Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Robotic renal and adrenal surgery: present and future

2005; Wiley; Volume: 96; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1464-410x.2005.05611.x

1464-410X

Rajeev Kumar, Ashok K. Hemal, Mani Menon,

Renal cell carcinoma treatment

BJU InternationalVolume 96, Issue 3 p. 244-249 Robotic renal and adrenal surgery: present and future Rajeev Kumar, Rajeev Kumar Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India, andSearch for more papers by this authorAshok K. Hemal, Corresponding Author Ashok K. Hemal Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USAAshok Hemal, Professor of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorMani Menon, Mani Menon Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USASearch for more papers by this author Rajeev Kumar, Rajeev Kumar Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India, andSearch for more papers by this authorAshok K. Hemal, Corresponding Author Ashok K. Hemal Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USAAshok Hemal, Professor of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorMani Menon, Mani Menon Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USASearch for more papers by this author First published: 24 July 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05611.xCitations: 16Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES 1 Bentas W, Wolfram M, Brautigam R et al. Vinci robot assisted Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty: technique and 1 year follow-up. World J Urol 2003; 21: 133–8 2 Hubert J, Feuillu B, Mangin P, Lobontiu A, Artis M, Villemot JP. Laparoscopic computer-assisted pyeloplasty. The results of experimental surgery in pigs. BJU Int 2003; 92: 437–40 3 Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results. Eur Urol 2002; 42: 453–7 4 Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P, Smith AD, Lee BR. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 2002; 60: 39–45 5 Yohannes P, Burjonrappa SC. Rapid communication. laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty using the da Vinci robot: technical considerations. J Endourol 2003; 17: 79–83 6 Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31: 701–17 7 Cathelineau X, Rozet F, Vallancien G. Robotic radical prostatectomy: the European experience. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31: 693–9 8 Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Bhandari A. The technique of apical dissection of the prostate and urethrovesical anastomosis in robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2004; 93: 715–9 9 Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2003; 170: 1738–41 10 Hemal AK, Eun D, Tewari A, Menon M. Nuances in the optimum placement of ports in pelvic and upper urinary tract surgery using the da Vinci robot. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31: 683–92 11 Gill IS, Sung GT, Hsu TH, Meraney AM. Robotic remote laparoscopic nephrectomy and adrenalectomy: the initial experience. J Urol 2000; 164: 2082–5 12 Sung GT, Gill IS. Robotic laparoscopic surgery. a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems. Urology 2001; 58: 893–8 13 Guillonneau B, Jayet C, Tewari A, Vallancien G. Robot assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 2001; 166: 200–1 14 Marella VK, Wise GJ, Silver DA. Adjunctive technologies in laparoscopic nephrectomy-comparison of hand-assisted and robotic techniques. J Urol 2004; 171 (Suppl.): 339 15 Hubert JH, Feuillu FB, Prevot LP, Cormier LC, Mangin PM. Robotic (da Vinci) remote laparoscopic nephrectomy: feasibility and results in 16 cases. Eur Urol 2003; 44 (Suppl): 198 16 Pedraza R, Palmer L, Moss V, Franco I. Bilateral robotic assisted laparoscopic heminephoureterectomy. J Urol 2004; 171: 2394–5 17 Horgan S, Vanuno D, Sileri P, Cicalese L, Benedetti E. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2002; 73: 1474–9 18 Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Partin AW, Bender JS, Zenilman ME, Satava RM. Telerobotic assisted laparoscopic surgery. initial laboratory and clinical experience. Urology 1994; 44: 15–9 19 Partin AW, Adams JB, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Complete robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 1995; 181: 552–7 20 Moore RG, Adams JB, Partin AW, Docimo SG, Kavoussi LR. Telementoring of laparoscopic procedures: initial clinical experience. Surg Endoscopy 1996; 10: 107–10 21 Lee BR, Png DJ, Liew L et al. Laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2000; 29: 665–8 22 Steinberg JR, Matin SF. Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy. dilemma of the distal ureter. Curr Opin Urol 2004; 14: 61–5 23 Bhayani SB, Rha KH, Pinto PA et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. effect of warm ischemia on serum creatinine. J Urol 2004; 172: 1264–6 24 Ratner LE, Buell JF, Kuo PC. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: pro. Transplantation 2000; 70: 1544 25 Merlin TL, Scott DF, Rao MM et al. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a systematic review. Transplantation 2000; 70: 1659–66 26 Leventhal JR, Deeik RK, Joehl RJ et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy – is it safe? Transplantation 2000; 70: 602–6 27 Horgan S, Benedetti E, Moser F. Robotically assisted donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation. Am J Surg 2004; 188 (Suppl. 4A): 45–51 28 Sung GT, Gill IS, Hsu TH. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a pilot study. Urology 1999; 53: 1099–103 29 Guillonneau B, Rietbergen JB, Fromont G, Vallancien G. Robotically assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: a chronic porcine study. Urology 2003; 61: 1063–6 30 Gettman MT, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Urology 2002; 60: 509–13 31 Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993; 150: 1795–9 32 Klingler HC, Remzi M, Janetschek G, Kratzik C, Marberger MJ. Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. Eur Urol 2003; 44: 340–5 33 Baldwin DD, Dunbar JA, Wells N, McDougall EM. Single-center comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2003; 17: 155–60 34 Janetschek G, Peschel R, Frauscher F, Franscher F. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Urol Clin North Am 2000; 27: 695–704 35 Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Gettman MT. Robotic pyeloplasty. technique and results. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31: 737–41 36 Young JA, Chapman WH, Kim VB et al. Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy for adrenal incidentaloma. Case and review of the technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Technical 2002; 12: 126–30 37 Bentas W, Wolfram M, Brautigam R, Binder J. Laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy using a remote-controlled robotic surgical system. J Endourol 2002; 16: 373–6 38 Desai MM, Gill IS, Kaouk JH, Matin SF, Sung GT, Bravo EL. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Urology 2002; 60: 1104–7 39 Beninca G, Garrone C, Rebecchi F, Giaccone C, Morino M. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Preliminary results at our center. Chir Ital 2003; 55: 321–31 40 Brunaud L, Bresler L, Ayav A et al. Advantages of using robotic Da Vinci system for unilateral adrenalectomy: early results. Ann Chir 2003; 128: 530–5 41 Undre S, Munz Y, Moorthy K et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy: preliminary UK results. BJU Int 2004; 93: 357–9 42 D’Annibale A, Fiscon V, Trevisan P et al. The da Vinci robot in right adrenalectomy: considerations on technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2004; 14: 38–41 43 Horgan S, Vanuno D. Robots in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2001; 11: 415–9 44 Cadeddu JA, Bzostek A, Schreiner S et al. A robotic system for percutaneous renal access. J Urol 1997; 158: 1589–93 45 Cadeddu JA, Stoianovici D, Chen RN, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Stereotactic mechanical percutaneous renal access. J Endourol 1998; 12: 121–5 46 Hoznek A, Hubert J, Antiphon P, Gettman MT, Hemal AK, Abbou CC. Robotic renal surgery. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31: 731–6 47 Hoznek A, Zaki SK, Samadi DB et al. Robotic assisted kidney transplantation: an initial experience. J Urol 2002; 167: 1604–6 48 Peters CA. Robotically assisted surgery in pediatric urology. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31: 743–52 49 Olsen LH, Deding D, Yeung CK, Jorgensen TM. Computer assisted laparoscopic pneumovesical ureter reimplantation a.m. Cohen: initial experience in a pig model. APMIS 2003; Suppl: 23–5 Citing Literature Volume96, Issue3August 2005Pages 244-249 ReferencesRelatedInformation