Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The Median Effective Dose of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Is Larger in the Single-Shot Spinal as Compared with the Combined Spinal-Epidural Technique

2005; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 100; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1213/01.ane.0000150941.84786.38

1526-7598

Raymond Goy, Yoong Chee-Seng, Alex Tiong-Heng Sia, Koay Choo-Kok, Shen Liang,

Spinal Hematomas and Complications

In Brief The combined spinal-epidural technique (CSE) has been associated with prolonged motor recovery and more frequent arterial hypotension as compared with a single-shot spinal (SSS) technique. We determined the median effective dose (MED) of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine for CSE and SSS by using the up-down sequential allocation technique. Sixty male patients were randomly allocated to receive intrathecal administration through an SSS or CSE technique. Needle insertion occurred at the L3-4 interspace in all patients. In SSS, 9.5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine was administered through a 27-gauge Whitacre spinal needle. In CSE, a 17-gauge Tuohy needle with 4 mL of air was used to locate the epidural space, through which a 27-gauge Whitacre spinal needle was introduced and 7.0 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine was administered. The dosing adjustment was 0.5 mg. A “successful” outcome was arbitrarily defined as sensory anesthesia at or above the T6 dermatome lasting for 60 min. A “success” resulted in a 0.5-mg decrement, whereas a “failure” resulted in a 0.5-mg increment in the next patient. There were 13 successes in both groups. The MED of bupivacaine was 9.18 mg (95% confidence interval, 8.89–9.47 mg) for CSE as compared with 11.37 mg (95% confidence interval, 10.88–11.86 mg) for SSS (P < 0.001). CSE required 19.3% (95% confidence interval, 14.9%–23.6%) less local anesthetic to achieve the defined clinical target. We found significant discrepancies in the MED of hyperbaric bupivacaine between the two techniques. Under similar clinical conditions, a 20% decrement in the dose of bupivacaine may be warranted whenever CSE is intended in place of SSS. IMPLICATIONS: A combined spinal-epidural technique is likely to result in prolonged sensory and motor block as compared with the single-shot spinal technique for the same dose of intrathecal local anesthetic. The combined spinal-epidural technique required 20% less hyperbaric bupivacaine than the single-shot spinal technique to achieve the same level and duration of sensory blockade.