Comment on Easterbrook and Fischel, "Contract and Fiduciary Duty"
1993; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 36; Issue: 1, Part 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/467283
ISSN1537-5285
Autores Tópico(s)Securities Regulation and Market Practices
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessComment on Easterbrook and Fischel, "Contract and Fiduciary Duty"Roberta RomanoRoberta RomanoPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Law and Economics Volume 36, Number 1, Part 2Apr., 1993John M. Olin Centennial Conference in Law and Economics Sponsored by The University of Chicago Booth School of Business and The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/467283 Views: 16Total views on this site Citations: 5Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1993 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Jianfeng Hu, Kelvin F.K. Low, Wei Zhang The Value of Fiduciary Duties: Evidence from En Bloc Sales in Singapore, International Review of Law and Economics 62 (Aug 2022): 106093.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2022.106093Howard Chitimira Theoretical aspects of insider trading regulation in Zimbabwe, Journal of Financial Crime 29, no.11 (Jun 2021): 389–405.https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-02-2021-0028Jianfeng Hu, Kelvin F.K. Low, Wei Zhang The Value of Fiduciary Duties: Evidence from En Bloc Sales in Singapore, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2992656Hanoch Dagan The Law and Ethics of Restitution, 99 (Jul 2009).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495496Tamar Frankel Fiduciary Duties, (Jan 2017): 785–790.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_148
Referência(s)