Publius—A Split Personality?
1984; Cambridge University Press; Volume: 46; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1017/s0034670500048737
ISSN1748-6858
Autores Tópico(s)Legal and Constitutional Studies
ResumoThis article critically examines the widely accepted thesis that because of basic theoretical differences between Hamilton and Madison the Federalist is best read as the product of a “split personality.” An examination of the areas and concerns identified by leading proponents of this thesis (Douglass Adair and Alpheus T. Mason) fails to reveal any significant differences between Hamilton and Madison writing as “Publius.” In fact, this analysis reveals a very close correspondence in their views on the basic principles of the proposed system. These findings strongly support the proposition that the Federalist is a consensual work whose contradictions and tensions reflect more basic difficulties endemic to the proposed system and principles of republicanism rather than theoretical differences between its authors.
Referência(s)