Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

On the Effects of Weak Auxins and Antiauxins upon Root Growth

1952; Wiley; Volume: 5; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1399-3054.1952.tb07719.x

1399-3054

Börje ÅBerg,

Plant Reproductive Biology

Physiologia PlantarumVolume 5, Issue 2 p. 305-319 On the Effects of Weak Auxins and Antiauxins upon Root Growth Börje ÅBerg, Börje ÅBerg Institute of Plant Physiology, Royal Agricultural College, UppsalaSearch for more papers by this author Börje ÅBerg, Börje ÅBerg Institute of Plant Physiology, Royal Agricultural College, UppsalaSearch for more papers by this author First published: April 1952 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1952.tb07719.xCitations: 27AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References 1 Åberg, B.: On auxin antagonists and synergists in root growth. Physiol. Plant. 3: 447. 1950. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1950.tb07673.x CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 2 Åberg, B. On the growth substances activity of enantiomorphic α-(naphthoxy)-propionic acids. Arkiv f. Kemi 3(59): 549. 1951. Google Scholar 3 Åberg, B. The interaction of some auxin antagonists and 2,4-D in root growth. Physiol. Plant. 4: 627. 1951. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1951.tb07698.x Web of Science®Google Scholar 4 Bonner, J. & Koepfli, J. B.: The inhibition of root growth by auxins. Amer. Jour. Bot. 26: 557. 1939. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1939.tb09319.x CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 5 Burström, H.: The influence of heteroauxin on cell growth and root development. Ann. Agric. Coll. Sweden 10: 209. 1942. CASGoogle Scholar 6 Burström, H. Studies on growth and metabolism of roots. IV. Positive and negative auxin effects on cell elongation, – Physiol. Plant. 3: 277. 1950. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1950.tb07508.x Web of Science®Google Scholar 7 Burström, H. Do. VI. The relative growth action of different isobutyric acid derivatives. Physiol, Plant 4: 470. 1951. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1951.tb07684.x CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 8 Burström, H. Do. VII. The growth action of α-(phenoxy) propionic acids. Physiol. Plant. 4: 641. 1951. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1951.tb07699.x CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 9 Clauss, H.: Kritische Untersuchungen über den Kressewurzeltest von Moewus. Zoitschr. Naturforsch. 7b: 112. 1952. Google Scholar 10 Fredga, A.: Studies on synthetic growth substances. I. Arkiv f. Kemi 3 (16): 123. 1951. CASGoogle Scholar 11 Fredga, A. & Matell, M.: Do. II. The steric relations between the optically active naphthoxypropionic acids. Arkiv f. Kemi 3 (47): 429. 1951. CASGoogle Scholar 12 Fredga, A. & Matell, M. Do. III. The steric relations of the optically active α-phenoxypropionic acids. Arkiv f. Kemi 4, 1952. CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 13 Gustafson, F. G.: A comparative study of different methods of determining activities of growth-promoting substances. Amer. Jour. Bot. 30: 649. 1943. 10.2307/2437480 CASGoogle Scholar 14 Haagen Smit, A. J. & Went, F. W.: A physiological analysis of the growth substance. Proc. K. Akad. Wetensch. Amsterdam 38: 852. 1935. Google Scholar 15 Hitchcock, A. E. & Zimmerman, P. W.: Structure of phenoxy compounds in relation to root-inducing activity. Amer. Jour. Bot. 29: 11 1942. Google Scholar 16 Hitchcock, A. E. & Zimmerman, P. W. Methods of rating the root inducing activity of phenoxy acids and other growth substances, – Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 14: 21. 1945. CASGoogle Scholar 17 Koepfli, J. B., Thimann, K. V. & Went, F. W.: Phytohormones: Structure and physiological activity. I. Jour. Biol. Chem. 122: 763. 1938. CASGoogle Scholar 18 Lundegårdh, H.: The growth of roots as influenced by pH and salt content of the medium. A contribution to The Theory of growth. Ann. Agric. Coll. Sweden 10: 31. 1942. CASGoogle Scholar 18a Mitchell, J. W., Kraus, E. J. & Whitehead, M. B.: Starch hydrolysis in bean leaves following spraying with alpha-naphthaleneacetic acid emulsion. Bot, daz. 102: 97. 1940. CASGoogle Scholar 19 Moewus, F.: Der Kressewurzeltest, ein neuer quantitativer Wuchsstofftest. Biol. Zentralbl. 68: 118. 1949. CASGoogle Scholar 20 Moewus, L. & Skwarra, H.: Nachweis von zwei Wuchsstoffen in Samen und Wurzeln der Kresse (Lepidium sativum). Planta 40: 254. 1952. 10.1007/BF01914857 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 21 Muir, R. M., Hansch, C. H. & Gallup, A. H.: Growth regulation by organic compounds. Plant Physiol. 24: 359. 1949. 10.1104/pp.24.3.359 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 22 Osborne, D. J. & Wain, R. L.: Studies on plant growth-regulating substances, II. Synthetic compounds inducing morphogenic responses in the tomato plant. Jour. Hort. Sci. 26: 60. 1950. CASGoogle Scholar 23 Osborne, D. J. & Wain, R. L. Do. III. The production of parthenocarpic pomaceous fruits by chemical treatment. Jour. Hort. Sci. 26: 317. 1951. CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 24 Overbeek, J. van: Auxin distribution in seedlings and its hearing on The problem of bud inhibition. Bol. Gaz. 100: 133. 1938. 10.1086/334770 Google Scholar 25 Skoog, F., Schneider, C L. & Malan, P.: Interactions of auxins in growth and inhibition. Amer. Jour. Bot. 29: 568. 1942. 10.2307/2437106 CASGoogle Scholar 26 Steiner, M.: Ein Beitrag zur Konstitutionsspezifilät der Heleroauxinwirkung. Planta 36: 131. 1948. 10.1007/BF01917222 Web of Science®Google Scholar 27 Thimann, K. V. & Schneider, C. L.: The relative activities of different auxins, Amer. Jour. Bot. 26: 328. 1939. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1939.tb09281.x CASGoogle Scholar 28 Veldstra, H.: Researches on plant growth substances. IV–V. Relation between chemical structure and physiological activity. I–II. Enzymologia 11: 97. 137. 1944. CASGoogle Scholar 29 Veldstra, H. & Westeringh, C. van de: Do. XIX. Do. IV. Partially hydrogenated naphthoic acids and α-alkyl-phenylacetic acids. Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 70: 1113 1951. 10.1002/recl.19510701213 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 30 Went, F. W.: The dual effect of auxin on root formation. Amer. Jour. Bot. 26: 24. 1939. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1939.tb12861.x CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 31 Went, F. W. Some experiments on bud growth. Amer. Jour. Bot. 26: 109. 1939. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1939.tb12877.x CASGoogle Scholar 32 Went, F. W. A case of correlative growth inhibition in plants. Amer. Jour. Bot. 26: 505. 1939. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1939.tb09310.x CASGoogle Scholar 33 Went, F. W. Further analysis of the pea test for auxin. Bul. Torrey Bot. Club 66: 391. 1939. 10.2307/2481039 CASGoogle Scholar 34 Zimmerman, P. W. & Hitchcock, A. E.: The aerosol method of treating plants with growth substances. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 13: 313. 1944. Google Scholar 35 Zimmerman, P. W. & Hitchcock, A. E. Formative effects of several substituted phenoxy acids applied to Kalanchoe. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 15: 421. 1949. CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 36 Zimmerman, P. W. & Wilcoxon, F.: Several chemical growth substances which cause initiation of roots and other responses in plants. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 7: 209. 1935. CASGoogle Scholar Citing Literature Volume5, Issue2April 1952Pages 305-319 ReferencesRelatedInformation