Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

PATIENT PERCEPTION OF ROBOTIC UROLOGY

2008; Wiley; Volume: 103; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1464-410x.2008.08058.x

1464-410X

Matthew Bultitude, Declan G. Murphy, Ben Challacombe, Oussama Elhage, Muhammad Shamim Khan, Qing Wang, Prokar Dasgupta,

Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

BJU InternationalVolume 103, Issue 3 p. 285-286 PATIENT PERCEPTION OF ROBOTIC UROLOGY Matthew F. Bultitude, Matthew F. Bultitude Departments of Urology and Health Economics, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this authorDeclan Murphy, Declan Murphy Departments of Urology and Health Economics, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this authorBen Challacombe, Ben Challacombe Departments of Urology and Health Economics, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this authorOussama Elhage, Oussama Elhage Departments of Urology and Health Economics, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this authorMohammed S. Khan, Mohammed S. Khan Departments of Urology and Health Economics, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this authorQing Wang, Qing Wang Departments of Urology and Health Economics, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this authorProkar Dasgupta, Prokar Dasgupta Departments of Urology and Health Economics, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this author Matthew F. Bultitude, Matthew F. Bultitude Departments of Urology and Health Economics, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this authorDeclan Murphy, Declan Murphy Departments of Urology and Health Economics, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this authorBen Challacombe, Ben Challacombe Departments of Urology and Health Economics, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this authorOussama Elhage, Oussama Elhage Departments of Urology and Health Economics, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this authorMohammed S. Khan, Mohammed S. Khan Departments of Urology and Health Economics, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this authorQing Wang, Qing Wang Departments of Urology and Health Economics, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this authorProkar Dasgupta, Prokar Dasgupta Departments of Urology and Health Economics, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London School of Medicine, London, UKSearch for more papers by this author First published: 16 January 2009 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08058.xCitations: 6 Prokar Dasgupta, Department of Urology, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.e-mail: [email protected] Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. REFERENCES 1 Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M; Members of the VIP Team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003; 92: 205–10 2 The Medical Outcomes Trust (MOT) Health Assessment Laboratory (HAL) and QualityMetric Incorporated. Co-copyright holders of all SF-361, SF-121 and SF-8TM Health Surveys. 3 Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE, Gandick B. How to Score and Interpret Single-item Health Status Measures: a Manual for Users of the SF-8 Health Survey. Lincoln: QualityMetric Incorporated, 2001 4 Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: developments of a general scale. Eval Program Plann 1979; 2: 197–207 5 Attkisson CC, Zwick R. The client satisfaction questionnaire. Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Program Plann 1982; 5: 233–7 6 Jayadevappa R, Chhatre S, Whittington R, Bloom BS, Wein AJ, Malkowicz SB. Health-related quality of life and satisfaction with care among older men treated for prostate cancer with either radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy. BJU Int 2006; 97: 955–62 7 Tseng TY, Kuebler HR, Cancel QV et al. Prospective health-related quality-of-life assessment in an initial cohort of patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2006; 68: 1061–6 8 Sahai A, Tang S, Challacombe B, Murphy D, Dasgupta P. Laparoscopic upper urinary tract surgery for benign and malignant conditions. Does aetiology have an effect on health-related quality of life? Int J Clin Pract 2007; 61: 2026–9 Citing Literature Volume103, Issue3February 2009Pages 285-286 ReferencesRelatedInformation