Beyond the "He/Man" Approach: The Case for Nonsexist Language
1980; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 5; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/493733
ISSN1545-6943
Autores Tópico(s)Gender Studies in Language
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessRevisions/ReportsBeyond the "He/Man" Approach: The Case for Nonsexist LanguageWendy MartynaWendy MartynaPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Signs Volume 5, Number 3Spring, 1980 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/493733 Views: 125Total views on this site Citations: 47Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1980 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Emily Keener, Kourtney Kotvas Beyond He and She: Does the Singular Use of "They, Them, Their" Function Generically as Inclusive Pronouns for Cisgender Men and Women?, Gender Issues 40, no.11 (Mar 2022): 23–43.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-022-09297-8Juta Pulijana, Graham Stevens What's so bad about being a manageress?, Inquiry (Feb 2023): 1–25.https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2023.2177727Giuditta Caliendo, Océane Foubert Gender representation in French Eurolect: An open dialogue between supranational and national legal varieties, Journal of Pragmatics 196 (Jul 2022): 54–66.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.04.014Abigail C. Saguy, Juliet A. Williams A Little Word That Means A Lot: A Reassessment of Singular They in a New Era of Gender Politics, Gender & Society 36, no.11 (Nov 2021): 5–31.https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432211057921Benjamin J. Newman, Stephanie L. DeMora, Tyler T. Reny Female Empowerment and the Politics of Language: Evidence Using Gender-Neutral Amendments to Subnational Constitutions, British Journal of Political Science 51, no.44 (Aug 2020): 1761–1772.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000332Ilyas Yakut, Bilal Genç, Erdogan Bada Epicene pronoun usage in the social sciences: The case of research articles, Journal of English for Academic Purposes 52 (Jul 2021): 101005.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101005Benedicta Adokarley Lomotey Exploring the Adoption of Gender-Fair Spanish Alternatives in School Domains: An African University in Focus, Sexuality & Culture 24, no.44 (May 2020): 1082–1106.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09746-0Jelisa S. Clark RING THE ALARM, Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race 17, no.11 (Aug 2020): 147–163.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X20000132Paolo Nitti La vigile e la sindaca. Uno studio sul sessismo nella lingua italiana, EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES , no.11 (Sep 2018): 122–141.https://doi.org/10.3280/ERP2018-001008Rebecca S. Bigler, Campbell Leaper Gendered Language, Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (Aug 2015): 187–194.https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215600452Y Gavriel Ansara, Peter Hegarty Methodologies of misgendering: Recommendations for reducing cisgenderism in psychological research, Feminism & Psychology 24, no.22 (Apr 2014): 259–270.https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353514526217Y. Gavriel Ansara, Peter Hegarty Cisgenderism in psychology: pathologising and misgendering children from 1999 to 2008, Psychology and Sexuality 3, no.22 (May 2012): 137–160.https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2011.576696Sally McConnell-Ginet Linguistics and Gender Studies, (Jan 2012): 503–530.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51747-0.50015-9Manizeh Khan, Meredyth Daneman How Readers Spontaneously Interpret Man-Suffix Words: Evidence from Eye Movements, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 40, no.5-65-6 (Aug 2011): 351–366.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-011-9173-3Laura Hamilton, Claudia Geist, Brian Powell Marital Name Change as a Window into Gender Attitudes, Gender & Society 25, no.22 (Mar 2011): 145–175.https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211398653Peter Hegarty, Felicia Pratto Interpreting and Communicating the Results of Gender-Related Research, (Dec 2009): 191–211.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_10Rina Villars Literality and communicative intention in a case of legal ambiguity: The notion of citizenship in Hispanic-American constitutions, Journal of Pragmatics 41, no.1111 (Nov 2009): 2312–2332.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.04.004Peter Githinji Sexism and (mis)representation of women in Sheng, Journal of African Cultural Studies 20, no.11 (Jun 2008): 15–32.https://doi.org/10.1080/13696810802159230Peter Hegarty Undoing Androcentric Explanations of Gender Differences: Explaining 'The Effect to be Predicted', Sex Roles 55, no.11-1211-12 (Nov 2006): 861–867.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9139-3Peter Hegarty, Carmen Buechel Androcentric Reporting of Gender Differences in APA Journals: 1965–2004, Review of General Psychology 10, no.44 (Dec 2006): 377–389.https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.10.4.377Peter Hegarty, Felicia Pratto, Anthony F. Lemieux Heterosexist Ambivalence and Heterocentric Norms: Drinking in Intergroup Discomfort, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 7, no.22 (Jul 2016): 119–130.https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430204041399Anne Curzan Gender Shifts in the History of English, 6 (Sep 2009).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486913Encarnación Hidalgo Tenorio Gender, Sex and Stereotyping in the Collins COBUILD English Language Dictionary, Australian Journal of Linguistics 20, no.22 (Jun 2010): 211–230.https://doi.org/10.1080/07268600020006076Paula J. Caproni, Maria Eugenia Arias Managerial Skills Training from a Critical Perspective, Journal of Management Education 21, no.33 (Aug 1997): 292–308.https://doi.org/10.1177/105256299702100303Mark E. Johnson, Seana Dowling-Guyer Effects of inclusive vs. exclusive language on evaluations of the counselor, Sex Roles 34, no.5-65-6 (Mar 1996): 407–418.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01547809Christopher Cronin, Sawsan Jreisat Effects of modeling on the use of nonsexist language among high school freshpersons and seniors, Sex Roles 33, no.11-1211-12 (Dec 1995): 819–830.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544781Rebecca Davis Merritt, Cynthia J. Kok Attribution of gender to a gender-unspecified individual: An evaluation of the people = male hypothesis, Sex Roles 33, no.3-43-4 (Aug 1995): 145–157.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544608Toshi Konishi The semantics of grammatical gender: A cross-cultural study, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 22, no.55 (Sep 1993): 519–534.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068252M. Kail Are Sex or Gender Relevant Categories to Language Performance ? A Critical Review, (Jan 1993): 151–174.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1709-8_9MARY F. ROGERS THEY ALL WERE PASSING:, Gender & Society 6, no.22 (Jun 1992): 169–191.https://doi.org/10.1177/089124392006002002Mykol C. Hamilton Masculine Bias in the Attribution of Personhood: People = Male, Male = People, Psychology of Women Quarterly 15, no.33 (Nov 2016): 393–402.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00415.xGiulio Lepschy Language and Sexism, (Jan 1991): 117–138.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21260-6_6Fatemeh Khosroshahi Penguins don't care, but women do: A social identity analysis of a Whorfian problem, Language in Society 18, no.44 (Dec 2008): 505–525.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500013889John Abraham Teacher Ideology and Sex Roles in Curriculum Texts, British Journal of Sociology of Education 10, no.11 (Jul 2006): 33–51.https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569890100103Eileen L. McDonagh, Edward C. McDonagh Gender/Generic Language in the United States Constitution: Gender Bias Versus Democratic Ideals, (Jan 1988): 120–136.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10122-1_8Giulio Lepschy Sexism and the Italian language, The Italianist 7, no.11 (Jul 2013): 158–169.https://doi.org/10.1179/ita.1987.7.1.158Diana L. Hughes, Patricia L. Casey Pronoun Choice for Gender-Unspecified Agent Words: Developmental Differences, Language and Speech 29, no.11 (Aug 2016): 59–68.https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098602900106Marsha B. Jacobson, William R. Insko Use of nonsexist pronouns as a function of one's feminist orientation, Sex Roles 13, no.1-21-2 (Jul 1985): 1–7.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287456Cheris Kramarae, Mercilee Jenkins Women Changing Words Changing Women, (Jan 1985): 10–22.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83937-4_3Cynthia Fuchs Epstein Symbolic segregation: Similarities and differences in the language and non-verbal communication of women and men, Sociological Forum 1, no.11 (Jan 1985): 27–49.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115072Debbie Cameron What has gender got to do with sex?, Language & Communication 5, no.11 (Jan 1985): 19–27.https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(85)90016-3Mary Crawford, Linda English Generic versus specific inclusion of women in language: Effects on recall, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 13, no.55 (Sep 1984): 373–381.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068152Judith Markowitz The Impact of the Sexist-language Controversy and Regulation on Language in University Documents, Psychology of Women Quarterly 8, no.44 (Jun 1984): 337–347.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1984.tb00641.xBarbara E. Moely, Kimberley Kreicker Ladies and Gentlemen, Women and Men: A Study of the Connotations of Words Indicating Gender, Psychology of Women Quarterly 8, no.44 (Jun 1984): 348–353.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1984.tb00642.xAnne K. Mellor On feminist utopias, Women's Studies 9, no.33 (Jul 2010): 241–262.https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.1982.9978570William R. Todd‐Mancillas Masculine generics=sexist language: A review of literature and implications for speech communication professionals, Communication Quarterly 29, no.22 (May 2009): 107–115.https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378109369395Peter Hegarty, Anthony F. Lemieux Who is the second (graphed) sex and why? The meaning of order in graphs of gender differences, ().https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110254310.325
Referência(s)