Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Histologic investigation of the human pulp after thermodebonding of metal and ceramic brackets

1992; Elsevier BV; Volume: 102; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/s0889-5406(05)81187-4

1097-6752

Paul‐Georg Jost‐Brinkmann, Harald Stein, Rainer‐Reginald Miethke, Minoru Nakata,

Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

Twenty-five human permanent teeth scheduled for extraction for orthodontic reasons were used to study the effect of thermodebonding on the pulp tissue. One week before brackets were removed the teeth were bonded with either metal or ceramic brackets, with two alternative adhesives. For debonding, three different techniques were used: (1) debonding of ceramic brackets warmed up indirectly by resistance heating of a metallic bow applied to the bracket slot, (2) debonding of metal brackets warmed up directly by inductive heating of the bracket itself, and (3) debonding of ceramic brackets warmed up indirectly by inductive heating of metallic plier tips, applied to the mesial and distal bracket surfaces. Teeth with metal brackets removed without heat by squeezing the wings together served as a control group. The teeth were extracted 24 hours after debonding and subjected to a light microscopic study after histologic preparation and staining. In addition, the location of adhesive remnants was evaluated. While the thermodebonding of metal brackets worked properly and without any obvious pulp damage, there were problems related to the thermodebonding of ceramic brackets: (1) if more than one heating cycle was necessary, several teeth showed localized damage of the pulp with slight infiltration of inflammatory cells, (2) bracket fractures occurred frequently, and enamel damage could be shown, and (3) often with Transbond (Unitek/3M, Monrovia, Calif.) as the adhesive, more than one heating cycle was necessary for bracket removal, and thus patients complained about pain. Twenty-five human permanent teeth scheduled for extraction for orthodontic reasons were used to study the effect of thermodebonding on the pulp tissue. One week before brackets were removed the teeth were bonded with either metal or ceramic brackets, with two alternative adhesives. For debonding, three different techniques were used: (1) debonding of ceramic brackets warmed up indirectly by resistance heating of a metallic bow applied to the bracket slot, (2) debonding of metal brackets warmed up directly by inductive heating of the bracket itself, and (3) debonding of ceramic brackets warmed up indirectly by inductive heating of metallic plier tips, applied to the mesial and distal bracket surfaces. Teeth with metal brackets removed without heat by squeezing the wings together served as a control group. The teeth were extracted 24 hours after debonding and subjected to a light microscopic study after histologic preparation and staining. In addition, the location of adhesive remnants was evaluated. While the thermodebonding of metal brackets worked properly and without any obvious pulp damage, there were problems related to the thermodebonding of ceramic brackets: (1) if more than one heating cycle was necessary, several teeth showed localized damage of the pulp with slight infiltration of inflammatory cells, (2) bracket fractures occurred frequently, and enamel damage could be shown, and (3) often with Transbond (Unitek/3M, Monrovia, Calif.) as the adhesive, more than one heating cycle was necessary for bracket removal, and thus patients complained about pain.