Recombinant DNA Technology and Its Social Transformation, 1972-1982
1986; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 2; Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/368659
ISSN1933-8287
Autores Tópico(s)CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessRecombinant DNA Technology and Its Social Transformation, 1972-1982Susan WrightSusan WrightPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Osiris Volume 2, Number 11986 Published for the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/368659 Views: 185Total views on this site Citations: 46Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1986 The History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Matthew Holmes Perspectives on biotechnology: Public and corporate narratives in the GM archives, PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET 4, no.55 (Jun 2022): 476–484.https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10283Karen Kastenhofer Natural Sciences in Academic Vienna in the 1990s: From "[Peripheral] Outpost Near the Iron Curtain" to "Central Hub", Studia Historiae Scientiarum 21 (Aug 2022).https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.22.016.15982Pamela Molina, Marbel Torres Arias Herramientas biotecnológicas en el diagnóstico, prevención y tratamiento frente a pandemias, Bionatura 3, no.33 (Aug 2021): 2091–2113.https://doi.org/10.21931/RB/2021.06.03.33Joyce C. Havstad Complexity begets crosscutting, dooms hierarchy (another paper on natural kinds), Synthese 198, no.88 (Jan 2020): 7665–7696.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02539-wRubab Shabbir, Talha Javed, Irfan Afzal, Ayman El Sabagh, Ahmad Ali, Oscar Vicente, Pinghua Chen Modern Biotechnologies: Innovative and Sustainable Approaches for the Improvement of Sugarcane Tolerance to Environmental Stresses, Agronomy 11, no.66 (May 2021): 1042.https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061042Jack A. Heinemann, Deborah J. Paull, Sophie Walker, Brigitta Kurenbach Differentiated impacts of human interventions on nature, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 9, no.11 (Mar 2021).https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00086Angela N.H. Creager Recipes for recombining DNA: A history of Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, BJHS Themes 5 (Dec 2020): 225–243.https://doi.org/10.1017/bjt.2020.5Dheeraj S. Rathore, Ewen Mullins Alternative Non‐ Agrobacterium Based Methods for Plant Transformation, (Nov 2018): 891–908.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119312994.apr0659Nathan Crowe The Historiography of Biotechnology, (Apr 2018): 1–25.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74456-8_13-1Sean P. Riley, Michael E. Woodman, Jonathan Holt, Brian Stevenson Culture of Escherichia coli and Related Bacteria, Current Protocols Essential Laboratory Techniques 15, no.11 (Nov 2017).https://doi.org/10.1002/cpet.17Brian Dick, Mark Jones The commercialization of molecular biology: Walter Gilbert and the Biogen startup, History and Technology 33, no.11 (Jun 2017): 126–151.https://doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2017.1338554Alison Kraft, Beatrix P. Rubin Changing cells: An analysis of the concept of plasticity in the context of cellular differentiation, BioSocieties 11, no.44 (Oct 2016): 497–525.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-016-0027-yElizabeth Popp Berman Not Just Neoliberalism, Science, Technology, & Human Values 39, no.33 (May 2014): 397–431.https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913509123Pablo A. Pellegrini, Anomalías en los comienzos de la transgénesis vegetal: intereses e interpretaciones en torno a las primeras plantas transgénicas, História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos 20, no.44 (Dec 2013): 1453–1471.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702013000500002Xianjun Chen, Xue Wang, Zengmin Du, Zhengcai Ma, Yi Yang Spatiotemporal Control of Gene Expression in Mammalian Cells and in Mice Using the LightOn System, Current Protocols in Chemical Biology 5, no.22 (Apr 2018): 111–129.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470559277.ch120267Alison Kraft New Light Through an Old Window? The " Translational Turn" in Biomedical Research, (May 2013).https://doi.org/10.1201/b14790-5Kenneth Dimitri Satyagraha Fernald, Tamar Cheka Weenen, Kelsey Jean Sibley, Eric Claassen Limits of Biotechnological Innovation, Technology and Investment 04, no.0303 (Jan 2013): 168–178.https://doi.org/10.4236/ti.2013.43020Hyo Yoon Kang Science Inside Law: The Making of a New Patent Class in the International Patent Classification, Science in Context 25, no.44 (Oct 2012): 551–594.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889712000233Thomas Wieland Rote Gentechnik und Öffentlichkeit: Von der Grundlegenden Skepsis zur Differenzierten Akzeptanz, (Jan 2012): 69–111.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33994-3_3Jeanette Wright, Priya Kurian Ecological modernization versus sustainable development: the case of genetic modification regulation in New Zealand, Sustainable Development 18, no.66 (Nov 2010): 398–412.https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.430Thom van Dooren Banking Seed: Use and Value in the Conservation of Agricultural Diversity, Science as Culture 18, no.44 (Dec 2009): 373–395.https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430902873975Doogab Yi The scientific commons in the marketplace: the industrialization of biomedical materials at the New England Enzyme Center, 1963–1980, History and Technology 25, no.11 (Mar 2009): 69–87.https://doi.org/10.1080/07341510802618182Doogab Yi Cancer, Viruses, and Mass Migration: Paul Berg's Venture into Eukaryotic Biology and the Advent of Recombinant DNA Research and Technology, 1967–1980, Journal of the History of Biology 41, no.44 (Feb 2008): 589–636.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-008-9149-9JON AGAR What happened in the sixties?, The British Journal for the History of Science 41, no.44 (Jul 2008): 567–600.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087408001179Carolina Roa-Rodríguez, Thom van Dooren Shifting Common Spaces of Plant Genetic Resources in the International Regulation of Property, The Journal of World Intellectual Property 11, no.33 (May 2008): 176–202.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2008.00342.xKjetil Rommetveit Towards a hermeneutic of technomedical objects, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29, no.22 (Jun 2008): 103–120.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-008-9064-2Sean P. Riley, Michael E. Woodman, Brian Stevenson Culture of Escherichia coli and Related Bacteria, Current Protocols Essential Laboratory Techniques 00, no.11 (Oct 2008): 4.2.1–4.2.25.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470089941.et0402s00Yann Devos, Pieter Maeseele, Dirk Reheul, Linda Van Speybroeck, Danny De Waele Ethics in the Societal Debate on Genetically Modified Organisms: A (Re)Quest for Sense and Sensibility, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21, no.11 (Aug 2007): 29–61.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-007-9057-6Nadia Abu El-Haj The Genetic Reinscription of Race, Annual Review of Anthropology 36, no.11 (Sep 2007): 283–300.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120522Thom Van Dooren Terminated Seed: Death, Proprietary Kinship and the Production of (Bio)Wealth, Science as Culture 16, no.11 (Mar 2007): 71–94.https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430601180912ERIC J. VETTEL The protean nature of Stanford University's biological sciences, 1946–1972, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 35, no.11 (Sep 2004): 95–113.https://doi.org/10.1525/hsps.2004.35.1.95Stephen Petrina, Kenneth Volk, Soowook Kim Technology and Rights, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 14, no.33 (Jan 2004): 181–204.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-004-0809-6Katherine D Watson Svedberg, Theodor, (May 2001).https://doi.org/10.1038/npg.els.0002925Katherine D Watson Berg, Paul, (Apr 2001).https://doi.org/10.1038/npg.els.0002735Daniel J. Kevles Principles, property rights, and profits: Historical reflections on university/industry tensions, Accountability in Research 8, no.44 (Jun 2008): 293–307.https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620108573982Paul Forman Into Quantum Electronics: The Maser as 'Gadget' of Cold-War America, (Jan 1996): 261–326.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0671-9_10John Christie The social standing of science: some contemporary history, History of the Human Sciences 8, no.22 (Jul 2016): 103–108.https://doi.org/10.1177/095269519500800207Nick Perry SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION, INNOVATION NETWORKS AND ORGANIZATION STRUCTURES*, Journal of Management Studies 30, no.66 (Nov 1993): 957–973.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00474.xFrederick H. Buttel Ideology and agricultural technology in the late twentieth century: Biotechnology as symbol and substance, Agriculture and Human Values 10, no.22 (Mar 1993): 5–15.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217599Susan Wright The Social Warp of Science: Writing the History of Genetic Engineering Policy, Science, Technology, & Human Values 18, no.11 (Aug 2016): 79–101.https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399301800105Glenn E. Bugos Intellectual Property Protection in the American Chicken–Breeding Industry, Business History Review 66, no.11 (Dec 2011): 127–168.https://doi.org/10.2307/3117055Frederick H. Buttel Beyond deference and demystification in the sociology of science and technology: A reply to Otero, Sociological Forum 6, no.33 (Sep 1991): 567–577.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01114477Andrew Webster Exploiting Science and Technology (I), (Jan 1991): 60–93.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21875-2_4Andrew Webster Exploiting Science and Technology (II), (Jan 1991): 94–125.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21875-2_5Frederick H. Buttel How epoch making are high technologies? The case of biotechnology, Sociological Forum 4, no.22 (Jun 1989): 247–261.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112424Burke K. Zimmerman Commentary on Kawar and Sherlock, Politics and the Life Sciences 7, no.22 (May 2016): 148–153.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0730938400004202
Referência(s)