State Control of Minorities in Bulgaria
2007; Taylor & Francis; Volume: 23; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1080/13523270701507030
ISSN1743-9116
Autores Tópico(s)European and International Law Studies
ResumoAbstract The political participation of minorities in post-communist Bulgaria continues to be shaped by the state control of minorities, which was characteristic of the communist past. Legal and constitutional provisions preventing the political participation of minorities continue to be applied against unpopular minority groups, while the mainly Turkish Movement for Rights and Freedoms, which has established itself in the political arena, maintains that it is not an ethnic party and pursues only a minimalist minority rights agenda. Remarkably, the restrictions on the political participation of minorities in Bulgaria have scarcely been affected by accession to the European Union. Funding for this work was provided by the Economic and Social Research Council of the United Kingdom and the University of Birmingham. Notes 1. Carter Johnson, ‘Democratic Transition in the Balkans: Romania's Hungarian and Bulgaria's Turkish Minority (1989–99)’, Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, Vol.8, No.1 (2002), pp.1–28 (p.4). 2. ‘Deklaratsiia na Narodnoto su˘branie na Narodna republika Bu˘lgariia po natsionalniia vu˘pros ot 15 ianuari 1990 g.’, Du˘rzhaven vestnik, 1990, No.6 (19 Jan. 1990). 3. Rumyana Kolarova, ‘Tacit Agreements in the Bulgarian Transition to Democracy: Minority Rights and Constitutionalism’, University of Chicago Law School Roundtable, Symposium: The Rights of Minorities in East European Constitutionalism (1993), pp.23–51 (p.33). 4. Helga A. Welsh, ‘Political Transition Processes in Central and Eastern Europe’, Comparative Politics, Vol.26, No.4 (1994), pp.379–94 (p.384). 5. Rumyana Kolarova and Dimitr Dimitrov, ‘The Roundtable Talks in Bulgaria’, in J. Elster (ed.), The Roundtable Talks and the Breakdown of Communism (Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press, 1996), pp.178–212 (p.191); Ralitsa Peeva and Ivan Kru˘stev, ‘Nevidimi konteksti, nevidimi barieri’, Kultura, Vol.31, 6 Sept. 2002, at < http://www.online.bg/kultura>, accessed 4 Dec. 2004. 6. Kolarova, ‘Tacit Agreements’, p.33; Kolarova and Dimitrov, ‘The Roundtable Talks in Bulgaria’, p.193. 7. Peeva and Kru˘stev, ‘Nevidimi konteksti, nevidimi barieri’. 8. ‘Zakon za politicheskite partii’, Du˘rzhaven vestnik, 1990, No.29 (10 April). 9. Kru˘sto Manchev, Natsionaliniiat vu˘pros na balkanite (Sofia: Akademichno izdatelstvo ‘Prof. Marin Drinov’, 1999), p.321; Rossen Vassilev, ‘Bulgaria's Ethnic Problems’, East European Quarterly, Vol.36, No.1 (2002), pp.103–25 (p.112); Jon Elster, ‘Ways of Constitution-Making’, in A. Hadenius (ed.), Democracy's Victory and Crisis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp.123–42 (p.135). 10. Ali Eminov, ‘Turks and Tatars in Bulgaria and the Balkans’, Nationalities Papers, Vol.28, No.1 (2000), pp.129–64 (p.157). 11. Kolarova, ‘Tacit Agreements’, p.42. 12. Claus Offe, ‘Ethnic Politics in East European Transitions’, in Claus Offe (ed.), Varieties of Transition: The East European and East German Experience (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996), pp.50–81 (p.53). 13. ‘Konstitutsiia na Republika Bu˘lgariia’, adopted on 12 July 1991, Du˘rzhaven vestnik, 1991, No.56 (13 July). 14. Stefan Troebst, ‘Nationalismus als Demokratiehemmnis in Bulgarien. Von der Verfassungsdiskussion zur Präsidentschaftswahl (Mai 1991–Januar 1992)’, Südosteuropa, Vol.41, No.3–4 (1992), pp.188–227 (p.203). 15. ‘Konstitutsiia na Republika Bu˘lgariia’, Preamble. 16. Ibid, Art. 2. 17. Kolarova, ‘Tacit Agreements’, p.41. 18. ‘Konstitutsiia na Republika Bu˘lgaria’ Art. 6.2. 19. ‘Konstitutsiia na Narodna republika Bu˘lgariia’, Du˘rzhaven vestnik, 1971, No.39 (18 May), Art. 54.7. 20. ‘Konstitutsiia na Republika Bu˘lgariia’, Art. 29. 21. Ibid., Art. 54. 22. Ibid., Art. 13. 23. Ibid., Art. 23. 24. Ibid., Art. 25.2. 25. Ibid., Art. 36. 26. Ibid., Art. 13. 27. Ibid., Art. 44.2. 28. ‘Konstitutsiia na Narodna republika Bu˘lgariia’, Art. 52.4. 29. Stefan Troebst, ‘Nationalismus als Demokratiehemmnis in Bulgarien. Von der Verfassungsdiskussion zur Präsidentschaftswahl (Mai 1991–Januar 1992)’, Südosteuropa, Vol.41 (1992), pp.188–227 (pp.204–5). 30. ‘Konstitutsiia na Republika Bu˘lgariia’, Art. 11.4. 31. Ali Eminov, ‘The Turks in Bulgaria: Post-1989 Developments’, Nationalities Papers, Vol.27, No.1 (1999), pp.31–55 (p.36). 32. Venelin I. Ganev, ‘History, Politics, and the Constitution: Ethnic Conflict and Constitutional Adjudication in Postcommunist Bulgaria’, Slavic Review, Vol.63, No.1 (2004), pp.66–89. 33. Ibid. 34. John D. Bell, ‘Democratization and Political Participation in “Postcommunist” Bulgaria’, in Karen Dawisha and Bruce Parrott (eds.), Politics, Power, and the Struggle for Democracy in South-East Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp.353–402 (p.365). 35. Peeva and Kru˘stev, ‘Nevidimi konteksti, nevidimi barieri’. 36. Ibid.; Johnson, ‘Democratic Transition in the Balkans’, p.5. 37. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), ‘Concluding Observations/Comments on the ninth, tenth and eleventh periodic reports of Bulgaria, A/46/18, art. 259–278’, in: 1991 Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, adopted by CERD on 23 August 1991, General Assembly, Official Records: Forty-Sixth Session, Supplement No. 18 (A/46/18) (New York: Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, United Nations, 1992); Human Rights Committee, ‘Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Committee: Bulgaria. 03/08/93, CCPR/C/79/Add.24. (Concluding Observations/Comments)’ (New York: Human Rights Committee, United Nations, 1993); CERD, ‘Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination: Bulgaria. 23/04/97. CERD/C/304/Add.29. (Concluding Observations/Comments)’ (New York: Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, United Nations, 1997). 38. European Commission, 2000 Regular Report on Bulgaria's Progress Towards Accession (Brussels: European Commission, 2000), p.22; European Commission against Racism and Intolerance, Second Report on Bulgaria, adopted on 18 June 1999, published on 21 March 2000 (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2000), p.6. 39. Konstitutsionnen su˘d, ‘Reshenie No.1 ot 29 fevruari 2000 g. po konstitutsionno delo No. 3 ot 1999 g.’; Du˘rzhaven vestnik, 2000, No.18 (7 March). 40. Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, ‘Opinion on Bulgaria (adopted on 27 May 2004)’ (Strasbourg, Council of Europe, 2006), p.18. 41. Krassimir Kanev, ‘Changing Attitudes towards the Ethnic Minorities in Bulgaria and the Balkans, 1992–1997’, in T.D. Sfikas and C. Williams (eds.), Ethnicity and Nationalism in East Central Europe and the Balkans (Brookfield, VT: Ashgate, 1999), pp.209–10. 42. Seydalina Voynova, Roma Participation in the 2005 Parliamentary Elections (Washington, DC: National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, 2005). 43. Kolarova, ‘Tacit Agreements’, p.33; Stefan Troebst, ‘“Demokratie als ethnisch geschlossene Veranstaltung”: Nationalistischer Integrationsdruck und politische Formierung der nationalen Minderheiten in Bulgarien (1989–April 1991)’, in W. Höpken (ed.), Revolution auf Raten. Bulgariens Weg zur Demokratie (Munich: Oldenbourg, 1996), pp.117–72 (p.134). 44. Troebst, ‘“Demokratie als ethnisch geschlossene Veranstaltung”, p.135. 45. Ibid, p.139. 46. Troebst, ‘Nationalismus als Demokratiehemmnis in Bulgarien’, p.207. 47. ‘Bulgaria; Hung by the Turks’, The Economist, 19 Oct. 1991. 48. Troebst, ‘Nationalismus als Demokratiehemmnis in Bulgarien’, p.207. 49. Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, Human Rights in Bulgaria After the October 1991 Elections (Sofia: Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, 1993). 50. Kolarova, ‘Tacit Agreements’, p.46; Ganev, ‘History, Politics, and the Constitution’, p.89. 51. Ganev, ‘History, Politics, and the Constitution’, p.89. 52. Konstitutsionnen su˘d, ‘Reshenie No. 4 ot 21 april 1992 g. po konstitutsionno delo No. 1 ot 1991 g.’, Du˘rzhaven vestnik, 1992, No. 35 (28 April). 53. David M. Olson, ‘Party Formation and Party System Consolidation in the New Democracies of Central Europe’, Political Studies, Vol.XLVI, No.3 (1998), pp.432–64 (p.447). 54. Nadege Ragaru, ‘Islam in Post-Communist Bulgaria: An Aborted “Clash of Civilizations”?’ Nationalities Papers, Vol.29, No.2 (2001), pp.293–324 (p.317). 55. ‘BSP ne podkrepi atakite na sotsialistite v Ku˘rdzhali sreshtu DPS’, at < http://www.mediapool.bg/cgi-bin/frend_print.cgi>, accessed 28 Oct. 2003. 56. ‘Ekskmet stiaga pomashka partiia, DPS e protiv’, SEGA, 29 April 2004. 57. Voynova, Roma Participation in the 2005 Parliamentary Elections. 58. Johnson, ‘Democratic Transition in the Balkans’, p.21. 59. Eminov, ‘The Turks in Bulgaria’, p.40; Ragaru, ‘Islam in Post-Communist Bulgaria’, p.316. 60. Vassilev, ‘Bulgaria's Ethnic Problems’, p.118. 61. Antoine Roger, ‘The European Union as a Political Incentive for Ethnic Minorities: Evidence from Post-Communist Bulgaria and Romania’, Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, Vol.5, No.1 (2003), pp.9–24 (p.11). 62. Johnson, ‘Democratic Transition in the Balkans’, pp.15–20. 63. Vassilev, ‘Bulgaria's Ethnic Problems’, p.114. 64. Gwendolyn Sasse, ‘Democracy Promotion in CEE: The Political Rights of National Minorities’, presentation at VII ICCEES World Congress, Humboldt University, Berlin, 25–30 July 2005, p.32. 65. Mila Maeva, ‘Indeks na etnopoliticheskite otnosheniia v Iugoiztochna Evropa’, Etnoreporter, Vol.2 (2003), pp.40–41. 66. Evangelos Karagiannis, Zur Ethnizität der Pomaken Bulgariens (Münster, Lit Verlag, 1997), p.46. 67. Tsvetana Georgieva, ‘Pomaks: Muslim Bulgarians’, Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, Vol.12, No.3 (2001), pp.303–16 (p.314). 68. Karagiannis, Zur Ethnizität der Pomaken Bulgariens; Yulian Konstantinov, Gulbrand Alhaug and Birgit Igla, ‘Names of the Bulgarian Pomaks’, Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers on Language and Linguistics, Vol.17 (1991), pp.8–117. 69. Mary Neuburger, ‘Pomak Borderlands: Muslims on the Edge of Nations’, Nationalities Papers, Vol.28, No.1 (2000), pp.181–98 (p.182). 70. Margarita Karamikhova, ‘Emigratsiiata ot Rodopite – nov fenomen ili vremenen otgovor v perioda na kriza’, in M. Karamikhova (ed.), Da zhiveesh tam, da se su˘nuvash tuk. Emigratsionni protsesi v nachaloto na XXI vek (Sofia: IMIR, 2003), pp.23–108 (p.35); Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, Pravata na choveka v Bu˘lgariia prez 2003 g. Godishen doklad na Bu˘lgarski khelzinski komitet (Sofia: Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, 2004). 71. Karamikhova, ‘Emigratsiiata ot Rodopite’, p.35. 72. Karagiannis, Zur Ethnizität der Pomaken Bulgariens, pp.144, 151–2. 73. Luan Troxel, ‘Bulgaria's Gypsies: Numerically Strong, Politically Weak’, RFE/RL Research Report, Vol.1, No.10 (1992), pp.58–61. 74. Voynova, Roma Participation in the 2005 Parliamentary Elections. 75. Rossen Vassilev, ‘The Roma of Bulgaria: A Pariah Minority’, Global Review of Ethnopolitics, Vol.3, No.2 (2004), pp.40–51 (p.44). 76. Republic of Bulgaria, Trideset i osmo narodno su˘branie, stenografski dnevnitsi, kniga 80, shesta sesiia, zasedaniia 228–230 i 39 izvu˘nredno, ot 17 do 19 fevruari 1999 g. (Sofia: Izdanie na Narodnoto Su˘branie, 1999). 77. Andrei Iliev, ‘Participation of Bulgarian Roma in the 2001 General Elections and Prospects for Political Representation’, Roma Rights: Journal of the European Roma Rights Centre, Vol.4, at < http://www.errc.org/cikk.php?cikk = 1232>, accessed 14 May 2007. 78. Open Society Institute, Monitoring the EU Accession Process: Minority Protection (Budapest and New York: Open Society Institute and Central European University Press, 2001), p.109. 79. Zhivko Georgiev, ‘Pu˘tiat ku˘m realnata integratsiia minava prez politicheskoto uchastie’, Etnoreporter, Vol.1 (2004), pp.14–15. 80. Project on Ethnic Relations, The Romani ‘Mahalas’ (Neighbourhoods) of Southeastern Europe: Politics, Poverty and Ethnic Unrest, Skopje, Macedonia, 13–14 December 2002 (Princeton, NJ, 2003), pp.8–11. 81. Iliev, ‘Participation of Bulgarian Roma in the 2001 General Elections’. 82. Voynova, Roma Participation in the 2005 Parliamentary Elections. 83. Ibid. 84. Iliev, ‘Participation of Bulgarian Roma in the 2001 General Elections’. 85. ‘Romskiiat elit su˘rdit na Emel Etem, iska obiasnenie ot Simeon’, SEGA, 18 Jan. 2003. 86. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Avoiding the Dependency Trap: A Human Development Report on the Roma Minority in Central and Eastern Europe (New York: UNDP, 2003), pp.17–18. 87. Iliev, ‘Participation of Bulgarian Roma in the 2001 General Elections’. 88. Project on Ethnic Relations, The Romani ‘Mahalas’ (Neighbourhoods) of Southeastern Europe, p.7. 89. UNDP, Avoiding the Dependency Trap, p.6. 90. John D. Bell, ‘The “Ilindentsi” – Does Bulgaria Have a Macedonian Minority?’, in J.D. Bell (ed.), Bulgaria in Transition: Politics, Economics, Society and Culture after Communism (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1998), pp.189–206 (p.195). 91. Zhidas Daskalovski, ‘Human Rights in the Balkans: The Forgotten Few: Macedonians of Bulgaria’, International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, Vol.9, No.2 (2002), pp.143–60 (p.151). 92. Mariana Lenkova, ‘Violating Minorities’ Rights Threatens Stability', Sofia Independent, 20 Feb. 1998 93. Bell, ‘The “Ilindentsi”‘, p.195. 94. ‘Reshenie na Sofii˘skia gradski su˘d da registrira politicheska partiia “OMO–Ilinden”–Pirin’, Du˘rzhaven vestnik, 1999, No.16 (23 Feb.). 95. Ilia Iliev, ‘Registriraneto na OMO “Ilinden” e udar sreshtu natsionalniia ni suverenitet’, Monitor (Sofia), 20 Feb. 1999, p.13. 96. Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, Human Rights in Bulgaria in 1999 (Sofia: Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, 2000). 97. Daskalovski, ‘Human Rights in the Balkans’, p.158. 98. OMO Ilinden Pirin, ‘Program of OMO Ilinden Pirin, United Macedonian Organization “Ilinden” – PIRIN, Party for Economic Development and Integration of the population in the Republic of Bulgaria (February 2000)’, at < http://www.omoilindenpirin.org/about_program.html>, accessed 22 March 2004; ‘By-Laws of OMO Ilinden Pirin, United Macedonian Organization “Ilinden”–Pirin, Party for Economic Development and Integration of the population in the Republic of Bulgaria’, at < http://www.omoilindenpirin.org/about_bylaws.html>, accessed 22 March 2004. 99. Konstitutsionnen su˘d, ‘Reshenie No.1 ot 29 fevruari 2000 g. po konstitutsionno delo No. 3 ot 1999 g.’. 100. Ibid. 101. International Helsinki Federation, ‘Macedonians of Bulgaria in Uncertainty’ (Sofia: International Helsinki Federation, 2000, at < http://lists.partners-intl.net/pipermail/neww-rights/2000-October/000328.html>, accessed 8 Nov. 2003. 102. Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, Human Rights in Bulgaria in 2002. Annual Report of the Bulgarian Helsinki Committee (Sofia: Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, 2003), p.17. 103. Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, Pravata na choveka v Bu˘lgariia prez 2003 g., p.14. 104. European Commission against Racism and Intolerance, Third Report on Bulgaria, adopted on 27 June 2003, published on 27 January 2004 (Strasbourg: European Commission against Racism and Intolerance, Council of Europe, 2004), p.8. 105. Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, Pravata na choveka v Bu˘lgariia prez 2006 g. Godishen doklad na Bu˘lgarski khelzinski komitet (Sofia: Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, 2007), p.22. Additional informationNotes on contributorsBernd Rechel Bernd Rechel is Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Centre for Russian and East European Studies at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Referência(s)