Exposure Science and the Exposome: An Opportunity for Coherence in the Environmental Health Sciences
2011; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Volume: 119; Issue: 11 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1289/ehp.1104387
ISSN1552-9924
AutoresPaul J. Lioy, Stephen M. Rappaport,
Tópico(s)Climate Change and Health Impacts
ResumoVol. 119, No. 11 EditorialOpen AccessExposure Science and the Exposome: An Opportunity for Coherence in the Environmental Health Sciencesis companion ofAn Integrated Approach to the Exposome: Rappaport and Lioy RespondAn Integrated Approach to the Exposome Paul J. Lioy and Stephen M. Rappaport Paul J. Lioy and Stephen M. Rappaport Published:1 November 2011https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104387Cited by:91AboutSectionsPDF ToolsDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InReddit The field of exposure science began with qualitative observations and quantitative measurements of air contaminants to aid our understanding of exposure–disease relationships. In fact, some of the earliest writings that describe the essence of exposure science are found in Bernardino Ramazzini's 1700 treatise on occupational diseases (Franco 1999). In the 1920s, exposure scientists collaborated with epidemiologists to investigate workplace exposures as sources of occupational diseases (Rappaport 2011). Between the 1950s and 1970, investigations expanded to include exposures to pollutants in ambient and indoor air and water (Rappaport 2011). Following establishment of U.S. governmental agencies in the 1970s to regulate exposures in the workplace (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) and the ambient environment [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)], the paths of exposure scientists diverged into those investigating sources of pollutants in occupational settings and those investigating ambient sources of pollutants (Rappaport 2011). By the 1990s the two groups had essentially parted ways, and the term "exposure science" was associated with community and personal exposures to ambient pollutants (Lioy 2010; Ott 1990, 1995). Investigations of total personal exposure initially employed external measurements of chemicals that can enter the body by inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact (1970s), and internal markers of exposure were added in the 1980s and 1990s (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2009; Hoffmann et al. 2000; Sexton et al. 1995; Wallace et al. 1985). In the 21st century, exposure science has increasingly embraced deterministic models to predict levels of diverse exposures based on categorical data (Cohen Hubal et al. 2010; Georgopoulos and Lioy 2006; Lioy 2010) and on measured levels of pollutants in biological fluids and tissues (Georgopoulos et al. 2009).In parallel with the above activities, during the 1980s and 1990s, molecular epidemiologists explored links between genetic and environmental factors and the resulting biochemical or biological indicators of possible ill health (biomarkers) measured in individual subjects (Bonassi and Au 2002). When completion of the human genome project in 2000 made it feasible to measure thousands of polymorphic genes in each subject, epidemiology increasingly focused on the genetic determinants of diseases (Hindorff et al. 2009). However, as results of these genome-wide association studies (GWAS) failed to explain most variability in human diseases (Manolio et al. 2009), interest in environmental factors reemerged. But there was no environmental analog of GWAS; that is, we had no way of characterizing the totality of a person's environmental exposures. This prompted Christopher Wild to publish a commentary that defined the "exposome" as the environmental complement to the genome (Wild 2005). Recognizing that humans are exposed to health-impairing agents from both pollution and nonpollution sources and that these sources change during a lifetime, Wild indicated that "… the exposome encompasses life-course environmental exposures (including lifestyle factors) from the prenatal period onwards." This is a powerful idea because it considers a person's lifetime history of all exposures experienced from both external sources (e.g. pollution, radiation, and diet) and internal sources (e.g. inflammation, infection, and the microbiome) (Rappaport and Smith 2010). Thus, one can imagine a future in which individuals' exposomes are contrasted between diseased and healthy populations for molecular epidemiology, or over different life stages as part of personalized medicine (Nicholson 2006). In either case, the goal would be to discover causes of ill health and to generate hypotheses regarding identification and elimination or reduction of harmful exposures.If the exposome concept is to be useful to exposure science, methods will be needed to characterize individual exposomes and to investigate sources of exposome variability. Because exposures arise from diverse sources, Rappaport defined two generic approaches for characterizing exposomes (Rappaport 2011; Rappaport and Smith 2010). A "bottom-up" approach would focus on each category of external exposure—including air, water, diet, radiation, lifestyle, etc.—to quantify contaminant levels that would be summed over all categories to estimate individual exposomes. This approach is appealing to some exposure scientists because it focuses on the same external media that have long been investigated and leads logically to interventions for eliminating or reducing exposures. However, this bottom-up approach would require tremendous effort to evaluate the myriad of largely unknown analytes in various external media and would also miss important endogenous exposures. The alternative "top-down" approach would adopt untargeted omic methods to measure features of exposures in biological fluids, and thus finds appeal with exposure scientists who have used biomonitoring for assessing exposure levels, albeit on a chemical-by-chemical basis. This approach is more efficient because both exogenous and endogenous exposures would be represented by a single specimen of blood, for example, and would encourage contrasts of omic profiles between diseased and healthy populations in much the same manner as GWAS (Patel et al. 2010). Omic profiles would generate hypotheses to a) indentify particular exposures, b) develop specific biomarkers for high-throughput screens, and c) determine sources of external and internal exposure. Recent untargeted metabolomic studies have applied this top-down approach to identify hitherto unknown exposures associated with cardiovascular disease (Holmes et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2011).When examined objectively, there is scientific value in both the bottom-up and top-down approaches for characterizing individual exposomes. The top-down approach offers appeal for discovering unknown causes of human disease (Rappaport 2011; Rappaport and Smith 2010), whereas the bottom-up approach encourages more comprehensive analyses of external exposures and methods for intervention and prevention (Lioy 2010). Indeed, we envision long-term strategies that embrace elements of both approaches for improving public health. Unfortunately, the differentiation between external (air, water, soil/dust, etc.) and internal (biological fluids) media has led to an apparent disconnect or competition between exposure scientists who focus on external monitoring and modeling and those who favor biomonitoring and omic methods. Indeed, we are encountering a view that can be summarized as "exposure science versus the exposome." This is counterproductive because it potentially deprives exposure science of avenues for vastly diversifying its pool of relevant exposures and for strengthening the source-to-dose framework needed by the environmental health sciences. Rather than adopting defensive postures, we encourage exposure scientists to exploit the relative strengths of both monitoring approaches for assessing human exposures. Toward this end, the National Academy of Sciences will convene a workshop in December 2011 to better integrate the top-down and bottom-up approaches for characterizing individual exposomes (Emerging Technologies for Measuring Individual Exposomes, 8–9 December 2011, Washington, DC; information is available at http://dels.nas.edu/envirohealth).Other recent developments offer opportunities for exposure scientists to characterize individual exposomes. For example, the National Children's Study (Landrigan et al. 2006) offers an evolving platform with which to link the top-down and bottom-up approaches. Because individual data and biospecimens will be collected during the first 21 years of life, this study will provide resources that can be used to evaluate the variability of exposome features during critical life stages. Moreover, the extensive questionnaire data, home samples, extant environmental data, and dietary histories of participants suggest avenues for modeling connections between the internal and external environments. Such prospective cohort studies will allow us to collect more and better exposure data with which to identify unknown health hazards and to develop appropriate preventive measures and regulations for recognized hazards. The exposome concept can play a key role in both endeavors.The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.ReferencesBonassi S, Au WW. 2002. Biomarkers in molecular epidemiology studies for health risk prediction.Mutat Res 511(1):73-8611906843. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. 2009. Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. Atlanta, GANational Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Google ScholarCohen Hubal EA, Richard AM, Shah I, Gallagher J, Kavlock R, Blancato Jet al.. 2010. Exposure science and the U.S. EPA National Center for Computational Toxicology.J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 20(3):231-23618985077. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarFranco G.. 1999. Ramazzini and workers' health.Lancet 354(9181):858-86110485743. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarGeorgopoulos PG, Lioy PJ. 2006. From a theoretical framework of human exposure and dose assessment to computational system implementatino: the Modeling Environment for Total Risk Studies (MENTOR).J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 9(6):457-48317090483. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarGeorgopoulos PG, Sasso AF, Isukapalli SS, Lioy PJ, Vallero DA, Okino Met al.. 2009. Reconstructing population exposures to environmental chemicals from biomarkers: challenges and opportunities.J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 19(2):149-17118368010. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarHindorff LA, Sethupathy P, Junkins HA, Ramos EM, Mehta JP, Collins FSet al.. 2009. Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(23):9362-936719474294. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarHoffmann K, Becker K, Friedrich C, Helm D, Krause C, Seifert B.. 2000. The German Environmental Survey 1990/1992 (GerES II): cadmium in blood, urine and hair of adults and children.J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 10(2):126-13510791594. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarHolmes E, Loo RL, Stamler J, Bictash M, Yap IK, Chan Qet al.. 2008. Human metabolic phenotype diversity and its association with diet and blood pressure.Nature 453(7193):396-40018425110. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarLandrigan PJ, Trasande L, Thorpe LE, Gwynn C, Lioy PJ, D'Alton MEet al.. 2006. The National Children's Study: a 21-year prospective study of 100,000 American children.Pediatrics 118(5):2173-218617079592. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarLioy PJ. 2010. Exposure science: a view of the past and milestones for the future.Environ Health Perspect 118:1081-109020308034. Link, Google ScholarManolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA, Hunter DJet al.. 2009. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases.Nature 461(7265):747-75319812666. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarNicholson JK. 2006. Global systems biology, personalized medicine and molecular epidemiology. [Editorial]Mol Syst Biol 2:52; doi:10.1038/msb4100095[3 October 2006]17016518. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarOtt WR. 1990. Total human exposure: basic concepts, EPA field studies, and future research needs.J Air Waste Manage Assoc 40(7):966-9752198893. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarOtt WR. 1995. Human exposure assessment: the birth of a new science.J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 5(4):449-4728938244. Medline, Google ScholarPatel CJ, Bhattacharya J, Butte AJ. 2010. An Environment-Wide Association study (EWAS) on type 2 diabetes mellitus.PLoS One 5(5):e10746; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010746[Online 20 May 2010]20505766. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarRappaport SM. 2011. Implications of the exposome for exposure science.J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 21(1):5-921081972. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarRappaport SM, Smith MT. 2010. Environment and disease risks.Science 330(6003):460-46120966241. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarSexton K, Kleffman DE, Callahan MA. 1995. An introduction to the National Human Exposure Assessment Survey (NHEXAS) and related phase I field studies.J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 5(3):229-2328814770. Medline, Google ScholarWallace LA, Pellizzari ED, Hartwell TD, Sparacino CM, Sheldon LS, Zelon H. 1985. Personal exposures, indoor-outdoor relationships, and breath levels of toxic air pollutants measured for 355 persons in New Jersey.Atmos Environ 19(10):1651-1661. Crossref, Google ScholarWang Z, Klipfell E, Bennett BJ, Koeth R, Levison BS, Dugar Bet al.. 2011. Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease.Nature 472(7341):57-6321475195. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarWild CP. 2005. Complementing the genome with an "exposome": the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14(8):1847-185016103423. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited by Fair P and Houde M (2023) Environmental endocrine-disrupting chemicals and their effects in marine mammals Environmental Contaminants and Endocrine Health, 10.1016/B978-0-12-824464-7.00017-9, (283-306), . Fayet Y (2023) Place of Integrative Approaches in the Study of Spatial Dimension of Health Outcomes Integrative Approaches in Environmental Health and Exposome Research, 10.1007/978-3-031-28432-8_8, (209-238), . Pontarotti G and Merlin F (2023) From Exposome to Pathogenic Niche. Looking for an Operational Account of the Environment in Health Studies Integrative Approaches in Environmental Health and Exposome Research, 10.1007/978-3-031-28432-8_7, (173-206), . Giroux É (2023) A Critical Assessment of Exposures Integration in Exposome Research Integrative Approaches in Environmental Health and Exposome Research, 10.1007/978-3-031-28432-8_6, (129-171), . Viel J, Bonvallot N and Dab W (2023) Integration of Occupational Exposure into the Exposome Handbook of Life Course Occupational Health, 10.1007/978-3-030-94023-2_7-1, (1-16), . Antonelli M, Barbieri G and Donelli D (2022) Defining a new perspective in Environmental Health: the healing environment, International Journal of Biometeorology, 10.1007/s00484-022-02251-z, 66:5, (1039-1044), Online publication date: 1-May-2022. Zhang P, Carlsten C, Chaleckis R, Hanhineva K, Huang M, Isobe T, Koistinen V, Meister I, Papazian S, Sdougkou K, Xie H, Martin J, Rappaport S, Tsugawa H, Walker D, Woodruff T, Wright R and Wheelock C (2021) Defining the Scope of Exposome Studies and Research Needs from a Multidisciplinary Perspective, Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00648, 8:10, (839-852), Online publication date: 12-Oct-2021. Papadopoulou P and Lytras M (2021) Empowering the One Health approach and health resilience with digital technologies across OECD countries: the case of COVID-19 pandemic Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Analytics for Smart Healthcare, 10.1016/B978-0-12-822060-3.00012-7, (225-241), . Vaseashta A, Gevorgyan G, Kavaz D, Ivanov O, Jawaid M and Vasović D (2021) Exposome, Biomonitoring, Assessment and Data Analytics to Quantify Universal Water Quality Water Safety, Security and Sustainability, 10.1007/978-3-030-76008-3_4, (67-114), . Gearhart-Serna L, Davis J, Jolly M, Jayasundara N, Sauer S, Di Giulio R and Devi G (2020) A polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-enriched environmental chemical mixture enhances AhR, antiapoptotic signaling and a proliferative phenotype in breast cancer cells, Carcinogenesis, 10.1093/carcin/bgaa047 Wang Z, Zhang C, Huang F, Liu X, Wang Z and Yan B (2020) Breakthrough of ZrO2 nanoparticles into fetal brains depends on developmental stage of maternal placental barrier and fetal blood-brain-barrier, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123563, (123563), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2020. Canali S (2020) What Is New about the Exposome? Exploring Scientific Change in Contemporary Epidemiology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10.3390/ijerph17082879, 17:8, (2879) Marouli C, Papadopoulou P and Misseyanni A (2020) Current Environmental Health Challenges Handbook of Research on Emerging Developments and Environmental Impacts of Ecological Chemistry, 10.4018/978-1-7998-1241-8.ch002, (38-67) Papadopoulou P, Misseyanni A and Marouli C (2020) Current Environmental Health Challenges Handbook of Research on Emerging Developments and Environmental Impacts of Ecological Chemistry, 10.4018/978-1-7998-1241-8.ch001, (1-37) Pleil J, Stiegel M and Beauchamp J (2020) Breath biomarkers and the exposome Breathborne Biomarkers and the Human Volatilome, 10.1016/B978-0-12-819967-1.00001-3, (3-21), . Demetriou C and Vineis P (2020) Biomarkers and omics of health effects associated with traffic-related air pollution Traffic-Related Air Pollution, 10.1016/B978-0-12-818122-5.00011-9, (281-309), . Miller G (2020) The environment: the good, the bad, and the ugly The Exposome, 10.1016/B978-0-12-814079-6.00004-3, (81-106), . Marder M (2020) Exposure science Information Resources in Toxicology, 10.1016/B978-0-12-813724-6.00033-5, (361-374), . Cheung A, Walker D, Juran B, Miller G and Lazaridis K (2019) Studying the Exposome to Understand the Environmental Determinants of Complex Liver Diseases, Hepatology, 10.1002/hep.31028 Bocato M, Bianchi Ximenez J, Hoffmann C and Barbosa F (2019) An overview of the current progress, challenges, and prospects of human biomonitoring and exposome studies, Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 10.1080/10937404.2019.1661588, (1-26) Xue J, Lai Y, Liu C and Ru H (2019) Towards Mass Spectrometry-Based Chemical Exposome: Current Approaches, Challenges, and Future Directions, Toxics, 10.3390/toxics7030041, 7:3, (41) Sun X, Wu H, Liu Z, Chen Y, Chen J, Cheng L, Ding Y and Yu R (2019) Target-based metabolomics for fast and sensitive quantification of eight small molecules in human urine using HPLC-DAD and chemometrics tools resolving of highly overlapping peaks, Talanta, 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.03.090, 201, (174-184), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2019. O'Lenick C, Pleil J, Stiegel M, Sobus J and Wallace M (2018) Detection and analysis of endogenous polar volatile organic compounds (PVOCs) in urine for human exposome research, Biomarkers, 10.1080/1354750X.2018.1548031, 24:3, (240-248), Online publication date: 3-Apr-2019. Nieuwenhuijsen M, Agier L, Basagaña X, Urquiza J, Tamayo-Uria I, Giorgis-Allemand L, Robinson O, Siroux V, Maitre L, de Castro M, Valentin A, Donaire D, Dadvand P, Aasvang G, Krog N, Schwarze P, Chatzi L, Grazuleviciene R, Andrusaityte S, Dedele A, McEachan R, Wright J, West J, Ibarluzea J, Ballester F, Vrijheid M and Slama R (2019) Influence of the Urban Exposome on Birth Weight, Environmental Health Perspectives, 127:4, Online publication date: 1-Apr-2019. Lee D and Jacobs Jr D (2019) New approaches to cope with possible harms of low-dose environmental chemicals, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 10.1136/jech-2018-210920, 73:3, (193-197), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2019. Lee D and Jacobs D (2019) Firm human evidence on harms of endocrine-disrupting chemicals was unlikely to be obtainable for methodological reasons, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.12.005, 107, (107-115), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2019. Lau C, Siskos A, Maitre L, Robinson O, Athersuch T, Want E, Urquiza J, Casas M, Vafeiadi M, Roumeliotaki T, McEachan R, Azad R, Haug L, Meltzer H, Andrusaityte S, Petraviciene I, Grazuleviciene R, Thomsen C, Wright J, Slama R, Chatzi L, Vrijheid M, Keun H and Coen M (2018) Determinants of the urinary and serum metabolome in children from six European populations, BMC Medicine, 10.1186/s12916-018-1190-8, 16:1, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018. Turner M, Vineis P, Seleiro E, Dijmarescu M, Balshaw D, Bertollini R, Chadeau-Hyam M, Gant T, Gulliver J, Jeong A, Kyrtopoulos S, Martuzzi M, Miller G, Nawrot T, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Phillips D, Probst-Hensch N, Samet J, Vermeulen R, Vlaanderen J, Vrijheid M, Wild C and Kogevinas M (2018) EXPOsOMICS: final policy workshop and stakeholder consultation, BMC Public Health, 10.1186/s12889-018-5160-z, 18:1, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018. Gearhart-Serna L, Jayasundara N, Tacam M, Di Giulio R and Devi G (2018) Assessing Cancer Risk Associated with Aquatic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Pollution Reveals Dietary Routes of Exposure and Vulnerable Populations, Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 10.1155/2018/5610462, 2018, (1-10), Online publication date: 19-Sep-2018. Olympio K, Silva J, Silva A, Souza V, Buzalaf M, Barbosa Jr. F and Cardoso M (2018) Blood lead and cadmium levels in preschool children and associated risk factors in São Paulo, Brazil, Environmental Pollution, 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.124, 240, (831-838), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2018. Juarez P and Matthews-Juarez P (2018) Applying an Exposome-Wide (ExWAS) Approach to Cancer Research, Frontiers in Oncology, 10.3389/fonc.2018.00313, 8 Jain P, Vineis P, Liquet B, Vlaanderen J, Bodinier B, van Veldhoven K, Kogevinas M, Athersuch T, Font-Ribera L, Villanueva C, Vermeulen R and Chadeau-Hyam M (2018) A multivariate approach to investigate the combined biological effects of multiple exposures, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 10.1136/jech-2017-210061, 72:7, (564-571), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2018. (2018) Oxytocin, Arginine Vasopressin and Autism Spectrum Disorder Autism and Environmental Factors, 10.1002/9781119042280.ch4, (97-121) Maurer L, Luz A and Meyer J (2018) Detection of Mitochondrial Toxicity of Environmental Pollutants Using Caenorhabditis elegans Mitochondrial Dysfunction Caused by Drugs and Environmental Toxicants, 10.1002/9781119329725.ch43, (655-689) Sharma V, Upton P, Swenberg J and La D (2018) Carcinogenic Alkylating Agents ☆ Comprehensive Toxicology, 10.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.95690-3, (68-86), . Sobus J, Wambaugh J, Isaacs K, Williams A, McEachran A, Richard A, Grulke C, Ulrich E, Rager J, Strynar M and Newton S (2017) Integrating tools for non-targeted analysis research and chemical safety evaluations at the US EPA, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 10.1038/s41370-017-0012-y Yousaf B, Liu G, Abbas Q, Wang R, Imtiaz M and Zia-ur-Rehman M (2017) Investigating the uptake and acquisition of potentially toxic elements in plants and health risks associated with the addition of fresh biowaste amendments to industrially contaminated soil, Land Degradation & Development, 10.1002/ldr.2821 Dai D, Prussin A, Marr L, Vikesland P, Edwards M and Pruden A (2017) Factors Shaping the Human Exposome in the Built Environment: Opportunities for Engineering Control, Environmental Science & Technology, 10.1021/acs.est.7b01097, 51:14, (7759-7774), Online publication date: 18-Jul-2017. Stiegel M, Pleil J, Sobus J, Stevens T and Madden M (2017) Linking physiological parameters to perturbations in the human exposome: Environmental exposures modify blood pressure and lung function via inflammatory cytokine pathway, Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 10.1080/15287394.2017.1330578, 80:9, (485-501), Online publication date: 3-May-2017. Joyce K and Senier L (2017) Why environmental exposures?, Environmental Sociology, 10.1080/23251042.2017.1281375, 3:2, (101-106), Online publication date: 3-Apr-2017. Stingone J, Buck Louis G, Nakayama S, Vermeulen R, Kwok R, Cui Y, Balshaw D and Teitelbaum S (2017) Toward Greater Implementation of the Exposome Research Paradigm within Environmental Epidemiology, Annual Review of Public Health, 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082516-012750, 38:1, (315-327), Online publication date: 20-Mar-2017. Manrai A, Cui Y, Bushel P, Hall M, Karakitsios S, Mattingly C, Ritchie M, Schmitt C, Sarigiannis D, Thomas D, Wishart D, Balshaw D and Patel C (2017) Informatics and Data Analytics to Support Exposome-Based Discovery for Public Health, Annual Review of Public Health, 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082516-012737, 38:1, (279-294), Online publication date: 20-Mar-2017. Buck Louis G, Smarr M and Patel C (2017) The Exposome Research Paradigm: an Opportunity to Understand the Environmental Basis for Human Health and Disease, Current Environmental Health Reports, 10.1007/s40572-017-0126-3, 4:1, (89-98), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017. Glorennec P, Lucas J, Mercat A, Roudot A and Le Bot B (2016) Environmental and dietary exposure of young children to inorganic trace elements, Environment International, 10.1016/j.envint.2016.10.009, 97, (28-36), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016. Wissenbach D, Winkler B, Otto W, Kohajda T, Roeder S, Müller A, Hoeke H, Matysik S, Schlink U, Borte M, Herbarth O, Lehmann I and von-Bergen M (2016) Long-term indoor VOC concentrations assessment a trend analysis of distribution, disposition, and personal exposure in cohort study samples, Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 10.1007/s11869-016-0396-1, 9:8, (941-950), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016. Pleil J (2016) Breath biomarkers in toxicology, Archives of Toxicology, 10.1007/s00204-016-1817-5, 90:11, (2669-2682), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2016. Hemeryck L, Moore S and Vanhaecke L (2016) Mass Spectrometric Mapping of the DNA Adductome as a Means to Study Genotoxin Exposure, Metabolism, and Effect, Analytical Chemistry, 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00863, 88:15, (7436-7446), Online publication date: 2-Aug-2016. Mapesa J, Maxwell A and Ryan E (2015) An Exposome Perspective on Environmental Enteric Dysfunction, Environmental Health Perspectives, 124:8, (1121-1126), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2016. Breton J, Daniel C, Vignal C, Body-Malapel M, Garat A, Plé C and Foligné B (2016) Does oral exposure to cadmium and lead mediate susceptibility to colitis? The dark-and-bright sides of heavy metals in gut ecology, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/srep19200, 6:1, Online publication date: 1-May-2016. Illari P and Russo F (2013) Information Channels and Biomarkers of Disease, Topoi, 10.1007/s11245-013-9228-1, 35:1, (175-190), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2016. Bijlsma N and Cohen M (2016) Environmental Chemical Assessment in Clinical Practice: Unveiling the Elephant in the Room, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10.3390/ijerph13020181, 13:2, (181) Lee D and Jacobs D (2016) Methodological issues in human studies of endocrine disrupting chemicals, Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, 10.1007/s11154-016-9340-9, 16:4, (289-297), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2015. Langley G, Austin C, Balapure A, Birnbaum L, Bucher J, Fentem J, Fitzpatrick S, Fowle J, Kavlock R, Kitano H, Lidbury B, Muotri A, Peng S, Sakharov D, Seidle T, Trez T, Tonevitsky A, van de Stolpe A, Whelan M and Willett C (2015) Lessons from Toxicology: Developing a 21st-Century Paradigm for Medical Research, Environmental Health Perspectives, 123:11, (A268-A272), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2015. Grandjean P, Barouki R, Bellinger D, Casteleyn L, Chadwick L, Cordier S, Etzel R, Gray K, Ha E, Junien C, Karagas M, Kawamoto T, Lawrence B, Perera F, Prins G, Puga A, Rosenfeld C, Sherr D, Sly P, Suk W, Sun Q, Toppari J, van den Hazel P, Walker C and Heindel J (2015) Life-Long Implications of Developmental Exposure to Environmental Stressors: New Perspectives, Endocrinology, 10.1210/en.2015-1350, 156:10, (3408-3415), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015. Shekhar S, Feiner S and Aref W (2015) From GPS and virtual globes to spatial computing - 2020, GeoInformatica, 10.1007/s10707-015-0235-9, 19:4, (799-832), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015. Robinson O, Basagaña X, Agier L, de Castro M, Hernandez-Ferrer C, Gonzalez J, Grimalt J, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Sunyer J, Slama R and Vrijheid M (2015) The Pregnancy Exposome: Multiple Environmental Exposures in the INMA-Sabadell Birth Cohort, Environmental Science & Technology, 10.1021/acs.est.5b01782, 49:17, (10632-10641), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2015. Athersuch T and Keun H (2015) Metabolic profiling in human exposome studies, Mutagenesis, 10.1093/mutage/gev060, (gev060) Lorusso L and Bacchini F (2015) A reconsideration of the role of self-identified races in epidemiology and biomedical research, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.02.004, 52, (56-64), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2015. Guo W, Zhang J, Li W, Xu M and Liu S (2015) Disruption of iron homeostasis and resultant health effects upon exposure to various environmental pollutants: A critical review, Journal of Environmental Sciences, 10.1016/j.jes.2015.04.004, 34, (155-164), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2015. Remane D, Grunwald S, Hoeke H, Mueller A, Roeder S, von Bergen M and Wissenbach D (2015) Validation of a multi-analyte HPLC-DAD method for determination of uric acid, creatinine, homovanillic acid, niacinamide, hippuric acid, indole-3-acetic acid and 2-methylhippuric acid in human urine, Journal of Chromatography B, 10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.06.021, 998-999, (40-44), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2015. Hoeke H, Roeder S, Bertsche T, Lehmann
Referência(s)