Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Further experience with distal aortic perfusion and motor-evoked potential monitoring in the management of extent I-III thoracoabdominal aortic anuerysms

2013; Elsevier BV; Volume: 58; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.jvs.2013.01.042

1097-6809

Robert T. Lancaster, Mark F. Conrad, Virendra I. Patel, Matthew Cambria, Emel A. Ergul, Richard P. Cambria,

Coronary Artery Anomalies

BackgroundPrior studies indicated improved early mortality and paraplegia rates in a small cohort of patients with type I-III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAs) treated with atriofemoral bypass (AFB) and motor-evoked potentials (MEVPs) when compared with a propensity-matched cohort of patients treated with the clamp and sew (CS) method, wherein epidural cooling was the principal spinal cord protective adjunct. The use of AFB/MEVP increases the complexity of TAA repair and in this study, we address whether the early benefits will be sustained when this is applied to a general population with type I-III TAAs.MethodsConsecutive patients undergoing repair of nonruptured Crawford extent I-III TAAs from 1/1987 to 12/2011 were identified. Patients were stratified according to operative approach (AFB/MEVP vs CS). Endpoints included long-term survival, and the composite outcome of perioperative death and paraplegia. A multivariate, risk-adjusted model was then created to determine if operative approach independently influenced outcome.ResultsThere were 485 patients (CS = 385 [79%]; AFB/MEVP = 100 [21%]). The cohorts differed in that the AFB/MEVP group was younger (65.8 ± 12.5 years vs 70.9 ± 9.7 years; P < .001), had more extent I/II aneurysms (66% vs 50.1%; P = .005), and had more chronic dissections (30.3% vs 18.9%; P = .018). Operative variables differed in that the AFB/MEVP cohort had longer operative times (434 ± 112 minutes vs 324 ± 98 minutes; P < .001) and higher blood turnover (6028 ± 3473 mL vs 3581 ± 3111 mL; P < .0001). There was no difference in the rate of intraoperative death (AFB/MEVP = 1.0% vs CS = 0.5%; P = .50), length of intensive care unit stay (AFB/MEVP = 9.6 ± 8.6 days vs CS = 9.5 ± 12.3 days; P = .95) or hospital length of stay (AFB/MEVP = 19.9 ± 12.6 days vs CS = 21.6 ± 23.5 days; P = .49). The composite perioperative death and paraplegia rate was lower in the AFB/MEVP cohort (7% vs 19%; P = .004). The multivariate model for predictors of the composite outcome showed that AFB/MEVP was protective (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.9; P = .028). Long-term (4-year) survival was improved in the AFB/MEVP group as well (73 ± 6% vs 60 ± 3%; P = .004).ConclusionsAFB/MEVP is an independent predictor of improved perioperative death and paraplegia rates as well as long-term survival in patients undergoing repair of type I-III TAAs and is the preferred operative strategy. Prior studies indicated improved early mortality and paraplegia rates in a small cohort of patients with type I-III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAs) treated with atriofemoral bypass (AFB) and motor-evoked potentials (MEVPs) when compared with a propensity-matched cohort of patients treated with the clamp and sew (CS) method, wherein epidural cooling was the principal spinal cord protective adjunct. The use of AFB/MEVP increases the complexity of TAA repair and in this study, we address whether the early benefits will be sustained when this is applied to a general population with type I-III TAAs. Consecutive patients undergoing repair of nonruptured Crawford extent I-III TAAs from 1/1987 to 12/2011 were identified. Patients were stratified according to operative approach (AFB/MEVP vs CS). Endpoints included long-term survival, and the composite outcome of perioperative death and paraplegia. A multivariate, risk-adjusted model was then created to determine if operative approach independently influenced outcome. There were 485 patients (CS = 385 [79%]; AFB/MEVP = 100 [21%]). The cohorts differed in that the AFB/MEVP group was younger (65.8 ± 12.5 years vs 70.9 ± 9.7 years; P < .001), had more extent I/II aneurysms (66% vs 50.1%; P = .005), and had more chronic dissections (30.3% vs 18.9%; P = .018). Operative variables differed in that the AFB/MEVP cohort had longer operative times (434 ± 112 minutes vs 324 ± 98 minutes; P < .001) and higher blood turnover (6028 ± 3473 mL vs 3581 ± 3111 mL; P < .0001). There was no difference in the rate of intraoperative death (AFB/MEVP = 1.0% vs CS = 0.5%; P = .50), length of intensive care unit stay (AFB/MEVP = 9.6 ± 8.6 days vs CS = 9.5 ± 12.3 days; P = .95) or hospital length of stay (AFB/MEVP = 19.9 ± 12.6 days vs CS = 21.6 ± 23.5 days; P = .49). The composite perioperative death and paraplegia rate was lower in the AFB/MEVP cohort (7% vs 19%; P = .004). The multivariate model for predictors of the composite outcome showed that AFB/MEVP was protective (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.9; P = .028). Long-term (4-year) survival was improved in the AFB/MEVP group as well (73 ± 6% vs 60 ± 3%; P = .004). AFB/MEVP is an independent predictor of improved perioperative death and paraplegia rates as well as long-term survival in patients undergoing repair of type I-III TAAs and is the preferred operative strategy.