Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Arguing for Majority Rule*

2004; Wiley; Volume: 12; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00190.x

1467-9760

Mathias Risse,

Legal and Constitutional Studies

Journal of Political PhilosophyVolume 12, Issue 1 p. 41-64 Arguing for Majority Rule* Mathias Risse, Mathias Risse Philosophy, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard UniversitySearch for more papers by this author Mathias Risse, Mathias Risse Philosophy, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard UniversitySearch for more papers by this author First published: 11 February 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00190.xCitations: 26Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Ackerman, B. 1980. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. Barry, B. 1991. Is democracy special? In Barry, Democracy and Power, Oxford: Clarendon. Benhabib, S. 1996. Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy. In Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Brams, S. and A. Taylor. 1996. Fair Division. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Broome, J. 1999. Fairness. In Broome, Ethics out of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cohen, J. 1986. An epistemic conception of democracy. Ethics, 97, 26–38. Copp, D. 1993. Could political truth be a hazard for democracy? In Copp et al. (1993). Copp, D., J. Hampton and J. Roemer, eds. 1993. The Idea of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Coughlin, P. 1992. Probabilistic Voting Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dahl, R. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. Dunn, J. 1969. The Political Thought of John Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Elster, J. 1989. Solomonic Judgements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Elster, J. 1992. Local Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Enelow, J. 1997. Cycling and majority rule. In Mueller (1997). Estlund, D. 1993. Making truth safe for democracy. In Copp et al. (1993). Estlund, D. 1994. Opinion leaders, independence and Condorcet's jury theorem. Theory and Decision, 36, 131–62. Estlund, D. and J. Waldron. 1989. Democratic theory and the public interest: Rousseau and Condorcet revisited. American Political Science Review, 83, 1317–40. Franklin, B. 1945. A Benjamin Franklin Reader, ed. N. Goodman. New York: Crowell. Gierke, O. von. 1913. Über die Geschichte des Majoritätsbegriffes. In Essays in Legal History, ed. P. Vinogradoff. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Goodwin, B. 1994. Justice by Lottery. New York: Harvester. Grant, R. 1987. John Locke's Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Grofman, B., G. Owen and S. Feld. 1983. Thirteen theorems in search of the truth. Theory and Decision, 15, 261–78. Heinberg, J. 1926. History of the majority principle. American Political Science Review, 20, 52–68. Heinberg, J. 1932. Theories of majority rule. American Political Science Review, 26, 452–69. Kemeny, J. 1959. "Mathematics Without Numbers. Daedalus 88: 571–591. Kendall, W. 1940. John Locke and the Doctrine of Majority Rule. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press. Knight, J. and J. Johnson. 1994. Aggregation and deliberation. Political Theory, 22, 277–96. May, K. 1952. A set of independent necessary and sufficient conditions for simple majority decision. Econometrica, 20, 680–4. Lewis, G. 1849. On the Influence of Authority in Matters of Opinion. London: Parker. Mayo, H. 1960. An Introduction to Democratic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Moulin, H. 1988. Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mueller, D. 1989. Public Choice II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mueller, D., ed. 1997. Perspectives on Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nagel, T. 1979. The fragmentation of value. In Nagel, Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pattanaik, P. 1997. Some paradoxes of preference aggregation. In Mueller (1997). Plott, C. 1967. A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule. American Economic Review, 57, 787–806. Rae, D. 1969. Decision rules and individual values in constitutional choice. American Political Science Review, 63, 40–56. Rae, D. and E. Schickler. 1997. Majority rule. In Mueller (1997). Riker, W. 1982. Liberalism Against Populism. San Francisco: Freeman. Risse, M. 2001. Arrow's theorem, indeterminacy and multiplicity reconsidered. Ethics, 111, 706–34. Sen, A. 1982. Social choice theory: a re-examination. In Sen, Choice, Welfare, and Measurement. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Taurek, J. 1977. Should the numbers count? Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6, 293–316. Taylor, A. 1995. Mathematics and Politics. New York: Springer. Taylor, M. 1969. Proof of a theorem on majority rule. Behavioral Science, 14, 228–31. Waldron, J. Legislation, authority and voting. Georgetown Law Journal, 1996. 84, 2185–214. Waldron, J. 1999. The Dignity of Legislation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wasserman, D. 1996. Let them eat chances: probability and distributive justice. Economics and Philosophy, 12, 29–49. Young, P. 1988. Condorcet's theory of voting. American Political Science Review, 82, 1231–44. Young, P. 1994. Equity in Theory and Practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Young, P. 1997. Group choice and individual judgements. In Mueller (1997). Citing Literature Volume12, Issue1March 2004Pages 41-64 ReferencesRelatedInformation