conceptualized Reality in the Wealth of Nations, Review of Social Economy 34, no.33 (Jul 2006): 259–274.https://doi.org/10.1080/00346767600000015 Literaturverzeichnis, (): 195–222.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-5349-9811-1_6
Referência(s)