Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Managing science: Is the Cudos still in place?

2008; Wiley; Volume: 3; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/biot.200800029

1860-7314

Konstantinos Karachalios,

Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development

Biotechnology JournalVolume 3, Issue 3 p. 306-310 ForumFree Access Managing science: Is the Cudos still in place? Konstantinos Karachalios Dr., Konstantinos Karachalios Dr. constantin@epo.org Search for more papers by this author Konstantinos Karachalios Dr., Konstantinos Karachalios Dr. constantin@epo.org Search for more papers by this author First published: 18 March 2008 https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.200800029Citations: 2AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES 1 Merton, R. K., The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action. Am. Soc. Rev. 1936, 1, 894– 904. 2 Reichman, J. H., Of Green Tulips and Legal Kudzu: Repackaging Rights in Subpatentable Innovation. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 2000, 53, 1743– 1798. 3 Gurry, F., The Cambrian Explosion. IIC. Int. Rev. Intellectual Prop. Competition Law 2007, 38, 255– 258. 4 Deleuze, G., Guattari, F.: Capitalisme et Schizophrénie: Milles Plateaux, Minuit, Paris 1980. 5 Merton, R. K.: The normative structure of science, in: Merton, R. K. (Ed.), The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1973. 6 Ziman, J.: Real Science: What it is, and what it means. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000. 7 Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L., The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ''Mode 2'' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Res. Policy 2000 29, 109– 123. 8 Anders, G.: Über die Antiquiertheit des Menschen. C. H. Beck Verlag, Munich 1956. 9 Arti, K. R., Regulating scientific research: IPRs and the norms of science. Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. 1999 94 77– 152. 10 Strathern, M.: Protecting channels of communication: Some challenges from the Pacific. Annual Conference on New Directions in Copyright; Theme 4: 'Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Culture', June 2004, Birkbeck, University of London, London 2004. 11 Biagioli, M., From Print to Patents: Living on Instruments in Early Modern Europe, 1500–1800. Hist. of Sci. 2006, 44, 139– 186. 12 Heller, M. A., Eisenberg, R. S., Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 1998, 280, 698– 701. 13 Rutz, B., Synthetic biology through the prism of scenarios. Biotechnol. J. 2007, 2, 1072– 1075. 14 Popper, K.: The World of Parmenides – Essays on the Presocratic Enlightenment. Routledge, London 1998. 15 Kuhn, T.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1962. 16 Whittall, T., The forensic use of DNA: Scientific success story, ethical minefield. Biotechnol. J. 2008 3, 303– 305. 17 Scenarios for the Future, European Patent Office, Munich, 2007. 18 Whittall, Biotechnol. J. 2008, 3, 303– 305. DOI: 10.1002/biot.200800018. 19 Karachalios, Biotechnol. J. 2008, 3, 306– 310. DOI: 10.1002/biot.200800029. Citing Literature Volume3, Issue3Special Issue: Methods and Advances in BiotechMarch 2008Pages 306-310 ReferencesRelatedInformation