Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

An analysis of the helix-to-strand transition between peptides with identical sequence

2000; Wiley; Volume: 41; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/1097-0134(20001101)41

ISSN

1097-0134

Autores

Xianghong Jasmine Zhou, Frank Alber, Gerd Folkers, Gastón H. Gonnet, Gareth Chelvanayagam,

Tópico(s)

Chemical Synthesis and Analysis

Resumo

Proteins: Structure, Function, and BioinformaticsVolume 41, Issue 2 p. 248-256 Research Article An analysis of the helix-to-strand transition between peptides with identical sequence Xianghong Zhou, Xianghong Zhou Department of Computer Science, Eidgenössische Technische Hochshule, Zürich, Switzerland Department of Applied Bioscience, Eidgenössische Technische Hochshule, Zürich, SwitzerlandSearch for more papers by this authorFrank Alber, Frank Alber International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica della Materia (INFM), Trieste, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorGerd Folkers, Gerd Folkers Department of Applied Bioscience, Eidgenössische Technische Hochshule, Zürich, SwitzerlandSearch for more papers by this authorGaston H. Gonnet, Gaston H. Gonnet Department of Computer Science, Eidgenössische Technische Hochshule, Zürich, SwitzerlandSearch for more papers by this authorGareth Chelvanayagam, Corresponding Author Gareth Chelvanayagam [email protected] Department of Computer Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, AustraliaDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Western Australia, Stirling Highway, Nedlands, Perth, W.A., 6009, Australia===Search for more papers by this author Xianghong Zhou, Xianghong Zhou Department of Computer Science, Eidgenössische Technische Hochshule, Zürich, Switzerland Department of Applied Bioscience, Eidgenössische Technische Hochshule, Zürich, SwitzerlandSearch for more papers by this authorFrank Alber, Frank Alber International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica della Materia (INFM), Trieste, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorGerd Folkers, Gerd Folkers Department of Applied Bioscience, Eidgenössische Technische Hochshule, Zürich, SwitzerlandSearch for more papers by this authorGaston H. Gonnet, Gaston H. Gonnet Department of Computer Science, Eidgenössische Technische Hochshule, Zürich, SwitzerlandSearch for more papers by this authorGareth Chelvanayagam, Corresponding Author Gareth Chelvanayagam [email protected] Department of Computer Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, AustraliaDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Western Australia, Stirling Highway, Nedlands, Perth, W.A., 6009, Australia===Search for more papers by this author First published: 24 August 2000 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0134(20001101)41:2 3.0.CO;2-JCitations: 34Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract An analysis of peptide segments with identical sequence but that differ significantly in structure was performed over non-redundant databases of protein structures. We focus on those peptides, which fold into an α-helix in one protein but a β-strand in another. While the study shows that many such structurally ambivalent peptides contain amino acids with a strong helical preference collocated with amino acids with a strong strand preference, the results overwhelmingly indicate that the peptide's environment ultimately dictates its structure. Furthermore, the first naturally occurring structurally ambivalent nonapeptide from evolutionary unrelated proteins is described, highlighting the intrinsic plasticity of peptide sequences. We even find seven proteins that show structural ambivalence under different conditions. Finally, a computer algorithm has been implemented to identify regions in a given sequence where secondary structure prediction programs are likely to make serious mispredictions. Proteins 2000;41:248–256. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc. REFERENCES 1 Chou PY, Fasman GD. Prediction of the secondary structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol 1978; 47: 45–148. 2 Munoz V, Serrano L. Intrinsic secondary structure propensities of the amino acids, using statistical phi-psi matrices: comparison with experimental scales. Proteins 1994; 20: 301–311. 3 Lyu PC, Liff M I, Marky LA, Kallenbach NR. Side chain contributions to the stability of α-helical structure in peptides. Science 1990; 250: 669–673. 4 O'Neil KT, DeGrado WF. A thermodynamic scale for the helix-forming tendencies of the commonly occurring amino acids. Science 1990; 250: 646–651. 5 Padmanabhan S, Marqusee S, Ridgeway T, Laue TM, Baldwin RL. Relative helix-forming tendencies of nonpolar amino acids. Nature 1990; 344: 268–270. 6 Kim CA, Berg JM. Thermodynamic β-sheet propensities measured using a zinc-finger host peptide. Nature 1993; 362: 267–270. 7 Blaber M, Zhang XJ, Matthews BW. Structural basis of amino acid αhelix propensity. Science 1993; 260: 1637–1640. 8 Minor DL Jr, Kim PS. Measurement of the β-sheet-forming propensities of amino acids. Nature 1994; 367: 660–663. 9 Smith CK, Withka JM, Regan L. A thermodynamic scale for the β-sheet forming tendencies of the amino acids. Biochemistry 1994; 33: 5510–5517. 10 Creamer TP, Rose GD. α-helix-forming propensities in peptides and proteins. Proteins 1994; 19: 85–97. 11 Lim V I. Algorithms for prediction of α-helical and β-structural regions in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1974; 88: 873–894. 12 Garnier J, Osguthorpe DJ, Robson B. Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1978; 120: 97–120. 13 Levin JM. Exploring the limits of nearest neighbour secondary structure prediction. Protein Eng 1997; 10: 771–776. 14 Zhong L, Johnson WC Jr. Environment affects amino acid preference for secondary structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 4462–4465. 15 Waterhous D V, Johnson WC Jr. Importance of environment in determining secondary structure in proteins. Biochemistry 1994; 33: 2121–2128. 16 Blondelle SE, Ostresh JM, Houghten RA, Perez-Paya E. Induced conformational states of amphipathic peptides in aqueous/lipid environments. Biophys J 1995; 68: 351–359. 17 Minor DL Jr, Kim PS. Context-dependent secondary structure formation of a designed protein sequence. Nature 1996; 380: 730–734. 18 Blondelle SE, Forood B, Houghten RA, Perez-Paya E. Secondary structure induction in aqueous vs. membrane-like environments. Biopolymers 1997; 42: 489–498. 19 Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJ, Meyer EE, Brice MD, Rodgers JR, Kennard O, Shimanouchi T, Tasumi M. The Protein Data Bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 1977; 112: 535–542. 20 Kabsch W, Sander C. On the use of sequence homologies to predict protein structure: identical pentapeptides can have completely different conformations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984; 81: 1075–1078. 21 Wilson IA, Haft DH, Getzoff ED, Tainer JA, Lerner RA, Brenner S. Identical short peptide sequences in unrelated proteins can have different conformations: A testing ground for theories of immune recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985; 82: 5255–5259. 22 Argos P. Analysis of sequence-similar pentapeptides in unrelated protein tertiary structures. Strategies for protein folding and a guide for site-directed mutagenesis. J Mol Biol 1987; 197: 331–348. 23 Cohen B I, Presnell SR, Cohen FE. Origins of structural diversity within sequentially identical hexapeptides. Protein Sci 1993; 2: 2134–2145. 24 Han KF, Baker D. Global properties of the mapping between local amino acid sequence and local structure in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 5814–5818. 25 Sudarsanam S. Structural Diversity of sequentially identical subsequences of proteins: identical octapeptides can have different conformations. Proteins 1998; 30: 228–231. 26 Frishman D, Argos P. Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment. Proteins 1995; 23: 566–579. 27 Hobohm U, Scharf M, Schneider R, Sander C. Selection of representative protein data sets. Protein Sci 1992; 1: 409–417. 28 Sobolev V, Sorokine A, Prilusky J, Abola EE, Edelman M. Automated analysis of interatomic contacts in proteins. Bioinformatics 1999; 15: 327–332. 29 Hubbard TJ, Ailey B, Brenner SE, Murzin AG, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database. Nucleic Acids Res 1999; 27: 254–256. 30 Gonnet GH, Hallet MH, Korostensky C, Bernardin L. An interpretive programming language for biological application: Darwin. Bioinformatics, 2000; 16: 101–103. 31 Kobe B. Autoinhibition by an internal nuclear localization signal revealed by the crystal structure of mammalian importin alpha. Nat Struct Biol 1999; 6: 388–397. 32 Mattevi A, Valentini G, Rizzi M, Speranza ML, Bolognesi M, Coda A. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli pyruvate kinase type I: molecular basis of allosteric transition. Structure 1995; 3: 729–741. 33 Hennig M, Sterner R, Kirschner K, Jansonius JN. Crystal structure at 2.0 A resolution of phosphoribosyl anthranilate isomerase from the hyperthermophile Thermotoga maritima: possible determinants of protein stability. Biochemistry 1997; 36: 6009–6016. 34 Norris GE, Stillman TJ, Anderson BF, Baker EN. The three-dimensional structure of PNGase F, a glycosylasparaginase from Flavobacterium meningosepticum. Structure 1994; 2: 1049–1059. 35 Klein C, Schulz GE. Structure of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase refinded at 2.0A resolution. J Mol Biol 1991; 217: 737–750. 36 Jacobson RH, Zhang XJ, DuBose RF, Matthews BW. Three-dimensional structure of beta-galactosidase from E.coli. Nature 1994; 369: 761–766. 37 Baumann U, Bode W, Huber R, Travis J, Potempa J. Crystal structure of cleaved equine leucocyte elastase inhibitor determined at 1.95A resolution. J Mol Biol 1992; 226: 1207–1218. 38 Johansson J, Szyperski T, Curstedt T, Wuthrich K. The NMR structure of the pulmonary surfactant-associated polypeptide SP-C in an apolar solvent contains a valyl-rich alpha-helix. Biochemistry 1994; 33: 6015–6023. 39 Baldwin RL, Rose GD. Is protein folding hierarchic? I. Local structure and peptide folding. Trends Biochem Sci 1999; 24: 26–33. 40 Kjeldgaard M, Nissen P, Thirup S, Nyborg J. The crystal structure of elongation factor EF-Tu from Thermus aquaticus in the GTP conformation. Structure 1993; 1: 35–50. 41 Polekhina G, Thirup S, Kjeldgaard M, Nissen P, Lippman C, Nyborg J. Helix unwinding in the effector region of elongation factor EF-TU-Gdp. Structure 1996; 4: 1141–1151. 42 Brown NR, Noble ME, Lawrie AM, Morris MC, Tunnah P, Divita G, Johnson LN, Endicott JA. Effects of phosphorylation of threonine 160 on cyclin-dependent kinase 2 structure and activity. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 8746–8756. 43 Jeffrey PD, Russo AA, Polyak K, Gibbs E, Hurwitz J, Massague J, Pavletich NP. Mechanism of CDK activation revealed by the structure of a cyclinA-CDK2 complex. Nature 1995; 376: 313–320. 44 Bone R, Frank L, Springer JP, Atack JR. Structural studies of metal binding by inositol monophosphatase: evidence for two-metal ion catalysis. Biochemistry 1994; 33: 9468–9476. 45 Jin L, Abrahams JP, Skinner R, Petitou M, Pike RN, Carrell RW. The anticoagulant activation of antithrombin by heparin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 14683–14688. 46 Skinner R, Chang WS, Jin L, Pei X, Huntington JA, Abrahams JP, Carrell RW, Lomas DA. Implications for function and therapy of a 2.9 A structure of binary-complexed antithrombin. J Mol Biol 1998; 283: 9–14. 47 Day CL, Anderson BF, Tweedie JW, Baker EN. Structure of the recombinant N-terminal lobe of human lactoferrin at 2.0 A resolution. J Mol Biol 1993; 232: 1084–1100. 48 Smith CA, Baker HM, Shongwe MS, Anderson BF, Baker EN. Crystallographic studies on metal and anion substituted human lactoferrin. Adv Exp Med Biol 1994; 357: 265–269. 49 Nielsen BB, Kastrup JS, Rasmussen H, Holtet TL, Graversen JH, Etzerodt M, Thogersen HC, Larsen IK. Crystal structure of tetranectin, a trimeric plasminogen-binding protein with an alpha-helical coiled coil. FEBS Lett 1997; 412: 388–396. 50 Kastrup JS, Nielsen BB, Rasmussen H, Holtet TL, Graversen JH, Etzerodt M, Thogersen HC, Larsen IK. Structure of the C-type lectin carbohydrate recognition domain of human tetranectin. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 1998; 54: 757–766. 51 Sauter NK, Hanson JE, Glick GD, Brown JH, Crowther RL, Park SJ, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. Binding of influenza virus hemagglutinin to analogs of its cell-surface receptor, sialic acid: analysis by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. Biochemistry 1992; 31: 9609–9621. 52 Bullough PA, Hughson FM, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. Structure of influenza haemagglutinin at the pH of membrane fusion. Nature 1994; 371: 37–43. 53 Rost B. Better 1D predictions by experts with machines. Proteins 1997; Suppl 1: 192–197. 54 Bewley CA, Gustafson KR, Boyd MR, Covell DG, Bax A, Clore GM, Gronenborn AM. Solution structure of cyanovirin-N, a potent HIV-inactivating protein. Nat Struct Biol 1998; 5: 571–578. 55 Ingelman M, Ramaswamy S, Niviere V, Fontecave M, Eklund H. Crystal structure of NAD(P)H: flavin oxidoreductase from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 1999; 38: 7040–7049. 56 Pascarella S, Argos P. Analysis of insertions/deletions in protein structure. J Mol Biol 1992; 224: 461–471. 57 Minor DL Jr, Kim PS. Context-dependent secondary structure formation of a designed protein sequence. Nature 1996; 380: 370–374. 58 Yang WZ, Ko TP, Corselli L, Johnson RC, Yuan HS. Conversion of a beta-strand to an alpha-helix induced by a single-site mutation observed in the crystal structure of Fis mutant Pro26Ala. Protein Sci 1998; 7: 1875–1883. 59 Cordes MH, Walsh NP, McKnight CJ, Sauer RT. Evolution of a protein fold in vitro. Science 1999; 284: 325–328. 60 Heinz DW, Baase WA, Dahlquist FW, Matthews BW. How amino-acid insertions are allowed in an alpha-helix of T4 lysozyme. Nature 1993; 361: 561–564. 61 James TL, Liu H, Uljanov NB, Farr-Jones S, Zhang H, Donne DG, Kaneko K, Groth D, Mehlhorn I, Prusiner SB, Cohen FE. Solution structure of a 142-residue recombinant prion protein corresponding to the infectious fragment of the scrapie isoform. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 10086–10091. 62 Jacchieri SG. Study of alpha-helix to beta-strand to beta-sheet transitions in amyloid: the role of segregated hydrophobic beta-strands. Biophys Chem 1998; 74: 23–34 63 Kirshenbaum K, Young M, Highsmith S. Predicting allosteric switches in myosins. Protein Sci 1999; 8: 1806–1815. 64 Young M, Kirshenbaum K, Dill KA, Highsmith S. Predicting conformational switches in proteins. Protein Sci 1999; 8: 1752–1764. 65 Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Fox BA, Bystroff C, Baker D. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins 1999; 34: 82–95. 66 Claessens M, Van Cutsem E, Lasters I, Wodak S. Modelling the polypeptide backbone with `spare parts' from known protein structures. Protein Eng 1989; 2: 335–345. 67 Levitt M. Accurate modeling of protein conformation by automatic segement matching. J Mol Biol 1992; 226: 507–533. 68 Merritt EA, Bacon DJ. Raster3D Photorealistic Molecular Graphics. Methods Enzymol 1997; 277: 505–524. Citing Literature Volume41, Issue21 November 2000Pages 248-256 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Referência(s)