Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

A Survey of Audiological Practices in the United States

1994; American Speech–Language–Hearing Association; Volume: 3; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1044/1059-0889.0302.20

1558-9137

Frederick N. Martin, Tracy Woodrick Armstrong, Craig A. Champlin,

Noise Effects and Management

No AccessAmerican Journal of AudiologyClinical Focus: Grand Rounds1 Jul 1994A Survey of Audiological Practices in the United States Frederick N. Martin, Tracy Woodrick Armstrong and Craig A. ChamplinPhD Frederick N. Martin The University of Texas at Austin Google Scholar More articles by this author , Tracy Woodrick Armstrong Audicles Hearing Aid Services of San Antonio Google Scholar More articles by this author and Craig A. Champlin The University of Texas at Austin Program in Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712-1089 Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889.0302.20 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1974). The audiologist: Responsibilities in the habilitation of the auditorily handicapped.Asha, 16, 68–70. Google Scholar American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1978). Guidelines for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry.Asha, 20, 297–301. MedlineGoogle Scholar American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1988). Guidelines for determining threshold level for speech.Asha, 30, 85–88. MedlineGoogle Scholar American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1992a). External auditory canal examination and cerumen management.Asha, 34, (Suppl. 7), 22–24. Google Scholar American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1992b). Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring.Asha, 34 (Suppl. 7), 34–36. Google Scholar Martin, F. N., & Forbis, N. K. (1978). The present status of audiometric practice: A follow-up study.Asha, 20, 531–541. Google Scholar Martin, F. N., & Morris, L. J. (1989). Current audiologic practices in the United States.The Hearing Journal, 42, 25–44. Google Scholar Martin, F. N., & Pennington, C. D. (1971). Current trends in audiometric practice.Asha, 13, 671–677. Google Scholar Martin, F. N., & Sides, D. G. (1985). Survey of current audiometric practices.Asha, 27, 29–36. MedlineGoogle Scholar Pennington, C. D., & Martin, F. N. (1972). Current trends in audiometric practices: Part II—Auditory tests for site of lesion.Asha, 14, 199–203. Google Scholar Thornton, A. R., & Raffin, M. J. (1978). Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, 507–518. LinkGoogle Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByAmerican Journal of Audiology29:3 (491-503)3 Sep 2020Validation of a Bilateral Simultaneous Computer-Based TympanometerHlologelo Ramatsoma and Dirk KoekemoerAmerican Journal of Audiology24:1 (53-65)1 Mar 2015How “Proficient” Is Proficient? Bilingual Listeners' Recognition of English Words in NoiseLu-Feng ShiAmerican Journal of Audiology21:1 (60-75)1 Jun 2012Survey of Audiological Immittance PracticesDiana C. Emanuel, Olivia E. C. Henson and Rita R. KnappJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research55:3 (879-891)1 Jun 2012Psychometric Functions for Shortened Administrations of a Speech Recognition Approach Using Tri-Word Presentations and Phonemic ScoringStanley A. Gelfand and Jessica T. GelfandAmerican Journal of Audiology20:1 (19-32)1 Jun 2011How “Proficient” Is Proficient? Subjective Proficiency as a Predictor of Bilingual Listeners’ Recognition of English WordsLu-Feng ShiAmerican Journal of Audiology20:2 (84-89)1 Dec 2011Survey of Audiologic Service Provision to Older Adults With Cochlear ImplantsJessica Rossi-Katz and Kathryn Hoberg ArehartJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research46:2 (405-412)1 Apr 2003Tri-Word Presentations With Phonemic Scoring for Practical High-Reliability Speech Recognition AssessmentStanley A. GelfandJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research46:4 (889-900)1 Aug 2003Development of Materials for the Clinical Assessment of Speech RecognitionJoseph H. Bochner, Wayne M. Garrison, Joan E. Sussman and Robert F. BurkardAmerican Journal of Audiology9:2 (59-62)1 Dec 2000Speech and Language Screening for AudiologistsMary Pannbacker, Barbara Batchelor and Lori BinderimJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research43:4 (879-892)1 Aug 2000Prescribed Clinician-Fit Versus As-Worn Coupler Gain in a Group of Elderly Hearing-Aid WearersLarry E. Humes, Nancy N. Barlow, Carolyn B. Garner and Dana L. WilsonAmerican Journal of Audiology8:2 (106-116)1 Dec 1999Clinical Masking in Speech AudiometryWilliam S. YaculloAmerican Journal of Audiology7:2 (55-60)1 Oct 1998Tympanometric Screening Norms for AdultsChristina M. Roup, Terry L. Wiley, Staci H. Safady and Daniel T. StoppenbachJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research41:5 (1088-1102)1 Oct 1998Optimizing the Reliability of Speech Recognition ScoresStanley A. GelfandAmerican Journal of Audiology4:3 (36-48)1 Nov 1995Modality Specificity as a Criterion for Diagnosing Central Auditory Processing DisordersDennis J. McFarland and Anthony T. CacaceJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research38:2 (490-502)1 Apr 1995Confidence Limits for Maximum Word-Recognition ScoresJudy R. Dubno, Fu-Shing Lee, Alan J. Klein, Lois J. Matthews and Chan F. Lam Volume 3Issue 2July 1994Pages: 20-26 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library HistoryReceived: Feb 14, 1993Accepted: Feb 11, 1994 Published in issue: Jul 1, 1994 Metrics Downloaded 63 times Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesKeywordscurrent proceduresaudiological practicescertified audiologistsCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1994 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF DownloadLoading ...