Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The fast block against polyspermy in fucoid algae is an electrical block

1991; Elsevier BV; Volume: 144; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/0012-1606(91)90482-i

1095-564X

Susan H. Brawley,

Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds

Fertilization potentials in Pelvetia fastigiata, Fucus vesiculosus, and Fucus ceranoides were studied to examine whether eggs of fucoid algae have an electrical block against polyspermy. The resting potential of eggs of all species was about −60 mV, depolarizing, respectively, to −24 ± 5 mV (SD, n = 9) for 7.5 ± 2.1 (n = 8) min, −26 ± 5 (n = 9) mV for 6.4 ± 2.3 (n = 9) min, and −24 ± 6 (n = 5) mV for 6.7 ± 1.9 (n = 4) min. The depolarization was slower, and the fertilization potential was about 10 mV more negative in eggs of both F. vesiculosus and Pelvetia fertilized in 45-mM Na+ ASW; many of these eggs were polyspermic. Steady current was passed through unfertilized eggs of F. vesiculosus prior to insemination to test the potential dependence of fertilization. Eggs (n = 10) bound sperm at all potentials tested (−45 to −23 mV), but fertilization was prevented if eggs were held at potentials more positive than −45 to −37 mV. Eggs underwent a second depolarization if artificially hyperpolarized to potentials more negative than −50 mV immediately after the rise of a normal fertilization potential. Thus, fucoid eggs have an electrical fast block against polyspermy. Only in F. ceranoides does the formation of the cell wall after fertilization appear to be fast enough (i.e., 3–6 min postfertilization versus at 10–15 min in F. vesiculosus and P. fastigiata) to replace the fertilization potential as a polyspermy block. Nonfertilizing fucoid sperm swim away from the egg surface by 1–3 min after rise of the fertilization potential. This suggests that there is another “intermediate block” against polyspermy.