Indirect cognitive control through top‐down activation of perceptual symbols
2009; Wiley; Volume: 39; Issue: 7 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1002/ejsp.679
ISSN1099-0992
AutoresEzequiel Morsella, Meredith Lanska, Christopher C. Berger, Adam Gazzaley,
Tópico(s)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
ResumoEuropean Journal of Social PsychologyVolume 39, Issue 7 p. 1173-1177 Commentary Indirect cognitive control through top-down activation of perceptual symbols Ezequiel Morsella, Corresponding Author Ezequiel Morsella [email protected] Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, USA Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, USADepartment of Psychology, San Francisco State University (SFSU), 1600 Holloway Avenue, EP 301, San Francisco, California 94132-4168, USA.Search for more papers by this authorMeredith Lanska, Meredith Lanska Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, USASearch for more papers by this authorChristopher C. Berger, Christopher C. Berger Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, USASearch for more papers by this authorAdam Gazzaley, Adam Gazzaley Department of Neurology and Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, USA Helen Willis Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, USASearch for more papers by this author Ezequiel Morsella, Corresponding Author Ezequiel Morsella [email protected] Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, USA Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, USADepartment of Psychology, San Francisco State University (SFSU), 1600 Holloway Avenue, EP 301, San Francisco, California 94132-4168, USA.Search for more papers by this authorMeredith Lanska, Meredith Lanska Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, USASearch for more papers by this authorChristopher C. Berger, Christopher C. Berger Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, USASearch for more papers by this authorAdam Gazzaley, Adam Gazzaley Department of Neurology and Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, USA Helen Willis Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, USASearch for more papers by this author First published: 13 November 2009 https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.679Citations: 15AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Arkin, R. C. (1998). Behavior-based robotics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Bargh, J. A., & Morsella, E. (2008). The unconscious mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 73–79. Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13, 185–188. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–609. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. Burgess, C., & Lund, K. (1997). Modelling parsing constraints with high-dimensional context space. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 177–210. Cunningham, W. A., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., Banaji, M. R., et al. (2004). Separable neural components in the processing of Black and White faces. Psychological Science, 15, 806–813. Farah, M. J. (2000). The neural bases of mental imagery. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences ( 2nd ed., pp. 965–974). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Ffytche, D. H. (2000). Imaging conscious vision. In T. Metzinger (Ed.), Neural correlates of consciousness: Empirical and conceptual questions (pp. 221–230). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Fries, P. (2005). A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: Neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 474–480. Gazzaley, A., Cooney, J. W., Rissman, J., & D'Esposito, M. (2005). Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1298–1300. Gazzaley, A., & D'Esposito, M. (2007). Unifying prefrontal cortex function: Executive control, neural networks and top-down modulation. In B. Miller & J. Cummings (Eds.), The human frontal lobes: Functions and disorders (pp. 187–206). New York: Guilford Press. Goodale, M., & Milner, D. (2004). Sight unseen: An exploration of conscious and unconscious vision. New York: Oxford University Press. Grafman, J., & Krueger, F. (2009). The prefrontal cortex stores structured event complexes that are the representational basis for cognitively derived actions. In E. Morsella, J. A. Bargh, & P. M. Gollwitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of human action (pp. 197–213). New York: Oxford University Press. Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42, 335–346. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding: A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937. Kosslyn, S. M., Thomspon, W. L., & Ganis, G. (2006). The case for mental imagery. New York: Oxford University Press. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. Lavond, D. G., Kim, J. J., & Thompson, R. F. (1993). Mammalian brain substrates of aversive classical conditioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 317–342. LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon and Schuster. Lieberman, M. D. (2007). The X- and C-systems: The neural basis of automatic and controlled social cognition. In E. Harmon-Jones, & P. Winkielman (Eds.), Fundamentals of social neuroscience (pp. 290–315). New York: Guilford. Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology—Paris, 102, 59–70. Markman, A. B. (1999). Knowledge representation. Hillsdales, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Markman, A. B., & Dietrich, E. (2000). Extending the classical view of representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 470–475. Martin, A. (2001). Functional neuroimaging of semantic memory. In R. Cabeza, & A. Kingstone (Eds.), Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition (pp. 153–186). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Morsella, E. (2005). The function of phenomenal states: Supramodular interaction theory. Psychological Review, 112, 1000–1021. Morsella, E., & Krauss, R. M. (2004). The role of gestures in spatial working memory and speech. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 411–424. Morsella, E., Krieger, S. C., Rizzo-Fontanesi, S., & Bargh, J. A. (2007). The primary function of consciousness in the nervous system. Annual Review of Biomedical Sciences, 9, 37–40. Morsella, E., Larson, L. R. L., & Bargh, J. A. (in press) Indirect cognitive control, working-memory-related movements, and sources of automatisms. In E. Morsella (Ed.), Expressing oneself/expressing one's self: Communication, cognition, language, and identity. London: Taylor and Francis. Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483–522. Olsson, A., & Phelps, E. A. (2004). Learned fear of "unseen" faces after Pavlovian, observational, and instructed fear. Psychological Science, 15, 822–828. Olsson, A., & Phelps, E. A. (2007). Social learning of fear. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1095–1102. Paivio, A. (1979). Imagery and verbal processes. Hillsdales, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Pessiglione, M., Petrovic, P., Daunizeau, J., Palminteri, S., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2008). Subliminal instrumental conditioning demonstrated in the human brain. Neuron, 59, 561–567. Pulvermuller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576–582. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2002). Mental imagery: In search of a theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 156–238. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 220–247. Tinbergen, N. (1952). "Derived" activities: Their causation, biological significance, origin and emancipation during evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology, 27, 1–32. Westwood, D. A. (2009). The visual control of object manipulation. In E. Morsella, J. A. Bargh, & P. M. Gollwitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of human action (pp. 88–103). New York: Oxford University Press. Williams, M. A., Morris, A. P., McGlone, F., Abbott, D. F., & Mattingley, J. B. (2004). Amygdala responses to fearful and happy facial expressions under conditions of binocular suppression. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 2898–2904. Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Experiential traces and mental simulations in language comprehension. In M. DeVega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (pp. 165–180). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13, 168–171. Citing Literature Volume39, Issue7Special Issue: Modalities of Social Life: Roadmaps for an Embodied Social PsychologyDecember 2009Pages 1173-1177 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)