The Complex Nature and Implications of International Engagement after Kosovo's Independence
2011; Taylor & Francis; Volume: 13; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1080/13698249.2011.576158
ISSN1743-968X
Autores Tópico(s)Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
ResumoAbstract This article examines the implications of two distinct phases of international engagement in Kosovo. We argue that a number of flaws developed during UNMIK's administration (1999–2008), which continue to undermine Kosovo's stability. We then disentangle the complex inter-institutional relations between ICO, EULEX, UNMIK and the OSCE. Indeed, their incompatible positions towards Kosovo's status results in a lack of clarity, coordination and coherence that weaken Kosovo within four policy areas: Kosovo's international recognition and participation, the rule of law, inter-ethnic relations and the fate of North Kosovo. While these shortcomings could be viewed as 'unintended consequences', we argue more broadly that the Kosovo case illustrates the limits of liberal peacebuilding and the tensions and implications of strategic peacebuilding. Notes 1. See Richard Caplan, 'International Diplomacy and the Crisis in Kosovo', International Affairs 74/4 (1998) pp.745–61; Adam Roberts, 'NATO's "Humanitarian War" over Kosovo', Survival 41/3 (1999) pp.102–03; Albrecht Schnabel and Ramesh Thakur (eds), Kosovo and the Challenge of Humanitarian Intervention: Selective Indignation, Collective Action, and International Citizenship (Tokyo: UNUP 2000); Florian Bieber and Zidas Daskalovski (eds), Understanding War in Kosovo (London: Frank Cass 2003); David Chandler, From Kosovo to Kabul and Beyond Human Rights and International Intervention (London: Pluto Press 2006); Iain King and Whit Mason, Peace at Any Price: How the World Failed Kosovo (London: Hurst & Company 2006); Alexandra Gheciu, 'International Norms, Power and the Politics of International Administration: The Kosovo Case', Geopolitics 10/1 (2005) pp.121–46; Oisín Tansey and Dominik Zaum, 'Muddling Through in Kosovo', Survival 51/1 (2009) pp.13–20. 2. For a comprehensive account of the different motivations of the international community to engage in post-conflict societies, see Michael E. Brown (ed.), The International Dimensions of Internal Conflict (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1996); Jarad Chopra, Peace-Maintenance: The Evolution of International Political Authority (London: Routledge 1999); Simon Chesterman, You, the People: The United Nations, Transitional Administration, and State-Building (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2004); Ramesh Thakur, The United Nations, Peace and Security: From Collective Security to the Responsibility to Protect (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006); Katharina P. Coleman, International Organisations and Peace Enforcement: The Politics of International Legitimacy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007); Louise Andersen, Bjørn Møller and Finn Stepputat (eds), Fragile States and Insecure People?: Violence, Security, and Statehood in the Twenty-First Century (Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan 2007); Roland Paris and Timothy D. Sisk (eds), The Dilemmas of Statebuilding: Confronting the Contradictions of Postwar Peace Operations (London: Routledge 2009); Oliver P. Richmond (ed.), Palgrave Advances in Peacebuilding (Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan 2010); David Chandler, International Statebuilding: The Raise of Post-Liberal Governance (London: Routledge 2010). 3. For an overview of UNMIK mandate, see UN Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999) approved on 10 Jun. 1999 and the UNMIK Regulation 1999/1, On the Authority of Interim Administration in Kosovo 25 Jul. 1999. For the aftermaths performance of UNMIK, see the quartile UN Secretary General reports presented to the UN Security Council. 4. Oliver P. Richmond, Peace in International Relations (London: Routledge 2008) p.74. 5. UNMIK, UNMIK Regulation 2001/9, On a Constitutional Framework for Provisional Self-Government in Kosovo 15 May 2001. 6. Compare two different perspectives: Marc Weller, Contested Statehood: Kosovo Struggle for Independence (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008) and James Ker-Lindsay, Kosovo: The Path to Contested Statehood in the Balkans (London: I.B. Tauris 2009). 7. UN Security Council, 'Report of the Special Envoy of the Secretary-General on Kosovo's Future Status', S/2007/168, 26 Mar. 2007. 8. Kosovo Declaration of Independence, 17 Feb. 2008, online at < www.assembly-kosova.org/?cid = 2,128,1635>, accessed 14 Dec. 2010. 9. For a more detailed discussion, see Grace Bolton and Gezim Visoka, 'Recognizing Kosovo's Independence: Remedial Secession or Earned Sovereignty?' Occasional Paper 11/10 (Oxford: SESSOX 2010). 10. Dominik Zaum, Sovereignty Paradox: The Norms and Politics of International Statebuilding (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007) p.16. 11. James R. Hooper and Paul R. Williams, 'Earned Sovereignty: The Political Dimension', Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 31(2002–03) pp.355–72. 12. Stephen Krasner, Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1999) p.3. 13. Roland Paris, 'Peacebuilding and the Limits of Liberal Internationalism', International Security 22/2 (1997) p.74. 14. Christopher Bickerton, 'State-building: Exporting State Failure' in Christopher Bickerton, Philip Cunliffe and Alexander Gourevitch (eds) Politics Without Sovereignty: A Critique of Contemporary International Relations (London: Routledge 2006) p.96. 15. Zaum (note 10) p.241; Adem Beha and Gezim Visoka, 'Human Security as "Ethnic Security" in Kosovo', Human Security Perspectives 7/1 (2010) pp.83–101. 16. Roland Paris and Timothy D. Sisk, Managing Contradictions: The Inherent Dilemmas of Postwar Statebuilding (New York: IPA 2007) p.6. 17. See Oliver P. Richmond, 'Resistance and the Post-liberal Peace', Millennium – Journal of International Studies 38/3 (2010) pp.665–92; Chandler (note 2); Daniel Philpott and Gerard F. Powers (eds), Strategies of Peace: Transforming Conflict in a Violent World (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010). 18. Richmond (note 17). 19. Oliver P. Richmond, 'Introduction' in Oliver P. Richmond (ed.) Palgrave Advances in Peacebuilding: Critical Developments and Approaches (Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan 2010) pp.1–2. 20. King and Mason (note 1) pp.241–56. 21. King and Mason (note 1), pp.137–88. 22. Jen Narten, 'Post-Conflict Peacebuilding and Local Ownership: Dynamics of External-Local Interaction in Kosovo under United Nations Administration', Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 2/3 (2008) pp.369–90. 23. See Blerim Reka, UNMIK as an International Governance in Post-War Kosova: NATO's Intervention, UN Administration and Kosovar Aspiration (Shkup: LogosA 2003). 24. Vivienne Jabri, 'War, Government, Politics: A Critical Response to the Hegemony of the Liberal Peace' in Oliver P. Richmond (ed.) Palgrave Advances in Peacebuilding: Critical Developments and Approaches (Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan 2010) p.49. 25. For a detailed account on the recent demarcation of border between Kosovo and Macedonia, see Murat Meha and Behar Selimi, The Challenges of Border Demarcation Kosovo-Macedonia, TS 2A – International Boundary Issues, FIG Congress 2010 Facing the Challenges – Building the Capacity Sydney, Australia, 11–16 Apr. 2010, online at < www.fig.net/pub/fig2010/papers/ts02a%5Cts02a_meha_4481.pdf>, accessed 1 Feb. 2011. 26. For the justifications invoked to recognize Kosovo's independence, see Bolton and Visoka (note 9). 27. UN Security Council (note 7). 28. International Steering Group consists of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Slovenia, Switzerland, Sweden, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. 29. ICO Information Leaflet 1, Jun. 2010. 30. ICO Information Leaflet 1, Jun. 2010 31. EU Council Decision 2010/118/CFSP of 25 Feb. 2010 extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative in Kosovo, Official Journal of the European Union, L 49/22, 26 Feb. 2010. 32. Jochen Prantl, The UN Security Council and Informal Groups of States: Complementing or Competing for Governance? (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006) p.81. 33. The Contact Group is formed by the US, Russia, UK, France, Germany and Italy, while the Quint is the Contact Group 'minus' Russia. The Trioka consists of the US, Russia and the EU. 34. Prantl (note 32) p.81. 35. Prantl (note 32), p.81. 36. See latest approved Laws by the Assembly of Kosovo, online at < www.assembly-kosova.org/?cid = 2,122>, accessed 16 Dec. 2010. 37. Meeting with Senior ICO Political Official, Prishtina, Jun. 2010. 38. Meeting with Senior ICO Political Official, Prishtina, Jun. 2010 39. Council Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP of 4 Feb. 2008, On the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, EULEX Kosovo (Brussels: EU Council 2008) p.2. 40. UN Secretary-General, Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo, S/2008/354, (12 Jun. 2008) p.3. 41. EULEX, 'What is EULEX?', online at < www.eulex-kosovo.eu/en/info/whatisEulex.php>, accessed 14 Dec. 2010. 42. European Council, Herman Van Rompuy, President of the European Council, following his visit to EULEX Headquarters, PCE 152/10, Pristina, 6 Jul. 2010, online at < www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/115689.pdf>, accessed 14 Dec. 2010. 43. EULEX, 2010 Programme Report, Prishtina, p.21. 44. Balkan Policy Institute, EULEX Still in Search of Identity (Prishtina: BPI 2010) p.7. 45. Balkan Policy Institute, EULEX Still in Search of Identity (Prishtina: BPI 2010) 46. EULEX (note 43) p.55. 47. Youth Initiative for Human Rights, State of Constriction: Governance and Free Expression in Kosovo (Prishtina: YIHR 2010) p.5. 48. IPOL (note 44); Kosovo Daily Express, The Game in North (in Albanian: Loja në Veri), 11 Oct. 2010, online at < www.gazetaexpress.com/?cid = 1,16,39717>, accessed 12 Oct. 2010; Kosovo Daily Koha Ditore, EULEX 10 Percent Functional (in Albanian: EULEX 10 për qind funksional), 6 Dec. 2010, online at < www.kohaditore.com/index.php?cid = 1,22,42532>, accessed 7 Dec. 2010; Kosovo Daily Koha Ditore, Unprosecuted Crimes by Internationals (in Albanian: Krimet e pandëshkuara nga ndërkombëtarët), 3 Feb. 2011, online at < www.kohaditore.com/index.php?cid = 1,22,48482>, accessed 6 Feb. 2011. 49. IPOL (note 44) p.5. 50. Kosovo Daily Express, 'Sfidon EULEX-in' (in Albanian: Challenges EULEX), 4 May 2010, online at < www.gazetaexpress.com/web/images/pdf/pdf050510.pdf>, accessed 2 Dec. 2010. 51. UN Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo, S/2008/354, (12 Jun. 2008) p.5. 52. Meeting with UNMIK Senior Political Official, Prishtina, Jun. 2010. 53. UN Security Council (note 51). 54. UN Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo S/2008/354 12 Jun. 2008, p.4. 55. Briefing at the Regional Cooperation Council, given by Deputy Director-General, Jelica Menic, on 4 Feb. 2011 in Sarajevo. 56. An Overview of OSCE Mission in Kosovo, online at < www.osce.org/kosovo/13194.html>, accessed 27 Jul. 2010. 57. Meeting with Senior OSCE Minority Rights Officer, Prishtina, Jun. 2010. 58. Meeting with Senior OSCE Minority Rights Officer, Prishtina, Jun. 2010 59. Meeting with Senior OSCE Minority Rights Officer, Prishtina, Jun. 2010 60. Meeting with Senior OSCE Minority Rights Officer, Prishtina, Jun. 2010 61. Meeting with Senior OSCE Minority Rights Officer, Prishtina, Jun. 2010 62. Meeting with Senior OSCE Minority Rights Officer, Prishtina, Jun. 2010 63. Meeting with Senior OSCE Minority Rights Officer, Prishtina, Jun. 2010 64. Meeting with Senior OSCE Minority Rights Officer, Prishtina, Jun. 2010 65. Kosovo Ministry of Foreign Affairs website, online at < www.mfa-ks.net/?page = 1,49>, accessed 1 Feb. 2011. 66. Kosovo Government, Program of the Government of Republic of Kosovo, 2008–11, Prishtina, p.36. 67. Bolton and Visoka (note 9) p.17. 68. ICO (note 37). 69. International Court of Justice, 'Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government of Kosovo', Advisory Opinion (22 Jul. 2010) p.43. 70. Statement on the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice by Members of the International Steering Group, 22 Jul. 2010, Prishtina, Kosovo. 71. UN Secretary-General, Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo, S/2010/169 (19 Apr. 2008) p.9. 72. EU Commission, 2010 Progress Report for Kosovo, p.21. 73. BBC Albanian, 'Kosovo takes the Chairmanship of CEFTA' (in Albanian: Kosova merr kryesimin e CEFTA-s), 6 Jan. 2011, online at < www.bbc.co.uk/albanian/news/2011/01/printable/110106_kos_cefta_keqja.shtml>, accessed 13 Feb. 2011. 74. YIHR (note 47) p.31. 75. Crisis Group, Rule of Law in Independent Kosovo, Crisis Group Europe, Report N°204 (Brussels: ICG 2010) p.6. 76. Crisis Group, Rule of Law in Independent Kosovo, Crisis Group Europe, Report N°204 (Brussels: ICG 2010) 77. Crisis Group, Rule of Law in Independent Kosovo, Crisis Group Europe, Report N°204 (Brussels: ICG 2010), p.5. 78. EULEX (Programme Report 2009, 2010). 79. EU Commission (note 72) p.11. 80. Crisis Group (note 75) p.15. 81. Crisis Group, (note 75) 82. Crisis Group, (note 75) 83. EU Commission (note 72) p.11. 84. See T. David Mason and James D. Meernik, Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding in Post-War Societies: Sustaining the Peace (Oxford and New York: Routledge 2006). 85. See Adem Beha and Gezim Visoka, Minority Consultative Mechanisms in Kosovo (Prishtina: RADC 2010) p.12. 86. The Constitution of Republic of Kosovo, Article 60, 15 Jun. 2008. 87. For a critical overview of their performance, see Beha and Visoka (note 85). 88. Humanitarian Law Centre, Ethnic Communities in Kosovo in 2007 and 2008 (Prishtina: HLC 2008) p.187. 89. Shannon Kyla Burke, Decentralization and Human Security in Kosovo: Prospects of Local Government Reform for Promoting Democracy, Development, and Conflict Mitigation, Thesis (MA) (Tufts, MA: Fletcher School 2005) p.5. 90. UN Security Council (note 27). 91. Kosovo Institute for Policy Research and Development, Kosovo at a Crossroad: Decentralization and the Creation of New Municipalities, Policy Brief #14 (Prishtina: KIPRED 2009) p.3. 92. ICO, News Release, International Civilian Representative Appoints Members to the Municipal Preparation Team for the New Municipality of Mitrovicë/Mitrovica North, 5 Feb. 2010. 93. New Kosovo Report, 'Parallel Structures', 28 Feb. 2008, online at < www.newkosovareport.com/20080228673/Blackbird/Parallel-structures.html>, accessed 4 Nov. 2010. 94. KIPRED (note 91) p.3. 95. Daily Koha Ditore, EULEX Still Making Efforts to be Function in the North 25 Mar. 2010. 96. EU Commission (note 72) p.11. 97. Crisis Group (note 75) p.21. 98. Medija Centar, Security and Perspectives in the North of Kosovo, Gracanica, 16 Jul. 2010. 99. Crisis Group (note 75) p.19. 100. Strategy for Northern Kosovo, confidential document, 15 Jan. 2010, p.1. 101. Strategy for Northern Kosovo, Confidential document, 15 Jan. 2010, p.10. 102. UN Secretary-General (note 71) p.4. 102. UN Security Council Meeting, S/PV/6353 (6 Jul. 2010) p.3. 104. UN Secretary-General (note 71) pp.3–4. 105. UNMIK (note 52). 106. Kosovo Daily Express, 'The Strategy for North Only in Paper' (in Albanian: 'Strategjia për veriun, vetëm në letër') 11 Feb. 2011, online at < www.gazetaexpress.com/?cid = 1,15,47381>, accessed 12 Feb. 2011. 107. Richard Caplan, The International Administration of War-torn Territories: Rule and Reconstruction (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003) p.159. 108. Narten (note 22) p.375. 109. Edward Newman, Roland Paris and Oliver P. Richmond (eds), New Perspective on Liberal Peacebuilding (Tokyo: UNUP 2009); Paris and Sisk (note 2). 110. Iain and King (note 1) pp.250–51. 111. Chesterman (note 2) p.257. 112. Dominik Zaum, 'The Norms and Politics of Exit: Ending Postconflict Transitional Administrations', Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs (2009) pp.189–208. 113. Chesterman (note 2); Paris and Sisk (note 2). 114. Roland Paris, 'Understanding the "Coordination Problem" in Postwar Statebuilding', in Roland Paris and Timothy D. Sisk (eds), The Dilemmas of Statebuilding Confronting the Contradictions of Postwar Peace Operations (London: Routledge 2009) pp.54–6. 115. Roland Paris, 'Understanding the 'Coordination Problem' in Postwar Statebuilding', in Roland Paris and Timothy D. Sisk (eds), The Dilemmas of Statebuilding Confronting the Contradictions of Postwar Peace Operations (London: Routledge 2009), 61. 116. Roland Paris, 'Understanding the 'Coordination Problem' in Postwar Statebuilding', in Roland Paris and Timothy D. Sisk (eds), The Dilemmas of Statebuilding Confronting the Contradictions of Postwar Peace Operations (London: Routledge 2009) 117. Philott and Powers (note 17). 118. See Robert K. Merton, 'The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action', American Sociological Review 1/6 (1936) pp.894–904; Raymond Boudon, The Unintended Consequences of Social Action (London: Palgrave Macmillan 1982); Robert Jervis, System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1997). 119. Chiyuki Aoi, Cedric de Coning and Ramesh Thakur, Unintended Consequences of Peacekeeping Operations (Tokyo: UNUP 2007) p.268. 120. Ulrich Schneckener, 'Unintended Consequences of International Statebuilding', in Christopher Daase and Cornelius Friesendorf (eds) Rethinking Security Governance: The Problem of Unintended Consequences (London and New York: Routledge 2010) p.77. 121. Ulrich Schneckener, 'Unintended consequences of international statebuilding', in Christopher Daase and Cornelius Friesendorf (eds), Rethinking Security Governance: The Problem of Unintended Consequences, (London and New York: Routledge 2010), pp.77–9. 122. Lise Morje Howard, UN Peacekeeping in Civil Wars (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2008) pp. 327–46. 123. Lise Morje Howard, UN Peacekeeping in Civil Wars (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2008) 124. General Assembly and Security Council, Review of the United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture, A/64/868 and S/2010/393 (25 Oct. 2010) p.4.
Referência(s)