Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Artigo Produção Nacional Revisado por pares

BIBTEX RIS

Influence of light-activated and auto- and dual-polymerizing adhesive systems on bond strength of indirect composite resin to dentin

2006; Elsevier BV; Volume: 96; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.06.003

1097-6841

Maria Jose Lorena de Menezes, César Augusto Galvão Arrais, Marcelo Giannini,

Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

Statement of problem Clinicians must be aware of the bonding effectiveness of auto- and dual- polymerizing adhesive systems before choosing the material and technique of cementing inlay/onlays to dentin. An inadequate choice may compromise the success of indirect restorations. Purpose This study compared the microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of indirect composite resin bonded to dentin by light-activated, autopolymerizing, and dual-polymerizing adhesive systems. Material and methods Occlusal dentin surfaces of 36 human third molars were exposed and flattened. Teeth were assigned to 1 of the following 6 groups (n=6) of adhesive luting systems: 2 dual-polymerizing systems (Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus/Rely X [SBMP] and Prime & Bond NT Dual Cure/Enforce [PBDC]); 1 autopolymerizing system (ED Primer/Panavia F [EDP]); and 3 light-activated systems (control groups) (Adper Single Bond/Rely X [SB], Prime & Bond NT/Enforce [PB], and Clearfil SE Bond/Panavia F [CF]). The restorative materials were applied according to manufacturer's directions. A 2-mm-thick prepolymerized composite resin (Clearfil APX) disc was cemented with the resin cements on the bonded dentin. Teeth were stored in water at 37°C for 24 hours. Afterwards, teeth were sectioned both mesial-distally and buccal-lingually to obtain multiple bonded beam specimens with 0.8 mm2 of cross-sectional area. Each specimen was tested in tension at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure. Data (MPa) were analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey post hoc test (α=.05). Failure patterns of tested specimens were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy. Results Mean MTBS values (MPa) for experimental groups were as follows: SBMP, 32.89 ± 3.26a; SB, 26.74 ± 7.45ab; PB, 26.11 ± 4.48ab; CF, 25.30 ± 6.42ab; EDP, 16.82 ± 5.53bc; PBDC, 11.20 ± 5.89c (P<.001). Groups with similar lowercase letters were not significantly different. Failure pattern of fractured specimens varied according to the polymerization mode. Conclusion The autopolymerizing system and one of the dual-polymerizing systems were as effective as the light-activated systems in bonding indirect composite restorations to dentin. Clinicians must be aware of the bonding effectiveness of auto- and dual- polymerizing adhesive systems before choosing the material and technique of cementing inlay/onlays to dentin. An inadequate choice may compromise the success of indirect restorations. This study compared the microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of indirect composite resin bonded to dentin by light-activated, autopolymerizing, and dual-polymerizing adhesive systems. Occlusal dentin surfaces of 36 human third molars were exposed and flattened. Teeth were assigned to 1 of the following 6 groups (n=6) of adhesive luting systems: 2 dual-polymerizing systems (Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus/Rely X [SBMP] and Prime & Bond NT Dual Cure/Enforce [PBDC]); 1 autopolymerizing system (ED Primer/Panavia F [EDP]); and 3 light-activated systems (control groups) (Adper Single Bond/Rely X [SB], Prime & Bond NT/Enforce [PB], and Clearfil SE Bond/Panavia F [CF]). The restorative materials were applied according to manufacturer's directions. A 2-mm-thick prepolymerized composite resin (Clearfil APX) disc was cemented with the resin cements on the bonded dentin. Teeth were stored in water at 37°C for 24 hours. Afterwards, teeth were sectioned both mesial-distally and buccal-lingually to obtain multiple bonded beam specimens with 0.8 mm2 of cross-sectional area. Each specimen was tested in tension at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure. Data (MPa) were analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey post hoc test (α=.05). Failure patterns of tested specimens were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy. Mean MTBS values (MPa) for experimental groups were as follows: SBMP, 32.89 ± 3.26a; SB, 26.74 ± 7.45ab; PB, 26.11 ± 4.48ab; CF, 25.30 ± 6.42ab; EDP, 16.82 ± 5.53bc; PBDC, 11.20 ± 5.89c (P<.001). Groups with similar lowercase letters were not significantly different. Failure pattern of fractured specimens varied according to the polymerization mode. The autopolymerizing system and one of the dual-polymerizing systems were as effective as the light-activated systems in bonding indirect composite restorations to dentin.