Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Performance of CURB-65 and CURB-age in community-acquired pneumonia

2009; Wiley; Volume: 63; Issue: 9 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02147.x

ISSN

1742-1241

Autores

Phyo Kyaw Myint, Prasanna Sankaran, P. Musonda, Deepak N. Subramanian, Hannah Ruffell, Alexandra Smith, Philippa Prentice, Shamoon Tariq, Ajay Kamath,

Tópico(s)

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment

Resumo

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is common and associated with significant mortality. In this study, we validated a newly proposed severity assessment rule for CAP, CURB-age, and also compared with to the currently recommended criteria in UK, CURB-65.We conducted a prospective study in three hospitals in Norfolk and Suffolk, UK. One hundred and ninety patients were included and followed up for 6 weeks.Of 190 patients, 100 were men (53%). The age range was 18-101 years (median 76 years). Sixty-five (34%) had severe pneumonia by CURB-65 and 54 (28%) had severe pneumonia by CURB-age. There were 54 deaths during follow-up. There were 32 deaths (50%) in severe and 22 deaths (18%) in non-severe group by CURB-65. There were 27 deaths each in both the groups by CURB-age (50% of severe cases and 20% of non-severe cases). For CURB-65, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 59.3% (45.0-72.4), 75.7% (67.6-82.7), 49.2% (36.6-61.9) and 82.4% (74.6-88.6), respectively. For CURB-age, the respective values were 50.0% (31.1-63.9), 80.1% (72.4-86.5), 50.0% (36.1-63.9) and 80.1% (72.4-86.5). Exclusion of patients aged < 65 years did not alter the results.Despite better specificity in correctly identifying 6-week mortality for CAP, CURB-age appears to be less sensitive than CURB-65. Our findings further assure the usefulness of CURB-65 for predicting mortality in CAP.

Referência(s)