Body, Bias, and Behavior: A Comparative Analysis of Reasoning in Two Areas of Biological Science
1983; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 9; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/494044
ISSN1545-6943
Autores Tópico(s)Philosophy and History of Science
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessBody, Bias, and Behavior: A Comparative Analysis of Reasoning in Two Areas of Biological ScienceHelen Longino and Ruth DoellHelen Longino and Ruth DoellPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Signs Volume 9, Number 2Winter, 1983 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/494044 Views: 64Total views on this site Citations: 69Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1983 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Martin Böhnert, Paul Reszke Chapter 2. Which facts to trust in the debate on climate change?, (Aug 2022): 15–40.https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.96.02bohI.L. Nikitina, E.K. Kudryashova, I.A. Kelmanson Prenatal androgen exposure and gender behavior in disorders of sex development, Sexologies 31, no.22 (Jun 2022): 129–137.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sexol.2021.04.006Marina DiMarco, Kareem Khalifa Sins of inquiry: How to criticize scientific pursuits, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 92 (Apr 2022): 86–96.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.12.008Lynn Hankinson Nelson Underdetermination, holism, and feminist philosophy of science, Synthese 200, no.11 (Feb 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03569-2Anke Bueter Bias as an epistemic notion, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 91 (Feb 2022): 307–315.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.12.002Cordelia Fine Fairly Criticized, or Politicized? Conflicts in the Neuroscience of Sex Differences in the Human Brain, Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology (Dec 2021): a039115.https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a039115James Owen Weatherall, Cailin O'Connor, and Justin P. Bruner How to Beat Science and Influence People: Policymakers and Propaganda in Epistemic Networks, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71, no.44 (Dec 2020): 1157–1186.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy062Finnur Dellsén The epistemic impact of theorizing: generation bias implies evaluation bias, Philosophical Studies 177, no.1212 (Dec 2019): 3661–3678.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01387-wStephanie J. Bird Neuroethics, (Jan 2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23379-8Artemisa Flores Espínola Rapports sociaux de sexe dans la recherche biomédicale : une lecture de la production de savoirs dans les publications féministes anglophones, Sociologie et sociétés 49, no.11 (Jan 2018): 61–87.https://doi.org/10.7202/1042806arAmanda Roth What Does Queer Family Equality Have to Do with Reproductive Ethics?, IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 9, no.11 (Jan 2016): 27–67.https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.9.1.27Maya J. Goldenberg How can Feminist Theories of Evidence Assist Clinical Reasoning and Decision-making?, Social Epistemology 29, no.11 (Jul 2013): 3–30.https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.794871Naonori Kodate, Kashiko Kodate, Takako Kodate Paving the way and passing the torch: mentors' motivation and experience of supporting women in optical engineering, European Journal of Engineering Education 39, no.66 (Mar 2014): 648–665.https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2014.899323Dr Ian Davis, Jennifer Germon Researching masculinities, narrating sexual difference, Qualitative Research Journal 14, no.11 (May 2014): 50–63.https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-03-2014-0004Stephanie J. Bird Potential for Bias in the Context of Neuroethics, Science and Engineering Ethics 18, no.33 (Sep 2012): 593–600.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9399-yRebecca M. Jordan-Young Hormones, context, and "Brain Gender": A review of evidence from congenital adrenal hyperplasia, Social Science & Medicine 74, no.1111 (Jun 2012): 1738–1744.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.026Sarah S. Richardson Brain Storm: The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences by Rebecca M. Jordan-YoungThe Mirage of a Space between Nature and Nurture by Evelyn Fox Keller, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 37, no.33 (Jul 2015): 755–760.https://doi.org/10.1086/662695Carla Fehr Feminist Engagement with Evolutionary Psychology, Hypatia 27, no.11 (Mar 2020): 50–72.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01221.xChris Calvert-Minor "Epistemological Communities" and the Problem of Epistemic Agency, Social Epistemology 25, no.44 (Oct 2011): 341–360.https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.604443David R. Morrow, Chris Alen Sula Naturalized metaphilosophy, Synthese 182, no.22 (Sep 2009): 297–313.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9662-1Carla Fehr What Is in It for Me? The Benefits of Diversity in Scientific Communities, (Mar 2011): 133–155.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_7Nancy Daukas Altogether Now: A Virtue-Theoretic Approach to Pluralism in Feminist Epistemology, (Mar 2011): 45–67.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_3Sarah S. Richardson Feminist philosophy of science: history, contributions, and challenges, Synthese 177, no.33 (Oct 2010): 337–362.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9791-6Marilyn Strathern Uma relação incômoda: o caso do feminismo e da antropologia, Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais 14, no.22 (Nov 2009): 83.https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2009v14n2p83S.J. Bird Neuroethics, (Jan 2009): 385–391.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045046-9.01936-7Ross H. Nehm, Rebecca Young "Sex Hormones" in Secondary School Biology Textbooks, Science & Education 17, no.1010 (Apr 2008): 1175–1190.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-008-9137-7Stephanie J. Bird Ethical Challenges in Research: Another Look, The American Journal of Bioethics 8, no.99 (Oct 2008): 15–17.https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160802412528Lynn Hankinson Nelson Feminist Philosophy of Science, (Jan 2008): 312–331.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756614.ch15Maria R. Ruiz, Bryan Roche Values and the scientific culture of behavior analysis, The Behavior Analyst 30, no.11 (Jun 2017): 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392139Vivian Anette Lagesen The Strength of Numbers, Social Studies of Science 37, no.11 (Jun 2016): 67–92.https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706063788Nancy Daukas Epistemic Trust and Social Location, Episteme 3, no.1-21-2 (Jan 2012): 109–124.https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.109Judith Lorber Věřit znamená vidět. Biologie jako ideologie, Sociální studia / Social Studies 2, no.22 (Aug 2005): 91.https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2005-2-91David B. Resnik Affirmative Action in Science and Engineering, Science & Education 14, no.11 (Jan 2005): 75–93.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-4221-0Carla Fehr Feminism and Science: Mechanism Without Reductionism, NWSA Journal 16, no.11 (Apr 2004): 136–156.https://doi.org/10.2979/NWS.2004.16.1.136Robert W. Proctor, E. J. Capaldi Empirical evaluation and justification of methodologies in psychological science., Psychological Bulletin 127, no.66 (Jan 2001): 759–772.https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.759Sophia M Connell Aristotle and Galen on sex difference and reproduction: a new approach to an ancient rivalry, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31, no.33 (Sep 2000): 405–427.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8486(00)00007-8Julie Fairman, Patricia D'Antonio Virtual power: gendering the nurse-technology relationship, Nursing Inquiry 6, no.33 (Sep 1999): 178–186.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1800.1999.00032.xKerstin Palm "Feministische Naturwissenschaftsforschung — was soll das denn sein?", (Jan 1999): 113–136.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93346-1_6Nancy W. Brickhouse Feminism(s) and Science Education, (Jan 1998): 1067–1081.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_62E.Anne Kerr Toward a feminist natural science, Women's Studies International Forum 21, no.11 (Jan 1998): 95–109.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00081-2PATRICIA D'ANTONIO Toward a History of Research in Nursing, Nursing Research 46, no.22 (Mar 1997): 105–110.https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199703000-00008Elisabeth A. Lloyd Science and Anti-Science: Objectivity and Its Real Enemies, (Jan 1996): 217–259.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1742-2_11Deborah Flndlay Discovering Sex: Medical Science, Feminism and Intersexuality, Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie 32, no.11 (Jul 2008): 25–52.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.1995.tb00833.xPeggy Tripp-Knowles Androcentric bias in science?, Women's Studies International Forum 17, no.11 (Jan 1994): 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(94)90002-7Kathleen Okruhlik Gender and the Biological Sciences, Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume 20 (Jan 2020): 21–42.https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1994.10717393Janet Seiz Feminism and the History of Economic Thought, History of Political Economy 25, no.11 (Mar 1993): 185–201.https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-25-1-185Alison Wylie The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on Gender, American Antiquity 57, no.11 (Jan 2017): 15–35.https://doi.org/10.2307/2694833Pamela S. Perlich The Relation of Science to the Feminist Project, Review of Radical Political Economics 22, no.2-32-3 (Aug 2016): 113–138.https://doi.org/10.1177/048661349002200206Sandra Harding Feminism and theories of scientific knowledge, Women: A Cultural Review 1, no.11 (Apr 1990): 87–98.https://doi.org/10.1080/09574049008578026Wendy Beck, Lesley Head Women in Australian prehistory, Australian Feminist Studies 5, no.1111 (Mar 1990): 29–48.https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.1990.9961673John Dupré Contemporary feminist perspectives on biological science, Biology & Philosophy 4, no.11 (Jan 1989): 107–119.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00144047Helen E. Longino Feminist critiques of rationality: Critiques of science or philosophy of science?, Women's Studies International Forum 12, no.33 (Jan 1989): 261–269.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(89)80004-4Alison Wylie, Kathleen Okruhlik, Leslie Thielen-Wilson, Sandra Morton Feminist critiques of science, Women's Studies International Forum 12, no.33 (Jan 1989): 379–388.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(89)80014-7BARBARA IMBER AND NANCY TUANA Feminist Perspectives on Science, Hypatia 3, no.11 (Dec 2008): 139–155.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1988.tb00060.xElizabeth Potter Modeling the Gender Politics in Science, Hypatia 3, no.11 (Mar 2020): 19–33.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1988.tb00054.xJoseph Axelrod The Anatomy of a Paradigm Shift: Toward a theory of learning, with exhibits from the Humanities and other disciplines, (Jan 1987): 15–39.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7864-2_2Stephanie J. Bird Neuroscience Research and Premenstrual Syndrome: Scientific and Ethical Concerns, (Jan 1987): 31–45.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5275-4_3Janet Sayers Feminism and science—Reason and passion, Women's Studies International Forum 10, no.22 (Jan 1987): 171–179.https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(87)90026-4Roberta S. Bennett, K.Gail Whitaker, Nina Jo Woolley Smith, Anne Sablove Changing the rules of the game: Reflections toward a feminist analysis of sport, Women's Studies International Forum 10, no.44 (Jan 1987): 369–379.https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(87)90054-9Helen E. Longino Can There Be A Feminist Science?, Hypatia 2, no.33 (Mar 2020): 51–64.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1987.tb01341.xLINDA BRODKEY Writing Ethnographic Narratives, Written Communication 4, no.11 (Nov 2016): 25–50.https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088387004001002Sue W. Williams, John C. McCullers MATURATION RATE, ENDOCRINE FUNCTIONING AND FEMALE CAREER TYPICALNESS, Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 15, no.11 (Jan 1987): 71–79.https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1987.15.1.71JOHN DUPRÉ Sex, Gender, and Essence, Midwest Studies In Philosophy 11, no.11 (May 2008): 441–457.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1986.tb00508.xAlbert Somit, Steven A. Peterson Biopolitics in 1985, Politics and the Life Sciences 5, no.11 (May 2016): 132–136.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0730938400001726Judith Lorber Dismantling noah's ark, Sex Roles 14, no.11-1211-12 (Jun 1986): 567–580.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287688Anthony Chase Lawyers and Popular Culture: A Review of Mass Media Portrayals of American Attorneys, American Bar Foundation Research Journal 11, no.22 (Nov 2018): 280–300.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1986.tb00242.xSigrid Schmitz, Smilla Ebeling Geschlechterforschung und Naturwissenschaften. Eine notwendige Verbindung, (): 7–32.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90091-9_1Sigrid Schmitz Jägerinnen und Sammler. Evolutionsgeschichten zur Menschwerdung, (): 189–210.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90091-9_9Sigrid Schmitz Gender und Diversity treffen Naturwissenschaften und Technik, (): 175–190.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91387-2_12
Referência(s)