Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Sibling Competition in Plants: An Experimental Study

1987; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 129; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/284636

1537-5323

Mary F. Willson, W. G. Hoppes, Doris Armstrong Goldman, Patricia A. Thomas, P. L. Katusic-Malmborg, Jennifer Bothwell,

Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Previous articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsSibling Competition in Plants: An Experimental StudyMary F. Willson, W. G. Hoppes, D. A. Goldman, P. A. Thomas, P. L. Katusic-Malmborg, and J. L. BothwellMary F. Willson, W. G. Hoppes, D. A. Goldman, P. A. Thomas, P. L. Katusic-Malmborg, and J. L. BothwellPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 129, Number 2Feb., 1987 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/284636 Views: 18Total views on this site Citations: 61Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1987 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Liru Chen, Yuanfei Pan, Xiaoyun Pan, Liangrui Yu, Alejandro Sosa, Ji Yang, Bo Li From competition to cooperation: Kin selection against selfish shade avoidance behaviour promotes plant invasions, Journal of Ecology 111, no.33 (Dec 2022): 645–654.https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14052Harihar Jaishree Subrahmaniam, Dominique Roby, Fabrice Roux Toward Unifying Evolutionary Ecology and Genomics to Understand Positive Plant–Plant Interactions Within Wild Species, Frontiers in Plant Science 12 (Jul 2021).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.683373Franca J. Bongers, Bernhard Schmid, Walter Durka, Shan Li, Helge Bruelheide, Christoph Z. Hahn, Haoru Yan, Keping Ma, Xiaojuan Liu Genetic richness affects trait variation but not community productivity in a tree diversity experiment, New Phytologist (May 2020).https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16567Syed Wajahat Husain Jaafry, Dezhi Li, Zhihua Fan, Lu Liu, Xiaoyu Wei, Tingjun Yang, Yuming Sun, Yingyang Zhu, Lingling Li, Zixing Ren, Rongpei Kong Effect of soil nutrients, neighbor identities and root separation types on intra‐ and interspecific interaction among three clonal plant species, Nordic Journal of Botany 37, no.77 (Jul 2019).https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.02070Hélène Fréville, Pierre Roumet, Nicolas Olivier Rode, Aline Rocher, Muriel Latreille, Marie‐Hélène Muller, Jacques David , Evolutionary Applications 12, no.99 ( 2019): 1837.https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12842Marina Golivets, Kimberly F. Wallin, Jessica Gurevitch Neighbour tolerance, not suppression, provides competitive advantage to non‐native plants, Ecology Letters 21, no.55 (Mar 2018): 745–759.https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12934Tong Lei Yu, Xiao Hui Deng, Michael Busam, Yan Song Does relatedness influence the intensity of competition in Bufo gargarizans minshanicus tadpoles?, Animal Biology 67, no.22 (Jun 2017): 157–163.https://doi.org/10.1163/15707563-00002530Bodil K. Ehlers, Patrice David, Christian F. Damgaard, Thomas Lenormand, Scott Wilson Competitor relatedness, indirect soil effects and plant coexistence, Journal of Ecology 104, no.44 (Apr 2016): 1126–1135.https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12568C. Pélabon, E. Albertsen, M. Falahati-Anbaran, J. Wright, W.S. Armbruster Does multiple paternity affect seed mass in angiosperms? An experimental test in Dalechampia scandens, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 28, no.99 (Aug 2015): 1719–1733.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12692Anna K. Simonsen, Theresa Chow, John R. Stinchcombe Reduced plant competition among kin can be explained by Jensen's inequality, Ecology and Evolution 4, no.2323 (Nov 2014): 4454–4466.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1312C. M. Lively, L. T. Morran The ecology of sexual reproduction, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 27, no.77 (Mar 2014): 1292–1303.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12354Ryan A. Martin, Sara C. Garnett Relatedness and resource diversity interact to influence the intensity of competition, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 110, no.33 (Jul 2013): 689–695.https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12146J. David Aguirre, Seth H. Miller, Steven G. Morgan, Dustin J. Marshall Relatedness affects the density, distribution and phenotype of colonisers in four sessile marine invertebrates, Oikos 122, no.66 (Oct 2012): 881–888.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20827.xNohemi Dimas-Flores, Manuel Serra, María José Carmona Does genetic diversity reduce intraspecific competition in rotifer populations?, Hydrobiologia 705, no.11 (Nov 2012): 43–54.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1378-4Bin J.W. Chen, Heinjo J. During, Niels P.R. Anten Detect thy neighbor: Identity recognition at the root level in plants, Plant Science 195 (Oct 2012): 157–167.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.07.006Anu Lepik, Maria Abakumova, Kristjan Zobel, Marina Semchenko, Alan Knapp Kin recognition is density-dependent and uncommon among temperate grassland plants, Functional Ecology 26, no.55 (Jul 2012): 1214–1220.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02037.xAmanda L. File, Guillermo P. Murphy, Susan A. Dudley Fitness consequences of plants growing with siblings: reconciling kin selection, niche partitioning and competitive ability, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279, no.17271727 (Nov 2011): 209–218.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1995Angela Hodge Plant Root Interactions, (Dec 2011): 157–169.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23524-5_9J. David Aguirre, Dustin J. Marshall DOES GENETIC DIVERSITY REDUCE SIBLING COMPETITION?, Evolution 66, no.11 (Aug 2011): 94–102.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01413.xCristina García, Delphine Grivet Molecular insights into seed dispersal mutualisms driving plant population recruitment, Acta Oecologica 37, no.66 (Nov 2011): 632–640.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2011.04.009C. G. WILLIS, M. T. BROCK, C. WEINIG Genetic variation in tolerance of competition and neighbour suppression in Arabidopsis thaliana, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23, no.77 (May 2010): 1412–1424.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02003.xFrédéric Masclaux, Robert L. Hammond, Joël Meunier, Caroline Gouhier‐Darimont, Laurent Keller, Philippe Reymond Competitive ability not kinship affects growth of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions, New Phytologist 185, no.11 (Nov 2009): 322–331.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03057.xRubén Milla, Diana M. Forero, Adrián Escudero, Jose M. Iriondo Growing with siblings: a common ground for cooperation or for fiercer competition among plants?, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276, no.16671667 (Apr 2009): 2531–2540.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0369Ursula Monzeglio, Peter Stoll Effects of spatial pattern and relatedness in an experimental plant community, Evolutionary Ecology 22, no.66 (Aug 2007): 723–741.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-007-9197-1Åsa Lankinen Root competition influences pollen competitive ability in Viola tricolor : effects of presence of a competitor beyond resource availability?, Journal of Ecology 96, no.44 (Jul 2008): 756–765.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01387.xChristopher G. Oakley, Ken S. Moriuchi, Alice A. Winn The Maintenance of Outcrossing in Predominantly Selfing Species: Ideas and Evidence from Cleistogamous Species, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38, no.11 (Dec 2007): 437–457.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095654 Gregory P. Cheplick and Kristin H. Kane Genetic Relatedness and Competition in Triplasis purpurea (Poaceae): Resource Partitioning or Kin Selection? Cheplick & Kane, International Journal of Plant Sciences 165, no.44 (Jul 2015): 623–630.https://doi.org/10.1086/386556S. Puustinen, T. Koskela, P. Mutikainen Relatedness affects competitive performance of a parasitic plant (Cuscuta europaea) in multiple infections, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17, no.44 (Jul 2004): 897–903.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00728.xPIRJO RAUTIAINEN, KARI KOIVULA, MARKO HYVARINEN The effect of within-genet and between-genet competition on sexual reproduction and vegetative spread in Potentilla anserina ssp. egedii, Journal of Ecology 92, no.33 (Jun 2004): 505–511.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00878.x Kathleen Donohue The Influence of Neighbor Relatedness on Multilevel Selection in the Great Lakes Sea Rocket. K. Donohue, The American Naturalist 162, no.11 (Jul 2015): 77–92.https://doi.org/10.1086/375299Giorgina Bernasconi, Melanie Paschke, Bernhard Schmid Diversity effects in reproductive biology, Oikos 102, no.11 (Jun 2003): 217–220.https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12598.xGRAEME E. POUND, C. PATRICK DONCASTER, SIMON J. COX A Lotka–Volterra Model of Coexistence between a Sexual Population and Multiple Asexual Clones, Journal of Theoretical Biology 217, no.44 (Aug 2002): 535–545.https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2002.3040Véronique A. Delesalle, Susan J. Mazer THE NEIGHBORHOOD MATTERS: EFFECTS OF NEIGHBOR NUMBER AND SIBLING (OR KIN) COMPETITION ON FLORAL TRAITS IN SPERGULARIA MARINA (CARYOPHYLLACEAE), Evolution 56, no.1212 (Jan 2002): 2406.https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2002)056[2406:TNMEON]2.0.CO;2Susan Kalisz, Frances M. Hanzawa, Stephen J. Tonsor, Denise A. Thiede, Steven Voigt ANT-MEDIATED SEED DISPERSAL ALTERS PATTERN OF RELATEDNESS IN A POPULATION OF TRILLIUM GRANDIFLORUM, Ecology 80, no.88 (Dec 1999): 2620–2634.https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2620:AMSDAP]2.0.CO;2J. Anita Dieleman, David A. Mortensen, Alex R. Martin Influence of velvetleaf ( Abutilon theophrasti ) and common sunflower ( Helianthus annuus ) density variation on weed management outcomes, Weed Science 47, no.11 (Jun 2017): 81–89.https://doi.org/10.1017/S004317450009069XH.J. Schenk, R.M. Callaway, B.E. Mahall Spatial Root Segregation: Are Plants Territorial?, (Jan 1999): 145–180.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60032-XRonald Feldman, Diana F. Tomback, James Koehler COST OF MUTUALISM: COMPETITION, TREE MORPHOLOGY, AND POLLEN PRODUCTION IN LIMBER PINE CLUSTERS, Ecology 80, no.11 (Jan 1999): 324–329.https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0324:COMCTM]2.0.CO;2A. SCHNABEL, J. D. NASON, J. L. HAMRICK Understanding the population genetic structure of Gleditsia triacanthos L.: seed dispersal and variation in female reproductive success, Molecular Ecology 7, no.77 (Jul 1998): 819–832.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00397.xDavid W. Pfennig, W. Anthony Frankino KIN‐MEDIATED MORPHOGENESIS IN FACULTATIVELY CANNIBALISTIC TADPOLES, Evolution 51, no.66 (May 2017): 1993–1999.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb05120.xB. Mohan Raju, R. Uma Shaanker, K. N. Ganeshaiah Intra-fruit seed abortion in a wind dispersed tree,Dalbergia sissoo Roxb: Proximate mechanisms, Sexual Plant Reproduction 9, no.55 (Sep 1996): 273–278.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02152702Denise A. Thiede, Carol K. Augspurger Intraspecific variation in seed dispersion of Lepidium campestre (Brassicaceae), American Journal of Botany 83, no.77 (Jul 1996): 856–866.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb12777.xMarcello Lisci, Massimo Bianchini, Ettore Pacini Structure and function of the elaiosome in some angiosperm species, Flora 191, no.22 (Apr 1996): 131–141.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0367-2530(17)30704-1Brenda B. Casper POSTDISPERSAL SIBLING COMPETITION AND THE EVOLUTION OF SINGLE‐SEEDEDNESS IN CRYPTANTHA FLAVA, Evolution 48, no.44 (May 2017): 1377–1382.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb05321.xPatric Nilsson, Torbj�rn Fagerstr�m, Juha Tuomi, M�rten �str�m Does seed dormancy benefit the mother plant by reducing sib competition?, Evolutionary Ecology 8, no.44 (Jul 1994): 422–430.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01238192Wojciech Galinski Non-random needle orientation in 1-year-old Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings when adjacent to non-shading vegetation, Trees 8, no.33 (Feb 1994): 160–164.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196640Jeffrey D. Karron, Diane L. Marshall Effects of environmental variation on fitness of singly and multiply sired progenies of Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae), American Journal of Botany 80, no.1212 (Dec 1993): 1407–1412.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1993.tb15385.xCristina Lopez-Suarez, Miguel A. Toro, Carlos Garcia GENETIC HETEROGENEITY INCREASES VIABILITY IN COMPETING GROUPS OF DROSOPHILA HYDEI, Evolution 47, no.33 (May 2017): 977–981.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01253.xFrançois Mesléard, Laurine Tan Ham, Vincent Boy, Carla van Wijck, Patrick Grillas Competition between an introduced and an indigenous species: the case of Paspalum paspalodes (Michx) Schribner and Aeluropus littoralis (Gouan) in the Camargue (southern France), Oecologia 94, no.22 (May 1993): 204–209.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00341318Carlos Garcia, Miguel A Toro Sib competition in Tribolium: a test of the elbow-room model, Heredity 68, no.66 (Jun 1992): 529–536.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1992.75Anneta Z. Argyres, Johanna Schmitt NEIGHBOR RELATEDNESS AND COMPETITIVE PERFORMANCE IN IMPATIENS CAPENSIS (BALSAMINACEAE): A TEST OF THE RESOURCE PARTITIONING HYPOTHESIS, American Journal of Botany 79, no.22 (Feb 1992): 181–185.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1992.tb13636.xGregory P. Cheplick, Gema M. Salvadori INTRA- AND INTERCLONAL COMPETITION IN THE CLEISTOGAMOUS GRASS AMPHIBROMUS SCABRIVALVIS, American Journal of Botany 78, no.1111 (Nov 1991): 1494–1502.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1991.tb11428.xGraham Bell THE ECOLOGY AND GENETICS OF FITNESS IN CHLAMYDOMONAS . IV. THE PROPERTIES OF MIXTURES OF GENOTYPES OF THE SAME SPECIES, Evolution 45, no.44 (May 2017): 1036–1046.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb04368.x Adam Lomnicki , and Ewa Symonides Limited Growth of Individuals with Variable Growth Rates, The American Naturalist 136, no.55 (Oct 2015): 712–714.https://doi.org/10.1086/285125Jeffrey D. Karron, Diane L. Marshall FITNESS CONSEQUENCES OF MULTIPLE PATERNITY IN WILD RADISH, RAPHANUS SATIVUS, Evolution 44, no.22 (May 2017): 260–268.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05196.x Stephen J. Tonsor Relatedness and Intraspecific Competition in Plantago lanceolata, The American Naturalist 134, no.66 (Oct 2015): 897–906.https://doi.org/10.1086/285020Claire McCall, Thomas Mitchell‐Olds, Donald M. Waller FITNESS CONSEQUENCES OF OUTCROSSING IN IMPATIENS CAPENSIS : TESTS OF THE FREQUENCY‐DEPENDENT AND SIB‐COMPETITION MODELS, Evolution 43, no.55 (May 2017): 1075–1084.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02552.x Diane L. Marshall , and Norman C. Ellstrand Regulation of Mate Number in Fruits of Wild Radish, The American Naturalist 133, no.66 (Oct 2015): 751–765.https://doi.org/10.1086/284951Reiner Cornelius, Andreas Faensen-Thiebes Population Ecology, (Jan 1989): 333–349.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75154-7_20Alexey S. Kondrashov Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction, Nature 336, no.61986198 (Dec 1988): 435–440.https://doi.org/10.1038/336435a0M. Jasieński Kinship ecology of competition: size hierarchies in kin and nonkin laboratory cohorts of tadpoles, Oecologia 77, no.33 (Nov 1988): 407–413.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378052M. Jasieński, U. Korzeniak, A. Łomnicki Ecology of kin and nonkin larval interactions in Tribolium beetles, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 22, no.44 (Apr 1988): 277–284.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299843