Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Rational Cavity Design Principles

1994; Wiley; Volume: 6; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1708-8240.1994.tb00865.x

1708-8240

PETTER R. HUNT,

Biosensors and Analytical Detection

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative DentistryVolume 6, Issue 5 p. 245-256 Rational Cavity Design Principles PETTER R. HUNT, PETTER R. HUNTSearch for more papers by this author PETTER R. HUNT, PETTER R. HUNTSearch for more papers by this author First published: September 1994 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1994.tb00865.xCitations: 7AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References 1 Thystruplrup A. Bille J and Qvist V. Radiographic and observed tissue changes in approximal carious lesions at the time of operative treatment, Carries Res. 20: 75–84, 1986. 10.1159/000260923 Google Scholar 2 Bailits HL, Chiribaga D, Grasso J, Damuth L and Willtemain TR. A new intermediate dental outcome measure- amalgam replacement rate. Medical Care 17: 780–786, 1979. 10.1097/00005650-197907000-00008 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3 Black GV. A work on operative dentistry Technical procedures infilling teeth. Vols I and II, Woodstock : Medico-Dental Publ Co. 1908. Google Scholar 4 O'Hara JW and Clark I. L. The evolution of the contemporary cavity preparation. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 108: 993–997, 1984. 10.14219/jada.archive.1984.0109 Google Scholar 5 Elderton RJ. New approaches to cavity design. Br. Dent. J. 157: 421–127, 1984. 10.1038/sj.bdj.4805514 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 6 Robinson PB. The evolution of cavity shape for minimal amalgam restorations. Dental Update 12: 357–370, 1985. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 7 Sigurjons H. “Extension for prevention” historical development and current status of GV Blacks concept. Oper. Dent. 8: 57–63, 1983. CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 8 Otto PF and Rule JP. Relationship between proximal cavity design and recurrent caries J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 116: 867–870, 1988. 10.14219/jada.archive.1988.0270 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 9 Hunter AR and Hunter AL The class II caries lesion. II Alternative direct cavity preparations. NZ Dent. J. 85: 116–121, 1989. CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 10 Markley MR. Restorations of silver amalgam. J. Amer. Dent. Assoc. 43: 133–146, 1951. 10.14219/jada.archive.1951.0192 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 11 Elderton RJ. An in vivo morphological study of cavity and amalgam margins on the occlusal surfaces of human teeth. PhD Thesis University of London, 1975. Google Scholar 12 Elderton RJ. Restorative dentistry: 1. current thinking on cavity design. Dental Update 13: 113–122, 1984. Google Scholar 13 Goldberg J, Tanzer J, Munster E, Amara J, Thal F and Birkthed D. Cross sectional clinical evaluation of recurrent enamel caries, restoration of marginal integrity, and oral hygiene status. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 102: 635–641, 1981. 10.14219/jada.archive.1981.0155 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 14 Hamilton JC, Moffa JP, Ellison JA and Jenkins WA. Marginal fracture not a predictor of longevity for two dental amalgam alloys: a ten year study. J. Pros. Dent. 50: 200–202, 1983. 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90013-6 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 15 Mjör IA. Frequency of secondary caries at various anatomical locations. Ope Dent. 10: 88–92, 1985. PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 16 Mjör IA and Smith DC. Detailed evaluation of six class 2 amalgam restorations. Op. Dent. 10: 17–21, 1984. Web of Science®Google Scholar 17 Simonsen RJ and Stallard RE. Sealant restorations utilising fillied composite resin: One year results. Quint. Int. 8: 77–84, 1977. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 18 Simonsen RJ and Landy NA. Preventive resin restorations: fracture resistance and 7-year clinical results. J. Dent. Res. 63: spec issue 39, 1984. Google Scholar 19 Swifi EJ. Preventive resin restorations. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 114: 819–821, 1987. 10.14219/jada.archive.1987.0159 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 20 Weerheijm KL, De Soet JJ, Van Amerongen WE, De Graff J. Sealing of occlusal hidden caries lesions: An alternative for curative treatment. J. Dent Child 59: 263–268, 1992. CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 21 Garcia-Godoy F. The preventive glass ienomer restoration. Quint. Int. 17: 617–419, 1986. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 22 Burke FJT. The use of a glass ionomer cement in the treatment of the initial carious lesion. Dent. Update 16 (6): 257–259, 1989. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 23 Lutz F and Burkart R. Das Concise-Enamel-Bond System, eine alternative: Schweiz Monatsschr. Zahnheilkd. 84: 1113–1129, 1974. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 24 Luescher B, Lutz F, Ochsenbein H and Mühlemann HR. Microleakage and marginal adaptation in conventional and adhesive class II restorariom. J. Prosthet. Dent. 37: 300–309, 1977. 10.1016/0022-3913(77)90072-5 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 25 Roberst GJ. Thc sauccr preparation. Part 1. Clinical evaluation over three years. Br. Dent. J. 153: 96–98, 1982. 10.1038/sj.bdj.4804859 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 26 Fusayama T. Cavity preparation Of a new adhesive restorative system. Quint. Int. 14, 397–409, 1983. Google Scholar 27 Hosoda H and Fusayma T. A tooth substance saving restiratuve technique. Int. Dent. Jour. 34: 1–12, 1984. CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 28 Lussi A, Gygax M and Hotz P. Die mini-preparation approximate kavitten. Schwit. Monatsschr. Zahneulkd 97: 186–190, 1987. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 29 Nordbro H, Leirskar J and Von Der Fehr FR. Saucer shaped cavity preparation for composite resin restorations in class II carious lesions: three year results. J. Prosthes Dent 69: 155–159, 1993. 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90134-A CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 30 Qvist V and Qvist J. Marginal leakage along Concise in relation to filling procedure. Scand J. Dent. Res. 85: 305, 1977. PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 31 Qvist V. The effect of mastication on marginal adaptation of composite restorations in vivoJ. Dent. Res. 62: 904–906, 1983. 10.1177/00220345830620081101 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 32 Hunt PR Letters to the editor: Amalgam Vs Composite. J. Amer. Dent. Assoc. 107: 384, 1983. 10.14219/jada.archive.1983.0254 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 33 Roulet JF. The problems associated with substituting composite resins for amalg, zm: a status report on posterior composites. J. Dent. 16: 101–113, 1988. 10.1016/0300-5712(88)90001-2 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 34 Battock RD, Rhoades J and Lund M. Management of proximal carieas in roots of posterior teeth. Oper. Dent. 4: 108–112, 1979. CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 35 Roggenkamp CL, Cochran MA and Lund M. The facial slos preparation: a nonocclusal ooption for class II carious lesions. Oper. Dent 7: 107, 1982. PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 36 McLean J. Erthrtin in restorative dentistry the chalenge for the future. Br. Dent. Jour. 149: 368–373, 1980. 10.1038/sj.bdj.4804525 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 37 McLean JW and Gasser O. Glass cermet cements. Quint. Int. 16: 333–343, 1985. PubMedGoogle Scholar 38 Hunt PR. A modified class II cavity preparation for glass ionomer restorative materials. Quint. Int. 15: 1011–1018, 1984. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 39 Knight GM. Thr tunnel restoration. Dent. Outlook 10: 3, 1984. Google Scholar 40 Knight GM. The use of adhesive materials in the conservative restoration of selected posterior teeth. Aust. Dent. Jour. 29: 324–331, 1984. 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1984.tb05294.x PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 41 Hunt P. Microconservative restorations for approximal carious lesions. J. Amer Dent. Assoc. 120: 37–40, 1990. 10.14219/jada.archive.1990.0011 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 42 Hasslero L. Tunnel restorations. Swed Dent. J. 17: 173–182, 1993. PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 43 Jinks, GM. Flouride impregnated cements and their effect on the activity of interproximal catries. J. Dent. Child. 30: 87, 1963. Google Scholar 44 Strand GV and Tveit A. Effectiveness of caries removal by the partial tunnel preparation method. Scand. J. Dent. Res. 101: 270–273, 1993. PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 45 Weerheijm KL, De Soet JJ. van Amerongen WE, de Graff J. The effect of glass ionomer cement on carious dentine: An in vivo study. Caries Res. 27: 417–423, 1993. 10.1159/000261573 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 46 Sato Y and Fursayama T. Removal of dentine guided by fuchsin staining. J. Dent. Res. 55: 670–683, 1976. 10.1177/00220345760550042301 Google Scholar 47 Anderson MH and Charbeneau GT. A comparison of digital and optical criteria for detecting carious dentin. J. Prosthet. Dent. 53: 643–646, 1985. 10.1016/0022-3913(85)90011-3 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 48 Kidd EAM, Joyston-Bechal S and Berghion D. The use of a caries detector dye during cavity preparation: a microbiological assessment. Br. Dent. J 174, 245, 1993. 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808142 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 49 Akerboom HBM, Borgmeyer PJ, Advokaat JGA and Van Reenan GJ. The influence of the preparation on the marginal breakdown of amalgam restorations. Results after three years. J. Dent. Res. 60A: 520, 1981. Google Scholar 50 Erikren HM and Buonocore MG. Marginal leakage with different composite restoratiue materialr in vitro. Effect of cavity design. J. Oral Rehab 3, 315–322, 1976. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1976.tb01445.x CASGoogle Scholar 51 Forsten L. Short- and long-term fluoride release from glass ionomers and other fluoride-containing filling matarials in vitro. Scand. J. Dent. Res. 98: 179–85, 1991. Web of Science®Google Scholar 52 Koch G and Hatibovic-Kofinan S. Glass ionomer cements a fluoride release system in viva. Swed. Dent. J. 14: 267–73, 1990. PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 53 Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass ionomers. Scand. J. Dent. Res. 99: 241–5, 1991. CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 54 Seppä L, Forss H and Øgaard B. The effect of fluoride application on flouride release and the antibacterial action of glass ionomerr. J Dent. Res. 72: 1310–14, 1993. 10.1177/00220345930720090901 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 55 Palenik CJ, Behnen MJ, Setcos JC and Miller CH. Inhibition of micro-bial adherenre and growth by various glass ionomers in vitro. Dent. Mater 8, 16–20, 1992. 10.1016/0109-5641(92)90047-G CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 56 Benelli EM, Serra MC, Rodrigues Jr AL and Cury JA. In situ anticari-ogenic potential of glass ionomer cement. Caries Res. 27: 280–282, 1993. 10.1159/000261551 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 57 Gardwell JE and Roberts BJ. Damage to adjacent teeth during cavity preparation. J. Dent. Res. 51: 1269–1270, 1972. Google Scholar 58 Quist V, Johannessen L and Bruun M. Progression of approximal caries in relation to iatrogenic preparation damage. J. Dent. Res 71: 1370–1373, 1992. 10.1177/00220345920710070401 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 59 Brännström M. Smear layer: pathological and treatment consideration Oper. Dent. Suppl. 3, 35–42, 1984. Google Scholar 60 Pashley DH. Smear layer: pathological considerations Oper, Dent. Suppl. 3, 13–29, 1984. Google Scholar 61 Waerhaug J. Effect of rough Surface upon gingival tissue. J. Dent Res. 35: 323–325, 1956. 10.1177/00220345560350022601 PubMedGoogle Scholar 62 Lang NP, Kril RA and Anderhalden K. Clinical and microbilogical effects of subgingival restoration with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. J. Clin. Periodontal. 10: 563, 1983. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1983.tb01295.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 63 Van Waes H, Krejci I and Lutz F. Die tunnel restauration Schiweiz Monatsschr. Zahnmed. 98: 1105, 1988. Google Scholar 64 Hickel R and Vo A. Untersuchungen zur Tunrrelpräparation. Dtsch. Zahnärztl. Z. 42: 545–548, 1987. CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 65 Nordbro H, Strand GV and Lyngstah SP Clinical performance of class II tunnel restorations 2nd NOF/CED Joint Meeting (IADR) Abs.#006, 1993. Google Scholar 66 Svangberg M. Class II amalgam restorations, glass ionomer tunnel restorations and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a three Year clinical study. Caries Res. 26: 315–318, 1992. 10.1159/000261459 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 67 Forsten L. Clinical experience with glass ionomer for proximal fillings Acta Odont. Scand. 51: 195–200, 1993. PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume6, Issue5September 1994Pages 245-256 ReferencesRelatedInformation