A novel RNA binding protein, SBP2, is required for the translation of mammalian selenoprotein mRNAs
2000; Springer Nature; Volume: 19; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1093/emboj/19.2.306
ISSN1460-2075
AutoresPaul R. Copeland, Julia E. Fletcher, Bradley A. Carlson, Dolph L. Hatfield, Donna M. Driscoll,
Tópico(s)Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
ResumoArticle17 January 2000free access A novel RNA binding protein, SBP2, is required for the translation of mammalian selenoprotein mRNAs Paul R. Copeland Paul R. Copeland Department of Cell Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue #NC-10, Cleveland, OH, 44195 USA Search for more papers by this author Julia E. Fletcher Julia E. Fletcher Department of Cell Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue #NC-10, Cleveland, OH, 44195 USA Search for more papers by this author Bradley A. Carlson Bradley A. Carlson Section on the Molecular Biology of Selenium, Basic Research Laboratory, Division of Basic Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892 USA Search for more papers by this author Dolph L. Hatfield Dolph L. Hatfield Section on the Molecular Biology of Selenium, Basic Research Laboratory, Division of Basic Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892 USA Search for more papers by this author Donna M. Driscoll Corresponding Author Donna M. Driscoll Department of Cell Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue #NC-10, Cleveland, OH, 44195 USA Search for more papers by this author Paul R. Copeland Paul R. Copeland Department of Cell Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue #NC-10, Cleveland, OH, 44195 USA Search for more papers by this author Julia E. Fletcher Julia E. Fletcher Department of Cell Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue #NC-10, Cleveland, OH, 44195 USA Search for more papers by this author Bradley A. Carlson Bradley A. Carlson Section on the Molecular Biology of Selenium, Basic Research Laboratory, Division of Basic Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892 USA Search for more papers by this author Dolph L. Hatfield Dolph L. Hatfield Section on the Molecular Biology of Selenium, Basic Research Laboratory, Division of Basic Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892 USA Search for more papers by this author Donna M. Driscoll Corresponding Author Donna M. Driscoll Department of Cell Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue #NC-10, Cleveland, OH, 44195 USA Search for more papers by this author Author Information Paul R. Copeland1, Julia E. Fletcher1, Bradley A. Carlson2, Dolph L. Hatfield2 and Donna M. Driscoll 1 1Department of Cell Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue #NC-10, Cleveland, OH, 44195 USA 2Section on the Molecular Biology of Selenium, Basic Research Laboratory, Division of Basic Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892 USA *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] The EMBO Journal (2000)19:306-314https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/19.2.306 Correction(s) for this article A novel RNA binding protein, SBP2, is required for the translation of mammalian selenoprotein mRNAs01 December 2000 PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyWechatReddit Figures & Info In eukaryotes, the decoding of the UGA codon as selenocysteine (Sec) requires a Sec insertion sequence (SECIS) element in the 3′ untranslated region of the mRNA. We purified a SECIS binding protein, SBP2, and obtained a cDNA clone that encodes this activity. SBP2 is a novel protein containing a putative RNA binding domain found in ribosomal proteins and a yeast suppressor of translation termination. By UV cross-linking and immunoprecipitation, we show that SBP2 specifically binds selenoprotein mRNAs both in vitro and in vivo. Using 75Se-labeled Sec-tRNASec, we developed an in vitro system for analyzing Sec incorporation in which the translation of a selenoprotein mRNA was both SBP2 and SECIS element dependent. Immunodepletion of SBP2 from the lysates abolished Sec insertion, which was restored when recombinant SBP2 was added to the reaction. These results establish that SBP2 is essential for the co-translational insertion of Sec into selenoproteins. We hypothesize that the binding activity of SBP2 may be involved in preventing termination at the UGA/Sec codon. Introduction The incorporation of selenocysteine (Sec) into a select group of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins creates a unique class of enzymes. Most selenoproteins are involved in redox reactions in which the active site Sec residue plays a central role in catalysis (reviewed in Low and Berry, 1996; Stadtman, 1996). This class of selenoproteins includes the bacterial formate dehydrogenases, the mammalian deiodinases, thioredoxin reductases, and glutathione peroxidases (GPx) including phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase (PHGPx). Our studies are focused primarily on the synthesis of PHGPx, whose enzymatic activity may play a protective role in the development of atherosclerotic lesions by detoxifying pathogenic lipids (Thomas et al., 1990). An important non-enzymatic function for PHGPx was recently described by Ursini et al. (1999), who showed that PHGPx acts as an oxidatively cross-linked structural protein in the midpiece of mature spermatozoa. That any single selenoprotein is essential for life remains to be determined, but their combined loss by means of disruption of the Sec-tRNASec gene in the mouse results in early embryonic lethality (Bosl et al., 1997). Sec incorporation embodies a significant exception to the interpretation of the universal genetic code as it requires the recoding of a UGA stop codon when it is found in the context of a specific, downstream RNA structure. In the case of bacteria, the structured cis-sequence (termed bacterial Sec insertion sequence, SECIS) lies immediately downstream from an in-frame opal codon (UGA) that directs the insertion of Sec (Huttenhofer et al., 1996). This process requires the activity of a specialized translation elongation factor (SELB) that interacts specifically with both the downstream sequences and with the selenocysteyl-tRNASec (Sec-tRNASec) (Zinoni et al., 1990; Heider et al., 1992; Baron et al., 1993; Chen et al., 1993). The synthesis of Sec-tRNASec requires the action of three other gene products: SELA, which converts Ser-tRNASec to Sec-tRNASec (Forchhammer and Bock, 1991); SELC, which encodes tRNASec (Leinfelder et al., 1988); and SELD, which synthesizes the selenium donor selenophosphate (Ehrenreich et al., 1992). The process of Sec incorporation into mammalian selenoproteins remains in the initial phases of discovery. While sharing some fundamental properties of the prokaryotic system, it has many distinguishing features. The required cis-sequences reside in the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) far downstream from the UGA codon (Berry et al., 1991a). The distance between the UGA codon and this element is naturally variable between 500 and 5300 nucleotides (nt). These sequences are predicted to form a stable stem–loop commonly referred to as a SECIS. Within the SECIS element are several short, discrete, highly conserved sequences, which include three consecutive, unpaired A residues in the terminal loop, AUGA in the stem 8–10 nt 5′ of the terminal loop, and GA in the 3′ region of the stem across from the AUGA element (Berry et al., 1991a, 1993; Shen et al., 1993). Recent structural analyses have focused on the sequences in and around the AUGA and GA elements, which have been reported to form a non-Watson–Crick duplex (Walczak et al., 1996, 1998). These structures appear to fall into two distinct classes depending on whether the terminal region is comprised of a single loop (form 1) or an adenosine bulge and smaller terminal loop (form 2; Grundner-Culemann et al., 1999). In the absence of a mammalian homolog of the bacterial selB gene, efforts have focused on the identification of proteins that bind specifically to the SECIS element as it is likely that such a factor would be involved in linking the SECIS element with the Sec-tRNASec or with a selenoprotein-specific elongation factor. Several groups have identified SECIS binding activities (SBPs) by both gel retardation and UV cross-linking studies, but a relationship between these factors and Sec insertion has not been established (Haas and Velten, 1992; Shen et al., 1993, 1995; Hubert et al., 1996). One potential reason for the lack of functional data for SBPs is the lack of a reliable in vitro assay for Sec incorporation. Making use of the fact that PHGPx is highly expressed in testis, we previously identified a 120 kDa SECIS binding protein (SBP2) that interacted specifically with both PHGPx and GPx 3′ UTRs (Lesoon et al., 1997). SBP2 activity was tightly correlated with selenoprotein synthesis since SBP2 binding and translational readthrough of the UGA codon were both eliminated or greatly reduced by mutations to the AUGA element. Recently, we reported the biochemical and RNA binding characteristics of SBP2, which was purified from rat testicular extracts (Copeland and Driscoll, 1999). Here, we utilized the same purification scheme and obtained sufficient SBP2 protein for peptide sequencing and subsequent cloning of the SBP2 cDNA. SBP2 is a novel protein of 846 amino acids that contains a putative RNA binding domain similar to that found in the yeast SUP1 omnipotent suppressor of translation termination (Koonin et al., 1994). We also report the first definitive incorporation of Sec into a selenoprotein translated in reticulocyte lysates. Using antibodies raised against bacterially expressed SBP2, we show that immunodepletion of SBP2 results in a complete loss of Sec incorporation. By adding back in vitro translated SBP2 to the depleted translation extracts, Sec incorporation was restored. These results demonstrate that SBP2 is required for Sec insertion and that this protein is limiting in reticulocyte lysates. Results Cloning of SBP2 cDNA We previously reported the purification of SBP2 by RNA affinity chromatography and the identification of a 120 kDa polypeptide that co-fractionated with SBP2 binding activity (Copeland and Driscoll, 1999). Using ∼50 g of trimmed rat testes, SBP2 polypeptide was pooled from several rounds of purification and separated from minor contaminants by SDS–PAGE. The band corresponding to SBP2 was excised and subjected to trypsin digestion, and the peptides were sequenced by tandem electrospray mass spectrometry (MS). A total of 14 peptides were sequenced by tandem liquid chromatography (LC)/MS, four of which were of sufficient length and quality to be used as a query of the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank databases using the tBLASTn program. While no matches were found in the non-redundant database, several rat, mouse and human expressed sequence tags (ESTs) were identified. One of the rat EST sequences (DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession No. H31811) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), sequenced and found to contain an open reading frame (ORF) that encoded four other SBP2 peptides identified by LC/MS. The ORF contained in this EST (1413 bp) was not of sufficient length to encode a 120 kDa protein. Using the 5′ region of this DNA, primers were designed for 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) from a rat testis λgt11 cDNA library. Two RACE clones contained overlapping sequence with EST H31811 and were analyzed further. The longer of the clones (2.2 kb) contained the remainder of the SBP2 coding sequence, and a full-length cDNA clone was constructed as described in Materials and methods. The deduced SBP2 amino acid sequence is shown in Figure 1A. The complete cDNA encodes a protein of 846 amino acids with a predicted mol. wt of 93.3 kDa. The discrepancy between the predicted molecular weight and the molecular weight observed by SDS–PAGE (120 kDa) is apparently due to aberrant migration during electrophoresis as in vitro translation of the coding region alone in reticulocyte lysates yields a major product migrating at 120 kDa (data not shown). While SBP2 is not homologous to any known proteins, the C-terminal 429 amino acids of SBP2 bear 46% identity with a protein of unknown function (human hypothetical protein KIAA0256, DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession No. D87445). The sequence alignment of SBP2 and KIAA0256 is shown in Figure 1B. The most notable feature of this protein is a putative RNA binding domain, which is conserved among several ribosomal proteins as well as the SUP1 protein, a translation termination supressor in yeast (Koonin et al., 1994). Another striking feature of the SBP2 sequence is a lysine-rich region from amino acids 368–382, which is predicted to be a strong nuclear localization signal. Figure 1.Predicted amino acid sequence of SBP2. (A) The largest ORF of the isolated SBP2 cDNA encodes a protein of 846 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass of 94.86 kDa. The positions of six peptides obtained by LC/MS analysis are underlined. Asterisks are placed above the amino acids conserved in the putative RNA binding domain. The putative nuclear localization signal is boxed. (B) BLASTp-generated alignment of SBP2 and human hypothetical protein KIAA0256 (HHP). Download figure Download PowerPoint Expression of SBP2 To analyze the expression pattern of SBP2 mRNA, a Northern blot derived from poly(A)+ RNA from various rat tissues was probed with the 3′ half of the SBP2 coding region (Figure 2). Two larger transcripts (4 and 3.5 kb) are detectable in all tissues tested, while a smaller (2.5 kb) transcript, which is of considerable abundance relative to the larger transcripts, is only observed in testis. The SBP2 clone used in this study generates a 3173 nt transcript (2541 nt of coding sequence plus a 632 nt 3′ UTR truncated at the polyadenylation site). Thus, the smaller transcript present in testis may correspond to a splice variant lacking the 3′ UTR or some of the coding region. The origin of the various transcripts is currently under investigation. The abundance of the smaller transcript in testis is coincident with the overexpression of SBP2 protein in this tissue, as determined by immunoprecipitation and Western blotting (data not shown), suggesting that the smaller transcript may be responsible for this high level of expression. Figure 2.Tissue distribution of SBP2 mRNA. A multiple tissue Northern blot (Clontech) of poly(A)+ RNAs from rat tissues was probed with 32P-labeled SBP2 cDNA. Molecular weight standards are indicated on the right. Download figure Download PowerPoint Binding properties of recombinant SBP2 To verify that the sequence cloned encodes a sequence-specific RNA binding protein, we tagged both full-length SBP2 and a C-terminal portion (amino acids 280–846) with an 8-amino-acid Strep tag. These proteins were overexpressed in bacteria and purified by affinity chromatography. While the C-terminal protein was expressed efficiently, very little stable full-length protein was obtained. In a UV cross-linking experiment with radiolabeled PHGPx 3′ UTRs, both of the recombinant SBP2 proteins bound specifically to the wild-type but not to the AUGA→ACGA mutant PHGPx 3′ UTRs (Figure 3A). This mutation is in one of the conserved motifs within the SECIS element and has previously been shown to reduce significantly both SBP2 binding and translational readthrough of a UGA codon (Lesoon et al., 1997). We believe the lower molecular weight species detectable in this cross-linking assay to be degradation products formed during the assay procedure as they were detected intermittently during purification (P.R.Copeland and D.M.Driscoll, unpublished data). No specific binding activity was detectable in bacterial extracts that were derived from non-induced cultures. Figure 3.UV cross-linking and immunoprecipitation of endogenous and recombinant SBP2. (A) Partially purified (PP SBP2) and recombinant Strep-tagged full-length (FL) or C-terminal (CT) SBP2 were incubated with either wild-type (wt) or mutant (mut) 32P-labeled PHGPx 3′ UTRs and subjected to UV cross-linking. After digestion with RNase A, the proteins were separated by SDS–PAGE and visualized by autoradiography. (B) Pre-immune (PI) and immune (Imm) sera raised against recombinant SBP2 were added to 1 mg of rat testicular S100 extract and complexes were precipitated with protein A–agarose. Proteins were resolved by electrophoresis, blotted to PVDF membrane and probed with anti-SBP2 peptide antiserum. (C) UV cross-linking assays were performed as described in (A) using 30 μg of S100 testicular extracts or 3 μg of partially purified SBP2 (PPure). Anti-SBP2 peptide antibody was added to the reactions as indicated, and complexes were precipitated with protein A–agarose and resolved by electrophoresis. Non-antibody-treated samples (NT) and samples treated with protein A–agarose alone (beads) were included as controls. Radiolabeled proteins were detected by PhosphorImager analysis. Download figure Download PowerPoint Having established that the RNA binding domain of SBP2 resides in the C-terminal two-thirds of the protein, we generated polyclonal antibodies to the bacterially expressed C-terminal domain. Using these antibodies, we specifically immunoprecipitated a 120 kDa protein from rat testis extracts (Figure 3B). An anti-peptide antibody raised against an N-terminal peptide (amino acids 179–197) also specifically immunoprecipitated SBP2 from a UV cross-linking reaction. In this experiment either S100 extracts or partially purified SBP2 were UV cross-linked to 32P-labeled PHGPx 3′ UTR. Anti-peptide SBP2 antibodies or pre-immune sera were added to these reactions and the immune complexes were precipitated on protein A–agarose. Figure 3C shows that in each case only the immune serum immunoprecipitated the 120 kDa cross-linked band. In vivo targets of SBP2 In an attempt to show an in vivo interaction between SBP2 and selenoprotein mRNAs, we immunoprecipitated SBP2 from extracts derived from a rat hepatoma cell line (McArdle 7777) in which both PHGPx and SBP2 are known to be expressed (Copeland and Driscoll, 1999). RNA was extracted from the immunoprecipitated protein and identified by reverse transcription followed by the polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR). Using primers specific for PHGPx amplification, the expected ∼800 bp band was obtained from the complexes immunoprecipitated with immune serum but not with pre-immune serum (Figure 4, top panel). Consistent with our previous data that demonstrated SBP2 binding to the GPx 3′ UTR, we were also able to amplify the expected fragment using GPx-specific primers as well (Figure 4, middle panel). No products were obtained in the absence of reverse transcriptase, thus eliminating the possibility of DNA contamination. As a control, a PCR specific for the housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was also performed. In this case only a very faint band was obtained in both pre-immune and immune serum immunoprecipitations, suggesting that a small amount of this abundant RNA was non-specifically trapped during the procedure (Figure 4, bottom panel). Figure 4.Interaction of SBP2 with selenoprotein mRNAs in vivo. Pre-immune or anti-SBP2 antisera were added to cytoplasmic extracts from McArdle 7777 cells, and complexes were precipitated with protein A–agarose. The co-immunoprecipitated RNAs were extracted and used as templates for RT–PCR using PHGPx- (top), GPx- (middle) or GAPDH-specific primers (bottom). Reverse transcriptase (RT) was included as indicated. RT–PCR from immune precipitated beads is shown in lanes 4 and 5, that from pre-immune beads in lanes 2 and 3. RT–PCR from total McArdle RNA is shown in lanes 6 and 7. The PCR products were resolved by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Lane 1 contains a 1 kb DNA ladder. Download figure Download PowerPoint Analysis of Sec incorporation in vitro Although the fact that SBP2 interacts with selenoprotein mRNAs in vivo is compelling evidence for its role in selenocysteine incorporation, we set out to develop a reliable in vitro system to study selenoprotein synthesis directly. We have used a modified procedure for translation in reticulocyte lysates to demonstrate Sec insertion using 75Se-labeled Sec-tRNASec. A diagram of the constructs used is presented in Figure 5A. These include PHGPx constructs that contained either a UGA (Sec), UGU (Cys) or UAA (Stop) codon at the Sec insertion site, and either wild-type or point-mutant (pt-mut; AUGA→ACGA) 3′ UTRs as indicated. We first optimized the conditions where PHGPx synthesis was only obtained when the in-frame stop codon specified Sec and the 3′ UTR was wild type. Under standard in vitro translation conditions (mRNA concentration of ∼4 μg/ml, incubation at 30°C), no SECIS element-dependent translation was observed. This optimum was obtained only when small quantities of mRNA (0.4 μg/ml) were used to program the lysate, and when the reaction was incubated at 37°C (data not shown). Figure 5.Sec incorporation in vitro. (A) Diagram of the PHGPx constructs used in this study. (B) PHGPx mRNAs shown in (A) were added to reticulocyte lysates in the presence of 75Se-labeled Sec-tRNASec or [35S]Met as indicated. In vitro translated PHGPx protein was purified by BSP–agarose treatment, resolved by electrophoresis and detected by PhosphorImager analysis. 35S-labeled PHGPx is included as a control for PHGPx migration during electrophoresis (lane 6). (C) Wild-type and mutant PHGPx mRNAs were extracted at the end of in vitro translation reactions and analyzed by Northern blotting (n = 3). A representative experiment is shown. Download figure Download PowerPoint We used the set of PHGPx constructs shown in Figure 5A to program reticulocyte lysates in the presence of 75Se-labeled Sec-tRNASec purified from HL60 cells. PHGPx protein was purified from the reaction by affinity chromatography on bromosulfophthalein–glutathione–agarose (BSP–agarose) and analyzed by SDS–PAGE and PhosphorImager analysis. As no other radioactive label was present in the reaction, any signal obtained is the result of 75Se-labeled Sec incorporation into PHGPx protein. As shown in Figure 5B, PHGPx translation was only detectable when the UGA codon specified Sec in the context of the wild-type PHGPx 3′ UTR (lane 2). No incorporation was detectable when the Sec codon is changed to UGU or UAA or when it is placed in the context of a mutant UTR (Figure 5B, lanes 1, 5 and 4, respectively). Figure 5C shows Northern blot analysis of PHGPx mRNAs extracted at the end of an in vitro reaction. Similar levels of both wild-type and mutant mRNAs were recovered, indicating that differential mRNA stability does not play a role in the translational regulation of PHGPx mRNA. Effect of SBP2 on PHGPx translation We also tested 75Se-labeled Sec incorporation in the presence of in vitro translated SBP2. For this experiment, RNAs encoding full-length, N-terminal amino acids 1–284 or C-terminal amino acids 280–846 of SBP2 were pre-translated in reticulocyte lysate. After a 15 min incubation at 30°C, the PHGPx mRNAs shown in Figure 5A were added to the reaction and incubation was continued for 50 min at 37°C. Figure 6A shows the SBP2 translated products obtained by the end of the reaction. Figure 6B shows that in the presence of either full-length or the C-terminal fragment of in vitro translated SBP2, PHGPx synthesis is significantly enhanced, suggesting that this factor is limiting in reticulocyte lysates. This point is further demonstrated by the relative overexpression of the C-terminal fragment compared with the full-length SBP2 (Figure 6A), which is consistent with the greater enhancement of PHGPx translation in the presence of this form of SBP2 (Figure 6B). No enhancement is observed, however, in the presence of an N-terminal fragment of SBP2, which was generated from a truncated mRNA. It is notable that SBP2 addition stimulates PHGPx synthesis even when the 3′ UTR harbors an SECIS element mutation (P/UGA/pt-mut construct, Figure 6B). Quantitative analysis of this experiment indicates that the expression of the C-terminal fragment of SBP2 stimulates PHGPx synthesis by 25-fold, and that this stimulation is 3.6-fold less efficient for the SECIS element mutant. Since the SECIS point mutant did not completely abrogate the effect of SBP2, we chose to analyze a more deleterious PHGPx construct, which possesses a deletion of the entire AUGA element (Δ-mut). This mutant was translated in the presence of C-terminal SBP2, and as shown in Figure 6C no readthrough is detectable when the AUGA element is deleted, indicating that the stimulatory effect is entirely 3′ UTR dependent. The stability of the Δ-mut is not altered relative to the wild-type mRNA as determined by Northern analysis (data not shown). Figure 6D shows that SBP2 did not enhance the translation of the Sec→Cys mutant (P/UGU/wt) even in the presence of a wild-type 3′ UTR. Figure 6.Addition of SBP2 to reticulocyte lysates. (A) Full-length (FL), N-terminal (NT) and C-terminal (CT) SBP2 mRNAs were translated in reticulocyte lysates in the presence of [35S]Met. Reactions were terminated, and proteins were resolved by SDS–PAGE. (B) PHGPx mRNAs as shown in Figure 5A were translated in reticulocyte lysates in the presence of 75Se-labeled Sec-tRNASec and in the presence or absence of the SBP2 proteins described in (A). In vitro translated PHGPx was purified on BSP–agarose and resolved by SDS–PAGE. (C) PHGPx mRNAs as indicated were translated in reticulocyte lysates as described in (B) except that all reactions were performed in the presence of pre-translated C-terminal SBP2. (D) As in (B) except that in vitro translated PHGPx protein (from P/UGU/wt construct) was blotted to PVDF and probed with anti-PHGPx antibody. Download figure Download PowerPoint SBP2 is required for Sec insertion in vitro Using the assay described above, we also tested whether SBP2 is required for the basal level of Sec insertion in reticulocyte lysate. To deplete SBP2 from reticulocyte lysates, anti-SBP2 polyclonal antibody and a pre-immune control were used to immunoprecipitate SBP2 from the lysates. The protein–antibody complexes were removed with protein A–agarose and the resulting depleted lysates analyzed for their ability to synthesize the PHGPx constructs shown in Figure 5A in a codon- and UTR-specific manner. Figure 7 shows that the anti-SBP2 antibody treatment completely eliminates PHGPx translation. When in vitro translated SBP2 is added back to these lysates, PHGPx translation is dramatically enhanced. The depletion of SBP2 had no effect on the translation of non-selenocysteine-containing messages (data not shown). These results clearly demonstrate that SBP2 is required for selenoprotein synthesis in vitro. Figure 7.SBP2 is required for Sec incorporation in reticulocyte lysates. Reticulocyte lysates were treated with either pre-immune or anti-SBP2 immune sera, and complexes were precipitated with protein A–agarose. PHGPx mRNAs as shown in Figure 5A were translated in the depleted reticulocyte lysate in the presence of 75Se-labeled Sec-tRNASec. Full-length SBP2 was added back to depleted lysates as indicated. Proteins were resolved by SDS–PAGE and detected by PhosphorImager analysis. Download figure Download PowerPoint Discussion Based on transfection and in vitro experiments, Sec incorporation is an inefficient process that is likely to be limited by three converging pathways: Sec-tRNASec biosynthesis, SECIS binding protein–elongation factor interactions, and competition with translation termination. While the latter of these has been shown to be the major limitation in bacterial Sec incorporation (Suppmann et al., 1999), the interplay between these systems in eukaryotes remains to be determined. In this study we have demonstrated that a SECIS binding protein is a necessary component of the Sec insertion machinery, and in the context of reticulocyte lysates it is limiting. We have identified the cDNA encoding this novel protein, and demonstrated its binding specificity and function in a newly developed in vitro translation assay for selenoprotein biosynthesis. SBP2 primary structure As illustrated in Figure 1B, the C-terminal 429 amino acids of SBP2 have 46% identity with a protein of unknown function (human hypothetical protein KIAA0256, DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession No. D87445). The most striking feature in the SBP2 sequence is in a region found to be similar to a putative RNA binding motif found in many ribosomal proteins as well as the SUP1 suppressor of translation termination (Koonin et al., 1994). Interestingly, the identity between SBP2 and KIAA0256 is 75% in a 60-amino-acid region surrounding this motif. While no data exist concerning the role of this motif in binding RNA or interacting with the termination machinery, it stands out as a promising starting point for a structure–function analysis of SBP2. The predicted amino acid sequence of SBP2 is also notable in that it contains several stretches of consecutive lysine residues, which are predicted to function as nuclear localization signals. As all of our analyses of SBP2 have utilized cytoplasmic extracts, this brings up the intriguing possibility that the subcellular localization of SBP2 is regulated and that it may serve some other function as a nuclear protein. Expression of SBP2 Northern analysis of poly(A)+ RNA from various tissues reveals that SBP2 may be encoded by as many as three distinct transcripts. Interestingly, the smallest transcrip
Referência(s)