Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

High-resolution studies of radio sources in the Hubble Deep and Flanking Fields

2005; Oxford University Press; Volume: 358; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08824.x

1365-2966

T. W. B. Muxlow, A. M. S. Richards, S. T. Garrington, P. N. Wilkinson, Ben Anderson, E. A. Richards, D. J. Axon, E. B. Fomalont, K. I. Kellermann, R. B. Partridge, Rogier A. Windhorst,

Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena

18 days of MERLIN data and 42 h of A-array VLA data at 1.4 GHz have been combined to image a 10-arcmin field centred on the Hubble Deep Field (HDF). This area also includes the Hubble Flanking Fields (HFF). A complete sample of 92 radio sources with S1.4 > 40 μJy was detected using the VLA data alone and then imaged with the MERLIN+VLA combination. The combined images offer (i) higher angular resolution (synthesized beams of diameter 0.2–0.5 arcsec), (ii) improved astrometric accuracy, and (iii) improved sensitivity compared with VLA-only data. The images are amongst the most sensitive yet made at 1.4 GHz, with rms noise levels of 3.3 μJy beam−1 in the 0.2-arcsec images. Virtually all the sources are resolved, with angular sizes in the range 0.2 to 3 arcsec. The central 3-arcmin square was imaged separately to search for sources down to 27 μJy. No additional sources were detected, indicating that sources fainter than 40 μJy are heavily resolved with MERLIN and must have typical angular sizes > 0.5 arcsec. Radio sources associated with compact galaxies have been used to align the HDF, the HFF and a larger CFHT optical field to the radio-based International Celestial Reference Frame. The HST optical fields have been registered to 70 per cent of the sources are starburst-type systems associated with major disc galaxies in the redshift range 0.3–1.3. Chandra detections are associated with 55 of the 92 radio sources, but their X-ray flux densities do not appear to be correlated with the radio flux densities or morphologies. The most recent submillimetre results on the HDF and HFF do not provide any unambiguous identifications with these latest radio data, except for HDF 850.1, but suggest at least three strong candidates.