Sex differences in the foetal pelvis
1957; Wiley; Volume: 15; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1002/ajpa.1330150409
ISSN1096-8644
Autores Tópico(s)Indigenous Studies and Ecology
ResumoAmerican Journal of Physical AnthropologyVolume 15, Issue 4 p. 581-600 Article Sex differences in the foetal pelvis Barbara J. Boucher, Barbara J. Boucher Department of Anatomy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, London Hospital Medical College, LondonSearch for more papers by this author Barbara J. Boucher, Barbara J. Boucher Department of Anatomy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, London Hospital Medical College, LondonSearch for more papers by this author First published: December 1957 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330150409Citations: 65 The bulk of this work was done during the tenure of a Research Fellowship in Anatomy at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, during leave of absence from the London Hospital Medical College. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Literature Cited Boucher, B. J. 1955 Sex difference in the foetal sciatic notch. J. For. Med., 2: 51– 54. Caffey, J., and S. H. Madell 1956 Ossification of the pubic bones at birth. Radiology, 67: 346– 350. Fehling, H. 1876 Die form des becken beim fötus und neugebornen und ihre beziehung zu der beim erwachseren. Arch. Für Gyn., Band, 10: 1– 80. Greulich, W. W., and H. Thoms 1944 The growth and development of individual girls before, during and after puberty. Yale J. Biol. and Med., 17: 91– 97. Jost, A. 1950 Récherches sur le contrǒls hormonal de l'organogenèse sexuele du lapin et remarques sur certaines malformations de l'appareil génital humain. Gyn. et Obst., 49: 44– 60. Lazorthes, G., and A. Lhez 1939 La grande échancrure sciatique; étude de sa morphology et de ses caractères sexueles. Arch. d'anat. et d'hist. et d'emb., 27: 143– 169. Letterman, G. S. 1941 Greater sciatic notch in American whites and Negroes. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 28: 99– 116. Moore, K. L., and M. L. Barr 1954 Nuclear morphology, according to sex in human tissues. Acta Anat., 21: 197– 205. Reynolds, E. L. 1945 The bony pelvic girdle in early infancy; roentgenometric study. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 3: 321– 354. Schultz, A. H. 1930 Skeleton of trunk and limbs of higher primates. Human Biology, 2: 303– 409. Thomson, A. 1899 Sexual differences of the foetal pelvis. J. Anat., 33: 359– 380. Verneau, R. 1875 Le Bassin dans les Sexes et dans les Races. Paris. Villemin, F. 1937 La différentiation sexuelle précoce de la grande échancrure sciatique, et son retentissement sur l'evolution du bassin chez les hommes. Strasbourg Med., 33: 593– 625. Washburn, S. L. 1948 Sex differences in the pubic bone. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., n.s. 6: 199– 207. Young, M., and J. G. H. Ince 1940 Radiographic comparison of the male and female pelvis. J. Anat., 74: 374– 385. Citing Literature Volume15, Issue4December 1957Pages 581-600 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)