Artigo Revisado por pares

Ionization chamber volume averaging effects in dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy beams

2003; Wiley; Volume: 30; Issue: 7 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1118/1.1582558

ISSN

2473-4209

Autores

Daniel A. Low, Parag J. Parikh, James F. Dempsey, Sasha H. Wahab, Saiful Huq,

Tópico(s)

Radiation Effects and Dosimetry

Resumo

The commercial cylindrical ionization chamber ionization integration accuracy of dynamically moving fields was evaluated. The ionization chambers were exposed to long (14 cm), narrow (0.6, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 cm) 6 MV and 18 MV fields. Rather than rely on the linear accelerator to reproducibly scan across the chamber, the chambers were scanned beneath fixed portals. A water‐equivalent phantom was constructed with cavities that matched the chambers and placed on a computer‐controlled one‐dimensional table. Computer‐controlled electrometers were utilized in continuous charge integrate mode, with 10 samples of the charge, along with time stamps, acquired for each chamber location. A reference chamber was placed just beneath the linear accelerator jaws to adjust for variations in linear accelerator dose rate. The scan spatial resolution was selected to adequately sample regions of steep dose gradient and second spatial derivative (curvature). A fixed measurement in a field was used to normalize the profiles to absolute chamber response. Three ionization chambers were tested, a microchamber a Farmer chamber and a waterproof scanning chamber The larger chambers exhibited severe under‐response at the small field's centers, but all of the chambers, independent of orientation, accurately integrated the ionization across the scanned portal. This indicates that the tested ionization chambers provide accurate integrated charges in regions of homogeneous dose regions. Partial integration (less than the field width plus the chamber length plus 2 cm), yielded integration errors of greater than 1% and 2% for 6 MV and 18 MV, respectively, with errors for the Farmer chamber of greater than 10% even for the 4 cm wide field.

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX