Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Cis control of gene expression in E.coli by ribosome queuing at an inefficient translational stop signal

2002; Springer Nature; Volume: 21; Issue: 16 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1093/emboj/cdf424

1460-2075

H. Jin,

RNA modifications and cancer

Article15 August 2002free access Cis control of gene expression in E.coli by ribosome queuing at an inefficient translational stop signal Haining Jin Haining Jin Department of Microbiology, Stockholm University, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden Search for more papers by this author Asgeir Björnsson Asgeir Björnsson Present address: deCODE Genetics, Sturlugata 8, IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland Search for more papers by this author Leif A. Isaksson Corresponding Author Leif A. Isaksson Department of Microbiology, Stockholm University, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden Search for more papers by this author Haining Jin Haining Jin Department of Microbiology, Stockholm University, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden Search for more papers by this author Asgeir Björnsson Asgeir Björnsson Present address: deCODE Genetics, Sturlugata 8, IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland Search for more papers by this author Leif A. Isaksson Corresponding Author Leif A. Isaksson Department of Microbiology, Stockholm University, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden Search for more papers by this author Author Information Haining Jin1, Asgeir Björnsson2 and Leif A. Isaksson 1 1Department of Microbiology, Stockholm University, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden 2Present address: deCODE Genetics, Sturlugata 8, IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] The EMBO Journal (2002)21:4357-4367https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdf424 PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyWechatReddit Figures & Info An UGA stop codon context which is inefficient because of the 3′-flanking context and the last two amino acids in the gene protein product has a negative effect on gene expression, as shown using a model protein A′ gene. This is particularly true at low mRNA levels, corresponding to a high intracellular ribosome/mRNA ratio. The negative effect is smaller if this ratio is decreased, or if the distance between the initiation and termination signals is increased. The results suggest that an inefficient termination codon can cause ribosomal pausing and queuing along the upstream mRNA region, thus blocking translation initiation of short genes. This cis control effect is dependent on the stop codon context, including the C-terminal amino acids in the gene product, the translation initiation signal strength, the ribosome/mRNA ratio and the size of the mRNA coding region. A large proportion of poorly expressed natural Escherichia coli genes are small, and the weak termination codon UGA is under-represented in small, highly expressed E.coli genes as compared with the efficient stop codon UAA. Introduction The bacterial cell has developed a number of controls to regulate gene expression at the translational level. Translation initiation is governed by the three initiation factors IFs 1–3 together with fMet-tRNAfMet (Kozak, 1999), but initiation efficiency and thereby gene expression is also determined by the base sequences that flank the initiation codon in the mRNA. The well known Shine–Dalgarno (SD) sequence (Shine and Dalgarno, 1975) normally is located 5–8 bases upstream of the initiation codon (Chen et al., 1994). This sequence anchors the mRNA to the 30S sequence by complementary base pairing to the anti-SD, close to the 3′ end of the 16S rRNA. Besides the canonical start codon AUG, the near-cognate codons UUG, GUG and AUU can also function as start signals. The AUU codon is used in Escherichia coli only in the case of the gene infC coding for initiation factor IF3, where this non-canonical initiation codon is used in an auto-regulatory control circuit (Sacerdot et al., 1996). The mRNA secondary structures that involve the regions that flank the initiation region and/or the initiation codon (de Smit and van Duin, 1994) can affect gene expression. Since the ribosome decodes the codons at various speeds, codon usage is also important and translation is faster for highly expressed, than for poorly expressed genes (Sorensen et al., 1989; Sorensen and Pedersen, 1991). Optimal codons and suboptimal codons, which are not necessarily rare codons, are evenly spaced in the different regions of genes. However, some rare codons are over-represented among the first 25 codons of E.coli genes (Chen and Inouye, 1990). In particular, the 5–6 codons that follow the initiation codon are important for gene expression levels. At least part of this effect originates from peptidyl-tRNA drop-off (Heurgue-Hamard et al., 2000) that reduces the effective gene expression level. The importance of the +2 codon for gene expression at the translational level has been studied extensively but is not fully understood (Looman et al., 1987; Stenström et al., 2001b). In normal wild-type E.coli there are no tRNAs that decode the three stop codons UAA, UAG and UGA. Instead, the stop codon UAG is decoded by release factor 1 (RF1). UGA is recognized by RF2. UAA is recognized by both RF1 and RF2 (Capecchi, 1967; Caskey et al., 1969). The termination reaction at all three stop codons is stimulated by RF3, although this factor is not essential for bacterial viability (Milman et al., 1969; Grentzmann et al., 1994; Mikuni et al., 1994). The efficiency of a stop codon, especially UGA, in promoting termination is very sensitive to the contexts on both sides of the stop codon itself. Altogether, the termination signal consists of the 2–3 codons upstream of the stop codon and the codon that follows at the 3′ side, together constituting as many as 12–15 bases (Buckingham et al., 1990; Kopelowitz et al., 1992; Björnsson and Isaksson, 1993; Mottagui-Tabar et al., 1994; Poole et al., 1995; Björnsson et al., 1996). The effects of the codons upstream of the termination codon itself are indirect since the effect on the termination reaction originates from the P-site tRNA (Zhang et al., 1996) and the last two amino acid residues in the protein product, that are encoded by the −1 and −2 codons. These amino acid residues probably affect binding of the RFs (Zhang et al., 1996). As a result, the last two amino acid residues of the gene product affect the efficiency of decoding the stop codon that terminates its own gene. This is particularly true for the weak stop codon UGA (Mottagui-Tabar et al., 1994; Björnsson et al., 1996). Thus, certain C-terminal dipeptide residues, together with an A-base after a UGA stop codon, can produce a very inefficient termination, giving up to 30% readthrough of UGA by the UGG reader tRNATrp. On the contrary, other dipeptide residues together with a U base following the stop codon give essentially complete termination (Björnsson and Isaksson, 1993). The bases in the codon downstream of the termination codon are directly involved in binding of the release factors. The frequency of the bases at the 3′ end of the stop codon is biased, being U>A>G>C for UGA, U>G>A>C for UAA and U>C=G>A for UAG (Bossi, 1983; Brown et al., 1990). Thus, U is over-represented and it also promotes the most efficient termination. In E.coli, UAA U and UAA G are major stop signals, whereas UGA U and UGA A are less common in highly expressed genes (Bossi, 1983; Brown et al., 1990; Tate and Brown, 1992). It has been observed that stop codon contexts that give inefficient termination, as revealed by high readthrough, gave a lower output of protein product than did efficient contexts, thus suggesting some kind of cis control (Björnsson and Isaksson, 1993). The effect could be explained partly by the less stable full-length mRNA in the case of the low efficiency stop codon context. However, the effect of mRNA degradation was not large enough to explain fully the observed stop codon context effect on gene expression at the protein level (Björnsson and Isaksson, 1996). To study further the combined influences of initiation and termination signals on gene expression, we have used a useful model gene for the investigation based on the protein A′ reporter gene derived from the protein A gene in Staphylococcus aureus (Björnsson et al., 1996, 1998). Our results suggest that inefficient termination can cause ribosome queuing that has a negative influence on translational initiation some 400 bases upstream of the mRNA termination signal. The influence of the termination signal on gene expression is dependent on the initiation codon context, the length of the gene and the intracellular level of mRNA. Translation termination efficiency that can be influenced by the C-terminal amino acid residues in the gene product can thus act as a cis control device of gene expression at the translation initiation level. Results Technical evaluation of the 3A′ in vivo assay system A′ gene-derived proteins are stable, non-functional and non-toxic for the E.coli host bacterium (Björnsson et al., 1998). The protein yield from an isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-induced 3A′ gene in the plasmid used here is ∼1% or more of the level of total cellular proteins (Björnsson et al., 1998). A series of protein A′ gene variants were constructed, in order to evaluate effects on A′ gene expression levels. Of these plasmids, pMCR3A′, carried 3A′ only. pHN110 carried the 3A′ test gene plus the 2A′ internal control gene (Figure 1A). pHN200 carried 3A′ as a test gene and 5A′ as an internal control gene (Figure 1B). The test gene 3A′ and control genes 2A′ or 5A′ are under separate control by the Ptrc promoter. This IPTG-inducible promoter can be repressed by the repressor encoded by lacI, which is also located in the plasmid. The 3A′ gene is preceded by a canonical, and thus highly efficient, SD sequence (SD+). The AUG initiation codon in the 3A′ gene in plasmids pMCR3A′, pHN110 and pHN200 is followed by a downstream region (DR) sequence (DR-A: AAA GCA AUU UUC GUA) that enables a high level of gene expression. Altogether, a high level of gene expression should be achieved for such 3A′ gene variants in the presence of IPTG. Figure 1.Plasmid cloning procedures for vector constructions. (A) Plasmid pHN110 carries a 3A′ gene as a test gene and a 2A′ gene as a standard gene. pHN500 has the 2A′ standard gene in the inverse orientation, as indicated. (B) Plasmid pHN200 has the 3A′ gene as test gene and a 5A′ gene as a standard gene. The directions of transcription of the test and internal control genes are indicated. AmpR, ampicillin resistance gene: Ori, plasmid origin of replication; lacZ, gene encoding β-galactosidase; lacI, repressor gene of lacZ. Download figure Download PowerPoint In order to analyse the influence of the A′ gene induction levels on bacterial growth, we measured the growth rates of plasmid-carrying cells in the presence or absence of the inducer IPTG. Despite different loads on cellular metabolism by the plasmids pMCR3A′, pHN110 and pHN200, all the E.coli strains grew at similar rates, with a doubling time of ∼30 min in LB medium, in the presence of IPTG (not shown). In the absence of IPTG, the A′ genes are expressed at very low levels, as revealed by SDS–PAGE (not shown). For cells induced with IPTG, significant expression is obtained. Cells with plasmids pMCR3A′, pHN110 or pHN200, growing in the presence of IPTG, were harvested in mid-log phase, and the A′ proteins were purified by one-step affinity chromatography on IgG–Sepharose and analysed by SDS–PAGE. Results presented in Figure 2 illustrate the separation obtained for the various A′ proteins that are expressed in the different plasmid-carrying strains. The molar expression ratios 3A′/2A′ and 3A′/5A′ are similar (0.48 and 0.49, respectively), showing that the nature of the internal control gene product, either 2A′ or 5A′, does not affect the expression level of the test gene 3A′. Since the initiation regions of the 2A′ and 5A′ genes are the same, being different from that of the 3A′ gene, this probably explains why the 2A′ and 5A′ genes can be interchanged as control genes. Figure 2.SDS–PAGE analysis of A′ proteins encoded by plasmids pMCR3A′, pHN110 and pHN200. Proteins 5A′, 3A′ and 2A′ are indicated by arrows. The A′ proteins were isolated from similar amounts of IPTG-induced (1 mM) plasmid-containing cells, as described in Materials and methods. Protein bands were scanned for determination of expression. Molecular markers are indicated. Molar units are given to compensate for differences in molecular weights of the different A′ proteins. Lane 1, pMCR3A′ (3A′: 6.9 ± 0.4 U); lane 2, pHN110 (3A′: 6.9 ± 0.3 U; 2A′, 14.5 ± 0.5 U; relative expression ratio 3A′/2A′ = 0.48 ± 0.17); lane 3, pHN200 (5A′, 15.3 ± 1 U; 3A′, 7.5 ± 0.6 U; relative expression ratio 3A′/5A′ = 0.49 ± 0.19). M = molecular markers. Standard errors were determined by analysis of four samples of the same protein preparation. Download figure Download PowerPoint The inverted direction of transcription from the test gene and the standard gene possibly could affect each other. To investigate this possibility, a plasmid was constructed where the direction of transcription of the internal standard gene 2A′ was inverted to be in the same direction as the test gene by using the two ClaI sites at both ends of the 2A′ gene. Relative 3A′ gene expression in pHN110 and pHN500 (Figure 1A) is very similar (0.47 and 0.49, respectively) irrespective of whether transcription of the test and control A′ genes is in the same or the inverted orientation. Influence of different stop codon contexts on gene expression Earlier results had indicated that the stop codon context could influence gene expression (Björnsson and Isaksson, 1993). In order to evaluate this effect further, two gene variants were made that were preceded by a strong (SD+; 5′-AAGGAGGU-3′) or weak (SD−; 5′-AAAUAAAU-3′) SD sequence followed by an efficient DR-A or a less efficient DR-B penta-codon sequence, respectively, downstream of the initiation codon. These two gene variants should give high or low levels of translation initiation, respectively. Furthermore, in the spacer region between the second and third A′-encoding sequences, a weak stop signal (CCA UGA A) and several strong stop signals (CCA UAA A, AGC UGA U or AGC UAA U) (Björnsson and Isaksson, 1993) were introduced (Figure 3). The eight variants thus obtained were analysed for A′ protein production (Figure 4). Besides the internal standard 2A′ protein encoded by the control gene, one would expect to find a 3A′ protein that results from readthrough of the stop codon in the linker region in the test gene. In addition, a 2A″ protein corresponding to two A′ units plus a few amino acids encoded by the linker sequence downstream of the start codon should be formed as the result of translation termination at the inserted stop codon. Since the three proteins are different in size, they can be separated from each other using SDS–PAGE and quantified by scanning of the stained protein bands in the gel (Figure 4). Figure 3.Translation assay system used in this study. Ptrc, promoter of transcription; Ttrp, transcription termination; A′, one protein A′ domain-encoding region; ATG and TAA are gene translational start and stop sites, respectively. mRNA sequences of start and stop regions are shown. The SD region is underlined. The AUG codon in the SD+ variant is followed by the DR-A penta-codon downsteam region. The AUG codon in the SD− variant is followed by the intermediately strong DR-B penta-codon sequence. The 2A′ gene mRNA starts with the sequence AATTGTGAGCGGATAA CAATTTCACACAGGAAACAGACCATGGAATTGCAACACGAT and the stop codon context is AAGTAAGTA. The +1 base of the mRNA transcript is indicated in the figure. Download figure Download PowerPoint Figure 4.Termination/readthrough of strong and weak stop codon contexts. Stop codon contexts of the A′ gene variants are indicated. The 3A′ protein band results from stop codon readthrough of the internal stop codon in the 3A′ gene. The 2A″ band results from termination at this stop codon. The 2A′ protein is the gene product of the 2A′ internal standard gene. Analysis of gene variants with the indicated stop codon contexts and with SD+, DR-A (A) or SD−, DR-B (B) are shown. Download figure Download PowerPoint Expression of the eight different gene variants (SD+ and SD− together with each of the four different stop codon contexts described above) was studied in connection with full induction by 1 mM IPTG. Protein A′ expression was quantified by measuring the product ratio (3A′ + 2A″)/2A′, where 2A″ represents the termination product, 3A′ the readthrough product and 2A′ the control product. For the stop codon contexts CCA UAA A (pHN52), AGC UAA U (pHN55) and AGC UGA U (pHN56), the stop signal was strong enough to prevent any measurable appearance of the 3A′ readthrough product on gels, and only the 2A″ protein was expressed from the test gene (Table I). However, for the weak stop signal GAC CCA UGA A, both the 3A′ readthrough and the 2A″ termination products were found, giving a transmission value (T; 3A′/2A″) of 0.64 for the SD+ variant in pHN53 and 0.80 for the SD− variant in pHN59. Measurements of total gene expression indicated a slightly lower expression level [(3A′ + 2A″)/2A′] for the variants with the inefficient stop codon context GAC CCA UGA A (Table I), than for those with the more efficient stop codon contexts. This was true no matter if a strong (SD+, DR-A) or weak (SD−, DR-B) start site was present in the 3A′ gene. Table 1. Protein expression with different translation and stop contexts Plasmids Constructions Gene expression Transmission T (3A′/2A″) Stop codon effect UAA/UGA 3A′ 2A″ pHN52 SD+-AUG-2A′-CCAUAA A – 0.22 ± 0.03 – pHN53 SD+-AUG-2A′-CCAUGA A 0.07 ± 0.01 0.11 ± 0.01 0.64 ± 0.05 pHN52/pHN53 1.2 pHN55 SD+-AUG-2A′-AGCUAA U – 0.25 ± 0.03 – pHN56 SD+-AUG-2A′-AGCUGA U – 0.24 ± 0.02 – pHN55/pHN56 1.0 pHN58 SD−-AUG-2A′-CCAUAA A – 0.097 ± 0.01 – pHN59 SD−-AUG-2A′-CCAUGA A 0.035 ± 0.01 0.044 ± 0.01 0.80 ± 0.08 pHN58/pHN59 1.2 pHN61 SD−-AUG-2A′-AGCUAA U – 0.105 ± 0.02 – pHN62 SD−-AUG-2A′-AGCUGA U 0.104 ± 0.02 – pHN61/pHN62 1.0 Protein A′ expressed in M9 minimal medium in 1 mM IPTG. The 3A′ values are normalized to 2A′ obtained by correction for the molecular weight of the A′ proteins (Björnsson et al. , 1998). All contexts have GAC as the −2 stop codon and DR-A penta-codon sequence downstream of the initiation codon of the SD+ group. The DR-B penta-codon sequence was used in the SD− group. SD+ is AAGGAGG and SD− is AAAUAAA (Figure 3). All data were obtained from at least four independent experiments. As can also be seen in Table I, the expression levels associated with the SD+ sequences are about double those of their SD− counterparts, confirming the positive effect on translation initiation by a canonical SD sequence. Furthermore, since the level of readthrough of the weak termination context GAC CCA UGA A is rather similar in the presence or absence of a strong SD, this suggests that the level of initiation does not influence termination efficiency in these cases. Influence of different induction levels on gene expression Since the induction by 1 mM IPTG used above should give a high level of mRNA, i.e. a low ratio between the number of free ribosomes and mRNA molecules in the cell, the effects of lowering the IPTG concentrations were analysed. This treatment should decrease the mRNA level, thus increasing the ribosomes/mRNA ratio. As can be seen in Figure 5, a low concentration of IPTG gave a higher total gene expression (3A′ + 2A″) for several of the analysed gene variants relative to the internal 2A′ standard. Expression values for the three gene variants with SD+, DR-A together with an efficient stop signal (pHN52, pHN55 and pHN56) are increased, whereas the one with a weak stop signal (pHN53) is unaffected. As a result, for the GAC CCA UPuA A stop codon contexts, the level of normalized expression was almost four times higher for UAA than for its UGA counterpart. For the context GAC AGC UPuA U, it was almost double. Thus, up to a 5-fold difference in gene expression during low induction can be obtained, depending on the nature of the stop signal. The DR-B variants together with SD− (pHN58, pHN59, pHN61 and pHN62) have a weak start site and they are unaffected by a lowered IPTG induction (Figure 5). As a result, expression of these SD−, DR-B variants is only ∼10% compared with the strongest expression found for the SD+, DR-A variant in pHN55. Thus, if the mRNA carries a strong start site and a strong translational stop signal, an increased protein production per mRNA molecule is obtained if the ribosome/mRNA ratio in the cell is increased by lowered IPTG induction. The results suggest that expression is dependent on the stop signal some 140 codons further down the gene, the strength of the start site and the ribosome/mRNA ratio. Ribosomal queuing is a possible explanation for the observed results. Figure 5.Effect of stop codon context and gene induction by IPTG on relative gene expression. The analysed stop codon contexts are indicated. Expression is given as (3A′ + 2A′)/2A′, where 3A′ is the readthrough product, 2A″ is the termination product and 2A′ is the product of the standard gene. The gene variants were preceded by SD+, DR-A (filled symbols) or SD−, DR-B (open symbols) as indicated in Table I. Download figure Download PowerPoint Influence of UV irradiation or increased distance between start and stop sites on gene expression The strain CSR603C is sensitive to UV irradiation, resulting in the destruction of DNA. In such a strain with a high copy number plasmid, any plasmid molecule that escapes the UV damage will continue to replicate, thus giving rise to a new population of the high copy number plasmid. Thus, chromosomal DNA is inactivated but plasmid-borne gene products are still expressed and enriched in the cell after the UV irradiation (Sancar et al., 1979). Since the gross mRNA concentration is decreased by such treatment, the effect should be an increased ratio of ribosomes over mRNA in the cell. The remaining functional mRNAs should be derived preferentially from plasmid genes being loaded efficiently by translating ribosomes. As a result, the chance of ribosome queuing should increase. However, for mRNAs with an initiation region that is covered by queued ribosomes due to slow termination, free ribosomes would nevertheless not give any increased initiation. This is true even if the free ribosomes are present in excess. The results of an experiment where non-induced cells had been exposed to UV irradiation are shown in Table II. Even though the 3A′ and 2A′ bands are normally very weak, using a sample of cells that had not been induced by IPTG, both the 3A′ and 2A′ protein bands can be clearly recognized in the gels after UV irradiation in the absence of induction (not shown). This result confirms the enrichment and preferential translation of the plasmid-borne 3A′ and 2A′ genes after UV irradiation. From the data, it is clear that the stop codon context variant with the most inefficient stop signal GAC CCA UGA A (pHN53) indeed gives a much lower expression level than the other three more efficient stop signal variants. Table 2. Protein expression in the mutant strain CSR603C Plasmids Constructions Gene expression (3A′ + 2A″)/2A′ Stop codon effect (UAA/UGA) pHN52 SD+-AUG-2A′-CCAUAA A 2.7 ± 0.3 pHN53 SD+-AUG-2A′-CCAUGA A 0.3 ± 0.02 pHN52/pHN53 9 pHN55 SD+-AUG-2A′-AGCUAA U 3.1 ± 0.4 pHN56 SD+-AUG-2A′-AGCUGA U 2.5 ± 0.4 pHN55/pHN56 1.2 CSR 603C is a mutant strain in which chromosomal DNA is inactivated and the plasmid test gene is overexpressed by UV irradiation. The initiation and termination codons are separated by a 2A′ gene sequence, as indicated. The SD preceding the AUG initiation codon is the SD+ variant, as shown in Figure 3. Cells were grown in M9 minimal medium without the inducer IPTG. The 3A′ values are normalized to 2A′ obtained by correction for the molecular weight of the A′ proteins (Björnsson et al. , 1998). All contexts have GAC as the −2 codon (Figure 3). All data are based on at least four independent experiments. It is quite possible that the UV irradiation causes some destruction not only of DNA but also of ribosomes. However, expression here is estimated as a relative value comparing it with the standard 2A′ gene. A decreased ribosome pool as the result of destruction by UV should also affect the expression of the 2A′ gene, i.e. the ratio 3A′/2A′ as a measure of relative expression is still relevant. A queuing effect should be apparent for low IPTG induction conditions giving a high ribosome/mRNA ratio. In this case and in the absence of UV treatment, relative expression values of 1.2 and 0.3 (pHN52 and pHN53, respectively, in Figure 5) are found. In the case of UV treatment, in the absence of induction, the expression values for these two constructs are 2.7 and 0.3 (Table II), respectively. Even if there is some destruction of ribosomes by the UV treatment, the increase in relative expression for pHN52 from 1.6 to 2.7 suggests that the treatment gives an increased ribosome/mRNA ratio, in line with the rationale behind the experiment. The significant difference in gene expression (9-fold) if gene variants ending with strong or weak termination signals are compared in connection with UV irradiation (Table II) supports a queuing model. Even if a stop signal context favours ribosome queuing upstream of the stop codon, the effect should be less pronounced if the distance between the initiation and termination codons is increased. The weak stop context GAC CCA UGA A and the strong stop signal GAC AGC UGA U were therefore analysed in constructs where they were preceded by one (pHN77 and pHN78), two (pHN53, pHN56) or four (pHN81 and pHN82) A′-encoding units (Figures 5 and 6), giving 2A′, 3A′ and 5A′ proteins as the readthrough products, respectively. All gene variants were SD+ with the DR-A sequence, thus ensuring efficient initiation. As can be seen in Figure 7, during low induction (high ribosome/mRNA ratio), gene expression levels are 4A′>2A′>1A′ for the weak stop signal (GAC CCA UGA A), suggesting gene size-dependent queuing effects. For the stronger stop signal (GAC AGC UGA U), only the smallest gene variant (1A′) in pHN78 failed to give higher expression during low induction, thus indicating queuing in this case. In contrast, the 2A′ (pHN56) and 4A′ (pHN82) variants give increased expression (4A′>2A′) as a response to lowered induction. Taken together, the results presented in Figure 7 suggest that an increased distance between the stop and start signals decreases ribsomal queuing up to the initiation region. Such queuing is counteracted by an efficient stop signal, and the ribosome/mRNA ratio is also important. Figure 6.Gene variants with different distances between start and stop codons. (A) Short (1A′) (pHN77 and pHN78) and (B) long distances (4A′) (pHN81 and pHN82) are shown. Ptrc, promoter of transcription; Ttrp, transcription termination; the protein A′-encoding regions are shown. The initiation codon AUG (ATG) and the termination codon UGA (TGA) are indicated. mRNA sequences of start and stop codon contexts are shown. All gene variants are preceded by SD+ and the initiation codon is followed by the DR-A penta-codon downstream sequence. Base +39 of the mRNA transcript is indicated. Download figure Download PowerPoint Figure 7.Effect of stop codon context and gene induction by IPTG on relative gene expression. Plasmids are specified in Figure 6. Expression values include the readthrough product, if any. Data for pHN56 and pHN53 have been presented in Figure 5, but they have been inserted here, using small symbols, for the sake of comparison. Download figure Download PowerPoint One A′ protein unit is comprised of 57–67 amino acids, corresponding to some 200 bases in the mRNA. The distance from the stop codon after the second A′-encoding unit up to the initiation codon is therefore almost 400 bases. If a ribosome covers ∼30–40 bases in the mRNA (Steitz and Jakes, 1975; Beyer et al., 1994), this means that queuing would block further initiation for polysomes containing ∼10 ribosomes, or more. Influence of stop codon contexts on 3A′ gene expression is not the result of altered mRNA levels or secondary structures It has been found that the half-life of a mRNA that uses an inefficient stop codon context is shorter by a factor of two than the half-life of a corresponding mRNA with an efficient stop codon context (Björnsson and Isaksson, 1996). It appeared possible that different pools of mRNA could explain the higher expression associated with some analysed efficient stop codon contexts, compared with the inefficient stop codon context CCA UGA A, during conditions of low induction by IPTG (Figure 5). Therefore, the steady-state levels of mRNA for the gene variants with the stop contexts GAC CCA UGA A, GAC AGC UAA U, GAC AGC UGA U and GAC CCA UAA A in weakly induced cells, as described above in Figure 5, were subjected to northern blot analysis. The 2A′ mRNA acted as an internal control. For these experiments, cells were cultivated together with 0.01 mM IPTG. As discussed above, this low level of induction, resulting in a high ribosome/mRNA ratio, gives significantly different gene expression values at the protein level when the four stop codon context variants were compared (Figure 5). However, according to the northern blot results shown in Figure 8, the relative level of 3A′ mRNA is similar for all four analysed stop codon context variants. Thus, the 4-fold difference in protein levels found for these stop codon context variants at low induction, as comp