Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Evaluation of surface contamination of titanium dental implants by LV-SEM: comparison with XPS measurements

1997; Wiley; Volume: 25; Issue: 13 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/(sici)1096-9918(199712)25

1096-9918

Marco Morra, Clara Cassinelli,

Dental materials and restorations

Surface and Interface AnalysisVolume 25, Issue 13 p. 983-988 Research Article Evaluation of surface contamination of titanium dental implants by LV-SEM: comparison with XPS measurements Marco Morra, Marco Morra Nobil Bio Ricerche, Str. S. Rocco 32, 14018 Villafranca d'Asti, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorClara Cassinelli, Clara Cassinelli Nobil Bio Ricerche, Str. S. Rocco 32, 14018 Villafranca d'Asti, ItalySearch for more papers by this author Marco Morra, Marco Morra Nobil Bio Ricerche, Str. S. Rocco 32, 14018 Villafranca d'Asti, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorClara Cassinelli, Clara Cassinelli Nobil Bio Ricerche, Str. S. Rocco 32, 14018 Villafranca d'Asti, ItalySearch for more papers by this author First published: 04 December 1998 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199712)25:13 3.0.CO;2-XCitations: 10AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract Low-voltage scanning electron microscopy (LV-SEM) was used to monitor contamination by carbonaceous compounds on the surface of two different commercially available titanium dental implants. Because of its higher surface sensitivity, the LV mode allows us to image contaminating materials on surfaces that are undetected by conventional SEM. Results stemming from LV-SEM observations were compared to surface composition data obtained by XPS analysis. A good relationship between findings obtained by the two techniques was found. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. References 1 R. Adell, U. Leckholm, B. Rockler and P. I. Branemark, Int. J. Oral Surg. 10, 387 (1981). 10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 2 P. I. Branemark, G. A. Zarb and T. Albrektsson, (eds), Tissue Integrated Prosthesis: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Quintessence, Chicago (1985). Google Scholar 3 G. E. White, Osseointegrated Dental Technology. Quintessence Publishing, London, (1993). Google Scholar 4 D. Kasemo and J. Lausmaa, CRC Crit. Rev. Biocompat. 2, 335 (1986). Web of Science®Google Scholar 5 D. C. Smith, R. M. Pilliar and G. Murray, Trans. 11th Annu. Meet. Soc. Biomater. 8, 8 (1985). Web of Science®Google Scholar 6 J. Lausmaa and B. Kasemo, Trans. 11th Annu. Meet. Soc. Biomater. 8, 12 (1985). Google Scholar 7 P. A. Maeusli, P. R. Bloch, V. Geret and S. G. Steinemann, in Biological and Biomechanical Performance of Biomaterials, edited by P. Christel, A. Meunier and J. C. Lee, p. 57. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1986). Google Scholar 8 J. Lausmaa, L. Mattson, U. Rolander and B. Kasemo, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 55, 351 (1986). CASGoogle Scholar 9 P. Ducheyne and K. E. Healy, Surface Characterization of Biomaterials, edited by B. D. Ratner, p. 175. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1988). Google Scholar 10 J. Lausmaa, B. Kasemo and H. Mattson, Appl. Surf. Sci. 40, 133 (1990). 10.1016/0169-4332(90)90100-E CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 11 D. C. Smith, R. M. Pilliar, J. B. Metson and N. S. McIntyre, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 25, 1069 (1991). 10.1002/jbm.820250903 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 12 T. Albrektsson, CRC Crit. Rev. Biocompat. 1, 53 (1984). Google Scholar 13 R. E. Baier and A. E. Mayer, Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants 3, 9 (1988). PubMedGoogle Scholar 14 B. Kasemo and J. Lausmaa, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 22, 145 (1988). 10.1002/jbm.820221307 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 15 D. C. Smith, R. M. Pilliar and R. Chernecky, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 25, 1045 (1991). 10.1002/jbm.820250902 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 16 M. Bellanda, M. Morra and C. Cassinelli, Dent. Cadmos. 18, 42 (1996). Google Scholar 17 D. Briggs and M. P. Seah (eds), Practical Surface Analysis. Wiley, Chichester (1992). Google Scholar 18 C. Cassinelli, unpublished results. Google Scholar 19 D. C. Joy and J. B. Pawley, Ultramicroscopy 47, 80 (1992). 10.1016/0304-3991(92)90186-N PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 20 S. L. Goodman, K. S. Tweden and R. M. Albrecht, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 32, 249 (1996). 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199610)32:2 3.0.CO;2-E CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 21 A. Wennerberg, T. Albrektsson and J. Lausmaa, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 30, 252 (1996). 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199602)30:2 3.0.CO;2-P CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 22 F. Garbassi, M. Morra and E. Occhiello, Polymer Surfaces, from Physics to Technology. Wiley, Chichester (1994). Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume25, Issue13December 1997Pages 983-988 ReferencesRelatedInformation