Speculation and Experiment in the Background of Oersted's Discovery of Electromagnetism
1957; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 48; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/348537
ISSN1545-6994
Autores Tópico(s)Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessSpeculation and Experiment in the Background of Oersted's Discovery of ElectromagnetismRobert C. StaufferRobert C. Stauffer Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Isis Volume 48, Number 1Mar., 1957 Publication of the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/348537 Views: 29Total views on this site Citations: 35Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1957 History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Erik Mohlhenrich, Dario Krpan Amateur hour: Improving knowledge diversity in psychological and behavioral science by harnessing contributions from amateurs, New Ideas in Psychology 65 (Apr 2022): 100922.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2021.100922Curt Wentrup Ørsted und Bunsen: Voltaische Batterien, Elektrische Lichtbögen, Elektromagnetismus und Elektrolyse, Angewandte Chemie 132, no.4343 (Sep 2020): 19010–19018.https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202006761Curt Wentrup Ørsted and Bunsen: Voltaic Batteries, Electric Arcs, Electromagnetism, and Electrolysis, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 59, no.4343 (Sep 2020): 18850–18857.https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202006761Ovidio Mario Bucci Electromagnetism Without Fields: From Orsted Through Ampere to Weber [Historical Corner], IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 62, no.44 (Aug 2020): 128–137.https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.2020.2998847Zhenyu Xing, Jun Lu, Xiulei Ji A Brief Review of Metallothermic Reduction Reactions for Materials Preparation, Small Methods 2, no.1212 (Aug 2018): 1800062.https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201800062Roberto de Andrade Martins An Educational Blend of Pseudohistory and History of Science and Its Application in the Study of the Discovery of Electromagnetism, (Jul 2018): 277–292.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74036-2_17Ana Paula Bispo da Silva, José Antonio Ferreira Pinto, Éwerton Jéferson Barbosa Ferreira Design and Implementation of a Lesson Plan for High School Students: A Case Study with Oersted’s Experiment, (Jul 2018): 327–339.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74036-2_20Allan David Franklin Is Seeing Believing?: Observation in Physics, Physics in Perspective 19, no.44 (Nov 2017): 321–423.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-017-0210-yAna Paula Bispo Silva, Jamily Alves da Silva A influência da Naturphilosophie nas ciências do século XIX: eletromagnetismo e energia, História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos 24, no.33 (Sep 2017): 687–705.https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-59702017000300008Kristian Camilleri The Shaping of Inquiry: Histories of the Exact Sciences after the Practical Turn, Advances in Historical Studies 04, no.0202 (Jan 2015): 68–84.https://doi.org/10.4236/ahs.2015.42008Matteo Leone History of Physics as a Tool to Detect the Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Students: The Case of Simple Electric Circuits in Primary Education, Science & Education 23, no.44 (Jan 2014): 923–953.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9676-zAaron D. Cobb Is John F. W. Herschel an Inductivist about Hypothetical Inquiry?, Perspectives on Science 20, no.44 (Dec 2012): 409–439.https://doi.org/10.1162/POSC_a_00080Aaron D. Cobb Inductivism in Practice: Experiment in John Herschel’s Philosophy of Science, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2, no.11 (Jul 2015): 21–54.https://doi.org/10.1086/663302GILDO MAGALHÃES SANTOS A debate on magnetic current: the troubled Einstein–Ehrenhaft correspondence, The British Journal for the History of Science 44, no.33 (Oct 2010): 371–400.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087410001299Aaron D. Cobb History and scientific practice in the construction of an adequate philosophy of science: revisiting a Whewell/Mill debate, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42, no.11 (Mar 2011): 85–93.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.022Kenneth L. Caneva Ørsted's Presentation Of Others'—And His Own—Work, (Jan 2007): 273–338.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2987-5_15Roberto de Andrade Martins Ørsted, Ritter, And Magnetochemistry, (Jan 2007): 339–385.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2987-5_16Keld Nielsen, Hanne Andersen The Influence Of Kant's Philosophy On The Young H. C. Ørsted, (Jan 2007): 97–114.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2987-5_6Michael Friedman Kant—Naturphilosophie—Electromagnetism, (Jan 2007): 135–158.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2987-5_8Nahum Kipnis Chance in Science: The Discovery of Electromagnetism by H.C. Oersted, Science & Education 14, no.11 (Jan 2005): 1–28.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-3286-0Rob Iliffe Philosophy of Science, (Mar 2003): 267–284.https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521572439.012Kenneth L. Caneva Physics and Naturphilosophie : A Reconnaissance, History of Science 35, no.11 (Jul 2016): 35–106.https://doi.org/10.1177/007327539703500102Geoffrey Cantor Scientific Investigations, (Jan 1991): 225–258.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13131-0_9Jörg Meya Elektrodynamik im 19. Jahrhundert — Zeitgeist und Theorieentwicklung, (Jan 1990): 60–248.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-14626-1_3Timothy Shanahan Kant, naturphilosophie, and Oersted's discovery of electromagnetism: A reassessment, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 20, no.33 (Sep 1989): 287–305.https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(89)90009-5Stephen G. Brush Romantik und Realismus, (Jan 1987): 18–31.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-88803-7_2Robert Paul German academic science and the mandarin ethos, 1850–1880, The British Journal for the History of Science 17, no.11 (Jan 2009): 1–29.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400020331Timothy Lenoir Introduction, (Jan 1982): 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6951-3_1Kenneth L. Caneva What Should We do with the Monster? Electromagnetism and the Psychosociology of Knowledge, (Jan 1981): 101–131.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8429-5_3Stephen G. Brush The scientific value of high energy physics, Annals of Nuclear Energy 8, no.33 (Jan 1981): 133–140.https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4549(81)90109-2Charles A. Culotta German Biophysics, Objective Knowledge, and Romanticism, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 4 (Jan 1974): 3–38.https://doi.org/10.2307/27757326Barry Gower Speculation in physics: The history and practice of naturphilosophie, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 3, no.44 (Feb 1973): 301–356.https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(73)90015-0Theodore M. Brown The Electric Current in Early Nineteenth-Century French Physics, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 1 (Jan 1969): 61–103.https://doi.org/10.2307/27757295Everett Mendelsohn The Biological Sciences in the Nineteenth Century: Some Problems and Sources, History of Science 3, no.11 (Jul 2016): 39–59.https://doi.org/10.1177/007327536400300103 I. Bernard Cohen , and Katharine Strelsky Eighty-Third Critical Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences (To 1 January 1958), Isis 49, no.22 (Oct 2015): 179–296.https://doi.org/10.1086/348672
Referência(s)