Mixed Government and Mixed Marriage in A King and No King: Sir Henry Neville Reads Beaumont and Fletcher
2002; Johns Hopkins University Press; Volume: 69; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1353/elh.2002.0037
ISSN1080-6547
Autores Tópico(s)Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
ResumoThe diplomat John Nicholas may have been the first, though certainly not the last, to read a royalist politics in Francis Beaumont and John Fletcher's A King and No King (1611). Writing to Lord Clarendon in April, 1654 from the Dutch court of Mary Stuart, Princess Royal of Orange and sister to Charles II, Nicholas reported that "the gentlemen and maides of honour to the Princess Royal are preparing to act a play . . . the very name of which seems to please many in her Court . . . it being so judicious and discreetly chosen, viz. A King and no King; but all loyal persons are astonished when they hear it named." Four months after Oliver Cromwell was named Protector, Nicholas apparently saw the play, or at least its title, as a sarcastic commentary on the paradoxically regal pretensions of the regicide, who had begun signing documents in the royal manner: "Oliver P." 1
Referência(s)