Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The Spaniels of St. Marx and the Panglossian Paradox: A Critique of a Rhetorical Programme

1995; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 70; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/419174

1539-7718

David C. Queller,

Philosophy and History of Science

Previous articleNext article No AccessCommentaryThe Spaniels of St. Marx and the Panglossian Paradox: A Critique of a Rhetorical ProgrammeDavid C. QuellerDavid C. Queller Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Quarterly Review of Biology Volume 70, Number 4Dec., 1995 Published in association with Stony Brook University Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/419174 Views: 62Total views on this site Citations: 34Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1995 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Michael A Woodley of Menie, Matthew A Sarraf Controversies in Evolutionary Psychology, (Apr 2021): 1399–1420.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_2175John Alcock Richard Lewontin and Stephen Jay Gould, (Apr 2021): 6670–6673.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_1376Alan H Krakauer Spandrels, (Apr 2021): 7820–7822.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_2171Laurence Mueller 1979 A critique of the adaptationist program, (Jan 2020): 105–106.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816013-8.00044-2Thomas Elmqvist, José Siri, Erik Andersson, Pippin Anderson, Xuemei Bai, Pranab Kishore Das, Tatu Gatere, Andrew Gonzalez, Julie Goodness, Steven N. Handel, Ellika Hermansson Török, Jessica Kavonic, Jakub Kronenberg, Elisabet Lindgren, David Maddox, Raymond Maher, Cheikh Mbow, Timon McPhearson, Joe Mulligan, Guy Nordenson, Meggan Spires, Ulrika Stenkula, Kazuhiko Takeuchi, Coleen Vogel Urban tinkering, Sustainability Science 13, no.66 (Aug 2018): 1549–1564.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0611-0John Alcock Richard Lewontin and Stephen Jay Gould, (Dec 2017): 1–4.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1376-1Alan H. Krakauer Spandrels, (Jun 2018): 1–3.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2171-1Michael A. Woodley of Menie, Matthew A. Sarraf Controversies in Evolutionary Psychology, (Jun 2018): 1–22.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2175-1Sonya Bahar Spandrels, Exaptations, and Raw Material, (Nov 2017): 333–359.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1054-9_15John Alcock The Behavioral Sciences and Sociobiology: A Darwinian Approach, (Dec 2017): 37–59.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69123-7_3Gary L. Brase The nature of thinking, shallow and deep, Frontiers in Psychology 5 (May 2014).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00435Patrick Forber Debating the Power and Scope of Adaptation, (Apr 2013): 145–160.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6537-5_8Randolph M. Nesse Ten questions for evolutionary studies of disease vulnerability, Evolutionary Applications 4, no.22 (Jan 2011): 264–277.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00181.x J. Stephen Lansing Murray P. Cox The Domain of the Replicators, Current Anthropology 52, no.11 (Jul 2015): 105–125.https://doi.org/10.1086/657643David C. Queller Profile: Selections from a life in social selection, (Nov 2010): 328–330.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781360.026Daniel J.C. Kronauer Mutualism: Wasp Keeps Watchdogs to Protect Young, Current Biology 18, no.1818 (Sep 2008): R866–R868.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.064Heikki Helanterä, Francis L.W Ratnieks Geometry explains the benefits of division of labour in a leafcutter ant, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275, no.16401640 (Mar 2008): 1255–1260.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0024Stephen J. Freeland Could an intelligent alien predict earth's biochemistry?, (Dec 2007): 280–317.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511536557.016Jodi Kearns, Brian C. O'Connor, Francisco B.‐G. Moore Provocations on the structure of scholarly writing in the digital era, On the Horizon 15, no.44 (Oct 2007): 222–238.https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120710836246Simon Jonathan Hampton Domain Mismatches, Scruffy Engineering, Exaptations and Spandrels, Theory & Psychology 14, no.22 (Aug 2016): 147–166.https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354304042014Craig T. Palmer, Randy Thornhill Straw men and fairy tales: Evaluating reactions to a natural history of rape, Journal of Sex Research 40, no.33 (Aug 2003): 249–255.https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552189John Alcock A textbook history of animal behaviour, Animal Behaviour 65, no.11 (Jan 2003): 3–10.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.2044Gary L. Brase Ecological and evolutionary validity: Comments on Johnson-Laird, Legrenzi, Girotto, Legrenzi, and Caverni's (1999) mental-model theory of extensional reasoning., Psychological Review 109, no.44 (Jan 2002): 722–728.https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.722Ullica SegerstrÅle World views and Trojan horses in the sociobiology debate, Journal of Biosciences 26, no.55 (Dec 2001): 549–554.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02704752Thomas Getty A constrained view of constraints, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15, no.66 (Jun 2000): 249.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01865-6Bruce J. Ellis, Timothy Ketelaar On the Natural Selection of Alternative Models: Evaluation of Explanations in Evolutionary Psychology, Psychological Inquiry 11, no.11 (Nov 2009): 56–68.https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1101_03Jeremy C. Ahouse The Tragedy of a priori Selectionism: Dennett and Gould on Adaptationism, Biology & Philosophy 13, no.33 (Jul 1998): 359–391.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006508719300Arthur L. Koch How Did Bacteria Come to Be?, (Jan 1998): 353–399.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2911(08)60135-6Albert F. Bennett Adaptation and the Evolution of Physiological Characters, (Jan 2011): 3–16.https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.cp130101Stephen Jay Gould The exaptive excellence of spandrels as a term and prototype, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94, no.2020 (Sep 1997): 10750–10755.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.20.10750C. Loring Brace The intellectual standing of Charles Darwin, and the legacy of the “Scottish Enlightenment” in biological thought, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 104, no.S25S25 (Jan 1997): 91–111.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(1997)25+<91::AID-AJPA4>3.0.CO;2-AG.A. Clark Aspects of Early Hominid Sociality: an Evolutionary Perspective, Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 7, no.11 (Jun 2008): 209–231.https://doi.org/10.1525/ap3a.1997.7.1.209G.A. Clark, C.M. Barton Rediscovering Darwin, Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 7, no.11 (Jun 2008): 309–319.https://doi.org/10.1525/ap3a.1997.7.1.309 Bibliographie, (): 209–263.https://doi.org/10.4000/books.editionsmsh.7121