Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Cargo surface hydrophobicity is sufficient to overcome the nuclear pore complex selectivity barrier

2009; Springer Nature; Volume: 28; Issue: 18 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1038/emboj.2009.225

1460-2075

Bracha Naim, David Zbaida, Shlomi Dagan, Ruti Kapon, Ziv Reich,

RNA regulation and disease

Article13 August 2009free access Cargo surface hydrophobicity is sufficient to overcome the nuclear pore complex selectivity barrier Bracha Naim Bracha Naim Department of Biological Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Search for more papers by this author David Zbaida David Zbaida Department of Materials and Interfaces, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Search for more papers by this author Shlomi Dagan Shlomi Dagan Department of Biological Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Search for more papers by this author Ruti Kapon Ruti Kapon Department of Biological Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Search for more papers by this author Ziv Reich Corresponding Author Ziv Reich Department of Biological Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Search for more papers by this author Bracha Naim Bracha Naim Department of Biological Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Search for more papers by this author David Zbaida David Zbaida Department of Materials and Interfaces, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Search for more papers by this author Shlomi Dagan Shlomi Dagan Department of Biological Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Search for more papers by this author Ruti Kapon Ruti Kapon Department of Biological Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Search for more papers by this author Ziv Reich Corresponding Author Ziv Reich Department of Biological Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Search for more papers by this author Author Information Bracha Naim1, David Zbaida2, Shlomi Dagan1, Ruti Kapon1 and Ziv Reich 1 1Department of Biological Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel 2Department of Materials and Interfaces, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel *Corresponding author. Department of Biological Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel. Tel.: +972 8 934 2982; Fax: +972 8 934 6010; E-mail: [email protected] The EMBO Journal (2009)28:2697-2705https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.225 PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyWechatReddit Figures & Info To fulfil their function, nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) must discriminate between inert proteins and nuclear transport receptors (NTRs), admitting only the latter. This specific permeation is thought to depend on interactions between hydrophobic patches on NTRs and phenylalanine-glycine (FG) or related repeats that line the NPC. Here, we tested this premise directly by conjugating different hydrophobic amino-acid analogues to the surface of an inert protein and examining its ability to cross NPCs unassisted by NTRs. Conjugation of as few as four hydrophobic moieties was sufficient to enable passage of the protein through NPCs. Transport of the modified protein proceeded with rates comparable to those measured for the innate protein when bound to an NTR and was relatively insensitive both to the nature and density of the amino acids used to confer hydrophobicity. The latter observation suggests a non-specific, small, and pliant interaction network between cargo and FG repeats. Introduction Eukaryotic cell nuclei are separated from the cytoplasm by a double lipid bilayer system known as the nuclear envelope (NE). Exchange of material between the two compartments proceeds solely through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs), large protein assemblies that span the NE and provide a medium for the exchange. NPCs support two modes of transport: small molecules, such as ions, metabolites, and other small solutes can pass by diffusion, which becomes increasingly restricted as the particles approach a size limit of ∼5 nm (30–40 kDa for globular proteins). On the other hand, most proteins and their complexes cannot cross NPCs unless they are bound to soluble nuclear transport receptors (NTRs) that recognize specific nuclear import signal (NLS) or nuclear export signal (NES) peptides displayed by the cargo (Paine et al, 1975; Corbett and Silver, 1997; Mattaj and Englmeier, 1998; Gorlich and Kutay, 1999; Keminer and Peters, 1999; Yoneda, 2000; Fried and Kutay, 2003; Suntharalingam and Wente, 2003; Weis, 2003; Fahrenkrog et al, 2004; Pemberton and Paschal, 2005; Lim et al, 2008). How do NPCs allow the passage of small molecules, suppress that of large molecules, yet permit transport of the same large molecules when bound to NTRs has been the focus of intense study. Fulfilling the above functions necessitates that a device exists, which not only discriminates between small and large molecules, but is also able to selectively admit NTRs and their bound cargoes over a background of free cargoes. The likely constituents of this device are arrays of hydrophobic peptide repeats, most commonly in the form of FG, FXFG, or GLFG, present in natively disordered domains carried by one-third of the proteins that make up the pores (called nucleoporins or nups) (Rout and Wente, 1994; Rout et al, 2000; Bayliss et al, 2002; Denning et al, 2003; Tran and Wente, 2006; Patel et al, 2007; Stewart, 2007; Lim et al, 2007b). How the presence of these repeats provides NPCs their discriminatory capability is under debate (Rout et al, 2000, 2003; Ben-Efraim and Gerace, 2001; Macara, 2001; Ribbeck and Gorlich, 2001, 2002; Pyhtila and Rexach, 2003; Peters, 2005; Burke, 2006; Elbaum, 2006; Frey and Gorlich, 2007; Patel et al, 2007; Weis, 2007; Lim et al, 2007b). Two major views have dominated the field. The first (Rout et al, 2000) invokes the idea of entropic exclusion. In this model, the FG domains form an unlinked polymer brush, which excludes the passage of large molecules through thermal undulations. Passage of NTRs is afforded, as they are able to bind to sites present in FG repeats, therefore, overcoming this exclusion. The second view suggests that the unfolded domains of nups form a mesh within NPCs that is mediated by FG motif interactions. The size of the mesh dictates the maximum size for passive diffusion and NTRs are incorporated or 'dissolved' into the meshwork by binding to the FG repeats, transiently replacing contacts between the FG domains (Ribbeck and Gorlich, 2001, 2002). More recently, a two-gated model using a central (hydrophobic) diffusion barrier, formed by a meshwork of cohesive FG domains, and peripheral (entropic) barriers, formed by repulsive FG domains, has been proposed (Patel et al, 2007). Regardless of differences in modus operandi, all models assume that selective permeation of NPCs to NTRs depends on interactions between the latter and FG repeats in the pores (Radu et al, 1995; Bayliss et al, 2000; Ribbeck and Gorlich, 2001, 2002; Strawn et al, 2004; Frey et al, 2006; Frey and Gorlich, 2007; Stewart, 2007; Yazicioglu et al, 2007; Isgro and Schulten, 2007b). This is supported by several lines of investigations including crystallographic (Bayliss et al, 2000, 2002; Liu and Stewart, 2005), NMR (Morrison et al, 2003), solution and single-molecule mechanical studies of NTR-FG repeat interactions (Lim et al, 2007b; Otsuka et al, 2008; Patel and Rexach, 2008) and studies involving deletions or swaps of FG-carrying nucleoporins (Strawn et al, 2004; Zeitler and Weis, 2004). Furthermore, NTR mutants impaired in FG binding (Bayliss et al, 1999; Quimby et al, 2001; Ribbeck and Gorlich, 2001; Yazicioglu et al, 2007) were shown to have attenuated transport rates, clearly pointing to the capacity to interact with FG repeats as a requisite for nucleocytoplasmic transport. Two experimental studies have made use of synthetic media containing a subset of nups to reproduce some of the selectivity properties of NPCs towards NTRs. In one study, a saturated FG-repeat hydrogel (made from the N-terminal of the yeast nucleoporin Nsp1p) (Frey and Gorlich, 2007) was shown to preferentially support the passage of NTRs over comparably sized inert proteins that cannot interact with FG repeats. More recently, NTRs were shown to have a greater capacity than an inert protein to cross a synthetic filter, one side of which was modified with the FG-repeat domains of the yeast nucleoporins Nsp1p and Nup100 (Jovanovic-Talisman et al, 2008). NTRs are distinguished from other cytoplasmic proteins by having a greater surface hydrophobicity (Ribbeck and Gorlich, 2002). In addition, substitutions that conserve hydrophobicity in FG domains of several nups were shown neither to affect the interactions between the nups themselves, nor did they interrupt their binding to NTRs (Patel et al, 2007). In contrast, substitution with non-hydrophobic residues impaired both binding activities (Frey et al, 2006; Patel and Rexach, 2008) and inhibited the transport of NTRs through in vitro assembled FG-repeat gels (Frey et al, 2006). The results obtained from all of the above studies indicate that NTRs are able to interact with FG repeats present in some nucleoporins and suggest that the interactions have a strong hydrophobic component. However, the exact nature of the interactions, as well as their specificity, valence, and architecture are still unknown. To address these issues in a systematic manner, we used a protein that is normally barred from passage through NPCs and modified its surface hydrophobicity by conjugating different hydrophobic amino-acid analogues, each to different degrees. We then examined the ability of the various protein derivates to cross NPCs and characterized their ensuing transport dynamics. Using this approach, we could discern the role of surface hydrophobicity in a molecule's capacity to cross the permeability barrier formed by NPCs from other potential contributions and to gain insight into the nature of the interaction network formed between FG repeats and transporting cargoes in intact NPCs within cells. Results Modifying the surface hydrophobicity of bovine serum albumin For the hydrophobicity-conferring moieties to exert their effect in full, their exposure to the solvent should be maximized and their interactions with and masking by neighbouring side chains minimized. We, therefore, took a synthetic approach in which we covalently attached hydrophobic amino-acid side-chain analogues to the target protein through distal functional groups of polar side-chains abundant on protein surfaces, primarily lysine and serine (Ser) residues. As a model protein, we used bovine serum albumin (BSA), which is cross-linked by 17 disulfide bonds that render its globular structure extremely stable. Such high stability was required, as the conjugation procedure involved rather harsh conditions (see Materials and methods) and we wished to be able to modify the protein surface even to large extents, both of which may induce partial or complete unfolding. Quite surprisingly, given its copious use in various studies, the three-dimensional structure of BSA is unknown. Therefore, to locate residues of BSA that could be used for modification and follow their distribution over the protein surface, we used a model based on the structure of human serum albumin (Supplementary Figure 1). K-means clustering analysis of all probable conjugation sites on the surface of BSA revealed that they are not arranged into clusters, with the average calculated silhouette value being not significantly different from that derived for randomly distributed sites on a surface of a similarly sized ellipsoid (see Materials and methods). Three hydrophobic amino-acid side-chain analogues were used to modify the protein: 3-phenylpropionic acid (C9H6O2), 3-indolepropionic acid (C11H11NO2), and 4-methyl valeric acid (C6H12O2). Given the composition of FG repeats, the choice of the first, a phenylalanine (Phe) analogue, was natural. The second modifier, an analogue of tryptophan (Trp), is also aromatic, but is larger and less hydrophobic than Phe. The choice of this analogue was motivated by the findings that substitution of Phe residues in FG repeats by Trp does not alter domain–domain interactions between FG nups and their binding to NTRs (Patel et al, 2007; Patel and Rexach, 2008), and the observation that mutation of a tryptophyl residue (Trp7) in the NTR NTF2 weakens the interaction of the receptor with FG repeats and slows down its passage through the pores (Bayliss et al, 1999; Ribbeck and Gorlich, 2001). The third substance, an analogue of leucine (Leu), which is hydrophobic, but not aromatic, was chosen to test the importance of π−π interactions to passage through the NPC. As a control, we used glycolic acid (C2H4O3) that, on conjugation, adds a hydrophilic moiety, analogous to that of a Ser residue, to the protein's surface. The modifying substances were conjugated to FITC-labelled BSA, using different modifier/protein stoichiometries, and the degree of modification was determined, post facto, by mass spectrometry (Supplementary Figure 2). The derivatized proteins were then subjected to far-UV circular dichroism and gel-filtration analyses to verify that no massive structural rearrangements had occurred and that the increase in surface hydrophobicity did not lead to aggregation of the proteins. The results (Supplementary Figure 3) indicated that the modifications of the protein neither lead to significant alterations in secondary structure or size nor have they led to aggregation. Modified BSA is able to pass through NPCs unassisted by NTRs We first examined whether the increase in surface hydrophobicity enabled BSA to cross the NPC. Experiments were conducted on HeLa cells whose plasma membrane was permeabilized by digitonin and were, therefore, largely devoid of soluble nuclear transport factors. As the derivatized BSA molecules had a propensity to bind to cytoplasmic components, presumably cytoskeletal elements, which complicated kinetic analysis (see below), most studies were performed on cells treated with the microtubule-disrupting agent nocodazole. The results obtained from untreated HeLa cells, as well as from isolated Xenopus oocyte nuclei (Supplementary Figure 4), were qualitatively similar. On account of its size (∼70 kDa) and lack of nuclear localization signals (NLSs), innate BSA is virtually excluded from NPCs (Ribbeck and Gorlich, 2001; Kramer et al, 2007; Naim et al, 2007) and indeed failed to enter the cell nuclei to a significant extent within the time scale of our experiments (Figure 1A and F). However, when modified by any of the hydrophobic amino-acid analogues described above, considerable nuclear entry of the protein was observed (Figure 1, panels C–E and F). This apparent promiscuity indicates that the essential characteristic for permeating NPCs is indeed surface hydrophobicity. This is consistent with experimental observations (Bayliss et al, 2000, 2002; Liu and Stewart, 2005) and binding simulations (Isgro and Schulten, 2005, 2007a, 2007b; Frey et al, 2006) showing that FG repeats can interact with the three amino acids used, as well as with other hydrophobic moieties, on NTRs. To verify that entry into the nucleus was not promoted by the modification process itself, we tested the ability of BSA conjugated to a Ser analogue to cross NPCs. As shown in Figure 1B and F, this derivative failed to enter cell nuclei. Likewise, BSA molecules modified by NLS peptides (CTPPKKKRKV) failed to enter the nucleus in the absence of cytosolic extracts (data not shown, see below). Thus, the ability of BSA to cross NPCs is not conferred by the mere modification of its surface, but rather requires that the modifiers be hydrophobic in nature. Figure 1.Nuclear entry of BSA molecules modified by amino-acid side-chain analogues on their surface. The modifier used in each panel is denoted in superscript by the three-letter code of the corresponding amino-acid side chain it carries and the number indicates the degree of modification. (A–E) Confocal images of digitonin-permeabilized, nocodazole-treated HeLa cells 30 min after the introduction of a transport mixture containing innate or modified BSA (green) and a 66-kDa dextran (red) probe serving as an NE integrity marker. (F) Quantitative analysis of nuclear entry. Shown is the ratio between (background-corrected) nuclear and cytoplasmic mean fluorescence intensity (Fnuc/Fcyt) measured 30 min after introduction of innate BSA, BSA molecules modified by different amino-acid analogues, and BSA linked to SV40 large T-antigen NLS peptides (in the presence of cytosolic extract and an energy regenerating system). Data are presented as the mean±2 s.e.m. of determinations involving 20–30 cells for each column. Download figure Download PowerPoint In all the cases we tested (Figure 1F), the BSA molecules derivatized by hydrophobic moieties accumulated in the nuclei (i.e. Fnuc/Fcyt>1). Given the rather non-specific nature of hydrophobic interactions and the highly crowded environment in the cell nucleus, such an accumulation is not unexpected. To verify that nuclear import of the modified BSA proceeded through NPCs, we repeated the experiments in the presence of the lectin wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) or an antibody raised against the central pore protein gp62, both known to block macromolecular transport through NPCs. As shown in Figure 2, these treatments effectively inhibited passage of the BSA NTR mimics through the pores. Figure 2.Inhibition of modified BSA transport by NPC blockers. (A–C) Confocal images of HeLa cells 30 min after the introduction of BSATrp4 either alone (A) or together with WGA (B) or αgp62 (C). The latter two are known blockers of NPC-mediated transport. Cells were permeabilized twice with the pore forming protein SLO, which is used for reversible permeabilization of the plasma membrane (Walev et al, 2001) (see Materials and methods) with the transport substrate introduced during the second permeabilization. (D) Quantitative analysis of nuclear entry. Shown is the ratio between (background-corrected) nuclear and cytoplasmic mean fluorescence intensity (Fnuc/Fcyt) measured 30 min after the second SLO permeabilization in which BSATrp4 was introduced to the cells. Data are presented as the mean±2 s.e.m. of determinations involving 6–12 cells for each column. Note that nuclear entry of the modified BSA in the absence of the blockers was as effective as that observed in digitonin-permeabilized cells. Download figure Download PowerPoint Transport rate is insensitive to the nature and density of the moieties used to confer hydrophobicity Crystallographic analyses reveal a few, well-defined sites on NTR surfaces that accommodate different FG-containing segments, albeit with different affinities (Stewart, 2007 and references therein). Molecular dynamics simulations suggest the presence of 8–14 binding sites (Isgro and Schulten, 2007a, 2007b). However, the number of sites simultaneously engaged during translocation is unknown. To gain insight into the valence and architecture of the interaction network between NTRs and the NPC, we followed the transport dynamics of BSA molecules carrying an increasing number of any of the three amino acids used to confer hydrophobicity. As can be expected from the results shown in Figure 1, the type of amino acid used for conjugation had a relatively small effect on the rate of nuclear import of BSA, the difference in t1/2 values not exceeding three folds for cargoes modified to a similar extent, but with different conjugates (Figures 3 and 4C). This apparent indifference to conjugate type given, we plotted the t1/2 values measured for all derivatives, regardless of their type, as a function of the number of conjugates present on the cargo (Figure 4A). Notably, at our resolution, the plot shows characteristics of a step function with a very sharp decrease in t1/2 with the addition of just four hydrophobic amino acids to the BSA surface. This latter number is very close to that derived from in vitro binding assays, which indicated that a minimum of six FG motifs are needed to detect binding between the yeast transport receptor Kap95 and GST–FG domain fusions (Patel and Rexach, 2008). Thus, the presence of a small number of hydrophobic spots on the cargo surface is sufficient to allow passage through the pores. Increasing the number of conjugates further had little effect on the overall transport rate, neither increasing nor decreasing it by more than two to three folds. Figure 3.Nuclear accumulation versus time traces of modified BSA. Shown are traces of BSA modified by (A) phenylalanine, (B) tryptophan, or (C) leucine analogues to varying degrees. Each data point represents the average obtained from multiple traces (see Figure 4C, for exact numbers) that were normalized before averaging. For convenience of presentation, error bars were not included (but see Figures 4A and 4C). The fits shown (solid lines) are provided only as guidance to the eyes. Download figure Download PowerPoint Figure 4.Nuclear import kinetics of BSA modified by either hydrophobic amino acids or by NLSs and of an NTR. (A) A plot of t1/2 values measured for all BSA derivatives used in this study (blue circles) versus N—the estimated number of hydrophobic moieties attached to the protein. With our experimental setup and timeframe of the measurements, we could not accurately determine the nuclear entry rate of unmodified BSA because it was too low. It has been estimated that BSA traffics to the nucleus at least 600 times slower than transportin (Ribbeck and Gorlich, 2001). Combining this with our data, we estimate that native BSA enters the nucleus with a t1/2 of about 50 000 s, under the experimental conditions we used. This latter value is marked in the graph by a black square (note the break in the y axis). (B) Comparison between nuclear import kinetics of BSALeu66 and BSA derivatized by NLSs, which serve as substrates for the transport receptor complex importin α/β. In these experiments, the cells were supplemented by cytoplasmic extract and an energy regenerating system. (Inset) Nuclear import kinetics of BSALeu66 as compared with that of the (unloaded) nuclear import receptor transportin (fused to GST), both measured in unsupplemented cells. Data describing the nuclear import of the transport receptor were taken from Naim et al (2007). (C) t1/2 values derived for nuclear transport of BSA derivatives used in this study. The numbers in parenthesis denote the number of cells used in the analysis. Download figure Download PowerPoint Transport of modified BSA proceeds at rates comparable to those exhibited by NTRs under the same experimental conditions Next, we compared the nuclear import kinetics of BSA modified by 66 Leu moieties (BSALeu66) with that of BSA covalently linked to 10 SV40 large T-antigen NLSs, which serve as substrates for the NTR complex importin α/β1. Receptor-mediated traffic through NPCs typically requires, in addition to NTRs, the participation of an effector system centring on the small GTPase Ran. This system controls the association and dissociation of cargoes with or from NTRs in the appropriate cellular compartment and provides loci for metabolic energy input in the form of hydrolysis of Ran-bound GTP (Tran and Wente, 2006; Stewart, 2007). As mentioned above, NLS-BSA indeed failed to enter nuclei of permeabilized cells, which are largely devoid of soluble cytoplasmic factors. Thus, for these experiments, the cells were supplemented by cytosolic extract and an energy regenerating system that, together, readily support receptor-mediated transport through NPCs in permeabilized cells (Adam et al, 1990). Under these conditions, BSALeu66 imported to the nucleus with a t1/2 of ∼400 s (Figure 4B and C). Expectedly, NLS-BSA accumulated in the nucleus to a larger extent than BSALeu66 (Figure 1F). However, its transport into the nucleus was in fact slightly slower, t1/2 being 500 s. This might be partially because of the fact that the transport complex formed by NLS-BSA is at least three times larger than BSALeu66 (depending on the number of bound importin α/β complexes) . In addition, its translocation through the pores involves binding to an NTR in the cytoplasm and its subsequent release in the nucleus and, therefore, depends on auxiliary activity of the Ran system. To eliminate the dependence on the two latter processes, we compared nuclear import kinetics of BSALeu66 with that of the free NTR, transportin, which can effectively import into the nucleus in a Ran-independent manner (Ribbeck and Gorlich, 2002). In an earlier study (Naim et al, 2007), we found that unloaded transportin enters the nuclei of permeabilized HeLa cells (not supplemented by cytosolic extract) with a t1/2 of ∼90 s. This value is only four times smaller than the one we measured for BSALeu66 under the same experimental conditions (Figure 4, panels B (inset) and C). Modified BSA does not impair the permeability barrier of the NPC Certain alcohols have been shown to compromise the permeability barrier of the NPC (Ribbeck and Gorlich, 2002; Patel et al, 2007), potentially by specifically disrupting interactions between FG repeats in the pores. The BSA derivates used in this study could act similarly by forming stable interactions with FG repeats, obliterating the ability of the latter to exclude inert molecules (i.e. other BSA molecules) from the pores. This is, however, not the case. Even the most extensively modified BSA molecules we used did not permeate the pores to a 66-kDa-dextran probe that was introduced as a marker for NE integrity in all transport assays (Figure 1). Entry of the probe into the nucleus was likewise not observed when di-phenylalanine methyl ester was added at high concentrations (data not shown). Discussion Deciphering the nature of the selectivity barrier of the NPC has been the subject of various experimental and theoretical studies, which collectively point to interactions between hydrophobic patches on the surface of NTRs and FG nups (Radu et al, 1995; Bayliss et al, 2000; Ribbeck and Gorlich, 2001, 2002; Strawn et al, 2004; Frey et al, 2006; Frey and Gorlich, 2007; Stewart, 2007; Yazicioglu et al, 2007; Zilman et al, 2007; Isgro and Schulten, 2007b; Jovanovic-Talisman et al, 2008). This study differs from most earlier works in two main aspects: first, the experiments were conducted on intact NPCs within cells rather than on reconstituted sieves or grafted surfaces or pores (Frey et al, 2006; Lim et al, 2006, 2007a, 2007b; Frey and Gorlich, 2007; Jovanovic-Talisman et al, 2008; Patel and Rexach, 2008), in which specific subsets of nups were used, or on nup-deficient cells (Strawn et al, 2004; Zeitler and Weis, 2004). Second, we made use of specially designed synthetic cargoes, which allowed us to single out the role of surface hydrophobicity in granting NTRs their ability to cross NPCs. The main conclusions from our results can briefly be summarized in the following way: cargo surface hydrophobicity is sufficient to provide access to the NPC, the interactions between cargo and FG repeats in the pores are non-specific, and their number is limited. The first two conclusions above are drawn from the fact that the ability of our NTR mimics to transport through NPCs was independent of amino-acid identity. We used three different amino acids to confer surface hydrophobicity to our otherwise inert cargo. The three amino acids used are all hydrophobic, but have a different structure and vary in the details of their chemical nature, being aromatic (Phe), polar-aromatic (Trp), and non-aromatic (Leu). Yet, all three were able to facilitate transport in a cargo that, by itself, could not cross the NPC, and there were no major differences in the transport dynamics of BSA cargoes modified by either of them. These results are in line with earlier experimental evidence showing that transport receptors are distinguished from other cytoplasmic proteins by a greater surface hydrophobicity (Ribbeck and Gorlich, 2002). The apparent promiscuity with respect to amino-acid identity is consistent with experimental observations (Patel et al, 2007; Patel and Rexach, 2008) that substitution of Phe with Trp in FG domains of several nups does not affect the interactions between FG-carrying nup domains and themselves or transport receptors. It is also supported by X-ray crystallography studies (Bayliss et al, 2000, 2002; Liu and Stewart, 2005), which reveal that the hydrophobic cavities on the surface of NTRs, to which Phe side chains of FG-repeat cores bind, are populated by a fairly large repertoire of hydrophobic and non-polar amino acids including Trp, Phe, Leu, Ile, and Val, as well as Met, Tyr, and Pro. In addition, it was shown that besides the aromatic ring of Phe in the FG-repeat region, there are secondary contributions from adjacent hydrophobic residues, which lie in the linker between FG cores (Liu and Stewart, 2005). Molecular dynamics simulations of binding of FG-carrying peptides to NTRs (Isgro and Schulten, 2005, 2007a, 2007b) likewise indicated that the binding spots on the latter include different hydrophobic amino acids. Thus, we conclude that surface hydrophobicity per se and not specific interactions is the primary determinant of the recognition of NTRs by the NPC. Let us now turn to the issue of the number of interactions formed between transporting cargoes and FG repeats. Crystallographic (Bayliss et al, 2000, 2002; Liu and Stewart, 2005), NMR (Morrison et al, 2003), mutational analyses (Chi and Adam, 1997; Kose et al, 1997; Kutay et al, 1997; Bednenko et al, 2003), as well as molecular dynamics simulations (Isgro and Schulten, 2005, 2007a, 2007b), and in vitro binding assays (Patel and Rexach, 2008) have been used to study the details of the interacti