Adaptation to the Laboratory: Comments on Sgrò and Partridge
2001; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 158; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/323591
ISSN1537-5323
AutoresMargarida Matos, Teresa Avelar,
Tópico(s)Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsAdaptation to the Laboratory: Comments on Sgrò and PartridgeMargarida Matos, Teresa Avelar, and Editor: Joseph TravisMargarida Matos*E‐mail: [email protected]. Search for more articles by this author , Teresa Avelar Search for more articles by this author , and Editor: Joseph Travis Search for more articles by this author 1. Centro de Biologia Ambiental, Departamento de Zoologia e Antropologia, Faculdade de Ciências de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749‐016 Lisboa, Portugal;2. Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, R. Jardim do Tabaco 34, 1149‐041 Lisboa, PortugalPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 158, Number 6December 2001 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/323591 Views: 26Total views on this site Citations: 13Citations are reported from Crossref HistoryReceived October 24, 2000Accepted May 31, 2001 Keywordslaboratory adaptationDrosophilaconvergent evolutiongenetic sampling effect© 2001 by The University of Chicago. PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Kata Pásztor, Ádám Kőrösi, Ádám Gór, Viktor Szigeti, Flóra Vajna, János Kis Phenotypic senescence in a natural insect population, Ecology and Evolution 12, no.1212 (Dec 2022).https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9668Brian S. Mautz, Nicolas O. Rode, Russell Bonduriansky, Howard D. Rundle, Jean‐Michel Gaillard Comparing ageing and the effects of diet supplementation in wild vs. captive antler flies, Protopiophila litigata, Journal of Animal Ecology 88, no.1212 (Aug 2019): 1913–1924.https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13079J. Santos, M. Pascual, P. Simões, I. Fragata, M. Lima, B. Kellen, M. Santos, A. Marques, M. R. Rose, M. Matos From nature to the laboratory: the impact of founder effects on adaptation, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25, no.1212 (Oct 2012): 2607–2622.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12008P. SIMÕES, M. R. ROSE, A. DUARTE, R. GONÇALVES, M. MATOS Evolutionary domestication in Drosophila subobscura, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20, no.22 (Mar 2007): 758–766.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01244.xFelix Zajitschek, John Hunt, Susanne R.K. Zajitschek, Michael D. Jennions, Robert Brooks, Tom Pizzari No Intra-Locus Sexual Conflict over Reproductive Fitness or Ageing in Field Crickets, PLoS ONE 2, no.11 (Jan 2007): e155.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000155J. A. Griffiths, M. Schiffer, A. A. Hoffmann Clinal variation and laboratory adaptation in the rainforest species Drosophila birchii for stress resistance, wing size, wing shape and development time, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, no.11 (Jan 2005): 213–222.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00782.xMargarida Matos, Pedro Simõtes, Ana Duarte, Carla Rego, Teresa Avelar, Michael R. Rose CONVERGENCE TO A NOVEL ENVIRONMENT: COMPARATIVE METHOD VERSUSEXPERIMENTAL EVOLUTION, Evolution 58, no.77 (Jul 2004): 1503–1510.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01730.xMargarida Matos, Pedro Simões, Ana Duarte, Carla Rego, Teresa Avelar, Michael R. Rose CONVERGENCE TO A NOVEL ENVIRONMENT: COMPARATIVE METHOD VERSUS EXPERIMENTAL EVOLUTION, Evolution 58, no.77 (Jan 2004): 1503.https://doi.org/10.1554/03-711Adam K. Chippindale, Anh L. Ngo, Michael R. Rose The devil in the details of life-history evolution: Instability and reversal of genetic correlations during selection onDrosophila development, Journal of Genetics 82, no.33 (Dec 2003): 133–145.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02715814N. G. Prasad, Amitabh Joshi What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies onDrosophila melanogaster taught us?, Journal of Genetics 82, no.1-21-2 (Apr 2003): 45–76.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02715881Christine C. Spencer, Christine E. Howell, Amber R. Wright, Daniel E. L. Promislow Testing an 'aging gene' in long-lived Drosophila strains: increased longevity depends on sex and genetic background, Aging Cell 2, no.22 (Apr 2003): 123–130.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1474-9728.2003.00044.xM. Matos, T. Avelar, M. R. Rose Variation in the rate of convergent evolution: adaptation to a laboratory environment in Drosophila subobscura, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15, no.44 (Jun 2002): 673–682.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00405.x Carla M. Sgrò and Linda Partridge Laboratory Adaptation of Life History in Drosophila. C. M. Sgrò and L. Partridge, The American Naturalist 158, no.66 (Jul 2015): 657–658.https://doi.org/10.1086/323592
Referência(s)