Post-transcriptional Up-regulation of ADAM17 upon Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Activation and in Breast Tumors
2007; Elsevier BV; Volume: 282; Issue: 11 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1074/jbc.m608826200
ISSN1083-351X
AutoresBelé n Santiago-Josefat, Cary Esselens, Joan Josep Bech‐Serra, Joaquı́n Arribas,
Tópico(s)Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
ResumoADAM17 is a transmembrane metalloprotease involved in the proteolytic release of the extracellular domain of many cell surface molecules, a process known as ectodomain shedding. Despite its likely participation in tumor progression and its current consideration as a therapeutic target, very little is known about the regulation of the expression of ADAM17. Here we show that long term treatment with epidermal growth factor (EGF) leads to a marked increase in the levels of ADAM17. EGF receptor activation does not affect the levels of the mRNA that encodes for, or the rate of synthesis of, ADAM17 but increases its half-life. The effect of EGF is biologically relevant because it increases the shedding of several substrates of ADAM17, including the desmosomal cadherin Dsg-2. Analysis of protein and mRNA levels in mammary tumor samples shows that in vivo the levels of ADAM17 can also be controlled post-transcriptionally. Finally, we show that both the shed extracellular domains of Dsg-2 and ADAM17 are frequently expressed in tumors, further supporting the participation of the metalloprotease in malignant progression. ADAM17 is a transmembrane metalloprotease involved in the proteolytic release of the extracellular domain of many cell surface molecules, a process known as ectodomain shedding. Despite its likely participation in tumor progression and its current consideration as a therapeutic target, very little is known about the regulation of the expression of ADAM17. Here we show that long term treatment with epidermal growth factor (EGF) leads to a marked increase in the levels of ADAM17. EGF receptor activation does not affect the levels of the mRNA that encodes for, or the rate of synthesis of, ADAM17 but increases its half-life. The effect of EGF is biologically relevant because it increases the shedding of several substrates of ADAM17, including the desmosomal cadherin Dsg-2. Analysis of protein and mRNA levels in mammary tumor samples shows that in vivo the levels of ADAM17 can also be controlled post-transcriptionally. Finally, we show that both the shed extracellular domains of Dsg-2 and ADAM17 are frequently expressed in tumors, further supporting the participation of the metalloprotease in malignant progression. The ADAMs 2The abbreviations used are: ADAM, a disintegrin and metalloprotease; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGFR, EGF receptor; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; APP, amyloid precursor protein; ALCAM, activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule; Dsg-2, desmoglein-2. 2The abbreviations used are: ADAM, a disintegrin and metalloprotease; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGFR, EGF receptor; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; APP, amyloid precursor protein; ALCAM, activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule; Dsg-2, desmoglein-2. constitute a large family of transmembrane proteases involved in different physiological processes, including fertilization, heart development, angiogenesis, and neurogenesis (1Kheradmand F. Werb Z. BioEssays. 2002; 24: 8-12Crossref PubMed Scopus (108) Google Scholar, 2White J.M. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2003; 15: 598-606Crossref PubMed Scopus (348) Google Scholar). Structurally, ADAMs are modular proteins containing the following recognizable domains: signal peptide, prodomain, cysteine-rich, epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like, transmembrane, and cytoplasmic (3Seals D.F. Courtneidge S.A. Genes Dev. 2003; 17: 7-30Crossref PubMed Scopus (881) Google Scholar). The prodomain, which keeps the enzyme in an inactive state, is typically removed during transit through the secretory pathway; thus, the metalloprotease reaches the plasma membrane in an active state. At the cell surface, certain ADAMs participate in the proteolytic removal of the ectodomain of a significant number of membrane-anchored proteins. This specialized type of proteolysis is known as ectodomain shedding and affects different cell surface molecules, including growth factors, growth factor receptors, and cell adhesion molecules (4Arribas J. Borroto A. Chem. Rev. 2002; 102: 4627-4638Crossref PubMed Scopus (205) Google Scholar).Increasing evidence points to a role of certain ADAMs, particularly the 17th member of the family, in the development of certain tumors (5Blobel C.P. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005; 6: 32-43Crossref PubMed Scopus (909) Google Scholar). ADAM17, also know as tumor necrosis factor-α-converting enzyme, participates in the activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and related receptors (6Sahin U. Weskamp G. Kelly K. Zhou H.M. Higashiyama S. Peschon J. Hartmann D. Saftig P. Blobel C.P. J. Cell Biol. 2004; 164: 769-779Crossref PubMed Scopus (772) Google Scholar), which play a crucial role in the development of different tumors of epidermal origin (7Citri A. Yarden Y. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006; 7: 505-516Crossref PubMed Scopus (1578) Google Scholar). All the ligands for the EGFR are synthesized as transmembrane molecules (8Harris R.C. Chung E. Coffey R.J. Exp. Cell Res. 2003; 284: 2-13Crossref PubMed Scopus (601) Google Scholar), and the inhibition of the shedding of their extracellular domains, carried out by ADAM17 and other ADAMs, prevents the activation of the EGFR in different experimental settings (see for example Refs. 9Dong J. Opresko L.K. Dempsey P.J. Lauffenburger D.A. Coffey R.J. Wiley H.S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999; 96: 6235-6240Crossref PubMed Scopus (214) Google Scholar, 10Gschwind A. Hart S. Fischer O.M. Ullrich A. EMBO J. 2003; 22: 2411-2421Crossref PubMed Scopus (281) Google Scholar, 11Zhou B.B. Peyton M. He B. Liu C. Girard L. Caudler E. Lo Y. Baribaud F. Mikami I. Reguart N. Yang G. Li Y. Yao W. Vaddi K. Gazdar A.F. Friedman S.M. Jablons D.M. Newton R.C. Fridman J.S. Minna J.D. Scherle P.A. Cancer Cell. 2006; 10: 39-50Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (316) Google Scholar). Therefore, metalloprotease inhibitors targeting ADAM17 have been proposed as anti-tumor drugs (reviewed in Ref. 12Hynes N.E. Schlange T. Cancer Cell. 2006; 10: 7-11Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar).Despite its importance, the regulation of the expression of ADAM17 remains poorly characterized. Certain cytokines and growth factors up-regulate the transcription of ADAM17 in endothelial and human monocyte-like cells (13Bzowska M. Jura N. Lassak A. Black R.A. Bereta J. Eur. J. Biochem. 2004; 271: 2808-2820Crossref PubMed Scopus (52) Google Scholar, 14Worley J.R. Baugh M.D. Hughes D.A. Edwards D.R. Hogan A. Sampson M.J. Gavrilovic J. J. Biol. Chem. 2003; 278: 51340-51346Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar). On the other hand, the expression of ADAM17 can be post-transcriptionally down-modulated by phorbol esters and interferons (15Doedens J.R. Black R.A. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 14598-14607Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar, 16Obeid D. Nguyen J. Lesavre P. Bauvois B. Oncogene. 2006; 26: 102-110Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar). However, the mechanisms and factors that increase the transcription or those that mediate the down-modulation of ADAM17 are unknown and remain uncharacterized. Despite this lack of knowledge, the analysis of its expression in human tumors also points to the participation of ADAM17 in malignant progression (recently reviewed in Ref. 17Arribas J. Bech-Serra J.J. Santiago-Josefat B. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006; 25: 57-68Crossref PubMed Scopus (108) Google Scholar). For example, ADAM17 mRNA levels are increased in different types of human tumors (18Ding X. Yang L.Y. Huang G.W. Wang W. Lu W.Q. World J. Gastroenterol. 2004; 10: 2735-2739Crossref PubMed Scopus (66) Google Scholar, 19Karan D. Lin F.C. Bryan M. Ringel J. Moniaux N. Lin M.F. Batra S.K. Int. J. Oncol. 2003; 23: 1365-1371PubMed Google Scholar, 20Tanaka Y. Miyamoto S. Suzuki S.O. Oki E. Yagi H. Sonoda K. Yamazaki A. Mizushima H. Maehara Y. Mekada E. Nakano H. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005; 11: 4783-4792Crossref PubMed Scopus (149) Google Scholar, 21Roemer A. Schwettmann L. Jung M. Roigas J. Kristiansen G. Schnorr D. Loening S.A. Jung K. Lichtinghagen R. Oncol. Rep. 2004; 11: 529-536PubMed Google Scholar, 22Yoshimura T. Tomita T. Dixon M.F. Axon A.T. Robinson P.A. Crabtree J.E. J. Infect. Dis. 2002; 185: 332-340Crossref PubMed Scopus (77) Google Scholar, 23Blanchot-Jossic F. Jarry A. Masson D. Bach-Ngohou K. Paineau J. Denis M.G. Laboisse C.L. Mosnier J.F. J. Pathol. 2005; 207: 156-163Crossref PubMed Scopus (114) Google Scholar). Furthermore, although we did not analyze mRNA levels, we have recently found that ADAM17 protein levels are dramatically augmented in the majority of breast cancer samples analyzed (24Borrell-Pagès M. Rojo F. Albanell J. Baselga J. Arribas J. EMBO J. 2003; 22: 1114-1124Crossref PubMed Scopus (239) Google Scholar).Here we show that long term treatment of different cells with EGF leads to a marked increase in the levels of ADAM17. EGFR activation does not affect the levels of the mRNA or the rate of synthesis of ADAM17 but increases its half-life. The effect of EGF on ADAM17 is biologically relevant because it increases the shedding of different substrates of the metalloprotease, including the desmosomal cadherin desmoglein-2. Analysis of ADAM17 protein and mRNA levels in mammary tumor samples shows that in vivo the levels of the metalloprotease can also be controlled post-transcriptionally. Finally, we show that both the shed extracellular domains of Dsg-2 and ADAM17 are frequently expressed in tumors, further supporting the participation of the metalloprotease in malignant progression.EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURESReagents and Antibodies—BB-94 and recombinant EGF were obtained from British Biotech and R&D Systems, respectively. Iressa was purchased from AstraZeneca R&D (Wilmington, DE). [α-32P]dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol) was from Amersham Biosciences. Endoglycosidase H (Endo H) was from Roche Applied Science. The polyclonal antibodies against the intracellular domains of ADAM17 and ADAM10 have been described previously (25Bech-Serra J.J. Santiago-Josefat B. Esselens C. Saftig P. Baselga J. Arribas J. Canals F. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006; 26: 5086-5095Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar). The monoclonal antibody against the extracellular domain of Dsg-2 was from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Anti-APP antibody was from Chemicon, and anti-ALCAM was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Mouse IgM anti-actin antibody was from Oncogene Research Products (San Diego, CA). Anti-phospho-MAPK and anti-MAPK were from Cell Signaling. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were purchased from Amersham Biosciences. All other chemicals were from Sigma. Furin inhibitor II was from Calbiochem.Cell Culture and Treatments with EGF—A431 and T47D cells (ATCC) were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium:F-12 medium (1:1) containing 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum and 2 mm l-glutamine. MCF7 Tet-Off cells (BD Biosciences) were stably transfected with the pUHD10-3 Hyg vector containing mouse ADAM17 under a doxycycline-responsive promoter. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum on 0.25% gelatin-precoated cell culture plates.For EGF treatments, A431 and T47D cells were plated at a density of 2 × 104 cells/cm2. After 24 h, cells were serum-starved for an additional 24 h and then treated with 50 ng/ml EGF, 1 μm Iressa (also known as ZD1839), 10 μm BB-94, or 20 μg/ml cycloheximide as indicated for different periods of time. The cells were then lysed as indicated below. When indicated, cells were also treated with 100 μm chloroquine, 10 μm MG132, or 10 μm BB-94 for different times. Potassium depletion was performed as described in Ref. 26Larkin J.M. Brown M.S. Goldstein J.L. Anderson R.G. Cell. 1983; 33: 273-285Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (339) Google Scholar.Immunoblotting—Cells or tissue samples were lysed in lysis buffer (50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8, 10 mm EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 150 mm NaCl, 10 μg/ml aprotinin, 10 μg/ml leupeptin, 10 mm 1,10-phenanthroline, 1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 15 min, and proteins in the supernatant were quantified. For Dsg-2 fractionation analysis, Triton-insoluble pellets were solubilized in 10 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1% SDS, 8 m urea. Equal amounts of total protein were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes for Western blot analysis. Conditioned media were collected and concentrated with wheat germ agglutinin-agarose beads (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 2 h at 4 °C, which were eluted directly in SDS-PAGE sample buffer for Western blot analysis. Endoglycosidase H treatments were performed as in Ref. 27Borroto A. Ruiz-Paz S. Villanueva de la Torre T. Borrell-Pages M. Merlos-Suarez A. Pandiella A. Blobel C.P. Baselga J. Arribas J. J. Biol. Chem. 2003; 278: 25933-25939Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar.Biotinylation—Serum-starved A431 cells were treated with 50 ng/ml EGF for different times, shifted to 4 °C, and labeled at the same temperature during 30 min with 1 mg/ml Sulfo-NHS-LC-Biotin (Pierce). The cells were then lysed or washed three times with a quenching solution (phosphate-buffered saline containing 1 mm CaCl2, 0.5 mm MgCl2, and 100 mm glycine) and incubated at 37 °C for different times in the absence or presence of 50 ng/ml EGF and lysed. Biotinylated proteins were isolated from cell lysates with neutravidin beads and analyzed by anti-ADAM17 immunoblotting.Reverse Transcription-PCR—Total RNA was isolated from cultured cells or tissue samples using RNeasy midi kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was reverse-transcribed using Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Ambion). Human ADAM17 cDNA was amplified with the following primers: GCACAGGTAATAGCAGTGAGT (forward) and CTCAGCATTTCGACGTTACTG (reverse). Human β-actin cDNA was amplified using the following primers: CCTGACCGAGCGTGGCTAC (forward) and GAAGCATTTGCGGTGGACG (reverse).Northern Blot—6 μg of total RNA were electrophoresed on a 1% (w/v) agarose gel containing 2.2 m formaldehyde. The RNA was then transferred onto nylon membranes (Hybond-N; Amersham Biosciences). The blots were prehybridized at 65 °C for 2 h in Rapid-hyb buffer (Amersham Biosciences) before hybridization for 16 h at 65 °C with [α-32P]dCTP-labeled DNA probe produced using Ready-to-Go DNA labeling beads (Amersham Biosciences). After stringent washing steps, the blots were exposed to a PhosphorImaging screen.Metabolic Labeling and ADAM17 Immunoprecipitation—∼2 × 104 cells/cm2 exponentially growing A431 cells were serum-starved and treated with EGF for different times, washed twice with methionine- and cysteine-free medium, and incubated for 30 min in medium supplemented with 1 mCi/ml Tran35S-label (Biolink 2000; Arlington Heights, IL). The cells were then washed and lysed in lysis buffer. Lysates were counted and normalized. Equal counts were precleared by incubation with protein A-agarose for 1 h at 4 °C. Precleared extracts were immunoprecipitated overnight at 4 °C with polyclonal anti-ADAM17 antibody, followed by a 1-h incubation at 4 °C with protein A-agarose. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.Tumor Samples and Immunohistochemistry—The breast tissue samples used in this study were surgical resection specimens obtained at the Vall d’Hebron University Hospital following institutional guidelines. For immunohistochemistry analysis, tumor samples were fixed in 10% neutral formalin following the standard procedures and stained with a polyclonal antibody against the cytoplasmic tail of ADAM17.RESULTSPost-transcriptional Up-regulation of ADAM17 by EGF—Despite the very high levels of expression of ADAM17 in the majority of breast tumors analyzed (24Borrell-Pagès M. Rojo F. Albanell J. Baselga J. Arribas J. EMBO J. 2003; 22: 1114-1124Crossref PubMed Scopus (239) Google Scholar), the mechanism of up-regulation has not been characterized. In search for a model cell line for characterizing the regulation of ADAM17 expression, we used T47D and A431 cells because, compared with a panel of cell lines, they express moderate and low levels of the metalloprotease, respectively (25Bech-Serra J.J. Santiago-Josefat B. Esselens C. Saftig P. Baselga J. Arribas J. Canals F. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006; 26: 5086-5095Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar). Treatment with different agonists, including vitamin D3, retinoic acid, estradiol, phorbol esters, dexamethasone, or transforming growth factor-β, lead to little or no variations in the levels of ADAM17 as judged by Western blotting (data not shown). In contrast, prolonged treatment with EGF induced a 2-fold and a 5-fold increase in the levels of ADAM17 in T47D and A431 cells, respectively (data not shown and Fig. 1A). Because the levels of EGFR in A431 cells are very high compared with those in T47D cells (28Moasser M.M. Basso A. Averbuch S.D. Rosen N. Cancer Res. 2001; 61: 7184-7188PubMed Google Scholar), this result suggests that, indeed, the activation of the EGFR could lead to the up-regulation of ADAM17. To confirm this conclusion, we treated cells with EGF and Iressa, a specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets the EGFR. As shown in Fig. 1B, Iressa effectively prevented the up-regulation of ADAM17 by EGF. As a control we analyzed the levels of phospho-MAPK, a well characterized downstream target of activated EGFR (7Citri A. Yarden Y. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006; 7: 505-516Crossref PubMed Scopus (1578) Google Scholar).Because most, if not all, shedding events carried out by ADAM17 take place at the cell surface (29Arribas J. Merlos-Suárez A. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2003; 5: 125-144Crossref Google Scholar), intracellular ADAM17, even when processed, is likely biologically inactive. To analyze the subcellular localization of ADAM17 in cells treated with EGF, we performed biotinylation experiments. In agreement with previous reports (27Borroto A. Ruiz-Paz S. Villanueva de la Torre T. Borrell-Pages M. Merlos-Suarez A. Pandiella A. Blobel C.P. Baselga J. Arribas J. J. Biol. Chem. 2003; 278: 25933-25939Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar), only mature ADAM17 can be detected at the cell surface (Fig. 1C); pro-ADAM17 is intracellular and localizes largely to the early secretory pathway. As shown in Fig. 1C, treatment with EGF leads to a marked increase of ADAM17 at the cell surface, where it can cleave its substrates.EGFR activation frequently leads to the transcriptional activation of target genes (7Citri A. Yarden Y. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006; 7: 505-516Crossref PubMed Scopus (1578) Google Scholar). Therefore, we analyzed the steady-state levels of the mRNA encoding ADAM17 in cells treated with EGF. Analysis, both by Northern blotting and reverse transcription-PCR, showed a slight increase in the levels of the mRNA encoding ADAM17 at 60 h of treatment with EGF (Fig. 2A and data not shown). However, because the increase in protein levels is readily apparent at 24 h (see Fig. 1A), we conclude that the up-regulation of ADAM17 by EGF does not primarily affect the levels of mRNA and therefore is post-transcriptional. To confirm this conclusion, we analyzed the outcome of increasing the transcription of ADAM17. As shown in Fig. 2B, induction of mRNA expression by treating with doxycycline a cell line transfected with ADAM17 under the control of a repressible promoter (Tet-Off) leads to the accumulation of pro-ADAM17 and little or no increase of ADAM17 (Fig. 2B). This result is in agreement with recent results showing that transfection of ADAM17 in different cell lines, including A431, leads to the specific accumulation of the proform of the metalloprotease in the early secretory pathway (25Bech-Serra J.J. Santiago-Josefat B. Esselens C. Saftig P. Baselga J. Arribas J. Canals F. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006; 26: 5086-5095Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar, 27Borroto A. Ruiz-Paz S. Villanueva de la Torre T. Borrell-Pages M. Merlos-Suarez A. Pandiella A. Blobel C.P. Baselga J. Arribas J. J. Biol. Chem. 2003; 278: 25933-25939Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar, 30Villanueva de la Torre T. Bech-Serra J.J. Ruiz-Paz S. Baselga J. Arribas J. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004; 314: 1028-1035Crossref PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar). In contrast, treatment with EGF leads to the predominant accumulation of processed ADAM17 (Fig. 2B), further supporting that the mechanism involved is not transcriptional.FIGURE 2Effect of EGF on ADAM17 mRNA levels. Serum-starved A431 cells were incubated in media with or without (NA) 50 ng/ml EGF. At the indicated time points cells were lysed, and total RNA was purified and analyzed by Northern blot with radioactively labeled ADAM17 or actin probes followed by autoradiography (A). B, MCF7 cells expressing the ADAM17 cDNA under the control of a Tet-Off system (left) or A431 cells (right) were treated for 24 h with or without doxycycline (Doxo) or EGF, respectively, and lysed. Cell lysates were analyzed by Western blot with antibodies against the intracellular domain of ADAM17. To confirm similar protein loading (LC), Ponceau S staining of the blot (left) or Western blot with anti-actin antibodies (right) are shown.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)EGF Does Not Affect the Rate of Synthesis of ADAM17 but Increases Its Half-life—To further characterize the effect of EGF, we first analyzed the rate of synthesis of ADAM17 in the presence of this growth factor. Thus, we treated cells with or without EGF and followed the levels of the metalloprotease by metabolic labeling and immunoprecipitation. The synthesis of ADAM17 was unaffected by treatment with EGF at the different time points examined (Fig. 3A), indicating that an increase in the translation of the mRNA encoding the metalloprotease is not the main mechanism of up-regulation.FIGURE 3Effect of EGF on the biosynthesis and degradation of ADAM17. A, serum-starved A431 cells were treated without or with EGF for the indicated times. The cells were then metabolically labeled for 30 min and lysed, and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-ADAM17 or nonspecific IgG (C) antibodies. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. B, serum-starved A431 cells were treated with or without (NA) EGF for 24 h and treated with cycloheximide for the indicated times and lysed. Cell lysates were analyzed by Western blot with anti-ADAM17 antibodies and quantified. C, serum-starved A431 cells were treated with or without (NA) EGF for 24 h, shifted to 4 °C, and labeled with Sulfo-NHS-LC-Biotin to specifically modify cell surface proteins. The cells were then shifted back to 37 °C, and the treatment with or without EGF was continued for the indicated times. Then the cells were lysed, and biotinylated proteins were concentrated with immobilized neutravidin and analyzed by Western blot with antibodies against ADAM17. The results of four independent experiments were quantified, and the averages ± S.D. of the results are represented (*, Student’s t test values (p < 0.005)).View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)To assay the half-life of ADAM17, we performed a pulse-chase experiment. Unfortunately, even in the presence of EGF, labeled ADAM17 could not be detected after 6 h of labeling (data not shown), probably because of the low affinity of the antibodies available. This technical problem is complicated by the low levels of expression of ADAM17 in A431 cells (25Bech-Serra J.J. Santiago-Josefat B. Esselens C. Saftig P. Baselga J. Arribas J. Canals F. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006; 26: 5086-5095Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar). As an alternative method to analyze the half-life of ADAM17, we used cycloheximide, a compound that inhibits protein synthesis and therefore allows us to monitor the fate of proteins by Western blot. As shown in Fig. 3B, in cells treated with cycloheximide, the half-life of pro-ADAM17 is ∼4 h, and the levels of ADAM17 are reduced ∼20% during the same period. These results are in agreement with the half-life of ADAM17 as described previously in COS and Chinese hamster ovary cells (27Borroto A. Ruiz-Paz S. Villanueva de la Torre T. Borrell-Pages M. Merlos-Suarez A. Pandiella A. Blobel C.P. Baselga J. Arribas J. J. Biol. Chem. 2003; 278: 25933-25939Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar, 31Schloöndorff J. Becherer J.D. Blobel C.P. Biochem. J. 2000; 347: 131-138Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Treatment of cells with EGF and cycloheximide did not have any effect on the half-life of pro-ADAM17 but prevented the degradation of ADAM17. This result clearly indicates that the effect of EGF is because of an inhibition of the degradation of ADAM17. Unfortunately, this analysis could not be performed at longer time points because of the toxic effects of cycloheximide.To confirm these results with an independent technique, we monitored the levels of cell surface ADAM17 labeled with biotin in a time course experiment. Consistent with published reports (15Doedens J.R. Black R.A. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 14598-14607Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar), the half-life of biotin-labeled ADAM17 in untreated cells is ∼24 h (Fig. 3C). Treatment with EGF clearly increased the half-life of biotinylated ADAM17, further supporting that the increase in the levels observed is because of an inhibition of the degradation of this metalloprotease.EGF Activates the Shedding of Different ADAM17 Substrates—To determine whether the effect of EGF is functionally relevant, and results in the activation of the proteolytic activity of ADAM17, we analyzed the levels of the cell-associated and soluble forms of several substrates of this metalloprotease. We chose APP, ALCAM, and Dsg-2 because they are endogenously expressed by A431 cells (25Bech-Serra J.J. Santiago-Josefat B. Esselens C. Saftig P. Baselga J. Arribas J. Canals F. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006; 26: 5086-5095Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar, 32Slack B.E. Breu J. Muchnicki L. Wurtman R.J. Biochem. J. 1997; 327: 245-249Crossref PubMed Scopus (52) Google Scholar). ADAM17 is responsible for the shedding of ALCAM (25Bech-Serra J.J. Santiago-Josefat B. Esselens C. Saftig P. Baselga J. Arribas J. Canals F. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006; 26: 5086-5095Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar), whereas both ADAM17 and ADAM10 are involved in the shedding of APP and Dsg-2 (25Bech-Serra J.J. Santiago-Josefat B. Esselens C. Saftig P. Baselga J. Arribas J. Canals F. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006; 26: 5086-5095Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar, 33Lammich S. Kojro E. Postina R. Gilbert S. Pfeiffer R. Jasionowski M. Haass C. Fahrenholz F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999; 96: 3922-3927Crossref PubMed Scopus (977) Google Scholar, 34Buxbaum J.D. Liu K.N. Luo Y. Slack J.L. Stocking K.L. Peschon J.J. Johnson R.S. Castner B.J. Cerretti D.P. Black R.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 27765-27767Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (834) Google Scholar, 35Merlos-Suárez A. Fernández-Larrea J. Reddy P. Baselga J. Arribas J. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 24955-24962Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar). Concomitantly with the increase in the levels of ADAM17 (Fig. 4D), treatment of A431 cells with EGF leads to an increase in the levels of the soluble forms of Dsg-2, ALCAM, and APP (Fig. 4, A-C). As expected, the increments in the production of soluble extracellular domains are readily prevented by treatment with the metalloprotease inhibitor BB-94 (Fig. 4, A-C), indicating that they are because of increased levels of ectodomain shedding. Despite the fact that ADAM10 can also act on APP and Dsg-2, the increase in the shedding of these molecules is likely attributable to ADAM17, because EGF has no effect on the levels of ADAM10 (Fig. 4D). These results indicate that the up-regulation of ADAM17 by EGF leads to an increase in the shedding of the substrates analyzed.FIGURE 4Effect of EGF on the shedding of Dsg-2, ALCAM, and APP and on the levels of ADAM17 and ADAM10. A431 cells were treated with or without EGF and BB-94 as indicated for 24 h. The cells were then lysed and conditioned media and cell lysates analyzed by Western blot with antibodies against the extracellular domains of Dsg-2 (A), ALCAM (B), or APP (C), or against the intracellular domains of ADAM17 or ADAM10 (D) as indicated.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)Expression of ADAM17 mRNA in Breast Cancer Samples—Despite the very high levels of expression of ADAM17 in some breast tumors (Fig. 5, A and B), the mechanism of up-regulation is unknown (24Borrell-Pagès M. Rojo F. Albanell J. Baselga J. Arribas J. EMBO J. 2003; 22: 1114-1124Crossref PubMed Scopus (239) Google Scholar); to characterize it, we analyzed the levels of the mRNA encoding the metalloprotease by reverse transcription-PCR and Northern blot in 15 tumor samples and matched normal tissue. Both techniques showed little or no increase of ADAM17 mRNA in tumor samples (Fig. 5, C and D and data not shown). Because of the low availability of normal tissue, note that the corresponding lanes are underloaded in the Northern blot shown in Fig. 5D; however, normalization of the quantitative data confirmed little or no
Referência(s)