An Experimental Study on the Effects of Predation Risk and Feeding Regime on the Mating Behavior of the Water Strider
1990; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 135; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/285044
ISSN1537-5323
AutoresAndrew Sih, James J. Krupa, Steven E. Travers,
Tópico(s)Animal Behavior and Reproduction
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsAn Experimental Study on the Effects of Predation Risk and Feeding Regime on the Mating Behavior of the Water StriderAndrew Sih, James Krupa, and Steven TraversAndrew Sih, James Krupa, and Steven TraversPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 135, Number 2Feb., 1990 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/285044 Views: 52Total views on this site Citations: 142Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1990 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Maren G. Callaway, Erik S. Johnson, Jerald B. Johnson, Arnar Palsson Predation history has no effect on lateralized behavior in Brachyrhaphis rhabdophora, PLOS ONE 18, no.22 (Feb 2023): e0280900.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280900Bryce Barbee, Noa Pinter-Wollman, Zhi-Yun JIA Nutritional needs and mortality risk combine to shape foraging decisions in ants, Current Zoology 285 (Nov 2022).https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoac089Natália de Souza Ribas, Jeremy N. McNeil, Hernane Dias Araújo, Bruna de Souza Ribas, Eraldo Lima The Effect of Resistance to Bt Corn on the Reproductive Output of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), Insects 13, no.22 (Feb 2022): 196.https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13020196Rebecca N. MacKay, Tyler C. Wood, Paul A. Moore Running away or running to? Do prey make decisions solely based on the landscape of fear or do they also include stimuli from a landscape of safety?, Journal of Experimental Biology 224, no.1919 (Oct 2021).https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.242687Scott D. Peacor, Brandon T. Barton, David L. Kimbro, Andrew Sih, Michael J Sheriff A framework and standardized terminology to facilitate the study of predation‐risk effects, Ecology 101, no.1212 (Oct 2020).https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3152Minjung Baek, Katherine M. Lawin, Christina J. Codden, Hangkyo Lim, Eunjin Yang, Ho-Young Kim, Sang-im Lee, Piotr G. Jablonski Water strider females use individual experience to adjust jumping behaviour to their weight within physical constraints of water surface tension, Scientific Reports 10, no.11 (Oct 2020).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75564-xZahra M. Bagheri, Callum G. Donohue, Jan M. Hemmi Evidence of predictive selective attention in fiddler crabs during escape in the natural environment, The Journal of Experimental Biology 223, no.2121 (Nov 2020): jeb234963.https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.234963Sarah C. Donelan, Geoffrey C. Trussell, Christine Miller Sex‐specific differences in the response of prey to predation risk, Functional Ecology 34, no.66 (Apr 2020): 1235–1243.https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13569Tyler C. Wood, Paul A. Moore Big and bad: how relative predator size and dietary information influence rusty crayfish ( Faxonius rusticus ) behavior and resource-use decisions, Canadian Journal of Zoology 98, no.11 (Jan 2020): 62–72.https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2019-0089Denis Meuthen, Sebastian A. Baldauf, Theo C.M. Bakker, Timo Thünken High perceived predation risk during development affects mutual mate choice in a cichlid fish, Animal Behaviour 158 (Dec 2019): 227–237.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.10.019Martin Plath, Kai Liu, Diane Umutoni, Guilherme Gomes-Silva, Jie-Fei Wei, Eric Cyubahiro, Bo-Jian Chen, Carolin Sommer-Trembo, Theodora Fuss Predator-induced changes of male and female mating preferences: innate and learned components, Current Zoology 65, no.33 (Feb 2019): 305–316.https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoz003Andrew C. Gallup, Krista Pietruch, Omar Tonsi Eldakar Plasticity of Mating Duration in Response to Slightly Biased Operational Sex Ratios in the Water Strider (Aquarius remigis): The Effect of Cohabitation Under Standard Laboratory Conditions, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7 (Mar 2019).https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00075Madeleine M. Dupuy, Ricardo A. Ramirez Consumptive and non-consumptive effects of predatory arthropods on billbug (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) pests in turfgrass, Biological Control 129 (Feb 2019): 136–147.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.10.010Phillip G. Byrne, Juan Diego Gaitan‐Espitia, Aimee J. Silla , Evolution 73, no.99 ( 2019): 1972.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13823Laurel B. Symes, Sharon J. Martinson, Lars-Olaf Hoeger, Rachel A. Page, Hannah M. ter Hofstede From Understory to Canopy: In situ Behavior of Neotropical Forest Katydids in Response to Bat Echolocation Calls, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 6 (Dec 2018).https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00227Emily Zepeda, Erich Marks, J. Chad Johnson, Andrew Sih Does sexual conflict increase juvenile survival by reducing cannibalism?, Behavioural Processes 157 (Dec 2018): 438–444.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.07.003U.K. Lubanga, R.A. Peters, M.J. Steinbauer Convenience polyandry and the role of lone and reciprocal calls in a psyllid, Animal Behaviour 145 (Nov 2018): 1–10.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.09.001Avery L Russell, Stephen L Buchmann, William de O Sabino, Daniel R Papaj Brawls Bring Buzz: Male Size Influences Competition and Courtship in Diadasia rinconis (Hymenoptera: Apidae), Journal of Insect Science 18, no.44 (Aug 2018).https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iey083Richard W. Orton, Eric J. McElroy, Lance D. McBrayer Predation and cryptic coloration in a managed landscape, Evolutionary Ecology 32, no.2-32-3 (Jan 2018): 141–157.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-018-9931-xKeiko Oku, Erik H. Poelman, Peter W. de Jong, Marcel Dicke, T. Tregenza Female response to predation risk alters conspecific male behaviour during pre-copulatory mate guarding, Ethology 124, no.22 (Dec 2017): 122–130.https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12710Colin M. Wright, James L. L. Lichtenstein, Graham A. Montgomery, Lauren P. Luscuskie, Noa Pinter-Wollman, Jonathan N. Pruitt Exposure to predators reduces collective foraging aggressiveness and eliminates its relationship with colony personality composition, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 71, no.88 (Jul 2017).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2356-7M.M. Dehn, R.C. Ydenberg, L.M. Dill Experimental addition of cover lowers the perception of danger and increases reproduction in meadow voles ( Microtuspennsylvanicus ), Canadian Journal of Zoology 95, no.77 (Jul 2017): 463–472.https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2016-0169Hannes A. Schraft Mobility cost of copulation is independent of female: Male size ratio in Anasa tristis, The Southwestern Naturalist 62, no.22 (Jun 2017): 162–165.https://doi.org/10.1894/0038-4909-62.2.162Yu Sumida, Masako Katsuki, Kensuke Okada, Keisuke Okayama, Zenobia Lewis Wolbachia induces costs to life-history and reproductive traits in the moth, Ephestia kuehniella, Journal of Stored Products Research 71 (Mar 2017): 93–98.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2017.02.003Pierre‐Olivier Montiglio, Tina W. Wey, Ann T. Chang, Sean Fogarty, Andrew Sih, Nate Sanders Correlational selection on personality and social plasticity: morphology and social context determine behavioural effects on mating success, Journal of Animal Ecology 86, no.22 (Jan 2017): 213–226.https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12610Keisuke Okayama, Masako Katsuki, Yu Sumida, Kensuke Okada Costs and benefits of symbiosis between a bean beetle and Wolbachia, Animal Behaviour 119 (Sep 2016): 19–26.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.07.004Reisla Oliveira, Christiane R. Pereira, Ana Laura A. F. D. Pimentel, Clemens Schlindwein, E. A. Hebets The Consequences of Predation Risk on the Male Territorial Behavior in a Solitary Bee, Ethology 122, no.88 (Jun 2016): 632–639.https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12509Katarzyna Michalska The effect of predation risk on spermatophore deposition rate of the eriophyoid mite, Aculops allotrichus, Experimental and Applied Acarology 68, no.22 (Dec 2015): 145–154.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-015-9998-9Chang S. Han, Robert C. Brooks, Piotr G. Jablonski Fluctuating sexual selection and the evolution of a courtship strategy, Behavioral Ecology 27, no.33 (Jan 2016): 886–894.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv232Nicolas Christian Ory, Thijs Christiaan van Son, Martin Thiel Mating rock shrimp hedge their bets: old males take greater risk, but only after careful assessment of the investment scenario, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 69, no.1212 (Sep 2015): 1975–1984.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-2009-7Arne Jungwirth, Michael Taborsky First- and second-order sociality determine survival and reproduction in cooperative cichlids, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282, no.18191819 (Nov 2015): 20151971.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1971Genevieve M. Kozak, Janette W. Boughman Predator experience overrides learned aversion to heterospecifics in stickleback species pairs, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282, no.18051805 (Apr 2015): 20143066.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.3066Michael C. Cavallaro, Lindsay A. Vivian, W. Wyatt Hoback Aquatic Vertebrate Predation Threats to the Platte River Caddisfly (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae), Florida Entomologist 98, no.11 (Mar 2015): 152–156.https://doi.org/10.1653/024.098.0126Tina W. Wey, Ann T. Chang, Sean Fogarty, Andrew Sih Personalities and presence of hyperaggressive males influence male mating exclusivity and effective mating in stream water striders, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 69, no.11 (Sep 2014): 27–37.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1814-8Tina W. Wey, Ann T. Chang, Pierre-Olivier Montiglio, Sean Fogarty, Andrew Sih Linking short-term behavior and personalities to feeding and mating rates in female water striders, Behavioral Ecology 26, no.44 (May 2015): 1196–1202.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv065Amanda M. Franklin, Zoe E. Squires, Devi Stuart-Fox, Therésa M. Jones Does Predation Risk Affect Mating Behavior? An Experimental Test in Dumpling Squid (Euprymna tasmanica), PLoS ONE 9, no.1212 (Dec 2014): e115027.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115027Gavin C. Woodruff, Christine M. Knauss, Timothy K. Maugel, Eric S. Haag, Christian Braendle Mating Damages the Cuticle of C. elegans Hermaphrodites, PLoS ONE 9, no.88 (Aug 2014): e104456.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104456Andrew Sih, Ann T. Chang, Tina W. Wey Effects of behavioural type, social skill and the social environment on male mating success in water striders, Animal Behaviour 94 (Aug 2014): 9–17.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.05.010Jan Heuschele, Sara Ceballos, Christian Marc Andersen Borg, Oda Bjærke, Stamatina Isari, Rachel Lasley-Rasher, Elin Lindehoff, Anissa Souissi, Sami Souissi, Josefin Titelman Non-consumptive effects of predator presence on copepod reproduction: insights from a mesocosm experiment, Marine Biology 161, no.77 (May 2014): 1653–1666.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-014-2449-zMark A. McPeek Keystone and Intraguild Predation, Intraspecific Density Dependence, and a Guild of Coexisting Consumers., The American Naturalist 183, no.11 (Jul 2015): E1–E16.https://doi.org/10.1086/674010A. T. Chang, A. Sih Multilevel selection and effects of keystone hyperaggressive males on mating success and behavior in stream water striders, Behavioral Ecology 24, no.55 (Jun 2013): 1166–1176.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/art044Inon Scharf, Franziska Peter, Oliver Y. Martin Reproductive Trade-Offs and Direct Costs for Males in Arthropods, Evolutionary Biology 40, no.22 (Dec 2012): 169–184.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-012-9213-4Kaiming Liang, Jia-en Zhang, Li Fang, Benliang Zhao, Mingzhu Luo, Prem Parajuli, Ying Ouyang The biological control of Pomacea canaliculata population by rice-duck mutualism in paddy fields, Biocontrol Science and Technology 23, no.66 (Jun 2013): 674–690.https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2013.790933Eleanor Bath, Nikolai Tatarnic, Russell Bonduriansky Asymmetric reproductive isolation and interference in neriid flies: the roles of genital morphology and behaviour, Animal Behaviour 84, no.66 (Dec 2012): 1331–1339.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.08.025N. Puniamoorthy, W. U. Blanckenhorn, M. A. Schäfer Differential investment in pre- vs. post-copulatory sexual selection reinforces a cross-continental reversal of sexual size dimorphism in Sepsis punctum (Diptera: Sepsidae), Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25, no.1111 (Sep 2012): 2253–2263.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02605.xEvan L. Preisser, John L. Orrock The allometry of fear: interspecific relationships between body size and response to predation risk, Ecosphere 3, no.99 (Sep 2012): art77.https://doi.org/10.1890/ES12-00084.1Dessa Bokides, Yuan Lou, Ian M. Hamilton A model of sexual selection and female use of refuge in a coercive mating system, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279, no.17411741 (May 2012): 3209–3216.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0246Phillip G. Byrne, J. Dale Roberts Evolutionary causes and consequences of sequential polyandry in anuran amphibians, Biological Reviews 87, no.11 (Jul 2011): 209–228.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00191.xA.K. Costello, R.B. Bextermueller, D.B. Meikle The influence of the presence of a predator odor on the non-vigilant behaviors of food-deprived house mice ( Mus musculus ), Ethology Ecology & Evolution 24, no.11 (Jan 2012): 14–22.https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2011.592858Emile van Lieshout, Mark A. Elgar Owner positional disadvantage in contests over mating prevents monopolization of females, Animal Behaviour 82, no.44 (Oct 2011): 753–758.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.07.005Lauren J. Cator, Benjamin J. Arthur, Alongkot Ponlawat, Laura C. Harrington Behavioral Observations and Sound Recordings of Free-Flight Mating Swarms of Ae. aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand, Journal of Medical Entomology 48, no.44 (Jul 2011): 941–946.https://doi.org/10.1603/ME11019J. Dale Roberts, Phillip G. Byrne Polyandry, Sperm Competition, and the Evolution of Anuran Amphibians, (Jan 2011): 1–53.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-380896-7.00001-0Odette Brunel-Pons, Sylvain Alem, Michael D. Greenfield The complex auditory scene at leks: balancing antipredator behaviour and competitive signalling in an acoustic moth, Animal Behaviour 81, no.11 (Jan 2011): 231–239.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.10.010Steven C. Williams, Lance D. McBrayer Attack-based indices, not movement patterns, reveal intraspecific variation in foraging behavior, Behavioral Ecology 22, no.55 (Jun 2011): 993–1002.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr082Megan L. Head, Bob B. M. Wong, Robert Brooks, Tapio Mappes Sexual Display and Mate Choice in an Energetically Costly Environment, PLoS ONE 5, no.1212 (Dec 2010): e15279.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015279K. E. ELGEE, J. P. EVANS, I. W. RAMNARINE, S. A. RUSH, T. E. PITCHER Geographic variation in sperm traits reflects predation risk and natural rates of multiple paternity in the guppy, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23, no.66 (May 2010): 1331–1338.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.01996.xClare C. Rittschof, Kelly V. Ruggles The complexity of site quality: multiple factors affect web tenure in an orb-web spider, Animal Behaviour 79, no.55 (May 2010): 1147–1155.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.014Phillip G Byrne, J. Scott Keogh Extreme sequential polyandry insures against nest failure in a frog, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276, no.16541654 (Sep 2008): 115–120.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0794Maria Almbro, Cecilia Kullberg The downfall of mating: the effect of mate-carrying and flight muscle ratio on the escape ability of a pierid butterfly, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63, no.33 (Oct 2008): 413–420.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0675-4Jonathan K. Webb, Robert M. Pringle, Richard Shine Intraguild predation, thermoregulation, and microhabitat selection by snakes, Behavioral Ecology 20, no.22 (Feb 2009): 271–277.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp011Dustin J. Wilgers, Amy C. Nicholas, David H. Reed, Gail E. Stratton, Eileen A. Hebets Condition-dependent alternative mating tactics in a sexually cannibalistic wolf spider, Behavioral Ecology 20, no.44 (Jun 2009): 891–900.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp078K.W. Pecor, B.A. Hazlett The tradeoff between reproductive and food resources in the crayfish Orconectes virilis, Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology 41, no.44 (Dec 2008): 273–280.https://doi.org/10.1080/10236240802518834Paul V Switzer, Patrick C Enstrom, Carissa A Schoenick Environmental Conditions Affect Sperm Competition Risk in Japanese Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), Annals of the Entomological Society of America 101, no.66 (Nov 2008): 1154–1161.https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746-101.6.1154Alison M. Dunn, Jaimie T.A. Dick, Melanie J. Hatcher The less amorous Gammarus: predation risk affects mating decisions in Gammarus duebeni (Amphipoda), Animal Behaviour 76, no.44 (Oct 2008): 1289–1295.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.06.013Martin A. Schäfer, Bernhard Misof, Gabriele Uhl Effects of body size of both sexes and female mating history on male mating behaviour and paternity success in a spider, Animal Behaviour 76, no.11 (Jul 2008): 75–86.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.01.011Kuhan Perampaladas, J. A. Stoltz, M. C. B. Andrade Mated Redback Spider Females Re-Advertise Receptivity Months after Mating, Ethology 114, no.66 (Jun 2008): 589–598.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01513.x Male Mating Strategies through Manipulation of Female-perceived Predation Risk: A Minireview and a Hypothesis, Journal of Ecology and Field Biology 31, no.11 (Feb 2008): 1–7.https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2008.31.1.001Nuria Polo-Cavia, Pilar López, José Martín Interspecific Differences in Responses to Predation Risk May Confer Competitive Advantages to Invasive Freshwater Turtle Species, Ethology 114, no.22 (Jan 2008): 115–123.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01441.xNils Koch, Brian Lynch, Rémy Rochette Trade-off between mating and predation risk in the marine snail, Littorina plena, Invertebrate Biology 126, no.33 (Oct 2007): 257–267.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7410.2007.00095.xJanette A. Steets, Diana E. Wolf, Josh R. Auld, Tia-Lynn Ashman THE ROLE OF NATURAL ENEMIES IN THE EXPRESSION AND EVOLUTION OF MIXED MATING IN HERMAPHRODITIC PLANTS AND ANIMALS, Evolution 61, no.99 (Sep 2007): 2043–2055.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00184.xChristian D. Jersabek, Martin S. Luger, Robert Schabetsberger, Susanne Grill, J. Rudi Strickler Hang on or run? Copepod mating versus predation risk in contrasting environments, Oecologia 153, no.33 (Jun 2007): 761–773.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0768-1Dominic A. Edward, Andre S. Gilburn The effect of habitat composition on sexual conflict in the seaweed flies Coelopa frigida and C. pilipes, Animal Behaviour 74, no.22 (Aug 2007): 343–348.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.07.023Ximena E. Bernal, A. Stanley Rand, Michael J. Ryan Sexual Differences in the Behavioral Response of Túngara Frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus , to Cues Associated with Increased Predation Risk, Ethology 113, no.88 (Jul 2007): 755–763.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01374.xLuisa Amo, Pilar López, José Martín Habitat deterioration affects antipredatory behavior, body condition, and parasite load of female Psammodromus algirus lizards, Canadian Journal of Zoology 85, no.66 (Jun 2007): 743–751.https://doi.org/10.1139/Z07-052Tae Won Kim, John H. Christy, Jae C. Choe, Tom Tregenza A Preference for a Sexual Signal Keeps Females Safe, PLoS ONE 2, no.55 (May 2007): e422.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000422John Winnie, David Christianson, Scott Creel, Bruce Maxwell Elk decision-making rules are simplified in the presence of wolves, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61, no.22 (Sep 2006).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0258-1Luisa Amo, Pilar López, José Martı´n Nature-based tourism as a form of predation risk affects body condition and health state of Podarcis muralis lizards, Biological Conservation 131, no.33 (Aug 2006): 402–409.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.02.015Keith W. Pecor, Brian A. Hazlett The Influence of Flowing Water on the Resource Pursuit-Risk Avoidance Tradeoff in the Crayfish Orconectes virilis, Ethology 112, no.44 (Apr 2006): 332–338.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01171.xPhilip W. Bateman, Patricia A. Fleming Sex, intimidation and severed limbs: the effect of simulated predator attack and limb autotomy on calling and emergence behaviour in the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 59, no.55 (Nov 2005): 674–681.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0096-6ROBERT R. STALLMANN, A. H. HARCOURT Size matters: the (negative) allometry of copulatory duration in mammals, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 87, no.22 (Feb 2006): 185–193.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00566.xThijs Christiaan van Son, Martin Thiel Mating behaviour of male rock shrimp, Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea): effect of recent mating history and predation risk, Animal Behaviour 71, no.11 (Jan 2006): 61–70.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.03.018Scott Creel, John Winnie, Bruce Maxwell, Ken Hamlin, Michael Creel ELK ALTER HABITAT SELECTION AS AN ANTIPREDATOR RESPONSE TO WOLVES, Ecology 86, no.1212 (Dec 2005): 3387–3397.https://doi.org/10.1890/05-0032Yoriko Saeki, Kipp C. Kruse, Paul V. Switzer Physiological Costs of Mate Guarding in the Japanese Beetle (Popillia japonica Newman), Ethology 111, no.99 (Sep 2005): 863–877.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01106.xAaron J. Wirsing, James D. Roth, Dennis L. Murray CAN PREY USE DIETARY CUES TO DISTINGUISH PREDATORS? A TEST INVOLVING THREE TERRESTRIAL AMPHIBIANS, Herpetologica 61, no.22 (Jun 2005): 104–110.https://doi.org/10.1655/04-47Scott Creel, John A. Winnie Responses of elk herd size to fine-scale spatial and temporal variation in the risk of predation by wolves, Animal Behaviour 69, no.55 (May 2005): 1181–1189.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.07.022Lesley J. Morrell Are behavioural trade-offs all they seem? Counter-intuitive resolution of the conflict between two behaviours, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 56, no.66 (Jul 2004): 539–545.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0821-6D. L. Murray, J. D. Roth, A. J. Wirsing Predation Risk Avoidance by Terrestrial Amphibians: The Role of Prey Experience and Vulnerability to Native and Exotic Predators, Ethology 110, no.88 (Aug 2004): 635–647.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004.01004.xJosé Martín, Pilar López Iberian Rock Lizards (Lacerta monticola) Assess Short-Term Changes in Predation Risk Level When Deciding Refuge Use., Journal of Comparative Psychology 118, no.33 (Jan 2004): 280–286.https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.118.3.280Glenn P. Svensson, Christer Löfstedt, Niels Skals The odour makes the difference: male moths attracted by sex pheromones ignore the threat by predatory bats, Oikos 104, no.11 (Jan 2004): 91–97.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12517.xLuisa Amo, Pilar López, José Martín, M. E. Douglas Risk Level and Thermal Costs Affect the Choice of Escape Strategy and Refuge Use in the Wall Lizard, Podarcis muralis, Copeia 2003, no.44 (Dec 2003): 899–905.https://doi.org/10.1643/h202-270.1J. Martín, P. López, W. E. Cooper Loss of mating opportunities influences refuge use in the Iberian rock lizard, Lacerta monticola, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 54, no.55 (Jul 2003): 505–510.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0659-3José Martín, Pilar López, William E. Cooper When to Come Out from a Refuge: Balancing Predation Risk and Foraging Opportunities in an Alpine Lizard, Ethology 109, no.11 (Sep 2008): 77–87.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00855.xAmaya Ortigosa, Locke Rowe The effect of hunger on mating behaviour and sexual selection for male body size in Gerris buenoi, Animal Behaviour 64, no.33 (Sep 2002): 369–375.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.3065Zbigniew Borowski Individual and seasonal differences in antipredatory behaviour of root volesa field experiment, Canadian Journal of Zoology 80, no.99 (Sep 2002): 1520–1525.https://doi.org/10.1139/z02-154Andrew Sih, Michael Lauer, James J. Krupa Path analysis and the relative importance of male–female conflict, female choice and male–male competition in water striders, Animal Behaviour 63, no.66 (Jun 2002): 1079–1089.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.2002Richard Vermette, Daphne J. Fairbairn HOW WELL DO MATING FREQUENCY AND DURATION PREDICT PATERNITY SUCCESS IN THE POLYGYNANDROUS WATER STRIDER AQUARIUS REMIGIS?, Evolution 56, no.99 (Jan 2002): 1808.https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2002)056[1808:HWDMFA]2.0.CO;2Robert A. Dielenberg, Iain S. McGregor Defensive behavior in rats towards predatory odors: a review, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 25, no.7-87-8 (Dec 2001): 597–609.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00044-6Veronique Campbell, Daphne J Fairbairn Prolonged copulation and the internal dynamics of sperm transfer in the water strider Aquarius remigis, Canadian Journal of Zoology 79, no.1010 (Oct 2001): 1801–1812.https://doi.org/10.1139/z01-148Mari Katvala, Arja Kaitala Male choice for current female fecundity in a polyandrous egg-carrying bug, Animal Behaviour 62, no.11 (Jul 2001): 133–137.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1737Jose Martin, Pilar Lopez Costs of Refuge Use Affect Escape Decisions of Iberian Rock Lizards Lacerta monticola, Ethology 106, no.66 (Jun 2000): 483–492.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2000.00568.xKari Vepsäläinen, John R. Spence Generalization in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology: From Hypothesis to Paradigm, Biology & Philosophy 15, no.22 (Mar 2014): 211–238.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006636918716Arja Kaitala, Annkristin H. Axén EGG LOAD AND MATING STATUS OF THE GOLDEN EGG BUG AFFECT PREDATION RISK, Ecology 81, no.33 (Mar 2000): 876–880.https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0876:ELAMSO]2.0.CO;2P. G. Byrne, J. D. Roberts Simultaneous mating with multiple males reduces fertilization success in the myobatrachid frog Crinia georgiana, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 266, no.14201420 (Apr 1999): 717–721.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0695ULRIKA CANDOLIN, HEINZ-RUDOLF VOIGT Predator-induced nest site preference: safe nests allow courtship in sticklebacks, Animal Behaviour 56, no.55 (Nov 1998): 1205–1211.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1998.0892Gary A. Polis, Joseph D. Barnes, Mary K. Seely, Joh R. Henschel, Margit M. Enders PREDATION AS A MAJOR COST OF REPRODUCTION IN NAMIB DESERT TENEBRIONID BEETLES, Ecology 79, no.77 (Oct 1998): 2560–2566.https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2560:PAAMCO]2.0.CO;2Jennifer L. Moses, Andrew Sih Effects of Predation Risk and Food Availability on the Activity, Habitat Use, Feeding Behavior and Mating Behavior of a Pond Water Strider, Gerris marginatus (Hemiptera), Ethology 104, no.88 (Apr 2010): 661–669.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00100.xAtle Mysterud, Rolf Anker Ims FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES IN HABITAT USE: AVAILABILITY INFLUENCES RELATIVE USE IN TRADE-OFF SITUATIONS, Ecology 79, no.44 (Jun 1998): 1435–1441.https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[1435:FRIHUA]2.0.CO;2PAUL JIVOFF, ANSON H HINES Female behaviour, sexual competition and mate guarding in the blue crab,Callinectes sapidus, Animal Behaviour 55, no.33 (Mar 1998): 589–603.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0646Steven L. Lima Stress and Decision Making under the Risk of Predation: Recent Developments from Behavioral, Reproductive, and Ecological Perspectives, (Jan 1998): 215–290.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60366-6 Mary L. Reid and Judy A. Stamps Female Mate Choice Tactics in A Resource‐Based Mating System: Field Tests of Alternative Models Reid & Stamps, The American Naturalist 150, no.11 (Jul 2015): 98–121.https://doi.org/10.1086/286058Nils Møller Andersen A phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of sexual dimorphism and mating systems in water striders (Hemiptera: Gerridae), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 61, no.33 (Jun 2008): 345–368.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1997.tb01796.xMICHAEL D. JENNIONS, MARION PETRIE VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES, Biological Reviews 72, no.22 (Jan 2007): 283–327.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1997.tb00015.xAlicia Mathis, W. Wyatt Hoback The Influence of Chemical Stimuli from Predators on Precopulatory Pairing by the Amphipod, Gammarus pseudolimnaeus, Ethology 103, no.11 (Apr 2010): 33–40.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1997.tb00004.xGad Perry The evolution of sexual dimorphism in the lizard Anolis polylepis (Iguania): evidence from intraspecific variation in foraging behavior and diet, Canadian Journal of Zoology 74, no.77 (Jul 1996): 1238–1245.https://doi.org/10.1139/z96-137Wolf U. Blanckenhorn, Dirk Perner Life History Dependent Behavioural Variation in Water Striders, Aquarius remigis, Ethology 102, no.88 (Apr 2010): 993–1007.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1996.tb01177.xAndrew Sih, James J. Krupa Direct and indirect effects of multiple enemies on water strider mating dynamics, Oecologia 105, no.22 (Jan 1996): 179–188.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328544S. L. BALL, R. L. BAKER The non-lethal effects of predators and the influence of food availability on life history of adult Chironomus tentans (Diptera: Chironomidae), Freshwater Biology 34, no.11 (Aug 1995): 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1995.tb00417.xA.D. TRAMONTIN, A. SIH Experiments on the effects of food and density on voltinism in a stream-dwelling water strider (Aquarius remigis), Freshwater Biology 34, no.11 (Aug 1995): 61–67.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1995.tb00423.xGerhard Maier Mating frequency and interspecific matings in some freshwater cyclopoid copepods, Oecologia 101, no.22 (Feb 1995): 245–250.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317290Douglas P. Chivers, Brian D. Wisenden, R. Jan F. Smith Predation Risk Influences Reproductive Behaviour of Iowa Darters, Etheostoma exile (Osteichthyes, Percidae), Ethology 99, no.44 (Apr 2010): 278–285.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1995.tb00902.xAndrew Sih Predation risk and the evolutionary ecology of reproductive behaviour, Journal of Fish Biology 45, no.sasa (Dec 1994): 111–130.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1994.tb01087.xHannu Ylönen, Heidi Ronkainen Breeding suppression in the bank vole as antipredatory adaptation in a predictable environment, Evolutionary Ecology 8, no.66 (Nov 1994): 658–666.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01237848Simon C. Nemtzov Intraspecific variation in sand-diving and predator avoidance behavior of green razorfish,Xyrichtys splendens (Pisces, Labridae): effect on courtship and mating success, Environmental Biology of Fishes 41, no.1-41-4 (Nov 1994): 403–414.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197856Hannu Ylönen Vole cycles and antipredatory behaviour, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 9, no.1111 (Nov 1994): 426–430.https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(94)90125-2Yukio Yasui Adaptive control of copulation duration by males under sperm competition in the mite, Macrocheles muscaedomesticae, Experimental and Applied Acarology 18, no.99 (Sep 1994): 543–554.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058937Locke Rowe, Göran Arnqvist, Andrew Sih, James J.Krupa Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns: water striders as a model system, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 9, no.88 (Aug 1994): 289–293.https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(94)90032-9H. Ronkainen, H. Ylönen Behaviour of cyclic bank voles under risk of mustelid predation: do females avoid copulations?, Oecologia 97, no.33 (Apr 1994): 377–381.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317328Konstantine Souroukis, Anne-Marie Murray Female mating behavior in the field cricket,Gryllus pennsylvanicus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) at different operational sex ratios, Journal of Insect Behavior 8, no.22 (Mar 1994): 269–279.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01988910Piotr Jabłonski, Szymon Kaczanowski Influence of Mate-guarding Duration on Male Reproductive Success: An Experiment with Irradiated Water Strider (Gerris lacustris) Males, Ethology 98, no.3-43-4 (Apr 2010): 312–320.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1994.tb01079.xSimon C. Nemtzov Intraspecific variation in sand-diving and predator avoidance behavior of green razorfish, Xyrichtys splendens (Pisces, Labridae): effect on courtship and mating success, (Jan 1994): 403–414.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0199-8_28Nils Mølle Andersen The evolution of sexual size dimorphism and mating systems in water striders (Hemiptera: Gerridae): A phylogenetic approach, Écoscience 1, no.33 (Mar 2016): 208–214.https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.1994.11682244Carin Magnhagen Conflicting demands in gobies: When to eat, reproduce, and avoid predators, Marine Behaviour and Physiology 23, no.1-41-4 (Oct 1993): 79–90.https://doi.org/10.1080/10236249309378858Kerry Uzendoski, Esther Maksymovitch, Paul Verrell Do the risks of predation and intermale competition affect courtship behavior in the salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus?, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 32, no.66 (Jun 1993).https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00168826S. L. Matthews, J. S. Boates, S. J. Walde Shorebird predation may cause discrete generations in an amphipod prey, Ecography 15, no.44 (Oct 1992): 393–400.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1992.tb00049.xLocke Rowe Convenience polyandry in a water strider: foraging conflicts and female control of copulation frequency and guarding duration, Animal Behaviour 44 (Aug 1992): 189–202.https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(92)90025-5Göran Arnqvist SPATIAL VARIATION IN SELECTIVE REGIMES: SEXUAL SELECTION IN THE WATER STRIDER, GERRIS ODONTOGASTER, Evolution 46, no.44 (May 2017): 914–929.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb00609.xAndrew Sih, James J. Krupa Predation risk, food deprivation and non-random mating by size in the stream water strider, Aquarius remigis, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 31, no.11 (Jul 1992): 51–56.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167815Göran Arnqvist Pre-copulatory fighting in a water strider: inter-sexual conflict or mate assessment?, Animal Behaviour 43, no.44 (Apr 1992): 559–567.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)81016-4 Another battle of the sexes: the consequences of sexual asymmetry in mating costs and predation risk in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 246, no.13151315 (Jan 1997): 31–38.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1991.0121Carin Magnhagen Predation risk as a cost of reproduction, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 6, no.66 (Jun 1991): 183–186.https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(91)90210-OR. Stimson Wilcox, Joia Di Stefano Vibratory signals enhance mate-guarding in a water strider (Hemiptera: Gerridae), Journal of Insect Behavior 4, no.11 (Jan 1991): 43–50.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01092550José Martín, Pilar López, William E. Cooper Jr., Daniel T. Blumstein Hiding time in refuge, (): 227–262.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107447189.010
Referência(s)