Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Functionalism and Structuralism: Two Programs for Evolutionary Biologists

1984; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 124; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/284311

1537-5323

Peter D. Dwyer,

Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

Previous articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsFunctionalism and Structuralism: Two Programs for Evolutionary BiologistsPeter D. DwyerPeter D. Dwyer Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 124, Number 5Nov., 1984 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/284311 Views: 35Total views on this site Citations: 34Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1984 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Allysha Powanda Winburn, An‐Di Yim, Michala K. Stock Recentering forensic anthropology within a multifaceted body of evolutionary theory: Strengthening method by making theory explicit, American Journal of Biological Anthropology 4 (Oct 2022).https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24628 Takahiro Asami , Robert H. Cowie , and Kako Ohbayashi Evolution of Mirror Images by Sexually Asymmetric Mating Behavior in Hermaphroditic Snails Asami, Cowie, & Ohbayashi, The American Naturalist 152, no.22 (Jul 2015): 225–236.https://doi.org/10.1086/286163Ilan Golani A mobility gradient in the organization of vertebrate movement: The perception of movement through symbolic language, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.0202 (May 2011): 249–266.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068539Colin Allen Why Eshkol-Wachman behavioral notation is not enough, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 266–267.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068540George W. Barlow Is the mobility gradient suitable for general application?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 267–268.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068552Charles H. M. Beck The environment modulates the mobility gradient, temporally if not sequentially, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 268–269.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068564Marc Bekoff Description and explanation: A plea for plurality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 269–270.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068576John A. Byers The mobility gradient: Useful, general, falsifiable?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 270–271.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068588Alexander R. Cools Striatal structures, dopamine and the mobility gradient model, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 271–272.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0006859XRobert C. Eaton Eshkol-Wachman movement notation and the evolution of locomotor patterns in vertebrates, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 272–274.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068606David Eilam The mobility gradient from a comparative phylogenetic perspective, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 274–275.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068618Robert Fagen Moving beyond words, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 275–276.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0006862XZen Faulkes, Dorothy Hayman Paul Connecting invertebrate behavior, neurophysiology and evolution with Eshkol-Wachman movement notation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 276–277.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068631John C. Fentress Alternative taxonomies in movement: Not only possible but critical, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 277–278.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068643Gary Goldberg Dynamical systems theory and the mobility gradient: Information, homology and self-similar structure, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 278–279.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068655John G. Harries Shapes of behaviour, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 279–281.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068667Peter H. Klopfer Structure and function in the CNS, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 281–282.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068679Paul Leyhausen Animal motility: Gestalt or piecemeal assembly, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 282–282.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068680Melvin Lyon Somewhere in time – temporal factors in vertebrate movement analysis, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 282–283.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068692William A. MacKay Joint torque precedes the kinematic end result, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 283–284.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068709Roger D. Masters Time-based objective coding and human nonverbal behavior, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 284–285.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068710Darren Newtson Human observation and human action, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 285–285.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068722Sergio M. Pellis The yin and yang of behavioral analysis, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 286–286.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068734William T. Powers Testing for controlled variables, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 286–287.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068746George V. Rebec From psychopharmacology to neuropsychopharmacology: Adapting behavioral terminology to neural events, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.0202 (May 2011): 287–288.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068758Wolfgang M. Schleidt Describing behavior: A new label for an old wine?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 288–289.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0006876XRené Thom Sensorimotor reference frames and physiological attractors, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 289–289.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068771Dietmar Todt, Henrike Hultsch Birdsong: Variations that follow rules, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 289–290.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068783Ian Q. Whishaw What are voluntary movements made of?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 290–291.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068795Ilan Golani The natural geometry of a behavioral homology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.22 (May 2011): 291–308.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00068801Susan Oyama Ontogeny and Phylogeny; a Case of Metarecapitulation?, (Jan 1992): 211–239.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8038-0_8D.M. Lambert, A.J. Hughes Keywords and concepts in structuralist and functionalist biology, Journal of Theoretical Biology 133, no.22 (Jul 1988): 133–145.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(88)80001-8Russell D. Gray Faith and Foraging: A Critique of the “Paradigm Argument from Design”, (Jan 1987): 69–140.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1839-2_2 Ian G. Jamieson The Functional Approach to Behavior: Is it Useful?, The American Naturalist 127, no.22 (Oct 2015): 195–208.https://doi.org/10.1086/284478