HYBRID MODEL OF IRT AND LATENT CLASS MODELS
1982; Wiley; Volume: 1982; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1002/j.2333-8504.1982.tb01326.x
ISSN2330-8516
Autores Tópico(s)Multi-Criteria Decision Making
ResumoETS Research Report SeriesVolume 1982, Issue 2 p. i-61 ArticleFree Access HYBRID MODEL OF IRT AND LATENT CLASS MODELS Kentaro Yamamoto, Kentaro Yamamoto Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New JerseySearch for more papers by this author Kentaro Yamamoto, Kentaro Yamamoto Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New JerseySearch for more papers by this author First published: December 1982 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1982.tb01326.xCitations: 7AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Andersen, E. B. (1977). Sufficient statistics and latent trait models. Psychometrika, 42, 69– 81. Angoff W. H. (1986, August). Validity: An evolving concept. Paper presented at ETS conference on validity, Princeton, NJ. Bejar, I. I. (1980). A procedure of investigating the unidimensionality of achievement tests based on item parameter estimates, Journal of Educational Measurement, 17, 283– 296. Bejar, I. I. (1983). Introduction to Item Response Models and Their Assumptions, in R. K. Hambleton ed. Applications of Item Response Theory, Educational Institute of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. Birenbaum, M., & Tatsuoka, K. K. (1981). The effect of different instructional methods on error types and the underlying dimensionality of the test (Technical Report 81–3-ONR). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Computer-based Educational Research Laboratory. Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In Lord & Novick (Eds.), Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores, Reading, MA.: Addison-Wesley. Bock, R. D. (1967). Fitting a response model for dichotomous items. Paper read at the Psychometric Society Meeting, Madison, Wisconsin. Bock, R. D., and Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443– 459. Brown, J. S., and Burton, R. R. (1978). Diagnostic models for procedual bugs in basec mathematical skills. Cognitive Science, 2, 155– 192. Dayton, C. M., and Macready, G. B. (1976). A probabilitstic model for validation of behavioral hierarchies. Psychometrika, 41, 189– 204. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B), 39, 1– 38. Formann, A. K. (1988) Latent class models for nonmonotone dichotomous items. Psychometrika, 53, 45– 62. Gitomer, D. H., and Van Slyke, D. H. (1988). Error analysis and tutor design. Machine-Mediated Learning, 2, 333– 350. Goodman, L. A. (1974). The analysis of qualitative variables when some of the variables are unobservable. Part I–A modified latent structure approach. American Journal of Sociology, 79, 1179– 1259. Heartel, E. H. (1984). Detection of a skill dichotomy using standardized achievement test items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 59– 72. Holland, P. W. (1981). When are item response models consistent with observed data? Psychometrika, 46, 79– 92. Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1960). Latent structure analysis and test theory. In H. Gulliksen and S. Messick (Eds.), Psychological Scaling, Theory and Applications. New York: Wiley, 83– 96. Lazarsfeld, P. F., and Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent Structure Analysis. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin. Loevinger, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3, 635– 694. Lord, M. F. (1974). Estimation of latent ability and item parameters when there are omitted responses, Psychometrika, 39, 247– 264. Lord, M. F. (1980) Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Lord, M. F. & Norvick, M.R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading. Mass.: Addison-Wesley. Messick, S. (1980). Test validity and the ethics of assessment. American Psychologist, 1980, 35, 1012– 1027. Messick, S. (1984). The psychology of educational measurement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21–3, 215– 237. McDonald, R. P. (1981). The dimensionality of tests and items, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34, 100– 117. Messick, S. (1980). Test validity and the ethics of assessment. American Psychologist, 35, 1012– 1027. Messick, S. (1984). The psychology of educational measurement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21–3, 215– 237. Mislevy, R. J. (1983). Item response models for grouped data, Journal of Educational Statistics, 8, 271– 288. Mislevy, R. J. (1986). Bays modal estimation in item response models, Psychometrika, 51, 177– 195. Mislevy, R. J. and Verhelst, N. (in press). Modeling item response when different subjects wmploy different solution strategies, Psychometrika. Paulson, A. J. (1982). A discrete latent-state approach to diagnostic testing. A research proposal submitted to the Office of Naval Research, Portland, OR: Portland State University. Paulson, A. J. (1986a, May). Latent class representation of systematic patterns in test responses (Research Report). Portland, OR: Portland State University. Paulson, A. J. (1986b, June). Estimation of parameters in latent class models with constraints on the parameters (Research Report). Portland, OR: Portland State University. Reckase, M. D. (1982). Multidimensional IRT models. A paper presented at 1982 CAT conference at Minneapolis. Reckase, M. D. (1985). The difficulty of test items that measure more than one ability. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 401– 412. Riley, M. S. and Greeno, J. M. (1988). Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and of solving problems. Cogniton and Instruction, 5(1), 49– 101. Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometric Monograph, 17. Samejima, F. (1972). A general model for free-response data. Psychometric Monograph Supplement, 18. Samejima, F. (1974). Normal ogive model on the continuous response level in the multidimensional latent space. Psychometrika, 39, 111– 121. Siegler, R. S. (1981). Developmental sequences within and between concepts. Monographs of The Society for Research in Child Development, 46. Stout, W. F. (1984). The statistical assessment of latent trait dimensionality in psychological testing, (final Report 8–82-ONR), University of Illinois, Department of Mathematics, Urbana-Champaign. Stout, W. F. (1986). Issues concerning local independence, dimensionality, and bias: advances in testing for unidimensionality and bias with a large-scale simulation study. A paper presented at ONR contractors meeting, Gatlinberg, TN. Stout, W. F. (1987). A nonparametric approach for assessing latent trait unidimensionality. Psychometrika, 52, 589– 617. Sympson, J. B. (1977). A model for testing with multidimensional items. Pater presented at the Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference, Minneapolis, MN. Tatsuoka, K. K. (1983). Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 345– 354. K. K. Tatsuoka (Ed.) (1984). Analysis of errors in fraction addition and subtraction problems (Research Report). Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois, Computer-based Educational Research Laboratory. Tatsuoka, K. K. (1985). A probabilistic model for diagnosing misconceptions in the pattern classification approach. Journal of Educational Statistics, 12, 55– 73. Tatsuoka, K. K., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1982). Detection of aberrant response patterns. Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 81– 96. Tatsuoka, K. K., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1987). Bug distribution and statistical pattern classification, Psychometrika, 2, 193– 206. Traub, R. E. (1983). Apriori considerations in choosing an item response model. In R. K. Hambleton (Ed.) Applications of Item Response Theory. Educational Institute of British Columbia, Vancouver, B. C. Wang, M. M. (1986). Fitting a unidimensional model to multidimensional item response data. Paper presented at ONR contractors meeting at Gatlinberg. Wang, M. M. (1987). Measurement bias in the application of a unidimensional item response data. Paper presented at ONR contractors meeting, Columbia, SC. Wilcox, R. R. (1979). Achievement tests and latent structure models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 32, 61– 71. Wright, B. D. (1977). Solving measurement problems with the Rasch model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 97– 116. Yamamoto, K. (1983). Derivation and test of predictions of a discrete latent state model for signed number addition test performance. Unpublished master's thesis, Portland, OR: Portland State University. Yamamoto, K. and Tatsuoka, K. (1985, March). CAT Misconception Analysis: Modifications and Conclusions. Paper presented at 1985 AERA Annual Meeting; Chicago, IL. Citing Literature Volume1982, Issue2December 1982Pages i-61 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)