The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal
1970; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 78; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/259614
ISSN1537-534X
Autores Tópico(s)Economic theories and models
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessThe Impossibility of a Paretian LiberalAmartya SenAmartya Sen Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 78, Number 1Jan. - Feb., 1970 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/259614 Views: 152Total views on this site Citations: 676Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1970 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Keith L. Dougherty, Julian Edward The effect of unconditional preferences on Sen’s paradox, Theory and Decision 93, no.33 (Jan 2022): 427–447.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-021-09863-8Jean-François Laslier Universalization and altruism, Social Choice and Welfare 34 (Sep 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-022-01426-2Madhuparna Karmokar, Souvik Roy The structure of (local) ordinal Bayesian incentive compatible random rules, Economic Theory 59 (Aug 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-022-01449-xSaptarshi Mukherjee, Hans Peters Self-implementation of social choice correspondences in Nash equilibrium, Social Choice and Welfare 8 (Jul 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-022-01420-8Masao Ogaki Economics of the community mechanism, The Japanese Economic Review 73, no.33 (Apr 2022): 433–457.https://doi.org/10.1007/s42973-022-00113-2Stephen John Nash, Liza Joan Rybak Locke, Marshall, and Knight, on uncertainty and risk, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 62 (Jun 2022): 1–25.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2022.2074495Zhiyong An Paternalism versus Veblen: How Should the Government Address the Concern for Relative Consumption in Housing?, Journal of Housing Research 60 (Apr 2022): 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1080/10527001.2022.2052547John Craven Self-designation and group allocation, Theory and Decision 89 (Mar 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-022-09882-zPatrick Harless, Romans Pancs A Review of Robert Sugden’s Community of Advantage, Journal of Economic Literature 60, no.11 (Mar 2022): 233–255.https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20201621Massimiliano Vatiero Extending Amartya Sen’s Paretian Liberal Paradox to a Firm’s Hierarchy, (Jun 2022): 357–373.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97106-9_14Nicolas Fayard, Chabane Mazri, Alexis Tsoukiás Capability theory inspired tools for aiding policy design, EURO Journal on Decision Processes 10 (Jan 2022): 100024.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejdp.2022.100024Salvatore Barbaro Impfpflicht: In einer liberalen Gesellschaft, Wirtschaftsdienst 101, no.1212 (Dec 2021): 920–920.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-021-3056-5Davide Rizza Mathematical problem-solving in scientific practice, Synthese 199, no.5-65-6 (Sep 2021): 13621–13641.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03392-1Evelyn Ivonne Díaz Montaño, Edison Fredy León Paime Tres discursos sobre los modos de regulación del capital y su relación con el concepto de lo público en las empresas de servicios públicos de Bogotá, Innovar 31, no.8282 (Oct 2021).https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v31n82.98421Claudio Kretz Consistent rights on property spaces, Journal of Economic Theory 197 (Oct 2021): 105323.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2021.105323Sridhar Venkatapuram Pandemic as revelation, Journal of Global Ethics 17, no.33 (Dec 2021): 388–399.https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2021.1995024Xin Sun, Feifei He, Mirek Sopek, Meiyun Guo Schrödinger’s Ballot: Quantum Information and the Violation of Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem, Entropy 23, no.88 (Aug 2021): 1083.https://doi.org/10.3390/e23081083Roger E. Backhouse, Antoinette Baujard, Tamotsu Nishizawa Introduction: Revisiting the History of Welfare Economics, (Apr 2021): 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108882507.001Kotaro Suzumura John Hicks’s Farewell to Economic Welfarism, (Apr 2021): 159–185.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108882507.008Nao Saito Non-welfaristic Features of Kenneth Arrow’s Idea of Justice, (Apr 2021): 256–276.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108882507.012Aldo Montesano The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal, Game Theory and Negotiation, Italian Economic Journal 2 (Apr 2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-021-00152-5Robert Sugden Normative economics without preferences, International Review of Economics 68, no.11 (Jul 2020): 5–19.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-020-00356-8Salvador Barberà, Walter Bossert, Kotaro Suzumura Daunou’s voting rule and the lexicographic assignment of priorities, Social Choice and Welfare 56, no.22 (Aug 2020): 259–289.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-020-01276-wBrian Judge The impossibility of a Rawlsian liberal, Cambridge Journal of Economics 45, no.11 (Jul 2020): 195–208.https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beaa031Stephen J. Nash, Liza Rybak, Sebastian Nash On Black, White, and the Possibility of Beauty in Locke, Perspectives on Political Science 50, no.11 (Jul 2020): 32–51.https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2020.1786334Marc Fleurbaey, Maurice Salles A Brief History of Social Choice and Welfare Theory, (Mar 2021): 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62769-0_1Matthew D. Adler, John A. Weymark Allan Gibbard, (Mar 2021): 171–207.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62769-0_11Philippe Mongin Peter J. Hammond, (Mar 2021): 209–241.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62769-0_12J. S. Kelly Kenneth J. Arrow, (Mar 2021): 19–36.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62769-0_2Fritz Söllner Mikroökonomie: Die weitere Entwicklung, (Jan 2021): 169–241.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62524-8_9Umut Türk, Marina Toger, John Östh How Can Small-Scale Measures of Human Development Index (HDI) be Used to Study the Local Potential for Sustainable Economic Growth?, (Jan 2021): 161–173.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4098-5_9Shaun Hargreaves Heap, Mehmet Ismail Liberalism, Rationality, and Pareto Optimality, SSRN Electronic Journal 6 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3771955Alina Dmitrievna Khokhlova, G.I. Muromtsev, S.B. Zinkovskii Application of V. Pareto’s economic efficiency criterion in Russian judicial practice, SHS Web of Conferences 118 (Aug 2021): 01013.https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111801013S. Subramanian Introduction, (Sep 2021): 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0428-7_1S. Subramanian Liberty, Equality, and Impossibility: Some General Results in the Space of ‘Soft’ Preferences, (Sep 2021): 27–45.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0428-7_4Rudolf Dujmovits, Richard Sturn Gemeinwohl, Gemeingüter und Wohlfahrt, (Sep 2021): 233–249.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22107-2_18Michael Mandler Coarse, Efficient Decision-Making, Journal of the European Economic Association 18, no.66 (May 2020): 3006–3044.https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvaa002Alexandru Marcoci, James Nguyen Judgement aggregation in scientific collaborations: The case for waiving expertise, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 84 (Dec 2020): 66–74.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.08.001Alfonso D’Amodio Toward a Human-Centered Economy and Politics: The Theory of Justice as Fairness from Rawls to Sen, Philosophies 5, no.44 (Dec 2020): 44.https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies5040044Enrica Chiappero-Martinetti, Siddiqur Osmani, Mozaffar Qizilbash The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, (Nov 2020).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316335741Gilbert Laffond, Jean Lainé, M. Remzi Sanver Metrizable preferences over preferences, Social Choice and Welfare 55, no.11 (Jan 2020): 177–191.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-019-01235-0JOÃO PAIVA-SILVA Pragmatism as a pillar of the New Developmentalism, Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 40, no.22 (Jun 2020): 376–397.https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572020-3099Stephan Klasen, Carlos Villalobos Diverging identification of the poor: A non-random process. Chile 1992–2017, World Development 130 (Jun 2020): 104944.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104944NATALIE GOLD, YILING LIN, RICHARD ASHCROFT, MAGDA OSMAN ‘Better off, as judged by themselves’: do people support nudges as a method to change their own behavior?, Behavioural Public Policy 8 (May 2020): 1–30.https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2020.6Debraj Ray ⓡ Rajiv Vohra Games of Love and Hate, Journal of Political Economy 128, no.55 (Mar 2020): 1789–1825.https://doi.org/10.1086/705552Itai Sher How perspective-based aggregation undermines the Pareto principle, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 19, no.22 (Jan 2020): 182–205.https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X19898866Xiufeng Cheng, Ziming Zhang, Yue Yang, Zhonghua Yan Open collaboration between universities and enterprises: a case study on GitHub, Internet Research 30, no.44 (Apr 2020): 1251–1279.https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-01-2019-0013Marco Mariotti, Roberto Veneziani The Liberal Ethics of Non-Interference, British Journal of Political Science 50, no.22 (Dec 2017): 567–584.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000576Leo Katz, Alvaro Sandroni Limits on power and rationality, Social Choice and Welfare 54, no.2-32-3 (Oct 2018): 507–521.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-018-1160-2Wesley H. Holliday, Eric Pacuit Arrow’s decisive coalitions, Social Choice and Welfare 54, no.2-32-3 (Dec 2018): 463–505.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-018-1163-zPrasanta K. Pattanaik, Yongsheng Xu Institutions and their ethical evaluation, Social Choice and Welfare 54, no.2-32-3 (Nov 2019): 293–310.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-019-01224-3Walter Horn CHOICE: an Objective, Voluntaristic Theory of Prudential Value, Philosophia 48, no.11 (Sep 2019): 191–215.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-019-00117-0Hun Chung, Brian Kogelmann Diversity and rights: a social choice-theoretic analysis of the possibility of public reason, Synthese 197, no.22 (Feb 2018): 839–865.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1737-4Salvador Barberà Social Choice Theory, (Aug 2020): 511–528.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0368-0_666Gianfranco Basti, Antonio Capolupo, Giuseppe Vitiello The Computational Challenge of Amartya Sen’s Social Choice Theory in Formal Philosophy, (Feb 2020): 87–119.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37305-4_7Panagiotis E. Petrakis, Dionysis G. Valsamis, Kyriaki I. Kafka Economic Policy Formation and Decision-Making, (Jul 2020): 91–122.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43181-5_4Rudolf Dujmovits, Richard Sturn Gemeinwohl, Gemeingüter und Wohlfahrt, (Mar 2020): 1–17.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22141-6_18-1Masudul Alam Choudhury The Meso-Economics of the Wellbeing Criterion, (Nov 2020): 115–138.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6054-5_6Asis Kumar Banerjee Toward an Inequality-Sensitive Measure of Development: The Unidimensional Case, (Jun 2020): 51–83.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6161-0_2Massimiliano Vatiero The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal in the Firm, SSRN Electronic Journal 62 (Jan 2020).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3722971Alessandro Roselli Ideologies and Political Economy in the Nineteenth Century, (Dec 2020): 1–68.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53317-5_1Kristina Meshelski Amartya Sen’s nonideal theory, Ethics & Global Politics 12, no.22 (Jun 2019): 31–45.https://doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2019.1622398Jakob Koscholke On the Pareto Condition on Permissible Belief, Erkenntnis 84, no.66 (Apr 2018): 1183–1188.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-0003-yTom Jacobson, Leanne Chang Sen’s Capabilities Approach and the Measurement of Communication Outcomes, Journal of Information Policy 9, no.11 (Dec 2019): 111–131.https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.9.1.0111Tom Jacobson, Leanne Chang Sen’s Capabilities Approach and the Measurement of Communication Outcomes, Journal of Information Policy 9 (Dec 2019): 111–131.https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.9.2019.0111Minna Lammi, Mika Pantzar The data economy: How technological change has altered the role of the citizen-consumer, Technology in Society 59 (Nov 2019): 101157.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101157Kevin Vallier Containing Ideological Rent Seekers Expanding the Reach of Buchanan’s Constitutionalism, Homo Oeconomicus 36, no.1-21-2 (Sep 2019): 71–85.https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-019-00087-4James Nguyen The limitations of the Arrovian consistency of domains with a fixed preference, Theory and Decision 87, no.22 (May 2019): 183–199.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-019-09702-xAndreas Darmann, Julia Grundner, Christian Klamler Evaluative voting or classical voting rules: Does it make a difference? Empirical evidence for consensus among voting rules, European Journal of Political Economy 59 (Sep 2019): 345–353.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.04.003Marc Fleurbaey Economic Theories of Justice, Annual Review of Economics 11, no.11 (Aug 2019): 665–684.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030429Maitreesh Ghatak, François Maniquet Universal Basic Income: Some Theoretical Aspects, Annual Review of Economics 11, no.11 (Aug 2019): 895–928.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030220Stephen John Nash, Sebastian St. John Xavier Nash, Liza Joan Rybak On Equality, Perspectives on Political Science 48, no.33 (Jun 2016): 141–161.https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2016.1184011Henry S. Richardson Well-being and the Capability Approach: Reflections on Robeyns, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 20, no.33 (Jul 2019): 357–361.https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2019.1631983José Carlos R. Alcantud, Susana Díaz, Susana Montes Liberalism and dictatorship in the problem of fuzzy classification, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 110 (Jul 2019): 82–95.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.04.004John Morgan Nicholson, Paul Collopy Pugh Controlled Convergence and Social Choice Theory, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design 1, no.11 (Jul 2019): 1245–1254.https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.130John W. Patty, Elizabeth Maggie Penn Measuring Fairness, Inequality, and Big Data: Social Choice Since Arrow, Annual Review of Political Science 22, no.11 (May 2019): 435–460.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-022018-024704Michael A. Clemens, Lant Pritchett The new economic case for migration restrictions: An assessment, Journal of Development Economics 138 (May 2019): 153–164.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.12.003John W. Patty, Elizabeth Maggie Penn A defense of Arrow’s independence of irrelevant alternatives, Public Choice 179, no.1-21-2 (Sep 2018): 145–164.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-018-0604-7Mozaffar Qizilbash The market, utilitarianism and the corruption argument, International Review of Economics 66, no.11 (Jul 2018): 37–55.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-018-0302-2Hun Chung THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF LIBERAL RIGHTS IN A DIVERSE WORLD, Economics and Philosophy 35, no.11 (Apr 2018): 1–27.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267118000044Echchakoui Said Salespeople’s reward preference methodological analysis, Journal of Marketing Analytics 7, no.11 (Jan 2019): 24–39.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-018-00047-y Restraint on Personal Choice, (Jan 2019): 175–200.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316479780.006Amos Witztum , ( 2019): 217.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10668-3_4Jan-R. Sieckmann Legislation as Balancing, (Jun 2019): 133–152.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12068-9_6Gabriel Leite Mota Does Happiness Improve Welfare Economics a Lot?, (Sep 2019): 129–156.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15835-4_6Hannu Nurmi Why Most Politicians Don’t Give a Hoot About Voting Theory?, (Nov 2019): 123–129.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18050-8_18Ashley Piggins Collective Choice Problems, Formal Representations, and Missing Information, (Nov 2019): 189–194.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18050-8_26Franco Archibugi The Programming Approach and the Old, Unresolved Debate on ‘Decision Theory’, (Nov 2019): 35–68.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78060-3_2Julchen Brieger Über die Unmöglichkeit einer kantisch handelnden Maschine, (Aug 2018): 107–119.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21083-0_7Erwin Amann Wohlfahrtsanalyse und kollektive Entscheidung, (Mar 2019): 47–61.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24515-3_3E. Wesley F. Peterson WTO Dispute Settlement and Food and Agricultural Trade, (Jun 2019): 2493–2500.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_423Constanze Binder Introduction, (Mar 2019): 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1615-2_1Weiwei Chen, Ulle Endriss , Artificial Intelligence 269 ( 2019): 27.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.10.003Alessandro Roncaglia , ( 2019).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108777766Dayma Echevarría, Alberto Gabriele, Sara Romanò, Francesco Schettino , Cambridge Journal of Economics 43, no.22 ( 2019): 361.https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bey026Salvador Barberà, Walter Bossert, Kotaro Suzumura Daunou's Voting Method, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2019).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3417074Foivos Savva Conditional Rights and Implementation, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2019).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3466832Nan Li A paradox of expert rights in abstract argumentation, Social Choice and Welfare 51, no.44 (Jun 2018): 737–752.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-018-1136-2Stephen John Nash, Sebastian St. John Xavier Nash, Liza Joan Rybak On the Universal Qualitative Uniformity of Man in Locke, Perspectives on Political Science 47, no.44 (Jul 2017): 218–238.https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2017.1331022Muriel Gilardone Amartya Sen : un allié pour l’économie de la personne contre la métrique des capabilités. Deux arguments pour une lecture non fonctionnelle de la liberté chez Sen, Revue de philosophie économique Vol. 19, no.11 (Sep 2018): 49–77.https://doi.org/10.3917/rpec.191.0049Nathan Atkinson Designing Remedies to Compensate Plaintiffs for Unobservable Harms, American Law and Economics Review 118 (Sep 2018).https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahy007Nathan Berg, Jeong-Yoo Kim Free expression and defamation, Law, Probability and Risk 17, no.33 (Apr 2018): 201–223.https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgy003Semih Koray, Kemal Yildiz Implementation via rights structures, Journal of Economic Theory 176 (Jul 2018): 479–502.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2018.04.009Itai Sher Evaluating Allocations of Freedom, The Economic Journal 128, no.612612 (Jan 2018): F65–F94.https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12455Edward R. Morey What are the ethics of welfare economics? And, are welfare economists utilitarians?, International Review of Economics 65, no.22 (Apr 2018): 201–230.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-018-0294-yMATTHEW D. ADLER Prioritarianism: Room for Desert?, Utilitas 30, no.22 (Aug 2017): 172–197.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820817000164A.J. Jacobs, K.S. Arora When may government interfere with religious practices to protect the health and safety of children?, Ethics, Medicine and Public Health 5 (Apr 2018): 86–93.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2018.03.001Christian Roessler, Sandro Shelegia, and Bruno Strulovici Collective Commitment, Journal of Political Economy 126, no.11 (Jan 2018): 347–380.https://doi.org/10.1086/694294Heinrich H. Nax, Stefano Balietti, Ryan O. Murphy, Dirk Helbing Adding noise to the institution: an experimental welfare investigation of the contribution-based grouping mechanism, Social Choice and Welfare 50, no.22 (Sep 2017): 213–245.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-017-1081-5Guifei Jiang, Dongmo Zhang, Laurent Perrussel A Hierarchical Approach to Judgment Aggregation with Abstentions, Computational Intelligence 34, no.11 (Jan 2017): 104–123.https://doi.org/10.1111/coin.12109Michael A. Clemens Testing for Repugnance in Economic Transactions: Evidence from Guest Work in the Gulf, The Journal of Legal Studies 47, no.S1S1 (Aug 2018): S5–S44.https://doi.org/10.1086/694615David B. Spence Naïve Electricity Markets, (Jun 2018): 29–57.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7822-9_2Karen Lovejoy Knight The Elusive A.C. Pigou, (Dec 2018): 19–77.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01018-8_2Francesco Grillo, Raffaella Y. Nanetti Introduction: Democracy, Innovation and Growth, (Feb 2019): 1–56.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02014-9_1Viktor J. Vanberg James M. Buchanan: Political Economist, Consistent Individualist, (Feb 2019): 539–576.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03080-3_25Geoffrey Brennan, Hartmut Kliemt The Constitution of Markets, (Feb 2019): 807–838.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03080-3_35Maxim Storchevoy Economics and Ethics after the 1950s, (Nov 2017): 35–70.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68861-9_2Prasanta K. Pattanaik Social Choice and Voting, (Oct 2018): 693–703.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77434-3_37Salvador Barberà Social Choice Theory, (Jan 2019): 1–19.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_666-1Lewis A. Kornhauser Economic Logic and Legal Logic, (Jul 2018): 711–745.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9452-0_24Christian Neuhäuser Sen, Amartya, (May 2018): 1–4.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_197-1Ngo Van Long, Vincent Martinet Combining rights and welfarism: a new approach to intertemporal evaluation of social alternatives, Social Choice and Welfare 50, no.11 (Aug 2017): 35–64.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-017-1073-5Richard Bookstaber, Alan Kirman Modeling a Heterogeneous World, (Jan 2018): 769–795.https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hescom.2018.03.004Prasanta K. Pattanaik Social Welfare Function, (Feb 2018): 12638–12644.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1348Sandeep Baliga, Tomas Sjöström Mechanism Design (New Developments), (Feb 2018): 8644–8653.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2134Louis Kaplow Pareto Principle and Competing Principles, (Feb 2018): 10035–10041.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2287Bertil Tungodden Justice (New Perspectives), (Feb 2018): 7183–7194.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2301Marc Fleurbaey , ( 2018): 3905.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2559Martin Ricketts Peacock, Alan T. (1922–2014), (Feb 2018): 10132–10141.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_3005Ben Johnson, Richard Jordan Should Like Cases Be Decided Alike?: A Formal Analysis of Four Theories of Justice, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3127737Brown Economics Working Paper Series, Debraj Ray, Rajiv Vohra Games of Love and Hate, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3221111Zoë Hitzig Bridging the 'Normative Gap': Mechanism Design and Social Justice, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3242882Susumu Cato, Adrien Lutz Kenneth Arrow, Moral Obligations, and Public Policies, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3312186Dejan Matić, Dušan Jerotijević Aksiological aspects of economic analysis of law, Ekonomika 64, no.33 (Jan 2018): 47–54.https://doi.org/10.5937/ekonomika1803047MGil Hersch THE NARROWED DOMAIN OF DISAGREEMENT FOR WELL-BEING POLICY, Public Affairs Quarterly 32, no.11 (Jan 2018): 1–20.https://doi.org/10.2307/26897020Beth Ann Fiedler, Valeria Costantini The Challenge of Implementing Macroeconomic Policy in an Increasingly Microeconomic World, (May 2018): 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75361-4_1Ufuk Akcigit Economic Growth: The Past, the Present, and the Future, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1736–1747.https://doi.org/10.1086/694617Fernando Alvarez Monetary Economics, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1825–1830.https://doi.org/10.1086/694619Stephane Bonhomme and Azeem M. Shaikh Keeping the ECON in Econometrics: (Micro-)Econometrics in the Journal of Political Economy, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1846–1853.https://doi.org/10.1086/694620George M. Constantinides Asset Pricing: Models and Empirical Evidence, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1782–1790.https://doi.org/10.1086/694621Douglas W. Diamond, Anil K. Kashyap, and Raghuram G. Rajan Banking and the Evolving Objectives of Bank Regulation, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1812–1825.https://doi.org/10.1086/694622Eugene F. Fama Finance at the University of Chicago, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1790–1799.https://doi.org/10.1086/694623David W. Galenson Economic History, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1747–1752.https://doi.org/10.1086/694624Lars Peter Hansen Time-Series Econometrics in Macroeconomics and Finance, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1774–1782.https://doi.org/10.1086/694625James J. Heckman Chicago Labor Economics, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1840–1845.https://doi.org/10.1086/694626Ali Hortaçsu Auctions in the Journal of Political Economy, 1894–2017, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1915–1920.https://doi.org/10.1086/694627Emir Kamenica Information Economics, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1885–1890.https://doi.org/10.1086/694628Greg Kaplan Inequality, Heterogeneity, and Consumption in the Journal of Political Economy, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1767–1774.https://doi.org/10.1086/694629Steven D. Levitt The Economics of Crime, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1920–1925.https://doi.org/10.1086/694630John List Experimental Economics in the Journal of Political Economy, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1925–1930.https://doi.org/10.1086/694631Robert E. Lucas Jr. Memories of Friedman and Patinkin, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1831–1834.https://doi.org/10.1086/694632Magne Mogstad The Human Capital Approach to Intergenerational Mobility, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1862–1868.https://doi.org/10.1086/694633Roger Myerson Political Economics in the Journal of Political Economy: Six Landmark Papers, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1752–1756.https://doi.org/10.1086/694634Canice Prendergast Agency Issues, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1878–1884.https://doi.org/10.1086/694635Philip J. Reny Assignment Problems, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1903–1914.https://doi.org/10.1086/694636Robert Shimer Labor Markets, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1834–1840.https://doi.org/10.1086/694637Hugo F. Sonnenschein Chicago and the Origins of Modern General Equilibrium, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1728–1736.https://doi.org/10.1086/694638Nancy L. Stokey Aggregative Fiscal Policy, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1756–1761.https://doi.org/10.1086/694639Richard H. Thaler Behavioral Economics, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1799–1805.https://doi.org/10.1086/694640Robert H. Topel Health Economics: A Selective Historical Review for the 125th Anniversary of the Journal of Political Economy, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1868–1878.https://doi.org/10.1086/694641Harald Uhlig Business Cycles and International Trade, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1761–1766.https://doi.org/10.1086/694642Robert Vishny and Luigi Zingales Corporate Finance, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1805–1812.https://doi.org/10.1086/694643Michael Greenstone The Continuing Impact of Sherwin Rosen’s “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition”, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1891–1902.https://doi.org/10.1086/694645Derek Neal Life Cycle Wage Dynamics and Labor Mobility, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1853–1862.https://doi.org/10.1086/694690John List and Harald Uhlig Introduction, Journal of Political Economy 125, no.66 (Dec 2017): 1723–1727.https://doi.org/10.1086/694751Martin Van der Linden Impossibilities for strategy-proof committee selection mechanisms with vetoers, Journal of Mathematical Economics 73 (Dec 2017): 111–121.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2017.09.003Bezalel Peleg, Ron Holzman Representations of Political Power Structures by Strategically Stable Game Forms: A Survey, Games 8, no.44 (Oct 2017): 46.https://doi.org/10.3390/g8040046Shengwu Li Ethics and market design, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33, no.44 (Nov 2017): 705–720.https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx047Ingrid Robeyns Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined, (Nov 2017).https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0130Cyril Hédoin Normative economics and paternalism: the problem with the preference-satisfaction account of welfare, Constitutional Political Economy 28, no.33 (Oct 2016): 286–310.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-016-9227-5Nicola Acocella THE RISE AND DECLINE OF ECONOMIC POLICY AS AN AUTONOMOUS DISCIPLINE: A CRITICAL SURVEY, Journal of Economic Surveys 31, no.33 (Jul 2016): 661–677.https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12168Jose Carlos R. Alcantud, Susana Diaz, Susana Montes Some results on aggregation for fuzzy classification, (Jun 2017): 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1109/IFSA-SCIS.2017.8023294Hugh Breakey Arbitrary Power, Arbitrary Interference and the Abuse of Power: Corruption, Natural Rights and Human Rights, (May 2017): 125–145.https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-209620170000017013Gustavo Bodanza, Fernando Tohmé, Marcelo Auday Collective argumentation: A survey of aggregation issues around argumentation frameworks, Argument & Computation 8, no.11 (May 2017): 1–34.https://doi.org/10.3233/AAC-160014Maurice Salles On Quine on Arrow, Social Choice and Welfare 48, no.44 (Mar 2017): 877–886.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-017-1042-zBruno Beltrame, Laura Valladão de Mattos As críticas de Amartya Sen à teoria da escolha social de Kenneth Arrow, Nova Economia 27, no.11 (Apr 2017): 65–88.https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6351/2790John A. Weymark Conundrums for nonconsequentialists, Social Choice and Welfare 48, no.22 (Jan 2017): 269–294.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-016-1021-9Gebhard Kirchgässner Soft paternalism, merit goods, and normative individualism, European Journal of Law and Economics 43, no.11 (May 2015): 125–152.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-015-9500-5Frederik Herzberg Respect for experts vs. respect for unanimity: The liberal paradox in probabilistic opinion pooling, Economics Letters 151 (Feb 2017): 44–47.https://doi
Referência(s)