Three-Dimensional Blood Flow Alterations After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
2012; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 125; Issue: 15 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1161/circulationaha.111.070086
ISSN1524-4539
AutoresMichael Markl, Issam Mikati, James Carr, Patrick M. McCarthy, S. Chris Malaisrie,
Tópico(s)Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
ResumoHomeCirculationVol. 125, No. 15Three-Dimensional Blood Flow Alterations After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Free AccessBrief ReportPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissionsDownload Articles + Supplements ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toSupplementary MaterialsFree AccessBrief ReportPDF/EPUBThree-Dimensional Blood Flow Alterations After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Michael Markl, PhD, Issam Mikati, MD, James Carr, MD, Patrick McCarthy, MD and S. Chris Malaisrie, MD Michael MarklMichael Markl From the Departments of Radiology (M.M., I.M., J.C.), Biomedical Engineering (M.M.), and Internal Medicine (I.M.), and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery (P.M., S.C.M.), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL. , Issam MikatiIssam Mikati From the Departments of Radiology (M.M., I.M., J.C.), Biomedical Engineering (M.M.), and Internal Medicine (I.M.), and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery (P.M., S.C.M.), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL. , James CarrJames Carr From the Departments of Radiology (M.M., I.M., J.C.), Biomedical Engineering (M.M.), and Internal Medicine (I.M.), and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery (P.M., S.C.M.), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL. , Patrick McCarthyPatrick McCarthy From the Departments of Radiology (M.M., I.M., J.C.), Biomedical Engineering (M.M.), and Internal Medicine (I.M.), and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery (P.M., S.C.M.), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL. and S. Chris MalaisrieS. Chris Malaisrie From the Departments of Radiology (M.M., I.M., J.C.), Biomedical Engineering (M.M.), and Internal Medicine (I.M.), and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery (P.M., S.C.M.), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL. Originally published17 Apr 2012https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.070086Circulation. 2012;125:e573–e575We present findings in a 79-year-old man after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis using a 26-mm Edwards Lifesciences Sapien 9000TFX valve.1 His predicted risk of operative mortality (Society of Thoracic Surgery score) was 12% on the basis of the following comorbidities: 2 previous coronary artery bypass operations, New York Heart Association functional class IV, hypertension, mild lung disease, ejection fraction of 25%, creatinine of 1.2 mg/dL, atrial fibrillation, and peripheral vascular disease. He underwent transapical delivery of the valve on January 5, 2011, without complication. His initial postoperative echocardiogram showed moderate aortic regurgitation (AR), mean gradient of 49mm Hg, and ejection fraction of 25%. After discharge, the patient was reevaluated for recurrent dyspnea.To gain further insight into the systemic implications of AR on hemodynamics of the left ventricular outflow tract in relation to potential congestive heart failure after TAVI, we performed time-resolved 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance velocity mapping (4-dimensional [4D] flow magnetic resonance imaging [MRI])2 6 months postoperatively. The study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from the patient. Magnetic resonance imaging examination (1.5T Espree, Siemens, Germany) included 4D flow (velocity sensitivity=150 cm/s, spatial/temporal resolution=2.5×2.1×3.2 mm3/42 ms) and dynamic 2D cine imaging of the heart (steady-state free precession, spatial/temporal resolution=1.4×1.6×8 mm3/49 ms).Echocardiographic assessment of aortic insufficiency was performed using standard parasternal and apical views with Nyquist limit >50 cm/s. Echocardiography demonstrated 2 jets of aortic regurgitation and was graded mild to moderate. Regurgitant volume and fraction were 28 mL and 41%, respectively (Figure 1).Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 1. Apical color Doppler echocardiographic image demonstrating mild-to-moderate aortic regurgitation.Four-dimensional flow MRI was used for 3D flow visualization (EnSight, CEI, North Carolina) based on 3D streamlines depicting the direction of blood flow as traces along the measured blood flow velocities (Figure 2). Time-resolved 3D pathlines were employed to illustrate the temporal evolution of blood flow in the left ventricular outflow tract and thoracic aorta (online-only Data Supplement Movie). Vector graphs were used to visualize flow profiles and retrograde flow jets below the aortic valve (Figure 3). Two-dimensional cine images of the left ventricular outflow tract were fused with the 4D flow data to coregister 3D hemodynamics and left ventricular outflow tract anatomy. In addition, the 4D flow data were used to retrospectively quantify retrograde flow and retrograde fraction as well as peak systolic and diastolic retrograde velocities above and below the valve.Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 2. Systolic and diastolic 3-dimensional streamlines in the left ventricle and aorta. Note the signal void caused by susceptibility effects induced by the valve material. Three-dimensional streamlines released from emitter planes above and below the valve illustrate the spatial distribution of blood flow during different time frames in the cardiac cycle. Marked helical flow in the aorta can be appreciated throughout the cardiac cycle (yellow arrows). Helix flow was initiated by an early systolic flow jet through the artificial valve, which propagates from the right to anterior along the outer curvature of the ascending aorta (white open arrows). Color coding shows local absolute blood flow velocity. LV indicates left ventricle; AAo, ascending aorta; and DAo, descending aorta.Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 3. Temporal and spatial distribution of diastolic retrograde flow below the aortic valve. A, Location of the analysis plane used for the visualization of flow profiles using vector graphs. B through E, Temporal evolution of the diastolic retrograde flow pattern below the valve. The velocity vectors (t=430 ms−600 ms) clearly illustrate the existence and spatiotemporal dynamics of 2 distinct retrograde flow jets during early and mid-diastole that were clearly separated from mitral inflow (dashed circle). AAo indicates ascending aorta; DAo, descending aorta.Three-dimensional streamline visualization (Figure 2) revealed intricate flow alterations that are absent in normal aortic flow. Strongly asymmetrical systolic left ventricular outflow with a flow jet forming along the right anterior outer curvature of the ascending aorta (Figure 1, left, open arrows) caused the development of marked helical flow (Figure 2, yellow arrows). Helix flow was fully developed during mid-systole (yellow arrows, t=170 ms and 205 ms) and extended toward the aortic arch during early and mid-diastole (t=396 ms and 525 ms). The complex multidirectional and phasically changing aortic flow can be best appreciated if viewed dynamically as shown in the online-only Data Supplement Movie.Vector graph visualization of flow in an analysis plane below the valve (Figure 3) revealed a complex retrograde flow jet pattern. Two clearly identifiable jets dynamically changed their location and direction during early and mid-diastole. Peak systolic velocity was high in the ascending aorta (2.1 m/s). Substantial diastolic retrograde peak velocities (0.7 m/s) were detected both above and below the valve. Analysis further revealed a moderate retrograde regurgitant fraction of 20% and retrograde flow of 19 mL (antegrade flow=92 mL).Because of the presence of metal artifacts (signal dropout) at the location of the inserted valve, visualization or quantification of flow was not possible inside the valve, which may explain why the residual AR as measured by 4D MRI was less severe compared with echocardiography. Nevertheless, the visualization of a dual jet pattern below the valve associated with perivalvular leak was possible with 4D flow MRI. The case also demonstrated unexpectedly complex abnormal flow after TAVI. A novel finding using 4D flow MRI was the substantial flow derangement in the aorta (marked helix flow). These findings clearly differed from normal flow patterns such as a mild-to-moderate right-handed systolic outflow helix and mild early diastolic retrograde flow in the ascending aorta and arch.3 Our findings suggest that the hemodynamic flow pattern after TAVI may be more complex than previously anticipated. Aortic helix flow may indicate regions with abnormal wall shear stress, which can change endothelial function and create areas at risk for vascular remodeling and aortic dilatation.These findings are of particular interest in light of a recent study in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, which showed that transcatheter and surgical procedures for aortic-valve replacement were associated with similar rates of survival but there were important differences in periprocedural risks. Transcatheter replacement resulted in much more frequent perivalvular AR possibly related to less seamless alignment of the transcatheter prosthesis compared with surgically repaired valves. However, no reliable and validated method exists to quantify multiple jets of perivalvular AR by echocardiography.4 The presented case illustrates the potential of 4D flow MRI to complement echocardiography in the assessment of aortic regurgitation in such patients and adds additional information on complex aortic hemodynamics and retrograde jet patterns.Optimal predictors and their correlation with long-term outcome after TAVI are still missing and require further investigations in longitudinal studies using larger cohorts of patients. Furthermore, studies are warranted to compare hemodynamics after TAVI to normal and age-matched controls and aortic valve replacement. Our findings indicate the potential role of methods such as 4D flow MRI for follow-up in these patients.DisclosuresDr Malaisri is an investigator in the Edward Lifesciences Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve (PARTNER) I and II trials.FootnotesThe online-only Data Supplement is available with this article at http://circ.ahajournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.070086/-/DC1.Correspondence to Michael Markl, PhD, Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, 737 N Michigan Ave, Ste 1600, Chicago, IL 60611. E-mail [email protected]eduReferences1. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG, Fontana GP, Makkar RR, Williams M, Dewey T, Kapadia S, Babaliaros V, Thourani VH, Corso P, Pichard AD, Bavaria JE, Herrmann HC, Akin JJ, Anderson WN, Wang D, Pocock SJ. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364:2187–2198.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Markl M, Harloff A, Bley TA, Zaitsev M, Jung B, Weigang E, Langer M, Hennig J, Frydrychowicz A. Time-resolved 3D MR velocity mapping at 3T: improved navigator-gated assessment of vascular anatomy and blood flow. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 25:824–831.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. Kilner PJ, Yang GZ, Mohiaddin RH, Firmin DN, Longmore DB. Helical and retrograde secondary flow patterns in the aortic arch studied by three-directional magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Circulation. 1993; 88:2235–2247.LinkGoogle Scholar4. Zoghbi WA, Chambers JB, Dumesnil JG, Foster E, Gottdiener JS, Grayburn PA. Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and Doppler ultrasound: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and the Canadian Society of EchocardiographyJ Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009; 22:975–1014.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Kari F, Russe M and Schlett C (2021) Magnetic resonance angiography-derived flow parameters to assess thoracic aortic disease risk, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 10.1093/ejcts/ezab533, 61:2, (403-404), Online publication date: 24-Jan-2022. Peper E, Leopaldi A, van Tuijl S, Coolen B, Strijkers G, Baan J, Planken R, de Weger A, Nederveen A, Marquering H and van Ooij P (2019) An isolated beating pig heart platform for a comprehensive evaluation of intracardiac blood flow with 4D flow MRI: a feasibility study, European Radiology Experimental, 10.1186/s41747-019-0114-5, 3:1, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2019. Veulemans V, Hellhammer K, Polzin A, Bönner F, Zeus T and Kelm M (2018) Current and future aspects of multimodal and fusion imaging in structural and coronary heart disease, Clinical Research in Cardiology, 10.1007/s00392-018-1284-5, 107:S2, (49-54), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2018. Blanken C, Farag E, Boekholdt S, Leiner T, Kluin J, Nederveen A, Ooij P and Planken R (2018) Advanced cardiac MRI techniques for evaluation of left‐sided valvular heart disease, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 10.1002/jmri.26204, 48:2, (318-329), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2018. Giese D, Weiss K, Baeßler B, Madershahian N, Choi Y, Maintz D and Bunck A (2017) In vitro evaluation of flow patterns and turbulent kinetic energy in trans-catheter aortic valve prostheses, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 10.1007/s10334-017-0651-y, 31:1, (165-172), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2018. Gunning P, Saikrishnan N, McNamara L and Yoganathan A (2014) An In Vitro Evaluation of the Impact of Eccentric Deployment on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Hemodynamics, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 10.1007/s10439-014-1008-6, 42:6, (1195-1206), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2014. Hope M, Sigovan M, Wrenn S, Saloner D and Dyverfeldt P (2013) MRI hemodynamic markers of progressive bicuspid aortic valve-related aortic disease, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 10.1002/jmri.24362, 40:1, (140-145), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2014. Tseng E, Wisneski A, Azadani A and Ge L (2013) Engineering perspective on transcatheter aortic valve implantation, Interventional Cardiology, 10.2217/ica.12.73, 5:1, (53-70), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2013. McGarvey J, Kondo N, Takebe M, Koomalsingh K, Witschey W, Barker A, Markl M, Takebayashi S, Shimaoka T, Gorman J, Gorman R and Pilla J (2013) Directed Epicardial Assistance in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Flow and Function Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.012, 96:2, (577-585), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2013. April 17, 2012Vol 125, Issue 15 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2012 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.070086PMID: 22508843 Originally publishedApril 17, 2012 PDF download Advertisement SubjectsCardiovascular SurgeryComputerized Tomography (CT)
Referência(s)