The Development of Auditory Feedback Monitoring: Delayed Auditory Feedback Studies on the Vocalizations of Children Aged Six Months to 19 Months
1973; American Speech–Language–Hearing Association; Volume: 16; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1044/jshr.1604.709
ISSN0022-4685
AutoresN. Fargo Belmore, Diane Kewley-Port, Richard L. Mobley, Violet E. Goodman,
Tópico(s)Infant Health and Development
ResumoNo AccessJournal of Speech and Hearing ResearchResearch Article1 Dec 1973The Development of Auditory Feedback Monitoring: Delayed Auditory Feedback Studies on the Vocalizations of Children Aged Six Months to 19 Monthsis corrected byErrata: The Development of Auditory Feedback Monitoring: Delayed Auditory Feedback Studies on the Vocalizations of Children Aged Six Months to 19 Months N. Fargo Belmore, Diane Kewley-Port, Richard L. Mobley, and Violet E. Goodman N. Fargo Belmore Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland Google Scholar More articles by this author , Diane Kewley-Port Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland Google Scholar More articles by this author , Richard L. Mobley Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland Google Scholar More articles by this author and Violet E. Goodman Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1604.709 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In As part of a series of experiments to determine the earliest age at which there is evidence of auditory feedback monitoring, the vocalizations of 28 children aged six to 19 months were recorded during simultaneous auditory feedback (SAF) and a 200-msec delay in auditory feedback (DAF). Measurements were made of duration and peak soind pressure level. Of the 28 children, 13 showed a significant change (p < 0.10) on one or both of the two parameters. The usual change was a decrease, the opposite of the effect usually shown by adults. The best single measure of the DAF effect appeared to be duration. The best indicator of whether or not there would be a significant change was language development in that the greatest changes were observed among the children who were most advanced linguistically. It is not certain that the vocalizations of those children who showed a significant DAF effect are under closed-loop auditory feedback control. Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited by Current Biology22:2 (113-117)1 Jan 2012Children's Development of Self-Regulation in Speech ProductionEwen N. MacDonald, Elizabeth K. Johnson, Jaime Forsythe, Paul Plante and Kevin G. Munhall Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências76:2 (289-295)1 Jun 2004Causes and consequences of song amplitude adjustment in a territorial bird: a case study in nightingalesHenrik Brumm Animal Behaviour63:5 (891-897)1 May 2002Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbirdHenrik Brumm and Dietmar Todt Perceptual and Motor Skills90:3_suppl (1157-1170)1 Jun 2000Speech Self-Monitoring in Preschoolers: The Effects of Delayed Auditory Feedback on RecitationLawrence V. Harper and Karen S. Huie Journal of Communication Disorders31:6 (505-510)1 Nov 1998Is there a self-monitoring speech perception system?Christy L. Ludlow and Dragana Barac Cikoja The Irish Journal of Psychology10:4 (568-578)1 Jan 1989Phonological Disability and Reading: What Is the Link?Marie de Montfort Supple Gerald M. Siegel, Herbert L. Pick and Sharon R. Garber (1984) Auditory Feedback and Speech Development Advances in Child Development and Behavior Volume 1810.1016/S0065-2407(08)60369-9 WALTER H. MANNING and EDWARD A. SHIRKEY (1982) Determining Articulatory Automatization of Newly Learned Sounds 10.1016/B978-0-12-608608-9.50010-3 Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders11:2 (175-189)1 Jun 1981Comparison of auditory stimulus processing in normal and autistic adolescentsE. Harris Nober and James Q. Simmons DONALD E. MOWRER (1980) Phonological Development during the First Year of Life 10.1016/B978-0-12-608604-1.50008-2 WILLIAM R. LEITH and CLAUDIA C. CHMIEL (1980) Delayed Auditory Feedback and Stuttering: Theoretical and Clinical Implications 10.1016/B978-0-12-608603-4.50014-7 Brain and Language7:3 (307-319)1 May 1979An interpretation of research on feedback interruption in speechGloria J. Borden The Modern Language Journal63:8 (429-435)1 Dec 1979An Indirect Measure of Listening ComprehensionHarold S. Madsen Child Development46:1 (186)1 Mar 1975Development of Speech Timing Control in ChildrenBeth M. Tingley and George D. Allen Related articlesErrata: The Development of Auditory Feedback Monitoring: Delayed Auditory Feedback Studies on the Vocalizations of Children Aged Six Months to 19 Months Volume 16Issue 4December 1973Pages: 709-720 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library HistoryReceived: Jun 8, 1971Accepted: Jul 19, 1973 Published in issue: Dec 1, 1973 Metrics Topicsasha-article-typesCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1973 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...
Referência(s)