The Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy in the Theory of Capital; A View from New Haven: A Review Article
1974; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 82; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/260245
ISSN1537-534X
Autores Tópico(s)Economic Theory and Institutions
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessReview ArticleThe Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy in the Theory of Capital; A View from New Haven: A Review ArticleJoseph E. StiglitzJoseph E. StiglitzPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 82, Number 4Jul. - Aug., 1974 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/260245 Views: 29Total views on this site Citations: 43Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1974 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Selwyn Cornish, John Hawkins Geoffrey Harcourt (1931–2021): His Life and Works, History of Economics Review 81, no.11 (Apr 2022): 8–31.https://doi.org/10.1080/10370196.2022.2046974Tiago Mata Some Notes on the Life of a Book, SSRN Electronic Journal 28 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3866614Avi J. Cohen Who Is (Your) Geoff Harcourt? Afterword Two on The Man, SSRN Electronic Journal 1 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3866627Balázs István Tóth How Broad a Meaning Can "Capital" Acquire? Towards the Rigorous Comprehension of Capital, Virgil Madgearu Review of Economic Studies and Research 13, no.22 (Dec 2020): 169–197.https://doi.org/10.24193/RVM.2020.13.67Fabio Petri Capital Theory 1873–2019 and the State of Macroeconomics, History of Economics Review 74, no.11 (Mar 2020): 1–24.https://doi.org/10.1080/10370196.2020.1722411Saverio M. Fratini ON THE SECOND STAGE OF THE CAMBRIDGE CAPITAL CONTROVERSY, Journal of Economic Surveys 33, no.44 (Jan 2019): 1073–1093.https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12312Stephane Hallegatte, Adrien Vogt-Schilb Are Losses from Natural Disasters More Than Just Asset Losses?, (Nov 2019): 15–42.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16237-5_2George C. Bitros Monetary Policy, Market Structure and the Income Shares in the U.S, Open Economies Review 29, no.22 (Apr 2018): 383–413.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-017-9451-2Joseph E Stiglitz Where modern macroeconomics went wrong, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 34, no.1-21-2 (Jan 2018): 70–106.https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx057Gregor Semieniuk Piketty's Elasticity of Substitution: A Critique, Review of Political Economy 29, no.11 (Mar 2017): 64–79.https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2016.1244916Heinz D. Kurz Is there a "Ricardian Vice"? And what is its relationship with economic policy ad"vice"?, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 27, no.11 (Jul 2016): 91–114.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-016-0468-2Juan Pablo Mateo , Cuadernos de Economía 36, no.7070 ( 2017): 227.https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v36n70.58697M. Ali Khan On a forest as a commodity and on commodification in the discipline of forestry, Forest Policy and Economics 72 (Nov 2016): 7–17.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.010 References, (Jan 2016): 265–273.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809756-4.16001-5G. C. Harcourt Post-Keynesian Theory, Direct Action and Political Involvement, (Jan 2016): 245–257.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137475329_19Joseph E. Stiglitz The Measurement of Wealth: Recessions, Sustainability and Inequality, (Jan 2016): 63–76.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137529589_8Joseph E. Stiglitz New Theoretical Perspectives on the Distribution of Income and Wealth Among Individuals, (Jan 2016): 1–71.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137554543_1Georgios (George) C. Bitros Monetary Policy, Market Structure and the Income Shares in the U.S., SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2767318Marc Nerlove Agricultural Economics and Economics: Influence and Counter‐Influence, 1910–1960, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 37, no.11 (Oct 2014): 34–63.https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppu025Dennis O. Kundisch, Neeraj Mittal, Barrie R. Nault Research Commentary —Using Income Accounting as the Theoretical Basis for Measuring IT Productivity, Information Systems Research 25, no.33 (Sep 2014): 449–467.https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0534Saeideh Fallah-Fini, Konstantinos Triantis, Andrew L. Johnson Reviewing the literature on non-parametric dynamic efficiency measurement: state-of-the-art, Journal of Productivity Analysis 41, no.11 (Jun 2013): 51–67.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-013-0349-8Michael Kumhof, Dirk Muir Oil and the world economy: some possible futures, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 372, no.20062006 (Jan 2014): 20120327.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0327Minseong Kim Reflecting on the Capital Debates from Modern Perspectives: Interest Rate, Marginal Product of Capital, Equilibrium of Simultaneous Equations and Capital Intensity/Factor Remuneration, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2441760SCOTT CARTER C.E. FERGUSON'S LOST REPLY TO JOAN ROBINSON ON THE THEORY OF CAPITAL, Journal of the History of Economic Thought 34, no.11 (Mar 2012): 21–41.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837212000016G C Harcourt 'Horses for Courses': The Making of a Post-Keynesian Economist (1999), (Jan 2012): 11–51.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230348653_2Scott Carter C.E. Ferguson and the Neoclassical Theory of Capital: A Matter of Faith, Review of Political Economy 23, no.33 (Jul 2011): 339–356.https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2011.583818George C. Bitros The theorem of proportionality in contemporary capital theory: An assessment of its conceptual foundations, The Review of Austrian Economics 23, no.44 (Jul 2010): 367–401.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-010-0122-4Hak Choi Resolving the Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1486604Giuseppe Vittucci Marzetti The Fund-Flow Approach: A Critical Survey, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1503473Georgios (George) C. Bitros The Theorem of Proportionality in Contemporary Capital Theory: An Assessment of its Conceptual Foundations, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1533705Robert L. Vienneau A Model for Exploring Manifestations of Capital-Theoretic 'Paradoxes' in Temporary Equilibria, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2006).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1307930Tiago Mata Constructing Identity: The Post Keynesians and the Capital Controversies, Journal of the History of Economic Thought 26, no.22 (Jun 2009): 241–259.https://doi.org/10.1080/1042771042000219055Bruce Elmslie, Norman Sedgley The reswitching debate, Intellectual News 13, no.11 (Dec 2003): 65–70.https://doi.org/10.1080/15615324.2003.10427201Jesus Felipe, Franklin M. Fisher Aggregation in Production Functions: What Applied Economists should Know, Metroeconomica 54, no.2-32-3 (May 2003): 208–262.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-999X.00166G. C. Harcourt Theoretical Controversy and Social Significance: An Evaluation of the Cambridge Controversies, (Jan 2001): 23–47.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510562_2Fabio Petri On the Likelihood and Relevance of Reverse Capital Deepening, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2000).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.234880J. E. King Sheila Dow, (Jan 1995): 153–167.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378827_11Avi J. Cohen Samuelson and the 93% Scarcity Theory of Value, (Jan 1993): 149–172.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22728-0_6George R. Feiwel Joan Robinson Inside and Outside the Stream, (Jan 1989): 1–120.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08633-7_1G. R. Feiwel Quo Vadis Macroeconomics? Issues, Tensions and Challenges, (Jan 1985): 1–100.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06879-1_1STUART T. SAYER KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS AND THE ECONOMICS OF KEYNES, Scottish Journal of Political Economy 31, no.33 (Nov 1984): 294–304.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.1984.tb00482.xGeorge R. Feiwel Samuelson and Contemporary Economics: An Introduction, (Jan 1982): 1–28.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7377-0_1 Arvind Virmani A Dynamic Model of the Firm, Journal of Political Economy 84, no.33 (Oct 2015): 603–613.https://doi.org/10.1086/260462
Referência(s)