Artigo Revisado por pares

Complications and Technical Limitations of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Catheter Placement for Chemotherapy

1998; Elsevier BV; Volume: 9; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/s1051-0443(98)70262-3

ISSN

1535-7732

Autores

Thomas G. Habbe, Timothy C. McCowan, Timothy C. Goertzen, Robert F. LeVeen, William C. Culp, Margaret A. Tempero,

Tópico(s)

Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes

Resumo

To determine the rate of complications associated with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) catheter placement, as well as technical success related to liver perfusion.The authors reviewed 44 patients who underwent 106 HAI catheter placements, including 15 men and 29 women with an average age of 55 years (range, 32-82 years). One to nine placements were performed per patient with 61 (58%) via the left brachial artery, 40 (38%) via the right femoral artery, and five (4%) via the left femoral artery. Chemoinfusion lasted 4 days, with initial catheter placement assessed on technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin (MAA) perfusion scans, as well as daily abdominal radiographs.One hundred attempted hepatic arterial catheter placements were completed. Liver perfusion was global in 66 (66%) cases, in the right lobe only in 28 (28%) cases, and in the left lobe only in six (6%) cases. Eight (8%) had gastrointestinal (GI) tract perfusion; this was eliminated in seven cases (7%) after catheter repositioning. Forty-six (43%) placement attempts required embolization of 62 GI vessels to preclude GI chemoinfusion. Complications included one cerebrovascular accident (related to removal of a left brachial catheter), eight brachial artery thromboses (four that required emergent thrombectomy), six hepatic arterial dissections, four hepatic arterial thromboses, and four catheter malfunctions.HAI catheter placement via the left brachial artery has increased complications. Nearly one-half of placements required embolization of GI vessels to preclude GI perfusion. Global perfusion is possible in two-thirds of cases.

Referência(s)