Daze of Our Lives: The Soap Opera as Feminine Text
1991; Bowling Green State University; Volume: 14; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1542-734x.1991.1404_29.x
ISSN2162-5735
Autores Tópico(s)Media Influence and Health
ResumoJournal of American CultureVolume 14, Issue 4 p. 29-41 Daze of Our Lives: The Soap Opera as Feminine Text Deborah D. Rogers, Deborah D. Rogers Associate professor of English at the University of Maine, Orono.Search for more papers by this author Deborah D. Rogers, Deborah D. Rogers Associate professor of English at the University of Maine, Orono.Search for more papers by this author First published: Winter 1991 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-734X.1991.1404_29.xCitations: 5AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Works Cited Allen, Robert. Reader-Oriented Criticism and Television. Channels of Discourse: Television and Contemporary Criticism. Ed. Robert Allen. 1987. Chapel Hill : U of North Carolina P, 1988. 74–112. Google Scholar Allen, Robert C. Speaking of Soap Operas. Chapel Hill : U of North Carolina P, 1985. Google Scholar Alden, Kay. Telephone interview. 19 August 1988. Google Scholar Ang, Ien. Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. Trans. Della Couling. 1982. New York : Methuen, 1985. Google Scholar Bennett, Tony. Text and Social Process: The Case of James Bond. Screen Education 41 (1982). Google Scholar Brandt, Allan. No Magic Bullet: A Social History of Venereat Disease in the United States since 1880. New York : Oxford UP, 1985. Google Scholar Cantor, Muriel G. Popular Culture and the Portrayal of Women: Content and Control. Analyzing Gender: A Handbook of Social Science Research. Eds. Beth Hess and Myra Marx Ferree. Beverly Hills : Sage, 1987. 190–214. Google Scholar Cantor, Muriel and Suzanne Pingree. The Soap Opera. Beverly Hills : Sage, 1983. Google Scholar Carveth, Rod and Alison Alexander. Soap Opera Viewing Motivations and the Cultivation Process. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 29 (1985: 259–73. 10.1080/08838158509386584 Web of Science®Google Scholar Chodorow, Nancy. The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Los Angeles : U of California P, 1978. 10.1525/9780520924086 Web of Science®Google Scholar Dullea, Georgia. As Gloria Monty's World Turns. The New York Times 11 July 1986: Y19. Google Scholar Ellis, John. Visible Fictions: Cinema, Television, Video. London : Routledge, 1982. Google Scholar Ellmann, Mary. Thinking about Women. New York : Harcourt, 1968. 10.1007/978-1-349-00764-6 Google Scholar Feuer, Jane. Melodrama, Serial Form, and Television Today. Screen 25 (1984): [11]. 10.1093/screen/25.1.4 Google Scholar Fiske, John. British Cultural Studies. Channels of Discourse: Television and Contemporary Criticism. Ed. Robert Allen, 1987. Chapel Hill : U of North Carolina P, 1988. 254–90. Google Scholar Fiske, John. Television Culture. New York : Methuen, 1987. Google Scholar Flitterman, Sandy. The Real Soap Operas: TV Commercials. Regarding Television: Critical Approaches—an Anthology. Ed. E. Ann Kaplan. Frederick , MD : U Publications of America, 1983. 84–95. Google Scholar Flitterman-Lewis, Sandy. All's Well that Doesn't End—Soap Opera and the Marriage Motif. Camera Obscura 16(1988): 119–27. Google Scholar Flitterman-Lewis, Sandy. Psychoanalysis, Film, and Television. Channels of Discourse: Television and Contemporary Criticism. Ed. Robert Allen, 1987. Chapel Hill : U of North Carolina P, 1988. 172–210. Google Scholar Freedman, David H. (reporting on the research of Professors Michael Rothschild and Elliot Wineberg). “Why You Watch Some Commercials—Whether You Mean To or Not. TV Guide 2026 February 1988: 3–7. Google Scholar Frentz, Suzanne. Personal communication. March 1988. Google Scholar Gerbner, George and Larry Gross. Living with Television: The Violence Profile. Journal of Communication 26 (1976: 173–99. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01397.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Goffman, Erving. Gender Advertisements. New York : Harper, 1979. Google Scholar Hall, Stuart. Encoding/Decoding. Culture, Media, Language. Ed. Stuart Hall. London : Hutchinson, 1980. 128–39. Web of Science®Google Scholar Iser, Wolfgang. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins UP, 1978. Google Scholar Kalisch, Beatrice, Philip Kalisch and Margaret Scobey. Images of Nurses on Television. New York : Springer, 1983. Google Scholar Kaplan, E. Ann. Feminist Criticism and Television. Channels of Discourse: Television and Contemporary Criticism. Ed. Robert Allen, 1987. Chapel Hill : U of North Carolina P, 1988. 211–53. Web of Science®Google Scholar Kuhn, Annette. Women's Pictures: Feminism and Cinema. London : Routledge, 1982. Google Scholar Modleski, Tania. Loving with a Vengeance: Mass-Produced Fantasies for Women. 1982. New York : Methuen, 1984. Google Scholar Mulvey, Laura. Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Screen 16 (1975: 6–18. 10.1093/screen/16.3.6 Google Scholar Perse, Elizabeth. Soap Opera Viewing Patterns of Students and Cultivation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 30 (1986: 175–93. 10.1080/08838158609386618 Web of Science®Google Scholar Phillips, David. The Impact of Fictional Television Stories on U.S. Adult Fatalities. American Journal of Sociology 87 (1982: 1340–59. 10.1086/227596 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Pingree, Suzanne. Personal Communication. 18 October 1988. Google Scholar Pingree, Suzanne and Margaret Thompson. The Family in Daytime Serials. Television and the American Family. Ed. J. Bryant. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, forthcoming. Google Scholar Radway, Janice. Reading the Romance. Chapel Hill : U of North Carolina P, 1984. Google Scholar “Real-Life Soap. Science News 129 (1986): 318. Google Scholar Rogers, Deborah D. The Soaps: Do they Support or Undermine the Family? Christian Science Monitor 23 September 1988: 21. PubMedGoogle Scholar Rosenblum, Carol. Drop-Dead Clothes Make the Working Woman. New York Times 26 February 1986: 1H. Google Scholar Seiter, Ellen. Eco's TV Guide—the Soaps. Tabloid 5 (1982). Google Scholar Showalter, Elaine. A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists from Brontë to Lessing. Princeton : Princeton UP, 1977. 10.1515/9780691221960 Google Scholar Sontag, Susan. Illness as Metaphor. New York : Farrar, 1978. Google Scholar Sontag, Susan. AIDS and its Metaphors. New York Review of Books 27 October 1988: 89–99. Web of Science®Google Scholar Turow, Joseph. Advising and Ordering: Daytime, Prime Time. Journal of Communication 24 (1974): 138–41. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00379.x Web of Science®Google Scholar White, Mimi. Ideological Analysis and Television. Channels of Discourse: Television and Contemporary Criticism. Ed. Robert Allen, 1987. Chapel Hill : U of North Carolina P, 1988. Google Scholar Whitesell, John. NBC Press Conference. 24 October 1987. Google Scholar Williams, Carol. Untitled presentation, Popular Culture Association, New Orleans, March 1988. Google Scholar Windom, Robert. NBC Press Conference. 24 October 1987. Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume14, Issue4Winter 1991Pages 29-41 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)