Produção Nacional
Revisado por pares
Environmental Vulnerability and Phosphorus Fractions of Areas with Pig Slurry Applied to the Soil
2015; Wiley; Volume: 44; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2134/jeq2014.08.0359
ISSN1537-2537
AutoresRafael da Rosa Couto, Matheus dos Santos, Jucinei José Comin, Luíz Carlos Pittol Martini, Luciano Colpo Gatiboni, Sérgio Roberto Martins, Paulo Belli Filho, Gustavo Brunetto,
Tópico(s)Phosphorus and nutrient management
ResumoJournal of Environmental QualityVolume 44, Issue 1 p. 162-173 Environmental Model, Module, and Dataset Environmental Vulnerability and Phosphorus Fractions of Areas with Pig Slurry Applied to the Soil Rafael da Rosa Couto, Corresponding Author Rafael da Rosa Couto rrccouto@hotmail.com Environmental Engineering Dep., Federal Univ. of Santa Catarina, Technology Center, Caixa Postal 476, CEP, 88040-970 Florianópolis, SC, BrazilCorresponding author (rrccouto@hotmail.com).Search for more papers by this authorMatheus dos Santos, Matheus dos Santos Agronomy Dep. and Social Technologies for Water Management Project (Tecnologias Sociais para a Gestão da Água), Federal Univ. of Santa Catarina, 88040-900 Florianopolis, SC, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorJucinei José Comin, Jucinei José Comin Rural Engineering Dep., Federal Univ. of Santa Catarina, Center for Agricultural Sciences, Rod. Admar Gonzaga 1346, CEP, 88034-000 Florianópolis, SC, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorLuíz Carlos Pittol Martini, Luíz Carlos Pittol Martini Rural Engineering Dep., Federal Univ. of Santa Catarina, Center for Agricultural Sciences, Rod. Admar Gonzaga 1346, CEP, 88034-000 Florianópolis, SC, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorLuciano Colpo Gatiboni, Luciano Colpo Gatiboni Soil Science Dep., Univ. of Santa Catarina State, Lages, SC, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorSérgio Roberto Martins, Sérgio Roberto Martins Environmental Engineering Dep., Federal Univ. of Santa Catarina, Technology Center, Caixa Postal 476, CEP, 88040-970 Florianópolis, SC, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorPaulo Belli Filho, Paulo Belli Filho Environmental Engineering Dep., Federal Univ. of Santa Catarina, Technology Center, Caixa Postal 476, CEP, 88040-970 Florianópolis, SC, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorGustavo Brunetto, Gustavo Brunetto Soil Science Dep., Federal Univ. of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, BrazilSearch for more papers by this author Rafael da Rosa Couto, Corresponding Author Rafael da Rosa Couto rrccouto@hotmail.com Environmental Engineering Dep., Federal Univ. of Santa Catarina, Technology Center, Caixa Postal 476, CEP, 88040-970 Florianópolis, SC, BrazilCorresponding author (rrccouto@hotmail.com).Search for more papers by this authorMatheus dos Santos, Matheus dos Santos Agronomy Dep. and Social Technologies for Water Management Project (Tecnologias Sociais para a Gestão da Água), Federal Univ. of Santa Catarina, 88040-900 Florianopolis, SC, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorJucinei José Comin, Jucinei José Comin Rural Engineering Dep., Federal Univ. of Santa Catarina, Center for Agricultural Sciences, Rod. Admar Gonzaga 1346, CEP, 88034-000 Florianópolis, SC, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorLuíz Carlos Pittol Martini, Luíz Carlos Pittol Martini Rural Engineering Dep., Federal Univ. of Santa Catarina, Center for Agricultural Sciences, Rod. Admar Gonzaga 1346, CEP, 88034-000 Florianópolis, SC, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorLuciano Colpo Gatiboni, Luciano Colpo Gatiboni Soil Science Dep., Univ. of Santa Catarina State, Lages, SC, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorSérgio Roberto Martins, Sérgio Roberto Martins Environmental Engineering Dep., Federal Univ. of Santa Catarina, Technology Center, Caixa Postal 476, CEP, 88040-970 Florianópolis, SC, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorPaulo Belli Filho, Paulo Belli Filho Environmental Engineering Dep., Federal Univ. of Santa Catarina, Technology Center, Caixa Postal 476, CEP, 88040-970 Florianópolis, SC, BrazilSearch for more papers by this authorGustavo Brunetto, Gustavo Brunetto Soil Science Dep., Federal Univ. of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, BrazilSearch for more papers by this author First published: 01 January 2015 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2014.08.0359Citations: 17 Assigned to Associate Editor Cesar Plaza. All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Read the full textAboutRelatedInformationPDFPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessClose modalShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Abstract The application of pig slurry as a fertilizer can cause soil and water contamination. Intrinsic characteristics of the environment may enhance this effect and influence the vulnerability of the agricultural system. The goal of this study was to evaluate the accumulation of soil P fractions in areas treated with pig slurry and in forest areas and to propose an evaluation of the areas’ vulnerability to P contamination. Soil samples were collected from 10 areas with pig slurry applied to the soil and one in forest without a history of pig slurry application, all located in the Coruja and Bonito rivers microbasin at Braço do Norte, Santa Catarina, southern Brazil. Samples were prepared and subjected to P chemical fractionation. Two versions of the P index method, based on soil P forms or only on P extracted by Mehlich-1, were used to evaluate the environmental risk of the studied areas. Estimated soil losses were lower for the forest and natural pasture and highest in areas with black oat (Avena strigosa Schreb.)–corn (Zea mays L.) crop cultivation. Concentrations of P fractions, especially of organic and inorganic P extracted by 0.1 and 0.5 mol L−1 NaOH and NaHCO3 and of inorganic P extracted by anion exchange resin and HCl, were higher in areas with a longer history and higher frequency of pig slurry applications. Vulnerability to P contamination was mainly influenced by soil P concentrations and soil losses in the studied areas. The P index based on Hedley's fractionation P forms resulted in a more accurate risk scoring of the studied areas than the P index based on the concentration of available P extracted by Mehlich-1. Citing Literature Volume44, Issue1January-February 2015Pages 162-173 RelatedInformation RecommendedPhosphorus Runoff from Incorporated and Surface‐Applied Liquid Swine Manure and Phosphorus FertilizerI. C. Daverede, A. N. Kravchenko, R. G. Hoeft, E. D. Nafziger, D. G. Bullock, J. J. Warren, L. C. Gonzini, Journal of Environmental QualityRunoff Phosphorus Losses from Surface‐Applied BiosolidsH. A. Elliott, R. C. Brandt, G. A. O'Connor, Journal of Environmental QualityImpact of Manure Phosphorus Fractions on Phosphorus Loss from Manured Soils after IncubationD. Kumaragamage, D. N. Flaten, O.O. Akinremi, C.A. Sawka, D. Ige, F. Zvomuya, Journal of Environmental Quality
Referência(s)