Revisão Revisado por pares

A Response to Orzack and Sober: Formal Analysis and the Fluidity of Science

1993; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 68; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/418302

ISSN

1539-7718

Autores

Richard Levins,

Tópico(s)

Ecosystem dynamics and resilience

Resumo

Previous articleNext article No AccessCommentaryA Response to Orzack and Sober: Formal Analysis and the Fluidity of ScienceRichard LevinsRichard Levins Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Quarterly Review of Biology Volume 68, Number 4Dec., 1993 Published in association with Stony Brook University Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/418302 Views: 39Total views on this site Citations: 69Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1993 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Alkistis Elliott-Graves Ecological Complexity, 106 (Jul 2023).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108900010Margherita Harris, Roman Frigg Climate Models and Robustness Analysis–Part II: The Justificatory Challenge, (Jan 2023): 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16960-2_147-1Marie Gueguen A Crack in the Track of the Hubble Constant, (Jan 2023): 33–55.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26618-8_3Lorenzo Casini, Jürgen Landes Confirmation by Robustness Analysis: A Bayesian Account, Erkenntnis 78 (May 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-022-00537-7Aki Lehtinen The epistemic benefits of generalisation in modelling II: expressive power and abstraction, Synthese 200, no.22 (Mar 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03530-3William J-A Ou, Gil J B Henriques, Athmanathan Senthilnathan, Po-Ju Ke, Tess N Grainger, Rachel M Germain Writing Accessible Theory in Ecology and Evolution: Insights from Cognitive Load Theory, BioScience 72, no.33 (Jan 2022): 300–313.https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab133Matthew A. Etterson, Gerald T. Ankley Endogenous Lifecycle Models for Chemical Risk Assessment, Environmental Science & Technology 55, no.2323 (Nov 2021): 15596–15608.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04791Lachlan Douglas Walmsley The strategy of model building in climate science, Synthese 199, no.1-21-2 (May 2020): 745–765.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02707-yAki Lehtinen The epistemic benefits of generalisation in modelling I: Systems and applicability, Synthese 199, no.3-43-4 (Jun 2021): 10343–10370.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03250-0Gareth P. Fuller, Armin W. Schulz Idealizations and Partitions: A Defense of Robustness Analysis, European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11, no.44 (Nov 2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00428-8Margherita Harris The epistemic value of independent lies: false analogies and equivocations, Synthese 199, no.5-65-6 (Oct 2021): 14577–14597.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03434-8Moein Khazaei, Mohammad Ramezani, Amin Padash, Dorien DeTombe Creating shared value to redesigning IT-service products using SYRCS; Diagnosing and tackling complex problems, Information Systems and e-Business Management 19, no.33 (May 2021): 957–992.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-021-00525-4Sandy Raimondo, Amelie Schmolke, Nathan Pollesch, Chiara Accolla, Nika Galic, Adrian Moore, Maxime Vaugeois, Pamela Rueda‐Cediel, Andrew Kanarek, Jill Awkerman, Valery Forbes Pop‐guide: Population modeling guidance, use, interpretation, and development for ecological risk assessment, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 17, no.44 (Feb 2021): 767–784.https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4377Bruno Travassos‐Britto, Renata Pardini, Charbel N. El‐Hani, Paulo I. Prado Towards a pragmatic view of theories in ecology, Oikos 130, no.66 (Mar 2021): 821–830.https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.07314Marco Ortiz, Roberto A. Uribe Comparing the stability of successional transient models in kelp forests and barrens (south‐east Pacific): Implications for conservation monitoring, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 31, no.66 (Feb 2021): 1297–1310.https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3497Ryan O’Loughlin Robustness reasoning in climate model comparisons, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 85 (Feb 2021): 34–43.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.12.005Marco Ortiz, Ferenc Jordán Modelling and Conservation of Coastal Marine Ecosystems in Latin America, (Dec 2020): 203–207.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58211-1_10Jan Jansen, Piers K. Dunstan, Nicole A. Hill, Philippe Koubbi, Jessica Melbourne‐Thomas, Romain Causse, Craig R. Johnson Integrated assessment of the spatial distribution and structural dynamics of deep benthic marine communities, Ecological Applications 30, no.33 (Jan 2020).https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2065Travis LaCroix Evolutionary Explanations of Simple Communication: Signalling Games and Their Models, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 51, no.11 (Oct 2019): 19–43.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-019-09481-7Pablo Lorenzano, Martín Andrés Díaz Laws, Models, and Theories in Biology: A Unifying Interpretation, (Apr 2020): 163–207.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39589-6_10Elizabeth C. Considine The Search for Clinically Useful Biomarkers of Complex Disease: A Data Analysis Perspective, Metabolites 9, no.77 (Jul 2019): 126.https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9070126Aki Lehtinen Derivational Robustness and Indirect Confirmation, Erkenntnis 83, no.33 (May 2017): 539–576.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-017-9902-6Sandy Raimondo, Matthew Etterson, Nathan Pollesch, Kristina Garber, Andrew Kanarek, Wade Lehmann, Jill Awkerman A framework for linking population model development with ecological risk assessment objectives, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 14, no.33 (Feb 2018): 369–380.https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.2024Silvia Caianiello Prolegomena to a History of Robustness, (Jan 2019): 23–54.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01198-7_2Marco Buzzoni Robustness, Mechanism, and the Counterfactual Attribution of Goals in Biology, (Jan 2019): 55–74.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01198-7_3Wendy S. Parker The Significance of Robust Climate Projections, (Feb 2018): 273–296.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65058-6_9Zachary Pirtle, Jay Odenbaugh, Zoe Szajnfarber “The One, the Few or the Many?”: Using Independence As a Strategy in Engineering Development and Modeling, (Jul 2018): 13–31.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91029-1_2Elhabib Moustaid, Sebastiaan Meijer A hybrid approach for building models and simulations for smart cities: Expert knowledge and low dimensionality, (Dec 2017): 1551–1562.https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2017.8247896Fulvio Mazzocchi, Antonello Pasini Climate model pluralism beyond dynamical ensembles, WIREs Climate Change 8, no.66 (May 2017).https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.477Marco Ortiz, Richard Levins, Chris T. Bauch Self-feedbacks determine the sustainability of human interventions in eco-social complex systems: Impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem health, PLOS ONE 12, no.44 (Apr 2017): e0176163.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176163Anantha M. Prasad, Louis R. Iverson, Stephen N. Matthews, Matthew P. Peters A multistage decision support framework to guide tree species management under climate change via habitat suitability and colonization models, and a knowledge-based scoring system, Landscape Ecology 31, no.99 (Apr 2016): 2187–2204.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0369-7Aki Lehtinen Allocating confirmation with derivational robustness, Philosophical Studies 173, no.99 (Jan 2016): 2487–2509.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0625-3Spencer Phillips Hey Heuristics and Meta-heuristics in Scientific Judgement, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67, no.22 (Nov 2020): 471–495.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axu045S. Andrew Inkpen Like Hercules and the Hydra: Trade-offs and strategies in ecological model-building and experimental design, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 57 (Jun 2016): 34–43.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.02.019Mark R. Payne, Manuel Barange, William W. L. Cheung, Brian R. MacKenzie, Harold P. Batchelder, Xochitl Cormon, Tyler D. Eddy, Jose A. Fernandes, Anne B. Hollowed, Miranda C. Jones, Jason S. Link, Philipp Neubauer, Ivonne Ortiz, Ana M. Queirós, José Ricardo Paula Uncertainties in projecting climate-change impacts in marine ecosystems, ICES Journal of Marine Science 73, no.55 (Dec 2015): 1272–1282.https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv231Martin A. Vezér Computer models and the evidence of anthropogenic climate change: An epistemology of variety-of-evidence inferences and robustness analysis, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56 (Apr 2016): 95–102.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.01.004Antonello Pasini, Fulvio Mazzocchi A multi-approach strategy in climate attribution studies: Is it possible to apply a robustness framework?, Environmental Science & Policy 50 (Jun 2015): 191–199.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.018Elisabeth A. Lloyd Model robustness as a confirmatory virtue: The case of climate science, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49 (Feb 2015): 58–68.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.12.002Jeffrey M. Dambacher, Peter C. Rothlisberg, Neil R. Loneragan Qualitative mathematical models to support ecosystem‐based management of Australia's Northern Prawn Fishery, Ecological Applications 25, no.11 (Jan 2015): 278–298.https://doi.org/10.1890/13-2030.1Mark Dickey-Collas, Mark R. Payne, Verena M. Trenkel, Richard D. M. Nash Hazard warning: model misuse ahead, ICES Journal of Marine Science 71, no.88 (Jan 2014): 2300–2306.https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fst215Ageliki Lefkaditou, Konstantinos Korfiatis, Tasos Hovardas Contextualising the Teaching and Learning of Ecology: Historical and Philosophical Considerations, (Dec 2013): 523–550.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_17Jani Raerinne Robustness and sensitivity of biological models, Philosophical Studies 166, no.22 (Oct 2012): 285–303.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-0040-3Angela Potochnik Feminist implications of model-based science, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43, no.22 (Jun 2012): 383–389.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.12.033JM Cope, MA Haltuch Temporal and spatial summer groundfish assemblages in trawlable habitat off the west coast of the USA, 1977 to 2009, Marine Ecology Progress Series 451 (Apr 2012): 187–200.https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09595Matthew R. Evans, Ken J. Norris, Tim G. Benton Predictive ecology: systems approaches, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367, no.15861586 (Jan 2012): 163–169.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0191Steven Hecht Orzack The philosophy of modelling or does the philosophy of biology have any use?, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367, no.15861586 (Jan 2012): 170–180.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0265Tarja Knuuttila, Andrea Loettgers Causal isolation robustness analysis: the combinatorial strategy of circadian clock research, Biology & Philosophy 26, no.55 (Jun 2011): 773–791.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-011-9279-xTarja Knuuttila Modelling and representing: An artefactual approach to model-based representation, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42, no.22 (Jun 2011): 262–271.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.034John Matthewson Trade-offs in model-building: A more target-oriented approach, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42, no.22 (Jun 2011): 324–333.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.040Marilia Sá Carvalho, Valeska Lima Andreozzi, Claudia Torres Codeço, Dayse Pereira Campos, Maria Tereza Serrano Barbosa, Silvia Emiko Shimakura Análise de sobrevivência: teoria e aplicações em saúde, 121 (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.7476/9788575413029Jaakko Kuorikoski, Aki Lehtinen, and Caterina Marchionni Economic Modelling as Robustness Analysis, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61, no.33 (Dec 2020): 541–567.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axp049Patrick Forber Confirmation and explaining how possible, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41, no.11 (Mar 2010): 32–40.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2009.12.006S. Meirmans, R. Strand Why Are There So Many Theories for Sex, and What Do We Do with Them?, Journal of Heredity 101, no.Supplement 1Supplement 1 (Apr 2010): S3–S12.https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esq021Aki Lehtinen, Jaakko Kuorikoski Unrealistic Assumptions in Rational Choice Theory, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37, no.22 (Aug 2016): 115–138.https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393107299684Laura Nagy, Anne Fairbrother, Matthew Etterson, Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta The Intersection of Independent Lies: Increasing Realism in Ecological Risk Assessment, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 13, no.22 (Mar 2007): 355–369.https://doi.org/10.1080/10807030701226814Stuart R. Borrett, Will Bridewell, Pat Langley, Kevin R. Arrigo A method for representing and developing process models, Ecological Complexity 4, no.1-21-2 (Mar 2007): 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.017Michael Weisberg Richard Levins’ Philosophy of Science, Biology & Philosophy 21, no.55 (Jan 2007): 603–605.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-006-9048-4Jay Odenbaugh The strategy of “The strategy of model building in population biology”, Biology & Philosophy 21, no.55 (Dec 2006): 607–621.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-006-9049-3Michael Weisberg Forty Years of ‘The Strategy’: Levins on Model Building and Idealization, Biology & Philosophy 21, no.55 (Jan 2007): 623–645.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-006-9051-9Sandy Raimondo, Charles L. McKenney, Mace G. Barron Application of Perturbation Simulations in Population Risk Assessment for Different Life History Strategies and Elasticity Patterns, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 12, no.55 (Oct 2006): 983–999.https://doi.org/10.1080/10807030600826904Jim Woodward Some varieties of robustness, Journal of Economic Methodology 13, no.22 (Jun 2006): 219–240.https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780600733376Sahotra Sarkar Biodiversity and Environmental Philosophy, 13 (Jul 2009).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498558Jay Odenbaugh THE “STRUCTURE” OF POPULATION ECOLOGY: PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTIONS ON UNSTRUCTURED AND STRUCTURED MODELS, (Jan 2005): 63–77.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012088459-9/50006-6Gregory J. Cooper The Science of the Struggle for Existence, 35 (May 2010).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720154Marco Ortiz, Matthias Wolff, Jaime Mendo Qualitative modelling for the development of a sustainable management strategy for the Peruvian scallopArgopecten purpuratus (Lamarck 1819), Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 12, no.33 (Jan 2002): 273–287.https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.497Peter Taylor, Yrjö Haila Situatedness and Problematic Boundaries: Conceptualizing Life's Complex Ecological Context, Biology & Philosophy 16, no.44 (Sep 2001): 521–532.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011957913992Peter Taylor Socio-Ecological Webs and Sites of Sociality:Levins’ Strategy of Model Building Revisited, Biology & Philosophy 15, no.22 (Mar 2014): 197–210.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006684801878K.J. Korfiatis, G.P. Stamou Habitat Templets and the Changing Worldview of Ecology, Biology & Philosophy 14, no.33 (Jul 1999): 375–393.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006543127454C. N. Van Der Weele Environmental Causes in Ontogeny and an Ethics of Attention, (Jan 1997): 283–300.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0538-7_17

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX